Add an `enable_if` to the generic `IntrusiveRefCntPtr` constructors so
that std::is_convertible gives an honest answer when the underlying
pointers cannot be converted. Added `static_assert`s to the test suite
to verify.
Also combine generic constructors from `IntrusiveRefCntPtr<X>&&` and
`const IntrusiveRefCntPtr<X>&`. At first glance this appears to be an
infinite loop, but the real copy/move constructors are spelled out
separately above. Added a unit test to verify.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95498
Allow a `std::unique_ptr` to be moved into the an `IntrusiveRefCntPtr`,
and remove a couple of now-unnecessary `release()` calls.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92888
Added a trivial destructor in release mode and in debug mode a destructor that asserts RefCount is indeed zero.
This ensure people aren't manually (maybe accidentally) destroying these objects like in this contrived example.
```lang=c++
{
std::unique_ptr<SomethingRefCounted> Object;
holdIntrusiveOwnership(Object.get());
// Object Destructor called here will assert.
}
```
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92480
This was partially supported but untested for RefCountedBase (the
implicit copy assignment would've been problematic - so delete that) and
unsupported (would not have compiled, because std::atomic is
non-copyable) for ThreadSafeRefCountedBase (implement similar support
to RefCountedBase)
Fix the test that had a copy ctor for the derived object but called
RefCountBase's default ctor from that copy ctor - which meant it wasn't
actually testing RefCountBase's copy semantics.
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This reverts commit r303383.
This breaks the modules-enabled macOS build with:
lib/Support/LockFileManager.cpp:86:7: error: declaration of 'gethostuuid' must be imported from module 'Darwin.POSIX.unistd' before it is required
llvm-svn: 303402
This roughly matches the semantics of std::enable_shared_from_this - that it
does not dictate the ownership model of all users, but constrains those users
taking advantage of the intrusive nature to do so only when there's a guarantee
that that's the ownership model being used for the object being passed.
Reviewers: jlebar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28245
llvm-svn: 290987
Edit for voice, and also add examples. In particular, add an
explanation for why you might want to specialize IntrusiveRefCntPtrInfo,
which is not obvious.
llvm-svn: 290720
Summary:
This class is unnecessary.
Its comment indicated that it was a compile error to allocate an
instance of a class that inherits from RefCountedBaseVPTR on the stack.
This may have been true at one point, but it's not today.
Moreover you really do not want to allocate *any* refcounted object on
the stack, vptrs or not, so if we did have a way to prevent these
objects from being stack-allocated, we'd want to apply it to regular
RefCountedBase too, obviating the need for a separate RefCountedBaseVPTR
class.
It seems that the main way RefCountedBaseVPTR provides safety is by
making its subclass's destructor virtual. This may have been helpful at
one point, but these days clang will emit an error if you define a class
with virtual functions that inherits from RefCountedBase but doesn't
have a virtual destructor.
Reviewers: compnerd, dblaikie
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28162
llvm-svn: 290717
This better aligns with other LLVM-specific and C++ standard library smart
pointer types.
In particular there are at least a few uses of intrusive refcounting in the
frontend where it's worth investigating std::shared_ptr as a more appropriate
alternative.
llvm-svn: 212366
As far as simplify_type is concerned, there are 3 kinds of smart pointers:
* const correct: A 'const MyPtr<int> &' produces a 'const int*'. A
'MyPtr<int> &' produces a 'int *'.
* always const: Even a 'MyPtr<int> &' produces a 'const int*'.
* no const: Even a 'const MyPtr<int> &' produces a 'int*'.
This patch then does the following:
* Removes the unused specializations. Since they are unused, it is hard
to know which kind should be implemented.
* Make sure we don't drop const.
* Fix the default forwarding so that const correct pointer only need
one specialization.
* Simplifies the existing specializations.
llvm-svn: 178147
Rationale:
1) This was the name in the comment block. ;]
2) It matches Clang's __has_feature naming convention.
3) It matches other compiler-feature-test conventions.
Sorry for the noise. =]
I've also switch the comment block to use a \brief tag and not duplicate
the name.
llvm-svn: 168996
now that this handles the release / retain calls.
Adds a regression test for that bug (which is a compile-time
regression) and for the last two changes to the IntrusiveRefCntPtr,
especially tests for the memory leak due to copy construction of the
ref-counted object and ensuring that the traits are used for release /
retain calls.
llvm-svn: 149411
