shouldn't do AU.setPreservesCFG(), because even though CodeGen passes
don't modify the LLVM IR CFG, they may modify the MachineFunction CFG,
and passes like MachineLoop are registered with isCFGOnly set to true.
llvm-svn: 77691
into the mergable section if it is one of our special cases. This could
obviously be improved, but this is the minimal fix and restores us to the
previous behavior.
llvm-svn: 77679
failures when building assorted projects with clang.
--- Reverse-merging r77654 into '.':
U include/llvm/CodeGen/Passes.h
U include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.h
U include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunction.h
U include/llvm/CodeGen/LazyLiveness.h
U include/llvm/CodeGen/SelectionDAGISel.h
D include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunctionAnalysis.h
U include/llvm/Function.h
U lib/Target/CellSPU/SPUISelDAGToDAG.cpp
U lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCISelDAGToDAG.cpp
U lib/CodeGen/LLVMTargetMachine.cpp
U lib/CodeGen/MachineVerifier.cpp
U lib/CodeGen/MachineFunction.cpp
U lib/CodeGen/PrologEpilogInserter.cpp
U lib/CodeGen/MachineLoopInfo.cpp
U lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp
D lib/CodeGen/MachineFunctionAnalysis.cpp
D lib/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.cpp
U lib/CodeGen/LiveVariables.cpp
llvm-svn: 77661
- This is "experimental" code, I am feeling my way around and working out the
best way to do things (and learning tblgen in the process). Comments welcome,
but keep in mind this stuff will change radically.
- This is enough to match "subb" and friends, but not much else. The next step is to
automatically generate the matchers for individual operands.
llvm-svn: 77657
When the return value is not used (i.e. only care about the value in the memory), x86 does not have to use add to implement these. Instead, it can use add, sub, inc, dec instructions with the "lock" prefix.
This is currently implemented using a bit of instruction selection trick. The issue is the target independent pattern produces one output and a chain and we want to map it into one that just output a chain. The current trick is to select it into a merge_values with the first definition being an implicit_def. The proper solution is to add new ISD opcodes for the no-output variant. DAG combiner can then transform the node before it gets to target node selection.
Problem #2 is we are adding a whole bunch of x86 atomic instructions when in fact these instructions are identical to the non-lock versions. We need a way to add target specific information to target nodes and have this information carried over to machine instructions. Asm printer (or JIT) can use this information to add the "lock" prefix.
llvm-svn: 77582
a Twine, e.g., for names).
- I am a little ambivalent about this; we don't want the string conversion of
utostr, but using overload '+' mixed with string and integer arguments is
sketchy. On the other hand, this particular usage is something of an idiom.
llvm-svn: 77579
