This particular DAG combine is designed to kick in when both ConstantFPs will
end up being loaded via a litpool, however those nodes have a semi-legal
status, dictated by isFPImmLegal so in some cases there wouldn't have been a
litpool in the first place. Don't try to be clever in those circumstances.
Picked up while merging some AArch64 tests.
llvm-svn: 206365
We had disabled use of TBAA during CodeGen (even when otherwise using AA)
because the ptrtoint/inttoptr used by CGP for address sinking caused BasicAA to
miss basic type punning that it should catch (and, thus, we'd fail to override
TBAA when we should).
However, when AA is in use during CodeGen, CGP now uses normal GEPs and
bitcasts, instead of ptrtoint/inttoptr, when doing address sinking. As a
result, BasicAA should be able to make us do the right thing in the face of
type-punning, and it seems safe to enable use of TBAA again. self-hosting seems
fine on PPC64/Linux on the P7, with TBAA enabled and -misched=shuffle.
Note: We still don't update TBAA when merging stack slots, although because
BasicAA should now catch all such cases, this is no longer a blocking issue.
Nevertheless, I plan to commit code to deal with this properly in the near
future.
llvm-svn: 206093
sign/zero/any extensions. However a few places were not checking properly the
property of the load and were turning an indexed load into a regular extended
load. Therefore the indexed value was lost during the process and this was
triggering an assertion.
<rdar://problem/16389332>
llvm-svn: 205923
When the loop vectorizer vectorizes code that uses the loop induction variable,
we often end up with IR like this:
%b1 = insertelement <2 x i32> undef, i32 %v, i32 0
%b2 = shufflevector <2 x i32> %b1, <2 x i32> undef, <2 x i32> zeroinitializer
%i = add <2 x i32> %b2, <i32 2, i32 3>
If the add in this example is not legal (as is the case on PPC with VSX), it
will be scalarized, and we'll end up with a number of extract_vector_elt nodes
with the vector shuffle as the input operand, and that vector shuffle is fed by
one or more build_vector nodes. By the time that vector operations are
expanded, visitEXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT will not create new extract_vector_elt by
looking through the vector shuffle (to make sure that no illegal operations are
created), and so the extract_vector_elt -> vector shuffle -> build_vector is
never simplified to an operand of the build vector.
By looking at build_vectors through a shuffle we fix this particular situation,
preventing a vector from being built, only to be deconstructed again (for the
scalarized add) -- an expensive proposition when this all needs to be done via
the stack. We probably want a more comprehensive fix here where we look back
recursively through any shuffles to any build_vectors or scalar_to_vectors,
etc. but that can come later.
llvm-svn: 205179
This patch renames method 'isConstantSplat' as 'getConstantSplatValue'
(mainly for consistency reasons), and rewrites its logic to ensure
that we always perform a legal 'cast<ConstantSDNode>'.
Added test shift-combine-crash.ll to verify that DAGCombiner no longer crashes with an assertion failure in the attempt to simplify a vector shift by a vector of all undef counts.
llvm-svn: 204536
This is already done for shifts. Allow it for rotations as well. E.g.:
(rotl:i32 x, (trunc (and y, 31))) -> (rotl:i32 x, (and (trunc y), 31))
Use the newly factored-out distributeTruncateThroughAnd.
With this patch and some X86.td tweaks we should be able to remove redundant
masking of the rotation amount like in the example above. HW implicitly
performs this masking.
The testcase will be added as part of the X86 patch.
llvm-svn: 203316
This is the new idiom:
x<<(y&31) | x>>((0-y)&31)
which is recognized as:
x ROTL (y&31)
The change refines matchRotateSub. In
Neg & (OpSize - 1) == (OpSize - Pos) & (OpSize - 1), if Pos is
Pos' & (OpSize - 1) we can just use Pos' instead of Pos.
llvm-svn: 203315
Slightly change the wording in the function comment. Originally, it can be
misunderstood as we turned the input into two subsequent rotates.
Better connect the comment which talks about Mask and the code which used
LoBits. Renamed variable to MaskLoBits.
llvm-svn: 203314
This patch teaches the DAGCombiner how to fold a binary OR between two
shufflevector into a single shuffle vector when possible.
The rules are:
1. fold (or (shuf A, V_0, MA), (shuf B, V_0, MB)) -> (shuf A, B, Mask1)
2. fold (or (shuf A, V_0, MA), (shuf B, V_0, MB)) -> (shuf B, A, Mask2)
The DAGCombiner can take advantage of the fact that OR is commutative and
compute two possible shuffle masks (Mask1 and Mask2) for the resulting
shuffle node.
Before folding a dag according to either rule 1 or 2, DAGCombiner verifies
that the resulting shuffle mask is legal for the target.
DAGCombiner would firstly try to fold according to 1.; If not possible
then it will try to fold according to 2.
If both Mask1 and Mask2 are illegal then we conservatively don't fold
the OR instruction.
llvm-svn: 203156
Currently this code is duplicated across visitSHL, visitSRA and visitSRL. The
plan is to add rotates as clients to this new function.
There is no functional change intended here.
llvm-svn: 202908
This extract-and-trunc vector optimization cannot work for i1 values as
currently implemented, and so I'm disabling this for now for i1 values. In the
future, this can be fixed properly.
Soon I'll commit support for i1 CR bit tracking in the PowerPC backend, and
this will be covered by one of the existing regression tests.
llvm-svn: 202449
shifted mask rather than masking and shifting separately.
The patch adds this transformation to the DAGCombiner:
(shl (and (setcc:i8v16 ...) N01C) N1C) -> (and (setcc:i8v16 ...) N01C<<N1C)
<rdar://problem/16054492>
Patch by Adam Nemet <anemet@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 201906
BUILD_VECTOR nodes, e.g.:
(concat_vectors (BUILD_VECTOR a1, a2, a3, a4), (BUILD_VECTOR b1, b2, b3, b4))
->
(BUILD_VECTOR a1, a2, a3, a4, b1, b2, b3, b4)
This fixes an issue with AVX, where a sequence was not recognized as a 256-bit
vbroadcast due to the concat_vectors.
llvm-svn: 201158
During DAGCombine visitShiftByConstant assumes that certain binary operations
with only constant operands can always be folded successfully. This is no longer
true when the constant is opaque. This commit fixes visitShiftByConstant by not
performing the optimization for opaque constants. Otherwise we would end up in
an infinite DAGCombine loop.
llvm-svn: 200900
when the input is a concat_vectors and the insert replaces one of the
concat halves:
Lower half: fold (insert_subvector (concat_vectors X, Y), Z) ->
(concat_vectors Z, Y)
Upper half: fold (insert_subvector (concat_vectors X, Y), Z) ->
(concat_vectors X, Z)
This can be seen with the following IR:
define <8 x float> @lower_half(<4 x float> %v1, <4 x float> %v2, <4 x
float> %v3) {
%1 = shufflevector <4 x float> %v1, <4 x float> %v2, <8 x i32> <i32
0, i32 1, i32 2, i32 3, i32 4, i32 5, i32 6, i32 7>
%2 = tail call <8 x float> @llvm.x86.avx.vinsertf128.ps.256(<8 x
float> %1, <4 x float> %v3, i8 0)
The vinsertf128 intrinsic is converted into an insert_subvector node
in SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp.
Using AVX, without the patch this generates two vinsertf128 instructions:
vinsertf128 $1, %xmm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
vinsertf128 $0, %xmm2, %ymm0, %ymm0
With the patch this is optimized into:
vinsertf128 $1, %xmm1, %ymm2, %ymm0
Patch by Robert Lougher.
llvm-svn: 200506
Make sure that we don't introduce illegal build_vector dag nodes
when trying to fold a sign_extend of a build_vector.
This fixes a regression introduced by r200234.
Added test CodeGen/X86/fold-vector-sext-crash.ll
to verify that llc no longer crashes with an assertion failure
due to an illegal build_vector of type MVT::v4i64.
Thanks to Ilia Filippov for spotting this regression and for
providing a reproducible test case.
llvm-svn: 200313
Also update the comment, since it actually produces a
select (setcc) instead of select_cc.
It was checking and using the setcc result type for the
type of the sext, instead of the type of the compared items.
In my problem case, the sext was to i32 and was used as the setcc type,
but the expected type was i64.
No test since I haven't been able to hit the problem with
this on any in-tree targets.
llvm-svn: 200249
This patch teaches the DAGCombiner how to fold a sext/aext/zext dag node when
the operand in input is a build vector of constants (or UNDEFs).
The inability to fold a sext/zext of a constant build_vector was the root
cause of some pcg bugs affecting vselect expansion on x86-64 with AVX support.
Before this change, the DAGCombiner only knew how to fold a sext/zext/aext of a
ConstantSDNode.
llvm-svn: 200234
Issue outcomes from DAGCombiner::MergeConsequtiveStores, more precisely from
mem-ops sequence sorting.
Consider, how MergeConsequtiveStores works for next example:
store i8 1, a[0]
store i8 2, a[1]
store i8 3, a[1] ; a[1] again.
return ; DAG starts here
1. Method will collect all the 3 stores.
2. It sorts them by distance from the base pointer (farthest with highest
index).
3. It takes first consecutive non-overlapping stores and (if possible) replaces
them with a single store instruction.
The point is, we can't determine here which 'store' instruction
would be the second after sorting ('store 2' or 'store 3').
It happens that 'store 3' would be the second, and 'store 2' would be the third.
So after merging we have the next result:
store i16 (1 | 3 << 8), base ; is a[0] but bit-casted to i16
store i8 2, a[1]
So actually we swapped 'store 3' and 'store 2' and got wrong contents in a[1].
Fix: In sort routine just also take into account mem-op sequence number.
llvm-svn: 200201
There are currently two issues, of which I currently know, that prevent TBAA
from being correctly usable in CodeGen:
1. Stack coloring does not update TBAA when merging allocas. This is easy
enough to fix, but is not the largest problem.
2. CGP inserts ptrtoint/inttoptr pairs when sinking address computations.
Because BasicAA does not handle inttoptr, we'll often miss basic type punning
idioms that we need to catch so we don't miscompile real-world code (like LLVM).
I don't yet have a small test case for this, but this fixes self hosting a
non-asserts build of LLVM on PPC64 when using -enable-aa-sched-mi and -misched=shuffle.
llvm-svn: 200093
This option (which is !NDEBUG only) allows restricting the use of alias
analysis in DAGCombiner to a specific function. This has proved extremely
valuable to isolating bugs related to this feature, and mirrors the
misched-only-func option provided by the new instruction scheduler.
llvm-svn: 200088
This commit caused -Woverloaded-virtual warnings. The two new
TargetTransformInfo::getIntImmCost functions were only added to the superclass,
and to the X86 subclass. The other targets were not updated, and the
warning highlighted this by pointing out that e.g. ARMTTI::getIntImmCost was
hiding the two new getIntImmCost variants.
We could pacify the warning by adding "using TargetTransformInfo::getIntImmCost"
to the various subclasses, or turning it off, but I suspect that it's wrong to
leave the functions unimplemnted in those targets. The default implementations
return TCC_Free, which I don't think is right e.g. for ARM.
llvm-svn: 200058
Retry commit r200022 with a fix for the build bot errors. Constant expressions
have (unlike instructions) module scope use lists and therefore may have users
in different functions. The fix is to simply ignore these out-of-function uses.
llvm-svn: 200034
DAGCombiner::GatherAllAliases, which is only used when AA used is enabled
during DAGCombine, had a fundamentally incorrect assumption for which this
change compensates. GatherAllAliases, which is used to find aliasing
predecessor chain nodes (so that a better chain can be selected for a load or
store to enable subsequent optimizations) assumed that walking up the chain
would always catch all possibly-aliasing loads and stores. This is not true: To
really find all aliases, we also need to search for aliases through the value
operand of a store, etc. Consider the following situation:
Token1 = ...
L1 = load Token1, %52
S1 = store Token1, L1, %51
L2 = load Token1, %52+8
S2 = store Token1, L2, %51+8
Token2 = Token(S1, S2)
L3 = load Token2, %53
S3 = store Token2, L3, %52
L4 = load Token2, %53+8
S4 = store Token2, L4, %52+8
If we search for aliases of S3 (which loads address %52), and we look only
through the chain, then we'll miss the trivial dependence on L1 (which loads
from %52). We then might change all loads and stores to use Token1 as their
chain operand, which could result in copying %53 into %52 before copying
%52 into %51 (which should happen first).
The problem is, however, that searching for such data dependencies can become
expensive, and the cost is not directly related to the chain depth. Instead,
we'll rule out such configurations by insisting that we've visited all chain
users (except for users of the original chain, which is not necessary). When
doing this, we need to look through nodes we don't care about (otherwise,
things like register copies will interfere with trivial use cases).
Unfortunately, I don't have a small test case for this problem. Creating the
underlying situation is not hard (a pair of memcpys will do it), but arranging
for the default instruction schedule to be incorrect is very fragile.
This unbreaks self hosting on PPC64 when using
-mllvm -combiner-global-alias-analysis -mllvm -combiner-alias-analysis.
llvm-svn: 200033
These transformations obviously won't work for indexed (pre/post-inc) loads and
stores. In practice, I'm not sure there is any benefit to enabling them for
indexed nodes because other transformations that these might enable likely also
won't handle indexed nodes.
I don't have an in-tree test case that hits this problem, but an upcoming bug
fix will make it much more likely.
llvm-svn: 200023
This pass identifies expensive constants to hoist and coalesces them to
better prepare it for SelectionDAG-based code generation. This works around the
limitations of the basic-block-at-a-time approach.
First it scans all instructions for integer constants and calculates its
cost. If the constant can be folded into the instruction (the cost is
TCC_Free) or the cost is just a simple operation (TCC_BASIC), then we don't
consider it expensive and leave it alone. This is the default behavior and
the default implementation of getIntImmCost will always return TCC_Free.
If the cost is more than TCC_BASIC, then the integer constant can't be folded
into the instruction and it might be beneficial to hoist the constant.
Similar constants are coalesced to reduce register pressure and
materialization code.
When a constant is hoisted, it is also hidden behind a bitcast to force it to
be live-out of the basic block. Otherwise the constant would be just
duplicated and each basic block would have its own copy in the SelectionDAG.
The SelectionDAG recognizes such constants as opaque and doesn't perform
certain transformations on them, which would create a new expensive constant.
This optimization is only applied to integer constants in instructions and
simple (this means not nested) constant cast experessions. For example:
%0 = load i64* inttoptr (i64 big_constant to i64*)
Reviewed by Eric
llvm-svn: 200022
This fixes a regression intruced by r199135.
Revision 199135 tried to simplify part of the logic in method
DAGCombiner::SimplifyVBinOp introducing calls to method BuildVectorSDNode::isConstant().
However, that revision wrongly changed the check performed by method
SimplifyVBinOp to identify dag nodes that can be folded.
Before revision 199135, that method only tried to simplify vector binary operations
if both operands were build_vector of Constant/ConstantFP/Undef only.
After revision 199135, method SimplifyVBinop tried to
simplify also vector binary operations with only one constant operand.
This fixes the problem restoring the old behavior of SimplifyVBinOp.
llvm-svn: 199328
This commit teaches DAG to reassociate vector ops, which in turn enables
constant folding of vector op chains that appear later on during custom lowering
and DAG combine.
Reviewed by Andrea Di Biagio
llvm-svn: 199135
At the moment we expect rotates to have the form:
(or (shl X, Y), (shr X, Z))
where Y == bitsize(X) - Z or Z == bitsize(X) - Y. This form means that
the (or ...) is undefined for Y == 0 or Z == 0. This undefinedness can
be avoided by using Y == (C * bitsize(X) - Z) & (bitsize(X) - 1) or
Z == (C * bitsize(X) - Y) & (bitsize(X) - 1) for any integer C
(including 0, the most natural choice).
llvm-svn: 198861
InstCombine converts (sub 32, (add X, C)) into (sub 32-C, X),
so a rotate left of a 32-bit Y by X+C could appear as either:
(or (shl Y, (add X, C)), (shr Y, (sub 32, (add X, C))))
without InstCombine or:
(or (shl Y, (add X, C)), (shr Y, (sub 32-C, X)))
with it.
We already matched the first form. This patch handles the second too.
llvm-svn: 198860
