1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-11-22 10:42:39 +01:00
Commit Graph

487 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Wei Mi
c317b3b823 [PGO] Make pgo related options in opt more consistent.
Currently we have pgo options defined in PassManagerBuilder.cpp only for
instrument pgo, but not for sample pgo. We also have pgo options defined
in NewPMDriver.cpp in opt only for new pass manager and for all kinds of
pgo. They have some inconsistency.

To make the options more consistent and make tests writing easier, the
patch let old pass manager to share the same pgo options with new pass
manager in opt, and removes the options in PassManagerBuilder.cpp.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56749

llvm-svn: 351392
2019-01-16 23:19:02 +00:00
Serge Guelton
bc5eec4c75 Python compat - print statement
Make sure all print statements are compatible with Python 2 and Python3 using
the `from __future__ import print_function` statement.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56249

llvm-svn: 350307
2019-01-03 14:11:33 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev
3f1062838f [NewPM] -print-module-scope -print-after now prints module even after invalidated Loop/SCC
-print-after IR printing generally can not print the IR unit (Loop or SCC)
which has just been invalidated by the pass. However, when working in -print-module-scope
mode even if Loop was invalidated there is still a valid module that we can print.

Since we can not access invalidated IR unit from AfterPassInvalidated instrumentation
point we can remember the module to be printed *before* pass. This change introduces
BeforePass instrumentation that stores all the information required for module printing
into the stack and then after pass (in AfterPassInvalidated) just print whatever
has been placed on stack.

Reviewed By: philip.pfaffe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55278

llvm-svn: 349896
2018-12-21 11:49:05 +00:00
Michael Kruse
f48207fec4 [Unroll/UnrollAndJam/Vectorizer/Distribute] Add followup loop attributes.
When multiple loop transformation are defined in a loop's metadata, their order of execution is defined by the order of their respective passes in the pass pipeline. For instance, e.g.

    #pragma clang loop unroll_and_jam(enable)
    #pragma clang loop distribute(enable)

is the same as

    #pragma clang loop distribute(enable)
    #pragma clang loop unroll_and_jam(enable)

and will try to loop-distribute before Unroll-And-Jam because the LoopDistribute pass is scheduled after UnrollAndJam pass. UnrollAndJamPass only supports one inner loop, i.e. it will necessarily fail after loop distribution. It is not possible to specify another execution order. Also,t the order of passes in the pipeline is subject to change between versions of LLVM, optimization options and which pass manager is used.

This patch adds 'followup' attributes to various loop transformation passes. These attributes define which attributes the resulting loop of a transformation should have. For instance,

    !0 = !{!0, !1, !2}
    !1 = !{!"llvm.loop.unroll_and_jam.enable"}
    !2 = !{!"llvm.loop.unroll_and_jam.followup_inner", !3}
    !3 = !{!"llvm.loop.distribute.enable"}

defines a loop ID (!0) to be unrolled-and-jammed (!1) and then the attribute !3 to be added to the jammed inner loop, which contains the instruction to distribute the inner loop.

Currently, in both pass managers, pass execution is in a fixed order and UnrollAndJamPass will not execute again after LoopDistribute. We hope to fix this in the future by allowing pass managers to run passes until a fixpoint is reached, use Polly to perform these transformations, or add a loop transformation pass which takes the order issue into account.

For mandatory/forced transformations (e.g. by having been declared by #pragma omp simd), the user must be notified when a transformation could not be performed. It is not possible that the responsible pass emits such a warning because the transformation might be 'hidden' in a followup attribute when it is executed, or it is not present in the pipeline at all. For this reason, this patche introduces a WarnMissedTransformations pass, to warn about orphaned transformations.

Since this changes the user-visible diagnostic message when a transformation is applied, two test cases in the clang repository need to be updated.

To ensure that no other transformation is executed before the intended one, the attribute `llvm.loop.disable_nonforced` can be added which should disable transformation heuristics before the intended transformation is applied. E.g. it would be surprising if a loop is distributed before a #pragma unroll_and_jam is applied.

With more supported code transformations (loop fusion, interchange, stripmining, offloading, etc.), transformations can be used as building blocks for more complex transformations (e.g. stripmining+stripmining+interchange -> tiling).

Reviewed By: hfinkel, dmgreen

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49281
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55288

llvm-svn: 348944
2018-12-12 17:32:52 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev
5a4198704c [NewPM] fixing asserts on deleted loop in -print-after-all
IR-printing AfterPass instrumentation might be called on a loop
that has just been invalidated. We should skip printing it to
avoid spurious asserts.

Reviewed By: chandlerc, philip.pfaffe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54740

llvm-svn: 348887
2018-12-11 19:05:35 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev
e9e52b4a6a Fixing -print-module-scope for legacy SCC passes
It appears that print-module-scope was not implemented for legacy SCC passes.
Fixed to print a whole module instead of just current SCC.

Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54793

llvm-svn: 348144
2018-12-03 14:48:15 +00:00
Sven van Haastregt
50bd8e4bd3 Print newline after banner for ModulePass
Before this commit, `llc -print-after-all` would print something like:

  *** IR Dump After Pre-ISel Intrinsic Lowering ***; ModuleID = ...

Emit a newline such that ModuleID appears on a line by its own.

llvm-svn: 346844
2018-11-14 10:05:28 +00:00
Florian Hahn
586ba5447b Recommit r346483: [CallSiteSplitting] Only record conditions up to the IDom(call site).
The underlying problem causing the expensive-check failure was fixed in
rL346769.

llvm-svn: 346843
2018-11-14 10:04:30 +00:00
Philip Pfaffe
2815eb046a Add an OptimizerLast EP
Summary:
It turns out that we need an OptimizerLast PassBuilder extension point
after all. I missed the relevance of this EP the first time. By legacy PM magic,
function passes added at this EP get added to the last _Function_ PM, which is a
feature we lost when dropping this EP for the new PM.

A key difference between this and the legacy PassManager's OptimizerLast
callback is that this extension point is not triggered at O0. Extensions
to the O0 pipeline should append their passes to the end of the overall
pipeline.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54374

llvm-svn: 346645
2018-11-12 11:17:07 +00:00
Florian Hahn
b0abfd0d17 Revert r346483: [CallSiteSplitting] Only record conditions up to the IDom(call site).
This cause a failure with EXPENSIVE_CHECKS

llvm-svn: 346492
2018-11-09 13:28:58 +00:00
Florian Hahn
e9a44d27d2 [CallSiteSplitting] Only record conditions up to the IDom(call site).
We can stop recording conditions once we reached the immediate dominator
for the block containing the call site. Conditions in predecessors of the
that node will be the same for all paths to the call site and splitting
is not beneficial.

This patch makes CallSiteSplitting dependent on the DT anlysis. because
the immediate dominators seem to be the easiest way of finding the node
to stop at.

I had to update some exiting tests, because they were checking for
conditions that were true/false on all paths to the call site. Those
should now be handled by instcombine/ipsccp.

Reviewers: davide, junbuml

Reviewed By: junbuml

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44627

llvm-svn: 346483
2018-11-09 10:23:46 +00:00
Teresa Johnson
a65755ade0 [hot-cold-split] Only perform splitting in ThinLTO backend post-link
Summary:
Fix the new PM to only perform hot cold splitting once during ThinLTO,
by skipping it in the pre-link phase.

This was already fixed in the old PM by the move of the hot cold split
pass later (after the early return when PrepareForThinLTO) by r344869.

Reviewers: vsk, sebpop, hiraditya

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53611

llvm-svn: 345096
2018-10-23 22:57:40 +00:00
Fangrui Song
eaf80baf01 Actually fix test from r345085 REQUIRE: asserts
llvm-svn: 345090
2018-10-23 22:07:34 +00:00
Fangrui Song
5ade736c36 Fix test after r345085
llvm-svn: 345089
2018-10-23 22:04:33 +00:00
Zhizhou Yang
d0d7c336e5 Print out DebugCounter info with -print-debug-counter
Summary:
This patch will print out {Counter, Skip, StopAfter} info of all passes which have DebugCounter set at destruction.

It can be used to monitor how many times does certain transformation happen in a pass, and also help check if -debug-counter option is set correctly.

Please refer to this [[ http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-July/124722.html  | thread ]] for motivation.

Reviewers: george.burgess.iv, davide, greened

Reviewed By: greened

Subscribers: kristina, llozano, mgorny, llvm-commits, mgrang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50031

llvm-svn: 345085
2018-10-23 21:51:56 +00:00
Vedant Kumar
2347bcfab6 [test] Relax test/Other/opt-hot-cold-split.ll
On some ARM bots, 'Target Pass Configuration' does not run after 'Target
Transform Info'. Relax this pipeline test to allow that.

This is the same fix as in r328167.

Bot URL: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-quick/builds/4611

llvm-svn: 344919
2018-10-22 16:50:24 +00:00
Aditya Kumar
8249a7a474 Schedule Hot Cold Splitting pass after most optimization passes
Summary:
In the new+old pass manager, hot cold splitting was schedule too early.
Thanks to Vedant for pointing this out.

Reviewers: sebpop, vsk

Reviewed By: sebpop, vsk

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53437

llvm-svn: 344869
2018-10-21 18:11:56 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev
7a2bc37d0a [NewPM] Fixing test failure on Windows - removed opt binary name from pattern
llvm-svn: 344686
2018-10-17 11:01:15 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev
99f8b94bce [NewPM] teach -passes= to emit meaningful error messages
All the PassBuilder::parse interfaces now return descriptive StringError
instead of a plain bool. It allows to make -passes/aa-pipeline parsing
errors context-specific and thus less confusing.

TODO: ideally we should also make suggestions for misspelled pass names,
but that requires some extensions to PassBuilder.

Reviewed By: philip.pfaffe, chandlerc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53246

llvm-svn: 344685
2018-10-17 10:36:23 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev
0259ebdd6a Revert "[NewPM] teach -passes= to emit meaningful error messages"
This reverts r344519 due to failures in pipeline-parsing test.

llvm-svn: 344524
2018-10-15 15:36:08 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev
dd4337b392 [NewPM] teach -passes= to emit meaningful error messages
Summary:
All the PassBuilder::parse interfaces now return descriptive StringError
instead of a plain bool. It allows to make -passes/aa-pipeline parsing
errors context-specific and thus less confusing.

TODO: ideally we should also make suggestions for misspelled pass names,
but that requires some extensions to PassBuilder.

Reviewed By: philip.pfaffe, chandlerc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53246

llvm-svn: 344519
2018-10-15 15:00:18 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev
a32848448b [NewPM] implement SCC printing for -print-before-all/-print-after-all
Removing deficiency of initial implementation of -print-before-all/-after-all
- it was effectively skipping IR printing for all the SCC passes.

Now LazyCallGraph:SCC gets its IR printed.

Reviewed By: skatkov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53270

llvm-svn: 344505
2018-10-15 10:46:35 +00:00
Zachary Turner
03fa1d0375 Make YAML quote forward slashes.
If you have the string /usr/bin, prior to this patch it would not
be quoted by our YAML serializer.  But a string like C:\src would
be, due to the presence of a backslash.  This makes the quoting
rules of basically every single file path different depending on
the path syntax (posix vs. Windows).

While technically not required by the YAML specification to quote
forward slashes, when the behavior of paths is inconsistent it
makes it difficult to portably write FileCheck lines that will
work with either kind of path.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53169

llvm-svn: 344359
2018-10-12 16:31:20 +00:00
Zachary Turner
001c3c07a2 Revert "Make YAML quote forward slashes."
This reverts commit b86c16ad8c97dadc1f529da72a5bb74e9eaed344.

This is being reverted because I forgot to write a useful
commit message, so I'm going to resubmit it with an actual
commit message.

llvm-svn: 344358
2018-10-12 16:31:08 +00:00
Zachary Turner
00ac5d8257 Make YAML quote forward slashes.
llvm-svn: 344357
2018-10-12 16:24:09 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
0073f67e9e [CFG Printer] Add support for writing the dot files with a custom
prefix.

Use this to direct these files to a specific location in the test suite
so that we don't write files out to random directories (or fail if the
working directory isn't writable).

llvm-svn: 344014
2018-10-09 04:30:23 +00:00
Kristina Brooks
dd017bbf60 Fix incorrect Twine usage in CFGPrinter
CFGPrinter (-view-cfg, -dot-cfg) invokes an undefined behaviour (dangling
pointer to rvalue) on IR files with branch weights. This patch fixes the
problem caused by Twine initialization and string conversion split into
two statements.

This change fixes the bug 37019. A similar patch to this problem was
provided in the llvmlite project

Patch by mcopik (Marcin Copik).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52933

llvm-svn: 343984
2018-10-08 17:29:39 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev
6a98598547 [New PM][PassTiming] implement -time-passes for the new pass manager
Enable time-passes functionality through PassInstrumentation callbacks
for passes and analyses.

TimePassesHandler class keeps all the callbacks, the timing data as it
is being collected as well as the stack of currently active timers.

Parts of the fix that might be somewhat unobvious:
  - mapping of passes into Timer (TimingData) can not be done per-instance.
    PassID name provided into the callback is common for all the pass invocations.
    Thus the only way to get a timing with reasonable granularity is to collect
    timing data per pass invocation, getting a new timer for each BeforePass.
    Hence the key for TimingData uses a pair of <StringRef/unsigned count> to
    uniquely identify a pass invocation.

  - consequently, this new-pass-manager implementation performs no aggregation
    of timing data, reporting timings for each pass invocation separately.
    In that it differs from legacy-pass-manager time-passes implementation that
    reports timing data aggregated per pass instance.

  - pass managers and adaptors are not tracked, similar to how pass managers are
    not tracked in legacy time-passes.

  - TimerStack tracks timers that are active, each BeforePass pushes the new timer
    on stack, each AfterPass pops active timer from stack and stops it.

Reviewers: chandlerc, philip.pfaffe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51276

llvm-svn: 343898
2018-10-05 22:32:01 +00:00
Eric Christopher
d53fbb1b78 Temporarily revert "[GVNHoist] Re-enable GVNHoist by default"
This reverts commit r342387 as it's showing significant performance
regressions in a number of benchmarks. Followed up with the
committer and original thread with an example and will get performance
numbers before recommitting.

llvm-svn: 343522
2018-10-01 18:57:08 +00:00
Hiroshi Inoue
b51c4baf85 [CodeGen] fix broken successor probability in MBB dump
When printing successor probabilities for a MBB, a human readable value is sometimes shown as 200.0%.
The human readable output is based on getProbabilityIterator, which returns 0xFFFFFFFF for getNumerator() and 0x80000000 for getDenominator() for unknown BranchProbability.
By using getSuccProbability as we do for the non-human readable part, we can avoid this problem.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52605

llvm-svn: 343297
2018-09-28 05:27:32 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev
912a050cc8 [New PM][PassInstrumentation] IR printing support for New Pass Manager
Implementing -print-before-all/-print-after-all/-filter-print-func support
through PassInstrumentation callbacks.

- PrintIR routines implement printing callbacks.

- StandardInstrumentations class provides a central place to manage all
  the "standard" in-tree pass instrumentations. Currently it registers
  PrintIR callbacks.

Reviewers: chandlerc, paquette, philip.pfaffe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50923

llvm-svn: 342896
2018-09-24 16:08:15 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev
d3259add24 [New PM][PassInstrumentation] Adding PassInstrumentation to the AnalysisManager runs
As a prerequisite to time-passes implementation which needs to time both passes
and analyses, adding instrumentation points to the Analysis Manager.
The are two functional differences between Pass and Analysis instrumentation:
  - the latter does not increment pass execution counter
  - it does not provide ability to skip execution of the corresponding analysis

Reviewers: chandlerc, philip.pfaffe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51275

llvm-svn: 342778
2018-09-21 22:10:17 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev
406a5f5b60 [New PM] Introducing PassInstrumentation framework
Pass Execution Instrumentation interface enables customizable instrumentation
of pass execution, as per "RFC: Pass Execution Instrumentation interface"
posted 06/07/2018 on llvm-dev@

The intent is to provide a common machinery to implement all
the pass-execution-debugging features like print-before/after,
opt-bisect, time-passes etc.

Here we get a basic implementation consisting of:
* PassInstrumentationCallbacks class that handles registration of callbacks
  and access to them.

* PassInstrumentation class that handles instrumentation-point interfaces
  that call into PassInstrumentationCallbacks.

* Callbacks accept StringRef which is just a name of the Pass right now.
  There were some ideas to pass an opaque wrapper for the pointer to pass instance,
  however it appears that pointer does not actually identify the instance
  (adaptors and managers might have the same address with the pass they govern).
  Hence it was decided to go simple for now and then later decide on what the proper
  mental model of identifying a "pass in a phase of pipeline" is.

* Callbacks accept llvm::Any serving as a wrapper for const IRUnit*, to remove direct dependencies
  on different IRUnits (e.g. Analyses).

* PassInstrumentationAnalysis analysis is explicitly requested from PassManager through
  usual AnalysisManager::getResult. All pass managers were updated to run that
  to get PassInstrumentation object for instrumentation calls.

* Using tuples/index_sequence getAnalysisResult helper to extract generic AnalysisManager's extra
  args out of a generic PassManager's extra args. This is the only way I was able to explicitly
  run getResult for PassInstrumentationAnalysis out of a generic code like PassManager::run or
  RepeatedPass::run.
  TODO: Upon lengthy discussions we agreed to accept this as an initial implementation
  and then get rid of getAnalysisResult by improving RepeatedPass implementation.

* PassBuilder takes PassInstrumentationCallbacks object to pass it further into
  PassInstrumentationAnalysis. Callbacks registration should be performed directly
  through PassInstrumentationCallbacks.

* new-pm tests updated to account for PassInstrumentationAnalysis being run

* Added PassInstrumentation tests to PassBuilderCallbacks unit tests.
  Other unit tests updated with registration of the now-required PassInstrumentationAnalysis.

  Made getName helper to return std::string (instead of StringRef initially) to fix
  asan builtbot failures on CGSCC tests.

Reviewers: chandlerc, philip.pfaffe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47858

llvm-svn: 342664
2018-09-20 17:08:45 +00:00
Eric Christopher
7b8d4f4b37 Temporarily Revert "[New PM] Introducing PassInstrumentation framework"
as it was causing failures in the asan buildbot.

This reverts commit r342597.

llvm-svn: 342616
2018-09-20 05:16:29 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev
817b214094 [New PM] Introducing PassInstrumentation framework
Pass Execution Instrumentation interface enables customizable instrumentation
of pass execution, as per "RFC: Pass Execution Instrumentation interface"
posted 06/07/2018 on llvm-dev@

The intent is to provide a common machinery to implement all
the pass-execution-debugging features like print-before/after,
opt-bisect, time-passes etc.

Here we get a basic implementation consisting of:
* PassInstrumentationCallbacks class that handles registration of callbacks
  and access to them.

* PassInstrumentation class that handles instrumentation-point interfaces
  that call into PassInstrumentationCallbacks.

* Callbacks accept StringRef which is just a name of the Pass right now.
  There were some ideas to pass an opaque wrapper for the pointer to pass instance,
  however it appears that pointer does not actually identify the instance
  (adaptors and managers might have the same address with the pass they govern).
  Hence it was decided to go simple for now and then later decide on what the proper
  mental model of identifying a "pass in a phase of pipeline" is.

* Callbacks accept llvm::Any serving as a wrapper for const IRUnit*, to remove direct dependencies
  on different IRUnits (e.g. Analyses).

* PassInstrumentationAnalysis analysis is explicitly requested from PassManager through
  usual AnalysisManager::getResult. All pass managers were updated to run that
  to get PassInstrumentation object for instrumentation calls.

* Using tuples/index_sequence getAnalysisResult helper to extract generic AnalysisManager's extra
  args out of a generic PassManager's extra args. This is the only way I was able to explicitly
  run getResult for PassInstrumentationAnalysis out of a generic code like PassManager::run or
  RepeatedPass::run.
  TODO: Upon lengthy discussions we agreed to accept this as an initial implementation
  and then get rid of getAnalysisResult by improving RepeatedPass implementation.

* PassBuilder takes PassInstrumentationCallbacks object to pass it further into
  PassInstrumentationAnalysis. Callbacks registration should be performed directly
  through PassInstrumentationCallbacks.

* new-pm tests updated to account for PassInstrumentationAnalysis being run

* Added PassInstrumentation tests to PassBuilderCallbacks unit tests.
  Other unit tests updated with registration of the now-required PassInstrumentationAnalysis.

Reviewers: chandlerc, philip.pfaffe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47858

llvm-svn: 342597
2018-09-19 22:42:57 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev
a39d896f9f Revert rL342544: [New PM] Introducing PassInstrumentation framework
A bunch of bots fail to compile unittests. Reverting.

llvm-svn: 342552
2018-09-19 14:54:48 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev
ee5fd89f4a [New PM] Introducing PassInstrumentation framework
Summary:
Pass Execution Instrumentation interface enables customizable instrumentation
of pass execution, as per "RFC: Pass Execution Instrumentation interface"
posted 06/07/2018 on llvm-dev@

The intent is to provide a common machinery to implement all
the pass-execution-debugging features like print-before/after,
opt-bisect, time-passes etc.

Here we get a basic implementation consisting of:
* PassInstrumentationCallbacks class that handles registration of callbacks
  and access to them.

* PassInstrumentation class that handles instrumentation-point interfaces
  that call into PassInstrumentationCallbacks.

* Callbacks accept StringRef which is just a name of the Pass right now.
  There were some ideas to pass an opaque wrapper for the pointer to pass instance,
  however it appears that pointer does not actually identify the instance
  (adaptors and managers might have the same address with the pass they govern).
  Hence it was decided to go simple for now and then later decide on what the proper
  mental model of identifying a "pass in a phase of pipeline" is.

* Callbacks accept llvm::Any serving as a wrapper for const IRUnit*, to remove direct dependencies
  on different IRUnits (e.g. Analyses).

* PassInstrumentationAnalysis analysis is explicitly requested from PassManager through
  usual AnalysisManager::getResult. All pass managers were updated to run that
  to get PassInstrumentation object for instrumentation calls.

* Using tuples/index_sequence getAnalysisResult helper to extract generic AnalysisManager's extra
  args out of a generic PassManager's extra args. This is the only way I was able to explicitly
  run getResult for PassInstrumentationAnalysis out of a generic code like PassManager::run or
  RepeatedPass::run.
  TODO: Upon lengthy discussions we agreed to accept this as an initial implementation
  and then get rid of getAnalysisResult by improving RepeatedPass implementation.

* PassBuilder takes PassInstrumentationCallbacks object to pass it further into
  PassInstrumentationAnalysis. Callbacks registration should be performed directly
  through PassInstrumentationCallbacks.

* new-pm tests updated to account for PassInstrumentationAnalysis being run

* Added PassInstrumentation tests to PassBuilderCallbacks unit tests.
  Other unit tests updated with registration of the now-required PassInstrumentationAnalysis.

Reviewers: chandlerc, philip.pfaffe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47858

llvm-svn: 342544
2018-09-19 12:25:52 +00:00
Alexandros Lamprineas
efe6dfc2cf [GVNHoist] Re-enable GVNHoist by default
Rebase rL341954 since https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38912
has been fixed by rL342055.

Precommit testing performed:
* Overnight runs of csmith comparing the output between programs
  compiled with gvn-hoist enabled/disabled.
* Bootstrap builds of clang with UbSan/ASan configurations.

llvm-svn: 342387
2018-09-17 12:24:55 +00:00
Fangrui Song
79f0a1e11f test/Other/can-execute.txt: delete %t after the test
This test constructs a non-readable file of mode 0111, which lingers in the test output directory and will cause EACCES to various tools (rg, rsync, ...)

llvm-svn: 342279
2018-09-14 20:41:42 +00:00
George Burgess IV
9c4f29f0ca [PartiallyInlineLibCalls] Add DebugCounter support
This adds DebugCounter support to the PartiallyInlineLibCalls pass,
which should make debugging/automated bisection easier in the future.

Patch by Zhizhou Yang!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50093

llvm-svn: 342172
2018-09-13 20:33:04 +00:00
George Burgess IV
0e8ba1b7ab [DCE] Add DebugCounter support
Patch by Zhizhou Yang!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50092

llvm-svn: 342170
2018-09-13 20:29:50 +00:00
Alexandros Lamprineas
2b0a73b2fb Revert "[GVNHoist] Re-enable GVNHoist by default"
This reverts rL341954.

The builder `sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan` has been
failing with timeouts at stage2 clang/ubsan:

[3065/3073] Linking CXX executable bin/lld
command timed out: 1200 seconds without output running python
../sanitizer_buildbot/sanitizers/buildbot_selector.py,
attempting to kill

llvm-svn: 342001
2018-09-11 22:10:57 +00:00
Alexandros Lamprineas
a6ddc7ad4a [GVNHoist] Re-enable GVNHoist by default
Rebase rL340922 since https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38807
has been fixed by rL341947.

llvm-svn: 341954
2018-09-11 15:55:45 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne
b6e7ff238c Prevent Constant Folding From Optimizing inrange GEP
This patch does the following things:

1. update SymbolicallyEvaluateGEP so that it bails out if it cannot preserve inrange arribute;
2. update llvm/test/Analysis/ConstantFolding/gep.ll to remove UB in it;
3. remove inaccurate comment above ConstantFoldInstOperandsImpl in llvm/lib/Analysis/ConstantFolding.cpp;
4. add a new regression test that makes sure that no optimizations change an inrange GEP in an unexpected way.

Patch by Zhaomo Yang!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51698

llvm-svn: 341888
2018-09-11 01:53:36 +00:00
Jessica Paquette
0d774aa131 Add REQUIRES line to machine-size-remarks
Just was made aware that this is necessary for tests outside of
the X86 subdirectory. Add a REQUIRES line to make sure bots that
don't enable x86 are happy.

llvm-svn: 341885
2018-09-10 23:53:08 +00:00
Jessica Paquette
842d86be04 Explicitly state triple in machine-size-remarks.ll
A bot was unhappy with the x86 triple there before. Set it explicitly to
x86_64-apple-darwin just to get something consistent.

Example failure:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-hexagon-elf/builds/16846

llvm-svn: 341882
2018-09-10 23:30:53 +00:00
Jessica Paquette
d1afddc21f Add size remarks to MachineFunctionPass
This adds per-function size remarks to codegen, similar to what we have in the
IR layer as of r341588. This only impacts MachineFunctionPasses.

This does the same thing, but for `MachineInstr`s instead of just
`Instructions`. After this, when a `MachineFunctionPass` modifies the number of
`MachineInstr`s in the function it ran on, you'll get a remark.

To enable this, use the size-info analysis remark as before.

llvm-svn: 341876
2018-09-10 22:24:10 +00:00
Jessica Paquette
19d2f5bff7 Output per-function size-info remarks
This patch adds per-function size information remarks. Previously, passing
-Rpass-analysis=size-info would only give you per-module changes. By adding
the ability to do this per-function, it's easier to see which functions
contributed the most to size changes.

https://reviews.llvm.org/D51467

llvm-svn: 341588
2018-09-06 21:19:54 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev
4e90563407 [NFC] correcting patterns in time-passes test to fix buildbot
llvm-svn: 341348
2018-09-04 08:21:37 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev
dea2e75fc4 [PassTiming] reporting time-passes separately for multiple pass instances of the same pass
Summary:
Refactoring done by rL340872 accidentally appeared to be non-NFC, changing the way how
multiple instances of the same pass are handled - aggregation of results by PassName
forced data for multiple instances to be merged together and reported as one line.

Getting back to creating/reporting timers per pass instance.
Reporting was a bit enhanced by counting pass instances and adding #<num> suffix
to the pass description. Note that it is instances that are being counted,
not invocations of them.

time-passes test updated to account for multiple passes being run.

Reviewers: paquette, jhenderson, MatzeB, skatkov

Reviewed By: skatkov

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51535

llvm-svn: 341346
2018-09-04 06:12:28 +00:00