The cause of the windows failures was fixed by r180791. Revert to the state
after Sabre's original revert.
Original message:
revert r179735, it has no testcases, and doesn't really make sense.
llvm-svn: 180844
The actual storage was already using unsigned, but the interface was using
uint64_t. This is wasteful on 32 bits and looks to be the root causes of
a miscompilation on Windows where a value was being sign extended to 64bits
to compare with the result of getSlotIndex.
Patch by Pasi Parviainen!
llvm-svn: 180791
This un-reverts r179735 and reverts commit r180574.
This fixes assertion failures for me locally and should fix the failures
on Windows reported widely on llvm-dev. We should check if the bots
caught this and if so why not.
llvm-svn: 180722
Semantics of parameters named Index and Idx were inconsistent between
"include/llvm/IR/Attributes.h", "lib/IR/AttributeImpl.h" and
"lib/IR/Attributes.cpp": sometimes these were fixed 1-based indexes of IR
parameters (or AttributeSet::ReturnIndex for IR return values or
AttributeSet::FunctionIndex for IR functions), other times they were the
internal slot for storage in the underlying AttributeSetImpl. I renamed usage of
the former to "Index" and usage of the latter to "Slot" ("Slot" was already
being used consistently for the latter in a subset of cases)
Patch by Stephen Lin!
llvm-svn: 179791
This was causing the folding set to fail to fold attributes, because it was
being calculated in one spot without an empty values string but here with an
empty values string.
llvm-svn: 176301
This emits the attribute groups that are used by the functions. (It currently
doesn't print out return type or parameter attributes within attribute groups.)
Note: The functions still retrieve their attributes from the "old" bitcode
format (using the deprecated 'Raw()' method). This means that string attributes
within an attribute group will not show up during a disassembly. This will be
addressed in a future commit.
llvm-svn: 174867
The stuff we're handing are all enums (Attribute::AttrKind), integers and
strings. Don't convert them to Constants, which is an unnecessary step here. The
rest of the changes are mostly mechanical.
llvm-svn: 174456
Use the AttributeSet's iterators in AttrBuilder::hasAttributes() when
determining of the intersection of the AttrBuilder and AttributeSet is non-null.
llvm-svn: 174250
The AttrBuilder is for building a collection of attributes. The Attribute object
holds only one attribute. So it's not really useful for the Attribute object to
have a creator which takes an AttrBuilder.
This has two fallouts:
1. The AttrBuilder no longer holds its internal attributes in a bit-mask form.
2. The attributes are now ordered alphabetically (hence why the tests have changed).
llvm-svn: 174110
The Attribute::hasAttributes() is kind of meaningless since an Attribute can
have only one attribute. And we would rather people use the 'operator=='
instead of Attribute::hasAttribute().
llvm-svn: 174026
The AttributeSetNode contains all of the attributes. This removes one (hopefully
last) use of the Attribute class as a container of multiple attributes.
llvm-svn: 173761
The AttributeWithIndex class exposed the interior structure of the AttributeSet
class. That was gross. Remove it and all of the code that relied upon it.
llvm-svn: 173722
We want to remove AttributeWithIndex because it provides a non-encapsulated view
of the AttributeSetImpl object. Instead, use accessor methods and iterators.
Eventually, this code can be simplified because the Attribute object will hold
only one attribute instead of multiple attributes.
llvm-svn: 173641
The 'getSlot' function and its ilk allow introspection into the AttributeSet
class. However, that class should be opaque. Allow access through accessor
methods instead.
llvm-svn: 173522
This is a helper class for the AttributeSetImpl class. It holds a set of
attributes that apply to a single element: function, return type, or
parameter.
These are uniqued.
llvm-svn: 173310
This is more code to isolate the use of the Attribute class to that of just
holding one attribute instead of a collection of attributes.
llvm-svn: 173094
This c'tor takes the AttributeSet class as the parameter. It will eventually
grab the attributes from the specified index and create a new attribute builder
with those attributes.
llvm-svn: 171712
The Attribute class is eventually going to represent one attribute. So we need
this class to create the set of attributes. Add some iterator methods to the
builder to access its internal bits in a nice way.
llvm-svn: 171586
* Remove dead methods.
* Use the 'operator==' method instead of 'contains', which isn't needed.
* Fix some comments.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 171523
before the last time.
--- Reverse-merging r171442 into '.':
U include/llvm/IR/Attributes.h
U lib/IR/Attributes.cpp
U lib/IR/AttributeImpl.h
llvm-svn: 171448
The 'operator==' method is a bit clearer and much less verbose for somethings
that should have only one value. Remove from the AttrBuilder for consistency.
llvm-svn: 171442
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
llvm-svn: 171366
Aside from moving the actual files, this patch only updates the build
system and the source file comments under lib/... that are relevant.
I'll be updating other docs and other files in smaller subsequnet
commits.
While I've tried to test this, but it is entirely possible that there
will still be some build system fallout.
Also, note that I've not changed the library name itself: libLLVMCore.a
is still the library name. I'd be interested in others' opinions about
whether we should rename this as well (I think we should, just not sure
what it might break)
llvm-svn: 171359
