where there is no timeout. In the case where there is a timeout though, the
code is still wrong since it doesn't check that the alarm really went off.
Without this patch, I cannot debug a program that forks itself using
sys::ExecuteAndWait with lldb.
llvm-svn: 211918
Patch by Vladimir Voskresensky. The erros were:
Path.inc:274:3: error: ‘Dl_info’ was not declared in this scope
...
and
usr/include/spawn.h:52:14: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘argv’
llvm-svn: 192185
- New ProcessInfo class to encapsulate information about child processes.
- Generalized the Wait() to support non-blocking wait on child processes.
- ExecuteNoWait() now returns a ProcessInfo object with information about
the launched child. Users will be able to use this object to
perform non-blocking wait.
- ExecuteNoWait() now accepts an ExecutionFailed param that tells if execution
failed or not.
These changes will allow users to implement basic process parallel
tools.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1728
llvm-svn: 191763
Execute's Data parameter is now optional, so we won't allocate memory
for it on Windows and we'll close the process handle.
The Unix code should probably do something similar to avoid accumulation
of zombie children that haven't been waited on.
Tested on Linux and Windows.
llvm-svn: 183906
It was only used to implement ExecuteAndWait and ExecuteNoWait. Expose just
those two functions and make Execute and Wait implementations details.
llvm-svn: 183864
This change lets us bootstrap LLVM/Clang under ASan and MSan. It contains
fixes for 2 issues:
- X86JIT reads return address from stack, which MSan does not know is
initialized.
- bugpoint tests run binaries with RLIMIT_AS. This does not work with certain
Sanitizers.
We are no longer including config.h in Compiler.h with this change.
llvm-svn: 174306
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
This change allows bugpoint to pinpoint the "opt" pass and bitcode
segment responsible for a crash caused by miscompilation. At least it
works well for me now, without having to create any custom execution
wrappers.
llvm-svn: 131186
