Edit for voice, and also add examples. In particular, add an
explanation for why you might want to specialize IntrusiveRefCntPtrInfo,
which is not obvious.
llvm-svn: 290720
Summary:
This class is unnecessary.
Its comment indicated that it was a compile error to allocate an
instance of a class that inherits from RefCountedBaseVPTR on the stack.
This may have been true at one point, but it's not today.
Moreover you really do not want to allocate *any* refcounted object on
the stack, vptrs or not, so if we did have a way to prevent these
objects from being stack-allocated, we'd want to apply it to regular
RefCountedBase too, obviating the need for a separate RefCountedBaseVPTR
class.
It seems that the main way RefCountedBaseVPTR provides safety is by
making its subclass's destructor virtual. This may have been helpful at
one point, but these days clang will emit an error if you define a class
with virtual functions that inherits from RefCountedBase but doesn't
have a virtual destructor.
Reviewers: compnerd, dblaikie
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28162
llvm-svn: 290717
Summary: Previously we type-punned through a union, which is not safe.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28161
llvm-svn: 290715
This reverts commit r290694. It broke sanitizer tests on Win64. I'll
probably bring this back, but the jump tables will just live in .text
like they do for MSVC.
llvm-svn: 290714
This change adds a new intrinsic which is intended to provide memcpy functionality
with additional atomicity guarantees. Please refer to the review thread
or language reference for further details.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27133
llvm-svn: 290708
Apparently GCC targeting Windows breaks bitfields on static data members:
struct Foo {
unsigned X : 16;
static const int M = 42;
unsigned Y : 16;
};
static_assert(sizeof(Foo) == 4, "asdf"); // fails
Who knew.
llvm-svn: 290700
Summary:
Follow-up to r290691, where I introduced HasLLVMReservedName. rnk
pointed out that that patch added an extra word to GlobalValue on MSVC,
because it doesn't pack bitfields with different types.
This patch moves HasLLVMReservedName into the existing bitfield, where
we appear to have plenty of bits to spare.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28149
llvm-svn: 290696
Summary:
We were already using 32-bit jump table entries, but this was a
consequence of the default PIC model on Win64, and not an intentional
design decision. This patch ensures that we always use 32-bit label
difference jump table entries on Win64 regardless of the PIC model. This
is a good idea because it saves executable size and object file size.
Moving the jump tables to .rdata cleans up the disassembled object code
and reduces the available ROP targets, but it requires adding one more
RIP-relative lea to the code. COFF doesn't have relocations to express
the difference between two arbitrary symbols, so we can't use the jump
table label in the label difference like we do elsewhere.
Fixes PR31488
Reviewers: majnemer, compnerd
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28141
llvm-svn: 290694
The Bitstream reader and writer are limited to handle a "size_t" at
most, which means that we can't backpatch and read back a 64bits
value on 32 bits platform.
llvm-svn: 290693
Summary:
Previously isIntrinsic() called getName(). This involves a hashtable
lookup, so is nontrivially expensive. And isIntrinsic() is called
frequently, particularly by dyn_cast<IntrinsicInstr>.
This patch steals a bit of IntID and uses that to store whether or not
getName() starts with "llvm."
Reviewers: bogner, arsenm, joker-eph
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22949
llvm-svn: 290691
This index record the position for each metadata record in
the bitcode, so that the reader will be able to lazy-load
on demand each individual record.
We also make sure that every abbrev is emitted upfront so
that the block can be skipped while reading.
I don't plan to commit this before having the reader
counterpart, but I figured this can be reviewed mostly
independently.
Recommit r290684 (was reverted in r290686 because a test
was broken) after adding a threshold to avoid emitting
the index when unnecessary (little amount of metadata).
This optimization "hides" a limitation of the ability
to backpatch in the bitstream: we can only backpatch
safely when the position has been flushed. So if we emit
an index for one metadata, it is possible that (part of)
the offset placeholder hasn't been flushed and the backpatch
will fail.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28083
llvm-svn: 290690
Summary:
This index record the position for each metadata record in
the bitcode, so that the reader will be able to lazy-load
on demand each individual record.
We also make sure that every abbrev is emitted upfront so
that the block can be skipped while reading.
I don't plan to commit this before having the reader
counterpart, but I figured this can be reviewed mostly
independently.
Reviewers: pcc, tejohnson
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28083
llvm-svn: 290684
This is an orthogonal and separated layer instead of being embedded
inside the pass manager. While it adds a small amount of complexity, it
is fairly minimal and the composability and control seems worth the
cost.
The logic for this ends up being nicely isolated and targeted. It should
be easy to experiment with different iteration strategies wrapped around
the CGSCC bottom-up walk using this kind of facility.
The mechanism used to track devirtualization is the simplest one I came
up with. I think it handles most of the cases the existing iteration
machinery handles, but I haven't done a *very* in depth analysis. It
does however match the basic intended semantics, and we can tweak or
tune its exact behavior incrementally as necessary. One thing that we
may want to revisit is freshly building the value handle set on each
iteration. While I don't think this will be a significant cost (it is
strictly fewer value handles but more churn of value handes than the old
call graph), it is conceivable that we'll want a somewhat more clever
tracking mechanism. My hope is to layer that on as a follow up patch
with data supporting any implementation complexity it adds.
This code also provides for a basic count heuristic: if the number of
indirect calls decreases and the number of direct calls increases for
a given function in the SCC, we assume devirtualization is responsible.
This matches the heuristics currently used in the legacy pass manager.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23114
llvm-svn: 290665
analyses when we're about to break apart an SCC.
We can't wait until after breaking apart the SCC to invalidate things:
1) Which SCC do we then invalidate? All of them?
2) Even if we invalidate all of them, a newly created SCC may not have
a proxy that will convey the invalidation to functions!
Previously we only invalidated one of the SCCs and too late. This led to
stale analyses remaining in the cache. And because the caching strategy
actually works, they would get used and chaos would ensue.
Doing invalidation early is somewhat pessimizing though if we *know*
that the SCC structure won't change. So it turns out that the design to
make the mutation API force the caller to know the *kind* of mutation in
advance was indeed 100% correct and we didn't do enough of it. So this
change also splits two cases of switching a call edge to a ref edge into
two separate APIs so that callers can clearly test for this and take the
easy path without invalidating when appropriate. This is particularly
important in this case as we expect most inlines to be between functions
in separate SCCs and so the common case is that we don't have to so
aggressively invalidate analyses.
The LCG API change in turn needed some basic cleanups and better testing
in its unittest. No interesting functionality changed there other than
more coverage of the returned sequence of SCCs.
While this seems like an obvious improvement over the current state, I'd
like to revisit the core concept of invalidating within the CG-update
layer at all. I'm wondering if we would be better served forcing the
callers to handle the invalidation beforehand in the cases that they
can handle it. An interesting example is when we want to teach the
inliner to *update and preserve* analyses. But we can cross that bridge
when we get there.
With this patch, the new pass manager an build all of the LLVM test
suite at -O3 and everything passes. =D I haven't bootstrapped yet and
I'm sure there are still plenty of bugs, but this gives a nice baseline
so I'm going to increasingly focus on fleshing out the missing
functionality, especially the bits that are just turned off right now in
order to let us establish this baseline.
llvm-svn: 290664
There are cases of AVX-512 instructions that have two possible encodings. This is the case with instructions that use vector registers with low indexes of 0 - 15 and do not use the zmm registers or the mask k registers.
The EVEX encoding prefix requires 4 bytes whereas the VEX prefix can take only up to 3 bytes. Consequently, using the VEX encoding for these instructions results in a code size reduction of ~2 bytes even though it is compiled with the AVX-512 features enabled.
Reviewers: Craig Topper, Zvi Rackoover, Elena Demikhovsky
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27901
llvm-svn: 290663
This requires custom handling because BasicAA caches handles to other
analyses and so it needs to trigger indirect invalidation.
This fixes one of the common crashes when using the new PM in real
pipelines. I've also tweaked a regression test to check that we are at
least handling the most immediate case.
I'm going to work at re-structuring this test some to both scale better
(rather than all being in one file) and check more invalidation paths in
a follow-up commit, but I wanted to get the basic bug fix in place.
llvm-svn: 290603
inter-analysis dependencies) to use the new invalidation infrastructure.
This teaches it to invalidate itself when any of the peer function
AA results that it uses become invalid. We do this by just tracking the
originating IDs. I've kept it in a somewhat clunky API since some users
of AAResults are outside the new PM right now. We can clean this API up
if/when those users go away.
Secondly, it uses the registration on the outer analysis manager proxy
to trigger deferred invalidation when a module analysis result becomes
invalid.
I've included test cases that specifically try to trigger use-after-free
in both of these cases and they would crash or hang pretty horribly for
me even without ASan. Now they work nicely.
The `InvalidateAnalysis` utility pass required some tweaking to be
useful in this context and it still is pretty garbage. I'd like to
switch it back to the previous implementation and teach the explicit
invalidate method on the AnalysisManager to take care of correctly
triggering indirect invalidation, but I wanted to go ahead and send this
out so folks could see how all of this stuff works together in practice.
And, you know, that it does actually work. =]
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27205
llvm-svn: 290595
that require deferred invalidation.
This handles the other real-world invalidation scenario that we have
cases of: a function analysis which caches references to a module
analysis. We currently do this in the AA aggregation layer and might
well do this in other places as well.
Since this is relative rare, the technique is somewhat more cumbersome.
Analyses need to register themselves when accessing the outer analysis
manager's proxy. This proxy is already necessarily present to allow
access to the outer IR unit's analyses. By registering here we can track
and trigger invalidation when that outer analysis goes away.
To make this work we need to enhance the PreservedAnalyses
infrastructure to support a (slightly) more explicit model for "sets" of
analyses, and allow abandoning a single specific analyses even when
a set covering that analysis is preserved. That allows us to describe
the scenario of preserving all Function analyses *except* for the one
where deferred invalidation has triggered.
We also need to teach the invalidator API to support direct ID calls
instead of always going through a template to dispatch so that we can
just record the ID mapping.
I've introduced testing of all of this both for simple module<->function
cases as well as for more complex cases involving a CGSCC layer.
Much like the previous patch I've not tried to fully update the loop
pass management layer because that layer is due to be heavily reworked
to use similar techniques to the CGSCC to handle updates. As that
happens, we'll have a better testing basis for adding support like this.
Many thanks to both Justin and Sean for the extensive reviews on this to
help bring the API design and documentation into a better state.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27198
llvm-svn: 290594
constant expression and to correctly form function reference edges
through them without crashing because one of the operands (the
`BasicBlock` isn't actually a constant despite being an operand of
a constant).
llvm-svn: 290581
The 128 and 256 bit masked intrinsics are currently unused by clang. The sse and avx2 unmasked intrinsics are used instead. The new 512-bit intrinsic will be used to do the same. Then all masked versions will removed and autoupgraded.
llvm-svn: 290573
removing fully-dead comdats without removing dead entries in comdats
with live members.
This factors the core logic out of the current inliner's internals to
a reusable utility and leverages that in both places. The factored out
code should also be (minorly) more efficient in cases where we have very
few dead functions or dead comdats to consider.
I've added a test case to cover this behavior of the always inliner.
This is the last significant bug in the new PM's always inliner I've
found (so far).
llvm-svn: 290557
Mostly use a bit more idiomatic C++ where we can,
so we can combine some things later.
Reviewers: davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28111
llvm-svn: 290550
This recommits r290512 that was reverted when MSVC failed to compile it. Since
then I've played with various approaches using rextester.com (where I was able
to reproduce the failure) and think that I have a solution thanks in part to
the help of Dave Blaikie! It seems MSVC just has a defective `decltype` in this
version. Manually writing out the type seems to do the trick, even though it is
.... quite complicated.
Original commit message:
This allows both defining convenience iterator/range accessors on types
which walk across N different independent ranges within the object, and
more direct and simple usages with range based for loops such as shown
in the unittest. The same facilities are used for both. They end up
quite small and simple as it happens.
I've also switched an iterator on `Module` to use this. I would like to
add another convenience iterator that includes even more sequences as
part of it and seeing this one already present motivated me to actually
abstract it away and introduce a general utility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28093
llvm-svn: 290528
multiple asynchronous RPC calls.
ParallelCallGroup allows multiple asynchronous calls to be dispatched,
and provides a wait method that blocks until all asynchronous calls have
been executed on the remote and all return value handlers run on the
local machine.
This will allow, for example, the JIT client to issue memory allocation calls
for all sections in parallel, then block until all memory has been allocated
on the remote and the allocated addresses registered with the client, at which
point the JIT client can proceed to applying relocations.
llvm-svn: 290523
This code doesn't work on MSVC for reasons that elude me and I've not
yet covinced a workaround to compile cleanly so reverting for now while
I play with it.
llvm-svn: 290513
This allows both defining convenience iterator/range accessors on types
which walk across N different independent ranges within the object, and
more direct and simple usages with range based for loops such as shown
in the unittest. The same facilities are used for both. They end up
quite small and simple as it happens.
I've also switched an iterator on `Module` to use this. I would like to
add another convenience iterator that includes even more sequences as
part of it and seeing this one already present motivated me to actually
abstract it away and introduce a general utility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28093
llvm-svn: 290512
