1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-10-24 05:23:45 +02:00
Commit Graph

102 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Majnemer
df4ee5c023 Do (A == C1 || A == C2) -> (A & ~(C1 ^ C2)) == C1 rather than (A == C1 || A == C2) -> (A | (C1 ^ C2)) == C2 when C1 ^ C2 is a power of 2.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14223

Patch by Amaury SECHET!

llvm-svn: 254518
2015-12-02 16:15:07 +00:00
Michael Liao
9a38e95740 [InstCombine] Revise the test case to match full sequene
llvm-svn: 250950
2015-10-21 21:50:58 +00:00
Michael Liao
5efcb99302 [InstCombine] Optimize icmp of inc/dec at RHS
Allow LLVM to optimize the sequence like the following:

  %inc = add nsw i32 %i, 1
  %cmp = icmp slt %n, %inc

into:

  %cmp = icmp sle i32 %n, %i

The case is not handled previously due to the complexity of compuation of %n.
Hence, LLVM cannot swap operands of icmp accordingly.

llvm-svn: 250746
2015-10-19 22:08:14 +00:00
David Majnemer
5cca152072 [InstCombine] Don't assume m_Mul gives back an Instruction
This fixes PR24713.

llvm-svn: 246933
2015-09-05 20:44:56 +00:00
Sanjoy Das
ead6e3fe61 Re-apply r245635, "[InstCombine] Transform A & (L - 1) u< L --> L != 0"
The original checkin was buggy, this change has a fix.

Original commit message:

[InstCombine] Transform A & (L - 1) u< L --> L != 0

Summary:

This transform is never a pessimization at the IR level (since it
replaces an `icmp` with another), and has potentiall payoffs:

 1. It may make the `icmp` fold away or become loop invariant.
 2. It may make the `A & (L - 1)` computation dead.

This shows up in Java, in range checks generated by array accesses of
the form `a[i & (a.length - 1)]`.

Reviewers: reames, majnemer

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12210

llvm-svn: 245753
2015-08-21 22:22:37 +00:00
NAKAMURA Takumi
9d82bd7d88 Revert r245635, "[InstCombine] Transform A & (L - 1) u< L --> L != 0"
It caused miscompilation in clang.

llvm-svn: 245678
2015-08-21 07:46:07 +00:00
Sanjoy Das
d7d7f13bd6 [InstCombine] Transform A & (L - 1) u< L --> L != 0
Summary:
This transform is never a pessimization at the IR level (since it
replaces an `icmp` with another), and has potentiall payoffs:

 1. It may make the `icmp` fold away or become loop invariant.
 2. It may make the `A & (L - 1)` computation dead.

This shows up in Java, in range checks generated by array accesses of
the form `a[i & (a.length - 1)]`.

Reviewers: reames, majnemer

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12210

llvm-svn: 245635
2015-08-20 22:31:55 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer
ab138a6078 InstCombine: fold (A << C) == (B << C) --> ((A^B) & (~0U >> C)) == 0
Anding and comparing with zero can be done in a single instruction on
most archs so this is a bit cheaper.

llvm-svn: 233291
2015-03-26 17:12:06 +00:00
David Blaikie
3ea2df7c7b [opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to gep operator
Similar to gep (r230786) and load (r230794) changes.

Similar migration script can be used to update test cases, which
successfully migrated all of LLVM and Polly, but about 4 test cases
needed manually changes in Clang.

(this script will read the contents of stdin and massage it into stdout
- wrap it in the 'apply.sh' script shown in previous commits + xargs to
apply it over a large set of test cases)

import fileinput
import sys
import re

rep = re.compile(r"(getelementptr(?:\s+inbounds)?\s*\()((<\d*\s+x\s+)?([^@]*?)(|\s*addrspace\(\d+\))\s*\*(?(3)>)\s*)(?=$|%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|zeroinitializer|<|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{)", re.MULTILINE | re.DOTALL)

def conv(match):
  line = match.group(1)
  line += match.group(4)
  line += ", "
  line += match.group(2)
  return line

line = sys.stdin.read()
off = 0
for match in re.finditer(rep, line):
  sys.stdout.write(line[off:match.start()])
  sys.stdout.write(conv(match))
  off = match.end()
sys.stdout.write(line[off:])

llvm-svn: 232184
2015-03-13 18:20:45 +00:00
David Blaikie
0d99339102 [opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to getelementptr instruction
One of several parallel first steps to remove the target type of pointers,
replacing them with a single opaque pointer type.

This adds an explicit type parameter to the gep instruction so that when the
first parameter becomes an opaque pointer type, the type to gep through is
still available to the instructions.

* This doesn't modify gep operators, only instructions (operators will be
  handled separately)

* Textual IR changes only. Bitcode (including upgrade) and changing the
  in-memory representation will be in separate changes.

* geps of vectors are transformed as:
    getelementptr <4 x float*> %x, ...
  ->getelementptr float, <4 x float*> %x, ...
  Then, once the opaque pointer type is introduced, this will ultimately look
  like:
    getelementptr float, <4 x ptr> %x
  with the unambiguous interpretation that it is a vector of pointers to float.

* address spaces remain on the pointer, not the type:
    getelementptr float addrspace(1)* %x
  ->getelementptr float, float addrspace(1)* %x
  Then, eventually:
    getelementptr float, ptr addrspace(1) %x

Importantly, the massive amount of test case churn has been automated by
same crappy python code. I had to manually update a few test cases that
wouldn't fit the script's model (r228970,r229196,r229197,r229198). The
python script just massages stdin and writes the result to stdout, I
then wrapped that in a shell script to handle replacing files, then
using the usual find+xargs to migrate all the files.

update.py:
import fileinput
import sys
import re

ibrep = re.compile(r"(^.*?[^%\w]getelementptr inbounds )(((?:<\d* x )?)(.*?)(| addrspace\(\d\)) *\*(|>)(?:$| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$))")
normrep = re.compile(       r"(^.*?[^%\w]getelementptr )(((?:<\d* x )?)(.*?)(| addrspace\(\d\)) *\*(|>)(?:$| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$))")

def conv(match, line):
  if not match:
    return line
  line = match.groups()[0]
  if len(match.groups()[5]) == 0:
    line += match.groups()[2]
  line += match.groups()[3]
  line += ", "
  line += match.groups()[1]
  line += "\n"
  return line

for line in sys.stdin:
  if line.find("getelementptr ") == line.find("getelementptr inbounds"):
    if line.find("getelementptr inbounds") != line.find("getelementptr inbounds ("):
      line = conv(re.match(ibrep, line), line)
  elif line.find("getelementptr ") != line.find("getelementptr ("):
    line = conv(re.match(normrep, line), line)
  sys.stdout.write(line)

apply.sh:
for name in "$@"
do
  python3 `dirname "$0"`/update.py < "$name" > "$name.tmp" && mv "$name.tmp" "$name"
  rm -f "$name.tmp"
done

The actual commands:
From llvm/src:
find test/ -name *.ll | xargs ./apply.sh
From llvm/src/tools/clang:
find test/ -name *.mm -o -name *.m -o -name *.cpp -o -name *.c | xargs -I '{}' ../../apply.sh "{}"
From llvm/src/tools/polly:
find test/ -name *.ll | xargs ./apply.sh

After that, check-all (with llvm, clang, clang-tools-extra, lld,
compiler-rt, and polly all checked out).

The extra 'rm' in the apply.sh script is due to a few files in clang's test
suite using interesting unicode stuff that my python script was throwing
exceptions on. None of those files needed to be migrated, so it seemed
sufficient to ignore those cases.

Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7636

llvm-svn: 230786
2015-02-27 19:29:02 +00:00
David Majnemer
b89ab3fd88 InstCombine: Don't take A-B<0 into A<B if A-B has other uses
This fixes PR22226.

llvm-svn: 226023
2015-01-14 19:26:56 +00:00
David Majnemer
83939d3744 InstCombine: try to transform A-B < 0 into A < B
We are allowed to move the 'B' to the right hand side if we an prove
there is no signed overflow and if the comparison itself is signed.

llvm-svn: 225034
2014-12-31 04:21:41 +00:00
David Majnemer
3508fa333f InstCombine: Rely on cmpxchg's return code when it's strong
Comparing the result of a cmpxchg instruction can be replaced with an
extractvalue of the cmpxchg success indicator.

llvm-svn: 221498
2014-11-06 23:23:30 +00:00
David Majnemer
31bb458ba0 InstCombine: Combine (X+cst) < 0 --> X < -cst
This can happen pretty often in code that looks like:
int foo = bar - 1;
if (foo < 0)
  do stuff

In this case, bar < 1 is an equivalent condition.

This transform requires that the add instruction be annotated with nsw.

llvm-svn: 221045
2014-11-01 09:09:51 +00:00
David Majnemer
4c15df3adb InstCombine: Optimize icmp eq/ne (shl Const2, A), Const1
The following implements the optimization for sequences of the form:
icmp eq/ne (shl Const2, A), Const1

Such sequences can be transformed to:
icmp eq/ne A, (TrailingZeros(Const1) - TrailingZeros(Const2))

This handles only the equality operators for now. Other operators need
to be handled.

Patch by Ankur Garg!

llvm-svn: 220162
2014-10-19 08:23:08 +00:00
David Majnemer
e48fe8e34c InstSimplify: Move a transform from InstCombine to InstSimplify
Several combines involving icmp (shl C2, %X) C1 can be simplified
without introducing any new instructions.  Move them to InstSimplify;
while we are at it, make them more powerful.

llvm-svn: 216642
2014-08-28 03:34:28 +00:00
David Majnemer
5a9ece39af InstCombine: Properly optimize or'ing bittests together
CFE, with -03, would turn:
bool f(unsigned x) {
  bool a = x & 1;
  bool b = x & 2;
  return a | b;
}

into:
  %1 = lshr i32 %x, 1
  %2 = or i32 %1, %x
  %3 = and i32 %2, 1
  %4 = icmp ne i32 %3, 0

This sort of thing exposes a nasty pathology in GCC, ICC and LLVM.

Instead, we would rather want:
  %1 = and i32 %x, 3
  %2 = icmp ne i32 %1, 0

Things get a bit more interesting in the following case:
  %1 = lshr i32 %x, %y
  %2 = or i32 %1, %x
  %3 = and i32 %2, 1
  %4 = icmp ne i32 %3, 0

Replacing it with the following sequence is better:
  %1 = shl nuw i32 1, %y
  %2 = or i32 %1, 1
  %3 = and i32 %2, %x
  %4 = icmp ne i32 %3, 0

This sequence is preferable because %1 doesn't involve %x and could
potentially be hoisted out of loops if it is invariant; only perform
this transform in the non-constant case if we know we won't increase
register pressure.

llvm-svn: 216343
2014-08-24 09:10:57 +00:00
Matt Arsenault
0864675a02 Look through addrspacecasts when turning ptr comparisons into
index comparisons.

llvm-svn: 210488
2014-06-09 19:20:29 +00:00
Rafael Espindola
78f79310a7 Revert 209903 and 210040.
The messages were

 "PR19753: Optimize comparisons with "ashr exact" of a constanst."
 "Added support to optimize comparisons with "lshr exact" of a constant."

They were not correctly handling signed/unsigned operation differences,
causing pr19958.

llvm-svn: 210393
2014-06-07 04:12:35 +00:00
Rafael Espindola
affcd78e1b Added support to optimize comparisons with "lshr exact" of a constant.
Patch by Rahul Jain.

llvm-svn: 210040
2014-06-02 19:19:04 +00:00
Dinesh Dwivedi
e95c2e918a Added inst combine tarnsform for (1 << X) & C pattrens where C is (some PowerOf2 - 1)
This patch can handles following cases from http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/InstCombine.txt
  "((1 << X) & 7) == 0" ==> "X > 2"
  "((1 << X) & 7) != 0" ==> "X < 3".

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3678

llvm-svn: 210007
2014-06-02 07:57:24 +00:00
Rafael Espindola
db0bd4b30f PR19753: Optimize comparisons with "ashr exact" of a constanst.
Patch by suyog sarda.

llvm-svn: 209903
2014-05-30 15:54:32 +00:00
David Majnemer
809b8a331d InstCombine: Optimize -x s< cst
Summary:
This gets rid of a sub instruction by moving the negation to the
constant when valid.

Reviewers: nicholas

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3773

llvm-svn: 208827
2014-05-15 00:02:20 +00:00
Erik Verbruggen
11e61b79e5 Revert "InstCombine: merge constants in both operands of icmp."
This reverts commit r204912, and follow-up commit r204948.

This introduced a performance regression, and the fix is not completely
clear yet.

llvm-svn: 205010
2014-03-28 14:50:57 +00:00
Reid Kleckner
c826dce075 InstCombine: Don't combine constants on unsigned icmps
Fixes a miscompile introduced in r204912.  It would miscompile code like
(unsigned)(a + -49) <= 5U.  The transform would turn this into
(unsigned)a < 55U, which would return true for values in [0, 49], when
it should not.

llvm-svn: 204948
2014-03-27 17:49:27 +00:00
Erik Verbruggen
5e4efd4306 InstCombine: merge constants in both operands of icmp.
Transform:
    icmp X+Cst2, Cst
into:
    icmp X, Cst-Cst2
when Cst-Cst2 does not overflow, and the add has nsw.

llvm-svn: 204912
2014-03-27 11:16:05 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer
0519e29d1b InstCombine: fold (A >> C) == (B >> C) --> (A^B) < (1 << C) for constant Cs.
This is common in bitfield code.

llvm-svn: 194925
2013-11-16 16:00:48 +00:00
Quentin Colombet
48ec8d3046 [InstCombiner] Expose opportunities to merge subtract and comparison.
Several architectures use the same instruction to perform both a comparison and
a subtract. The instruction selection framework does not allow to consider
different basic blocks to expose such fusion opportunities.

Therefore, these instructions are “merged” by CSE at MI IR level.

To increase the likelihood of CSE to apply in such situation, we reorder the
operands of the comparison, when they have the same complexity, so that they
matches the order of the most frequent subtract.
E.g.,

icmp A, B
...
sub B, A

<rdar://problem/14514580>

llvm-svn: 190352
2013-09-09 20:56:48 +00:00
Matt Arsenault
95d00423a7 Teach InstCombine about address spaces
llvm-svn: 188926
2013-08-21 19:53:10 +00:00
Stephen Lin
f20746afd1 Catch more CHECK that can be converted to CHECK-LABEL in Transforms for easier debugging. No functionality change.
This conversion was done with the following bash script:

  find test/Transforms -name "*.ll" | \
  while read NAME; do
    echo "$NAME"
    if ! grep -q "^; *RUN: *llc" $NAME; then
      TEMP=`mktemp -t temp`
      cp $NAME $TEMP
      sed -n "s/^define [^@]*@\([A-Za-z0-9_]*\)(.*$/\1/p" < $NAME | \
      while read FUNC; do
        sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)\([A-Za-z0-9_]*\):\( *\)define\([^@]*\)@$FUNC\([( ]*\)\$/;\1\2-LABEL:\3define\4@$FUNC(/g" $TEMP
      done
      mv $TEMP $NAME
    fi
  done

llvm-svn: 186269
2013-07-14 01:50:49 +00:00
Stephen Lin
cf082ae903 Update Transforms tests to use CHECK-LABEL for easier debugging. No functionality change.
This update was done with the following bash script:

  find test/Transforms -name "*.ll" | \
  while read NAME; do
    echo "$NAME"
    if ! grep -q "^; *RUN: *llc" $NAME; then
      TEMP=`mktemp -t temp`
      cp $NAME $TEMP
      sed -n "s/^define [^@]*@\([A-Za-z0-9_]*\)(.*$/\1/p" < $NAME | \
      while read FUNC; do
        sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)\([A-Za-z0-9_]*\):\( *\)@$FUNC\([( ]*\)\$/;\1\2-LABEL:\3@$FUNC(/g" $TEMP
      done
      mv $TEMP $NAME
    fi
  done

llvm-svn: 186268
2013-07-14 01:42:54 +00:00
David Majnemer
3bb8099e6d InstCombine: variations on 0xffffffff - x >= 4
The following transforms are valid if -C is a power of 2:
(icmp ugt (xor X, C), ~C) -> (icmp ult X, C)
(icmp ult (xor X, C), -C) -> (icmp uge X, C)

These are nice, they get rid of the xor.

llvm-svn: 185915
2013-07-09 09:20:58 +00:00
David Majnemer
ebf98e0163 InstCombine: X & -C != -C -> X <= u ~C
Tests were added in r185910 somehow.

llvm-svn: 185912
2013-07-09 08:09:32 +00:00
David Majnemer
90d0b32c9e Commit r185909 was a misapplied patch, fix it
llvm-svn: 185910
2013-07-09 07:58:32 +00:00
David Majnemer
969e1f9c9f InstCombine: add more transforms
C1-X <u C2 -> (X|(C2-1)) == C1
C1-X >u C2 -> (X|C2) == C1
X-C1 <u C2 -> (X & -C2) == C1
X-C1 >u C2 -> (X & ~C2) == C1

llvm-svn: 185909
2013-07-09 07:50:59 +00:00
David Majnemer
c84fdc2727 InstCombine: Fold X-C1 <u 2 -> (X & -2) == C1
Back in r179493 we determined that two transforms collided with each
other.  The fix back then was to reorder the transforms so that the
preferred transform would give it a try and then we would try the
secondary transform.  However, it was noted that the best approach would
canonicalize one transform into the other, removing the collision and
allowing us to optimize IR given to us in that form.

llvm-svn: 185808
2013-07-08 11:53:08 +00:00
David Majnemer
f803d12937 InstCombine: typo in or_icmp_eq_B_0_icmp_ult_A_B test
llvm-svn: 185737
2013-07-06 00:54:07 +00:00
David Majnemer
2c72ce123d InstCombine: (icmp eq B, 0) | (icmp ult A, B) -> (icmp ule A, B-1)
This transform allows us to turn IR that looks like:
  %1 = icmp eq i64 %b, 0
  %2 = icmp ult i64 %a, %b
  %3 = or i1 %1, %2
  ret i1 %3

into:
  %0 = add i64 %b, -1
  %1 = icmp uge i64 %0, %a
  ret i1 %1

which means we go from lowering:
        cmpq    %rsi, %rdi
        setb    %cl
        testq   %rsi, %rsi
        sete    %al
        orb     %cl, %al
        ret

to lowering:
        decq    %rsi
        cmpq    %rdi, %rsi
        setae   %al
        ret

llvm-svn: 185677
2013-07-05 00:31:17 +00:00
David Majnemer
da449ec54b InstCombine: Optimize (1 << X) Pred CstP2 to X Pred Log2(CstP2)
We may, after other optimizations, find ourselves with IR that looks
like:

  %shl = shl i32 1, %y
  %cmp = icmp ult i32 %shl, 32

Instead, we should just compare the shift count:

  %cmp = icmp ult i32 %y, 5

llvm-svn: 185242
2013-06-28 23:42:03 +00:00
Rafael Espindola
64d9e8bdc2 Add a testcase from pr16244.
llvm-svn: 183433
2013-06-06 19:15:23 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer
54122b8028 InstCombine: Don't just copy known bits from the first operand of an srem.
That's obviously wrong. Conservatively restrict it to the sign bit, which
matches the original intention of this analysis. Fixes PR15940.

llvm-svn: 181518
2013-05-09 16:32:32 +00:00
David Majnemer
1dc3d3f7a0 Reorders two transforms that collide with each other
One performs: (X == 13 | X == 14) -> X-13 <u 2
The other: (A == C1 || A == C2) -> (A & ~(C1 ^ C2)) == C1

The problem is that there are certain values of C1 and C2 that
trigger both transforms but the first one blocks out the second,
this generates suboptimal code.

Reordering the transforms should be better in every case and
allows us to do interesting stuff like turn:
  %shr = lshr i32 %X, 4
  %and = and i32 %shr, 15
  %add = add i32 %and, -14
  %tobool = icmp ne i32 %add, 0

into:
  %and = and i32 %X, 240
  %tobool = icmp ne i32 %and, 224

llvm-svn: 179493
2013-04-14 21:15:43 +00:00
David Majnemer
eec2fe2c55 Simplify (A & ~B) in icmp if A is a power of 2
The transform will execute like so:
(A & ~B) == 0 --> (A & B) != 0
(A & ~B) != 0 --> (A & B) == 0

llvm-svn: 179386
2013-04-12 17:25:07 +00:00
David Majnemer
82ec1d080e Optimize icmp involving addition better
Allows LLVM to optimize sequences like the following:

%add = add nsw i32 %x, 1
%cmp = icmp sgt i32 %add, %y

into:

%cmp = icmp sge i32 %x, %y

as well as:

%add1 = add nsw i32 %x, 20
%add2 = add nsw i32 %y, 57
%cmp = icmp sge i32 %add1, %add2

into:

%add = add nsw i32 %y, 37
%cmp = icmp sle i32 %cmp, %x

llvm-svn: 179316
2013-04-11 20:05:46 +00:00
Arnaud A. de Grandmaison
019bd576ab Address issues found by Duncan during post-commit review of r177856.
llvm-svn: 177863
2013-03-25 11:47:38 +00:00
Arnaud A. de Grandmaison
1fdfeaba38 InstCombine: simplify comparisons to zero of (shl %x, Cst) or (mul %x, Cst)
This simplification happens at 2 places :
 - using the nsw attribute when the shl / mul is used by a sign test
 - when the shl / mul is compared for (in)equality to zero

llvm-svn: 177856
2013-03-25 09:48:49 +00:00
Arnaud A. de Grandmaison
6b2f7add7e Teach InstCombine to work with smaller legal types in icmp (shl %v, C1), C2
It enables to work with a smaller constant, which is target friendly for those which can compare to immediates.
It also avoids inserting a shift in favor of a trunc, which can be free on some targets.

This used to work until LLVM-3.1, but regressed with the 3.2 release.

llvm-svn: 175270
2013-02-15 14:35:47 +00:00
Jakub Staszak
eb568744b7 Add extra CHECK to make sure that 'or' instruction was replaced.
Also add an assert to avoid confusion in the code where is known that C1 <= C2.

llvm-svn: 171310
2012-12-31 18:26:42 +00:00
Jakub Staszak
000956e03b Transform (A == C1 || A == C2) into (A & ~(C1 ^ C2)) == C1
if C1 and C2 differ only with one bit.
Fixes PR14708.

llvm-svn: 171270
2012-12-31 00:34:55 +00:00
Paul Redmond
b0b73c2c50 Transform (x&C)>V into (x&C)!=0 where possible
When the least bit of C is greater than V, (x&C) must be greater than V
if it is not zero, so the comparison can be simplified.

Although this was suggested in Target/X86/README.txt, it benefits any
architecture with a directly testable form of AND.

Patch by Kevin Schoedel

llvm-svn: 170576
2012-12-19 19:47:13 +00:00