Yes, there are other types than i8* and GEPs on them can produce an add+multiply.
We don't consider that cheap enough to be speculatively executed.
llvm-svn: 126481
function prototype into a call to a varargs prototype. We do
allow the xform if we have a definition, but otherwise we don't
want to risk that we're changing the abi in a subtle way. On
X86-64, for example, varargs require passing stuff in %al.
llvm-svn: 126363
We usually catch this kind of optimization through InstSimplify's distributive
magic, but or doesn't distribute over xor in general.
"A | ~(A | B) -> A | ~B" hits 24 times on gcc.c.
llvm-svn: 126081
constant, including globals. This makes us generate much more "pretty" pattern
globals as well because it doesn't break it down to an array of bytes all the
time.
This enables us to handle stores of relocatable globals. This kicks in about
48 times in 254.gap, giving us stuff like this:
@.memset_pattern40 = internal constant [2 x %struct.TypHeader* (%struct.TypHeader*, %struct.TypHeader*)*] [%struct.TypHeader* (%struct.TypHeader*, %struct
.TypHeader*)* @IsFalse, %struct.TypHeader* (%struct.TypHeader*, %struct.TypHeader*)* @IsFalse], align 16
...
call void @memset_pattern16(i8* %scevgep5859, i8* bitcast ([2 x %struct.TypHeader* (%struct.TypHeader*, %struct.TypHeader*)*]* @.memset_pattern40 to i8*
), i64 %tmp75) nounwind
llvm-svn: 126044
unsplatable values into memset_pattern16 when it is available
(recent darwins). This transforms lots of strided loop stores
of ints for example, like 5 in vpr:
Formed memset: call void @memset_pattern16(i8* %4, i8* getelementptr inbounds ([16 x i8]* @.memset_pattern9, i32 0, i32 0), i64 %tmp25)
from store to: {%3,+,4}<%11> at: store i32 3, i32* %scevgep, align 4, !tbaa !4
llvm-svn: 126040
taken (and used!). This prevents merging the blocks (invalidating
the block addresses) in a case like this:
#define _THIS_IP_ ({ __label__ __here; __here: (unsigned long)&&__here; })
void foo() {
printf("%p\n", _THIS_IP_);
printf("%p\n", _THIS_IP_);
printf("%p\n", _THIS_IP_);
}
which fixes PR4151.
llvm-svn: 125829
plus some variations of this. According to my auto-simplifier this occurs a lot
but usually in combination with max/min idioms. Because max/min aren't handled
yet this unfortunately doesn't have much effect in the testsuite.
llvm-svn: 125462
It caused a crash in MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet.
Opt hit an assertion with "opt -std-compile-opts" because
Constant::getAllOnesValue doesn't know how to handle floats.
This patch added a test to reproduce the problem and a check that the
destination vector is of integer type.
Thank you Benjamin!
llvm-svn: 125459
gep to explicit addressing, we know that none of the intermediate
computation overflows.
This could use review: it seems that the shifts certainly wouldn't
overflow, but could the intermediate adds overflow if there is a
negative index?
Previously the testcase would instcombine to:
define i1 @test(i64 %i) {
%p1.idx.mask = and i64 %i, 4611686018427387903
%cmp = icmp eq i64 %p1.idx.mask, 1000
ret i1 %cmp
}
now we get:
define i1 @test(i64 %i) {
%cmp = icmp eq i64 %i, 1000
ret i1 %cmp
}
llvm-svn: 125271
exact/nsw/nuw shifts and have instcombine infer them when it can prove
that the relevant properties are true for a given shift without them.
Also, a variety of refactoring to use the new patternmatch logic thrown
in for good luck. I believe that this takes care of a bunch of related
code quality issues attached to PR8862.
llvm-svn: 125267
optimizations to be much more aggressive in the face of
exact/nsw/nuw div and shifts. For example, these (which
are the same except the first is 'exact' sdiv:
define i1 @sdiv_icmp4_exact(i64 %X) nounwind {
%A = sdiv exact i64 %X, -5 ; X/-5 == 0 --> x == 0
%B = icmp eq i64 %A, 0
ret i1 %B
}
define i1 @sdiv_icmp4(i64 %X) nounwind {
%A = sdiv i64 %X, -5 ; X/-5 == 0 --> x == 0
%B = icmp eq i64 %A, 0
ret i1 %B
}
compile down to:
define i1 @sdiv_icmp4_exact(i64 %X) nounwind {
%1 = icmp eq i64 %X, 0
ret i1 %1
}
define i1 @sdiv_icmp4(i64 %X) nounwind {
%X.off = add i64 %X, 4
%1 = icmp ult i64 %X.off, 9
ret i1 %1
}
This happens when you do something like:
(ptr1-ptr2) == 42
where the pointers are pointers to non-unit types.
llvm-svn: 125266
could end up removing a different function than we intended because it was
functionally equivalent, then end up with a comparison of a function against
itself in the next round of comparisons (the one in the function set and the
one on the deferred list). To fix this, I introduce a choice in the form of
comparison for ComparableFunctions, either normal or "pointer only" used to
find exact Function*'s in lookups.
Also add some debugging statements.
llvm-svn: 125180
