This makes it slightly easier to pass extra arguments to runPasses
and simplifies the code slightly.
Reviewers: efriedma, bogner, dblaikie, diegotf, hiraditya
Reviewed By: dblaikie, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68228
llvm-svn: 373265
This patch adds -Oz as option and also properly enables support for -Os.
Currently, the existing check for -Os is dead, because the enclosing if
only checks of O1, O2 and O3.
There is still a difference between the -Oz pipeline compared to opt,
but I have not been able to track that down yet.
Reviewers: bogner, sebpop, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67593
llvm-svn: 372079
Summary:
This was flagged in https://www.viva64.com/en/b/0629/ under "Snippet No.
7".
These statements are order independent, short of the use-after-move.
Reviewers: echristo, srhines, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: dblaikie, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62114
llvm-svn: 362267
Summary:
For the most part this consists of replacing ${LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD} with
some combination of AllTargets* so that they depend on specific components
of a target backend rather than all of it. The overall effect of this is
that, for example, tools like opt no longer falsely depend on the
disassembler, while tools like llvm-ar no longer depend on the code
generator.
There's a couple quirks to point out here:
* AllTargetsCodeGens is a bit more prevalent than expected. Tools like dsymutil
seem to need it which I was surprised by.
* llvm-xray linked to all the backends but doesn't seem to need any of them.
It builds and passes the tests so that seems to be correct.
* I left gold out as it's not built when binutils is not available so I'm
unable to test it
Reviewers: bogner, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: bogner
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mgorny, steven_wu, dexonsmith, rupprecht, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62331
llvm-svn: 361567
Summary:
This was flagged in https://www.viva64.com/en/b/0629/ under "Snippet No.
6".
Note that author also states:
"Note that the loop doesn't actually execute at all."
This is not true, but the author can be forgiven; there's two distinct
variables with very similar identifiers:
MiscompiledFunctions
MisCompFunctions
Reviewers: echristo, srhines, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62113
llvm-svn: 361279
This cleans up all LoadInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass the
value type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57172
llvm-svn: 352911
This cleans up all CallInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass a
function type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57170
llvm-svn: 352909
Recommit r352791 after tweaking DerivedTypes.h slightly, so that gcc
doesn't choke on it, hopefully.
Original Message:
The FunctionCallee type is effectively a {FunctionType*,Value*} pair,
and is a useful convenience to enable code to continue passing the
result of getOrInsertFunction() through to EmitCall, even once pointer
types lose their pointee-type.
Then:
- update the CallInst/InvokeInst instruction creation functions to
take a Callee,
- modify getOrInsertFunction to return FunctionCallee, and
- update all callers appropriately.
One area of particular note is the change to the sanitizer
code. Previously, they had been casting the result of
`getOrInsertFunction` to a `Function*` via
`checkSanitizerInterfaceFunction`, and storing that. That would report
an error if someone had already inserted a function declaraction with
a mismatching signature.
However, in general, LLVM allows for such mismatches, as
`getOrInsertFunction` will automatically insert a bitcast if
needed. As part of this cleanup, cause the sanitizer code to do the
same. (It will call its functions using the expected signature,
however they may have been declared.)
Finally, in a small number of locations, callers of
`getOrInsertFunction` actually were expecting/requiring that a brand
new function was being created. In such cases, I've switched them to
Function::Create instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57315
llvm-svn: 352827
This reverts commit f47d6b38c7a61d50db4566b02719de05492dcef1 (r352791).
Seems to run into compilation failures with GCC (but not clang, where
I tested it). Reverting while I investigate.
llvm-svn: 352800
The FunctionCallee type is effectively a {FunctionType*,Value*} pair,
and is a useful convenience to enable code to continue passing the
result of getOrInsertFunction() through to EmitCall, even once pointer
types lose their pointee-type.
Then:
- update the CallInst/InvokeInst instruction creation functions to
take a Callee,
- modify getOrInsertFunction to return FunctionCallee, and
- update all callers appropriately.
One area of particular note is the change to the sanitizer
code. Previously, they had been casting the result of
`getOrInsertFunction` to a `Function*` via
`checkSanitizerInterfaceFunction`, and storing that. That would report
an error if someone had already inserted a function declaraction with
a mismatching signature.
However, in general, LLVM allows for such mismatches, as
`getOrInsertFunction` will automatically insert a bitcast if
needed. As part of this cleanup, cause the sanitizer code to do the
same. (It will call its functions using the expected signature,
however they may have been declared.)
Finally, in a small number of locations, callers of
`getOrInsertFunction` actually were expecting/requiring that a brand
new function was being created. In such cases, I've switched them to
Function::Create instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57315
llvm-svn: 352791
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
In addition to reducing the functions in an LLVM module, bugpoint now
reduces the function attributes associated with each of the remaining
functions.
To test this, add a -bugpoint-crashfuncattr test pass, which crashes if
a function in the module has a "bugpoint-crash" attribute. A test case
demonstrates that the IR is reduced to just that one attribute.
Reviewers: MatzeB, silvas, davide, reames
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: reames, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55216
llvm-svn: 349601
Summary:
When bugpoint attempts to find the other executables it needs to run,
such as `opt` or `clang`, it tries searching the user's PATH. However,
in many cases, the 'bugpoint' executable is part of an LLVM build, and
the 'opt' executable it's looking for is in that same directory.
Many LLVM tools handle this case by using the `Paths` parameter of
`llvm::sys::findProgramByName`, passing the parent path of the currently
running executable. Do this same thing for bugpoint. However, to
preserve the current behavior exactly, first search the user's PATH,
and then search for 'opt' in the directory containing 'bugpoint'.
Test Plan:
`check-llvm`. Many of the existing bugpoint tests no longer need to use the
`--opt-command` option as a result of these changes.
Reviewers: MatzeB, silvas, davide
Reviewed By: MatzeB, davide
Subscribers: davide, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54884
llvm-svn: 348734
This removes the primary remaining API producing `TerminatorInst` which
will reduce the rate at which code is introduced trying to use it and
generally make it much easier to remove the remaining APIs across the
codebase.
Also clean up some of the stragglers that the previous mechanical update
of variables missed.
Users of LLVM and out-of-tree code generally will need to update any
explicit variable types to handle this. Replacing `TerminatorInst` with
`Instruction` (or `auto`) almost always works. Most of these edits were
made in prior commits using the perl one-liner:
```
perl -i -ple 's/TerminatorInst(\b.* = .*getTerminator\(\))/Instruction\1/g'
```
This also my break some rare use cases where people overload for both
`Instruction` and `TerminatorInst`, but these should be easily fixed by
removing the `TerminatorInst` overload.
llvm-svn: 344504
This is a bit awkward in a handful of places where we didn't even have
an instruction and now we have to see if we can build one. But on the
whole, this seems like a win and at worst a reasonable cost for removing
`TerminatorInst`.
All of this is part of the removal of `TerminatorInst` from the
`Instruction` type hierarchy.
llvm-svn: 340701
This simplifies some code which had StringRefs to begin with, and
makes other code more complicated which had const char* to begin
with.
In the end, I think this makes for a more idiomatic and platform
agnostic API. Not all platforms launch process with null terminated
c-string arrays for the environment pointer and argv, but the api
was designed that way because it allowed easy pass-through for
posix-based platforms. There's a little additional overhead now
since on posix based platforms we'll be takign StringRefs which
were constructed from null terminated strings and then copying
them to null terminate them again, but from a readability and
usability standpoint of the API user, I think this API signature
is strictly better.
llvm-svn: 334518
Review feedback from r328165. Split out just the one function from the
file that's used by Analysis. (As chandlerc pointed out, the original
change only moved the header and not the implementation anyway - which
was fine for the one function that was used (since it's a
template/inlined in the header) but not in general)
llvm-svn: 333954
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.
In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624
llvm-svn: 332240
This is a follow-up to r331272.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290
llvm-svn: 331275
See r331124 for how I made a list of files missing the include.
I then ran this Python script:
for f in open('filelist.txt'):
f = f.strip()
fl = open(f).readlines()
found = False
for i in xrange(len(fl)):
p = '#include "llvm/'
if not fl[i].startswith(p):
continue
if fl[i][len(p):] > 'Config':
fl.insert(i, '#include "llvm/Config/llvm-config.h"\n')
found = True
break
if not found:
print 'not found', f
else:
open(f, 'w').write(''.join(fl))
and then looked through everything with `svn diff | diffstat -l | xargs -n 1000 gvim -p`
and tried to fix include ordering and whatnot.
No intended behavior change.
llvm-svn: 331184
LLVM_ON_WIN32 is set exactly with MSVC and MinGW (but not Cygwin) in
HandleLLVMOptions.cmake, which is where _WIN32 defined too. Just use the
default macro instead of a reinvented one.
See thread "Replacing LLVM_ON_WIN32 with just _WIN32" on llvm-dev and cfe-dev.
No intended behavior change.
This moves over all uses of the macro, but doesn't remove the definition
of it in (llvm-)config.h yet.
llvm-svn: 331127
Method BugDriver::performFinalCleanups(...) would delete Module object
it worked on, which was also deleted by its caller
(e.g. TestCodeGenerator(...)). Changed the code to avoid double delete
and make Module ownership slightly clearer.
Patch by Andrzej Janik.
llvm-svn: 330763
/usr/local/bin/ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: llvm::createAggressiveInstCombinerPass()
>>> referenced by cc1_main.cpp
>>> tools/clang/tools/driver/CMakeFiles/clang.dir/cc1_main.cpp.o:(_GLOBAL__sub_I_cc1_main.cpp)
And so on
The bot coverage is clearly missing.
llvm-svn: 330693
We have a few functions that virtually all command wants to run on
process startup/shutdown. This patch adds InitLLVM class to do that
all at once, so that we don't need to copy-n-paste boilerplate code
to each llvm command's main() function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45602
llvm-svn: 330046
Remove #include of Transforms/Scalar.h from Transform/Utils to fix layering.
Transforms depends on Transforms/Utils, not the other way around. So
remove the header and the "createStripGCRelocatesPass" function
declaration (& definition) that is unused and motivated this dependency.
Move Transforms/Utils/Local.h into Analysis because it's used by
Analysis/MemoryBuiltins.cpp.
llvm-svn: 328165
While there, change a bunch of helper functions to take references to
avoid adding calls to get().
This should conclude the bugpoint yak shaving.
llvm-svn: 325177
Bugpoint will keep going even if the opt binary it's given doesn't
exist. It should at least alert the user, so it's clear why reductions
are failing.
llvm-svn: 324713
Fix the comments, use early exits, use unique_ptr, and use ranged for
loops.
This is in preparation for a global *variable* reducer, which, with any
luck will help us clean up test cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43084
llvm-svn: 324649
Summary:
Currently, there is no way to extract a basic block from a function easily. This patch
extends llvm-extract to extract the specified basic block(s).
Reviewers: loladiro, rafael, bogner
Reviewed By: bogner
Subscribers: hintonda, mgorny, qcolombet, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41638
llvm-svn: 323266
We currently use target_link_libraries without an explicit scope
specifier (INTERFACE, PRIVATE or PUBLIC) when linking executables.
Dependencies added in this way apply to both the target and its
dependencies, i.e. they become part of the executable's link interface
and are transitive.
Transitive dependencies generally don't make sense for executables,
since you wouldn't normally be linking against an executable. This also
causes issues for generating install export files when using
LLVM_DISTRIBUTION_COMPONENTS. For example, clang has a lot of LLVM
library dependencies, which are currently added as interface
dependencies. If clang is in the distribution components but the LLVM
libraries it depends on aren't (which is a perfectly legitimate use case
if the LLVM libraries are being built static and there are therefore no
run-time dependencies on them), CMake will complain about the LLVM
libraries not being in export set when attempting to generate the
install export file for clang. This is reasonable behavior on CMake's
part, and the right thing is for LLVM's build system to explicitly use
PRIVATE dependencies for executables.
Unfortunately, CMake doesn't allow you to mix and match the keyword and
non-keyword target_link_libraries signatures for a single target; i.e.,
if a single call to target_link_libraries for a particular target uses
one of the INTERFACE, PRIVATE, or PUBLIC keywords, all other calls must
also be updated to use those keywords. This means we must do this change
in a single shot. I also fully expect to have missed some instances; I
tested by enabling all the projects in the monorepo (except dragonegg),
and configuring both with and without shared libraries, on both Darwin
and Linux, but I'm planning to rely on the buildbots for other
configurations (since it should be pretty easy to fix those).
Even after this change, we still have a lot of target_link_libraries
calls that don't specify a scope keyword, mostly for shared libraries.
I'm thinking about addressing those in a follow-up, but that's a
separate change IMO.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40823
llvm-svn: 319840
