More tests related to PR39195:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39195
If we limit the horizontal codegen, it may require different
constraints for FP and integer.
llvm-svn: 343994
This patch implements a pass that optimizes condition branches on x86 by
taking advantage of the three-way conditional code generated by compare
instructions.
Currently, it tries to hoisting EQ and NE conditional branch to a dominant
conditional branch condition where the same EQ/NE conditional code is
computed. An example:
bb_0:
cmp %0, 19
jg bb_1
jmp bb_2
bb_1:
cmp %0, 40
jg bb_3
jmp bb_4
bb_4:
cmp %0, 20
je bb_5
jmp bb_6
Here we could combine the two compares in bb_0 and bb_4 and have the
following code:
bb_0:
cmp %0, 20
jg bb_1
jl bb_2
jmp bb_5
bb_1:
cmp %0, 40
jg bb_3
jmp bb_6
For the case of %0 == 20 (bb_5), we eliminate two jumps, and the control height
for bb_6 is also reduced. bb_4 is gone after the optimization.
This optimization is motivated by the branch pattern generated by the switch
lowering: we always have pivot-1 compare for the inner nodes and we do a pivot
compare again the leaf (like above pattern).
This pass currently is enabled on Intel's Sandybridge and later arches. Some
reviewers pointed out that on some arches (like AMD Jaguar), this pass may
increase branch density to the point where it hurts the performance of the
branch predictor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46662
llvm-svn: 343993
Emit a waterfall loop in the general case for a potentially-divergent Rsrc
operand. When practical, avoid this by using Addr64 instructions.
Recommits r341413 with changes to update the MachineDominatorTree when present.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51742
llvm-svn: 343992
Some necessary yak shaving before lowering *_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG 256-bit vectors on AVX1 targets as suggested by D52964.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52970
llvm-svn: 343991
The instructions are complicated, so this code will
probably never be very obvious, but hopefully this
makes it better.
As shown in PR39195:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39195
...we need to improve the matching to not miss cases
where we're h-opping on 1 source vector, and that
should be a small patch after this rearranging.
llvm-svn: 343989
In r339636 the alias analysis rules were changed with regards to tail calls
and byval arguments. Previously, tail calls were assumed not to alias
allocas from the current frame. This has been updated, to not assume this
for arguments with the byval attribute.
This patch aligns TailCallElim with the new rule. Tail marking can now be
more aggressive and mark more calls as tails, e.g.:
define void @test() {
%f = alloca %struct.foo
call void @bar(%struct.foo* byval %f)
ret void
}
define void @test2(%struct.foo* byval %f) {
call void @bar(%struct.foo* byval %f)
ret void
}
define void @test3(%struct.foo* byval %f) {
%agg.tmp = alloca %struct.foo
%0 = bitcast %struct.foo* %agg.tmp to i8*
%1 = bitcast %struct.foo* %f to i8*
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i64(i8* %0, i8* %1, i64 40, i1 false)
call void @bar(%struct.foo* byval %agg.tmp)
ret void
}
The problematic case where a byval parameter is captured by a call is still
handled correctly, and will not be marked as a tail (see PR7272).
llvm-svn: 343986
CFGPrinter (-view-cfg, -dot-cfg) invokes an undefined behaviour (dangling
pointer to rvalue) on IR files with branch weights. This patch fixes the
problem caused by Twine initialization and string conversion split into
two statements.
This change fixes the bug 37019. A similar patch to this problem was
provided in the llvmlite project
Patch by mcopik (Marcin Copik).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52933
llvm-svn: 343984
Summary:
The ISA is really supposed to support 64-bit atomics as well,
so the data type should be an overload.
Mesa doesn't use these atomics yet, in fact I noticed this
issue while trying to use the atomics from Mesa.
Change-Id: I77f58317a085a0d3eb933cc7e99308c48a19f83e
Reviewers: tpr
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, t-tye, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52291
llvm-svn: 343978
Summary:
The predicate function is added in InlinePatternFragments, no need to
do it here. As a result, all uses of addPredicateFn are located in
InlinePatternFragments.
Test confirmed that there are no changes to generated files when
building all (non-experimental) targets.
Change-Id: I720e42e045ca596eb0aa339fb61adf6fe71034d5
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec, RKSimon, craig.topper, hfinkel, uweigand
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51993
llvm-svn: 343977
This commit adds a new IR level pass to the AMDGPU backend to perform
atomic optimizations. It works by:
- Running through a function and finding atomicrmw add/sub or uses of
the atomic buffer intrinsics for add/sub.
- If all arguments except the value to be added/subtracted are uniform,
record the value to be optimized.
- Run through the atomic operations we can optimize and, depending on
whether the value is uniform/divergent use wavefront wide operations
(DPP in the divergent case) to calculate the total amount to be
atomically added/subtracted.
- Then let only a single lane of each wavefront perform the atomic
operation, reducing the total number of atomic operations in flight.
- Lastly we recombine the result from the single lane to each lane of
the wavefront, and calculate our individual lanes offset into the
final result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51969
llvm-svn: 343973
This works on Windows, but seems to be breaking tests that
use an external shell (e.g. bash) because backquote has special
meaning.
This particular argument wasn't crucial for the test, so I've
just removed it.
llvm-svn: 343971
Summary:
If we have a symbol with (linkonce|weak)_odr linkage, we do not want
to dead strip it even it is not prevailing.
IR level (linkonce|weak)_odr symbol can become non-prevailing when we mix
ELF objects and IR objects where the (linkonce|weak)_odr symbol in the ELF
object is prevailing and the ones in the IR objects are not. Stripping
them will prevent us from doing optimizations with them.
By not dead stripping them, We will convert these symbols to
available_externally linkage as a result of non-prevailing and eventually
dropping them after inlining.
I modified cache-prevailing.ll to use linkonce linkage as it is
testing whether cache prevailing bit is effective or not, not
we should treat linkonce_odr alive or not
Reviewers: tejohnson, pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52893
llvm-svn: 343970
When branch target identification is enabled, we can only do indirect
tail-calls through x16 or x17. This means that the outliner can't
transform a BLR instruction at the end of an outlined region into a BR.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52869
llvm-svn: 343969
When branch target identification is enabled, all indirectly-callable
functions start with a BTI C instruction. this instruction can only be
the target of certain indirect branches (direct branches and
fall-through are not affected):
- A BLR instruction, in either a protected or unprotected page.
- A BR instruction in a protected page, using x16 or x17.
- A BR instruction in an unprotected page, using any register.
Without BTI, we can use any non call-preserved register to hold the
address for an indirect tail call. However, when BTI is enabled, then
the code being compiled might be loaded into a BTI-protected page, where
only x16 and x17 can be used for indirect tail calls.
Legacy code withiout this restriction can still indirectly tail-call
BTI-protected functions, because they will be loaded into an unprotected
page, so any register is allowed.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52868
llvm-svn: 343968
The Branch Target Identification extension, introduced to AArch64 in
Armv8.5-A, adds the BTI instruction, which is used to mark valid targets
of indirect branches. When enabled, the processor will trap if an
instruction in a protected page tries to perform an indirect branch to
any instruction other than a BTI. The BTI instruction uses encodings
which were NOPs in earlier versions of the architecture, so BTI-enabled
code will still run on earlier hardware, just without the extra
protection.
There are 3 variants of the BTI instruction, which are valid targets for
different kinds or branches:
- BTI C can be targeted by call instructions, and is inteneded to be
used at function entry points. These are the BLR instruction, as well
as BR with x16 or x17. These BR instructions are allowed for use in
PLT entries, and we can also use them to allow indirect tail-calls.
- BTI J can be targeted by BR only, and is intended to be used by jump
tables.
- BTI JC acts ab both a BTI C and a BTI J instruction, and can be
targeted by any BLR or BR instruction.
Note that RET instructions are not restricted by branch target
identification, the reason for this is that return addresses can be
protected more effectively using return address signing. Direct branches
and calls are also unaffected, as it is assumed that an attacker cannot
modify executable pages (if they could, they wouldn't need to do a
ROP/JOP attack).
This patch adds a MachineFunctionPass which:
- Adds a BTI C at the start of every function which could be indirectly
called (either because it is address-taken, or externally visible so
could be address-taken in another translation unit).
- Adds a BTI J at the start of every basic block which could be
indirectly branched to. This could be either done by a jump table, or
by taking the address of the block (e.g. the using GCC label values
extension).
We only need to use BTI JC when a function is indirectly-callable, and
takes the address of the entry block. I've not been able to trigger this
from C or IR, but I've included a MIR test just in case.
Using BTI C at function entries relies on the fact that no other code in
BTI-protected pages uses indirect tail-calls, unless they use x16 or x17
to hold the address. I'll add that code-generation restriction as a
separate patch.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52867
llvm-svn: 343967
Support G_UDIV/G_UREM/G_SREM. The instruction selection
code is taken from FastISel with only minor tweaks to adapt
for GlobalISel.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49781
llvm-svn: 343966
The IRBuilder CreateIntrinsic method wouldn't allow you to specify the
types that you wanted the intrinsic to be mangled with. To fix this
I've:
- Added an ArrayRef<Type *> member to both CreateIntrinsic overloads.
- Used that array to pass into the Intrinsic::getDeclaration call.
- Added a CreateUnaryIntrinsic to replace the most common use of
CreateIntrinsic where the type was auto-deduced from operand 0.
- Added a bunch more unit tests to test Create*Intrinsic calls that
weren't being tested (including the FMF flag that wasn't checked).
This was suggested as part of the AMDGPU specific atomic optimizer
review (https://reviews.llvm.org/D51969).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52087
llvm-svn: 343962
The following instruction:
> str q28, [x0, #1*6*4*@]
contains a @ which is parsed as an empty symbol. The parser returns true
but has no error, so the assembler continues by ignoring the
instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52645
llvm-svn: 343961
When deciding if it is safe to optimize a conditional branch to a CBZ or
CBNZ the offsets of the BasicBlocks from the start of the function are
estimated. For inline assembly the generic getInlineAsmLength() function is
used to get a worst case estimate of the inline assembly by multiplying the
number of instructions by the max instruction size of 4 bytes. This
unfortunately doesn't take into account the generation of Thumb implicit IT
instructions. In edge cases such as when all the instructions in the block
are 4-bytes in size and there is an implicit IT then the size is
underestimated. This can cause an out of range CBZ or CBNZ to be generated.
The patch takes a conservative approach and assumes that every instruction
in the inline assembly block may have an implicit IT.
Fixes pr31805
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52834
llvm-svn: 343960
The MachineOutliner for AArch64 transforms indirect calls into indirect
tail calls, replacing the call with the TCRETURNri pseudo-instruction.
This pseudo lowers to a BR, but has the isCall and isReturn flags set.
The problem is that TCRETURNri takes a tcGPR64 as the register argument,
to prevent indiret tail-calls from using caller-saved registers. The
indirect calls transformed by the outliner could use caller-saved
registers. This is fine, because the outliner ensures that the register
is available at all call sites. However, this causes a verifier failure
when the register is not in tcGPR64. The fix is to add a new
pseudo-instruction like TCRETURNri, but which accepts any GPR.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52829
llvm-svn: 343959
The srli test in alu8.ll was a no-op, as it shifted by 8 bits. Fix this, and
also change the immediate in alu16.ll as shifted by something other than a
poewr of 8 is more interesting.
llvm-svn: 343958
Fix the following warning when compiling with clang (caused by commit
rL343951):
GlobalsStream.cpp:61:33: warning: comparison of integers of different
signs: 'int' and 'uint32_t'
This also avoids double evaluation of `GlobalsTable.HashBuckets.size()`.
llvm-svn: 343957
Currently running the @insertelem_after_gep function below through the InstCombine pass with opt produces invalid IR.
Input:
```
define void @insertelem_after_gep(<16 x i32>* %t0) {
%t1 = bitcast <16 x i32>* %t0 to [16 x i32]*
%t2 = addrspacecast [16 x i32]* %t1 to [16 x i32] addrspace(3)*
%t3 = getelementptr inbounds [16 x i32], [16 x i32] addrspace(3)* %t2, i64 0, i64 0
%t4 = insertelement <16 x i32 addrspace(3)*> undef, i32 addrspace(3)* %t3, i32 0
call void @extern_vec_pointers_func(<16 x i32 addrspace(3)*> %t4)
ret void
}
```
Output:
```
define void @insertelem_after_gep(<16 x i32>* %t0) {
%t3 = getelementptr inbounds <16 x i32>, <16 x i32>* %t0, i64 0, i64 0
%t4 = insertelement <16 x i32 addrspace(3)*> undef, i32 addrspace(3)* %t3, i32 0
call void @my_extern_func(<16 x i32 addrspace(3)*> %t4)
ret void
}
```
Which although causes no complaints when produced, isn't valid IR as the insertelement use of the %t3 GEP expects an address space.
```
opt: /tmp/bad.ll:52:73: error: '%t3' defined with type 'i32*' but expected 'i32 addrspace(3)*'
%t4 = insertelement <16 x i32 addrspace(3)*> undef, i32 addrspace(3)* %t3, i32 0
```
I've fixed this by adding an addrspacecast after the GEP in the InstCombine pass, and including a check for this type mismatch to the verifier.
Reviewers: spatel, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52294
llvm-svn: 343956
r126518 introduced a a type parameter to the getShiftAmountTy target hook. It
produces the type of the shift (RHSTy), parameterised by the type of the value
being shifted (LHSTy). SelectionDAGBuilder::visitShift passed RHSTy rather
than LHSTy and this patch corrects this. The change is a no-op because in LLVM
IR the LHS and RHS types for a shift must be equal anyway.
llvm-svn: 343955
At the point when we perform `emitTransformedIndex`, we have a broken IR (in
particular, we have Phis for which not every incoming value is properly set). On
such IR, it is illegal to create SCEV expressions, because their internal
simplification process may try to prove some predicates and break when it
stumbles across some broken IR.
The only purpose of using SCEV in this particular place is attempt to simplify
the generated code slightly. It seems that the result isn't worth it, because
some trivial cases (like addition of zero and multiplication by 1) can be
handled separately if needed, but more generally InstCombine is able to achieve
the goals we want to achieve by using SCEV.
This patch fixes a functional crash described in PR39160, and as side-effect it
also generates a bit smarter code in some simple cases. It also may cause some
optimality loss (i.e. we will now generate `mul` by power of `2` instead of
shift etc), but there is nothing what InstCombine could not handle later. In
case of dire need, we can support more trivial cases just in place.
Note that this patch only fixes one particular case of the general problem that
LV misuses SCEV, attempting to create SCEVs or prove predicates on invalid IR.
The general solution, however, seems complex enough.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52881
Reviewed By: fhahn, hsaito
llvm-svn: 343954
The Globals table is a hash table keyed on symbol name, so
it's possible to lookup symbols by name in O(1) time. Add
a function to the globals stream to do this, and add an option
to llvm-pdbutil to exercise this, then use it to write some
tests to verify correctness.
llvm-svn: 343951
This is where we legalize gather and masked load so this is consistent.
Since these ops are always on vectors I've chosen to go with LegalizeDAG since that's what we do for other vector only ops like BUILD_VECTOR, VECTOR_SHUFFLE, etc. The ScalarizeMaskedMemIntrinsic pass should take care of scalarizing these before SelectionDAG so hopefully we don't need to worry about illegally typed scalar ops being emitted in the legalizing. If we did we would need to do this in LegalizeVectorOps so we could get the second type legalization that runs between LegalizeVectorOps and LegalizeDAG.
llvm-svn: 343947
This change is proposed as a part of D44548, but we
need this independently to avoid regressions from improved
undef propagation in SimplifyDemandedVectorElts().
llvm-svn: 343940
rL343913 was using SimplifyDemandedBits's original demanded mask instead of the adjusted 'NewMask' that accounts for multiple uses of the op (those variable names really need improving....).
Annoyingly many of the test changes (back to pre-rL343913 state) are actually safe - but only because their multiple uses are all by PMULDQ/PMULUDQ.
Thanks to Jan Vesely (@jvesely) for bisecting the bug.
llvm-svn: 343935
It was always returning the chain which seems to be the result number of the SDValue in the lit tests we have. But I don't know if that's guaranteed.
llvm-svn: 343933
This patch fixes PR39099.
When strided loads are predicated, each of them will form an interleaved-group
(with gaps). However, subsequent stages of vectorization (planning and
transformation) assume that if a load is part of an Interleave-Group it is not
predicated, resulting in wrong code - unmasked wide loads are created.
The Interleaving Analysis does take care not to have conditional interleave
groups of size > 1, but until we extend the planning and transformation stages
to support masked-interleave-groups we should also avoid having them for
size == 1.
Reviewers: Ayal, hsaito, dcaballe, fhahn
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52682
llvm-svn: 343931
