Did you know that 0 is a shifted mask? But 0x0000ff00 and 0x000000ff aren't? At least we get 0xff000000 right.
I only see one usage of this function in the code base today and its in InstCombine. I think its protected against 0 being misreported as a mask. I guess we just don't have tests for the missed cases.
llvm-svn: 299187
StringMap's iterators did not support LLVM's
iterator_facade_base, which made it unusable in various
STL algorithms or with some of our range adapters.
This patch makes both StringMapConstIterator as well as
StringMapIterator support iterator_facade_base.
With this in place, it is easy to make an iterator adapter
that iterates over only keys, and whose value_type is
StringRef. So I add StringMapKeyIterator as well, and
provide the method StringMap::keys() that returns a
range that can be iterated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31171
llvm-svn: 298436
There were some issues in the implementation of enumerate()
preventing it from being used in various contexts. These were
all related to the fact that it did not supporter llvm's
iterator_facade_base class. So this patch adds support for that
and additionally exposes a new helper method to_vector() that
will evaluate an entire range and store the results in a
vector.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30853
llvm-svn: 297633
We currently have to insert bits via a temporary variable of the same size as the target with various shift/mask stages, resulting in further temporary variables, all of which require the allocation of memory for large APInts (MaskSizeInBits > 64).
This is another of the compile time issues identified in PR32037 (see also D30265).
This patch adds the APInt::insertBits() helper method which avoids the temporary memory allocation and masks/inserts the raw bits directly into the target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30780
llvm-svn: 297458
Summary:
Similar to SmallPtrSet, this makes find and count work with both const
referneces and const pointers.
Reviewers: dblaikie
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30713
llvm-svn: 297424
Fix SmallPtrSet::iterator behaviour and creation ReverseIterate is true.
- Any function that creates an iterator now uses
SmallPtrSet::makeIterator, which creates an iterator that
dereferences to the given pointer.
- In reverse-iterate mode, initialze iterator::End with "CurArray"
instead of EndPointer.
- In reverse-iterate mode, the current node is iterator::Buffer[-1].
iterator::operator* and SmallPtrSet::makeIterator are the only ones
that need to know.
- Fix the assertions for reverse-iterate mode.
This fixes the tests Danny B added in r297182, and adds a couple of
others to confirm that dereferencing does the right thing, regardless of
how the iterator was found, and that iteration works correctly from each
return from find.
llvm-svn: 297234
This extends an earlier change that did similar for add and sub operations.
With this first patch we lose the fastpath for the single word case as operator&= and friends don't support it. This can be added there if we think that's important.
I had to change some functions in the APInt class since the operator overloads were moved out of the class and can't be used inside the class now. The getBitsSet change collides with another outstanding patch to implement it with setBits. But I didn't want to make this patch dependent on that series.
I've also removed the Or, And, Xor functions which were rarely or never used. I already commited two changes to remove the only uses of Or that existed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30612
llvm-svn: 297121
We currently have methods to set a specified number of low bits, a specified number of high bits, or a range of bits. But looking at some existing code it seems sometimes we want to set the high bits starting from a certain bit. Currently we do this with something like getHighBits(BitWidth, BitWidth - StartBit). Or once we start switching to setHighBits, setHighBits(BitWidth - StartBit) or setHighBits(getBitWidth() - StartBit).
Particularly for the latter case it would be better to have a convenience method like setBitsFrom(StartBit) so we don't need to mention the bit width that's already known to the APInt object.
I considered just making setBits have a default value of UINT_MAX for the hiBit argument and we would internally MIN it with the bit width. So if it wasn't specified it would be treated as bit width. This would require removing the assertion we currently have on the value of hiBit and may not be as readable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30602
llvm-svn: 297114
This patch implements getLowBitsSet/getHighBitsSet/getBitsSet in terms of the new setLowBits/setHighBits/setBits methods by making an all 0s APInt and then calling the appropriate set method.
This also adds support to setBits to allow loBits/hiBits to be in the other order to match with getBitsSet behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30563
llvm-svn: 297112
Summary:
There are quite a few places in the code base that do something like the following to set the high or low bits in an APInt.
KnownZero |= APInt::getHighBitsSet(BitWidth, BitWidth - 1);
For BitWidths larger than 64 this creates a short lived APInt with malloced storage. I think it might even call malloc twice. Its better to just provide methods that can set the necessary bits without the temporary APInt.
I'll update usages that benefit in a separate patch.
Reviewers: majnemer, MatzeB, davide, RKSimon, hans
Reviewed By: hans
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30525
llvm-svn: 297111
Summary:
This makes operator~ take the APInt by value so if it came from a temporary APInt the move constructor will get invoked and it will be able to reuse the memory allocation from the temporary.
This is similar to what was already done for 2s complement negation.
Reviewers: hans, davide, RKSimon
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30614
llvm-svn: 296997
The current pattern for extract bits in range is typically:
Mask.lshr(BitOffset).trunc(SubSizeInBits);
Which can be particularly slow for large APInts (MaskSizeInBits > 64) as they require the allocation of memory for the temporary variable.
This is another of the compile time issues identified in PR32037 (see also D30265).
This patch adds the APInt::extractBits() helper method which avoids the temporary memory allocation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30336
llvm-svn: 296272
The current pattern for extract bits in range is typically:
Mask.lshr(BitOffset).trunc(SubSizeInBits);
Which can be particularly slow for large APInts (MaskSizeInBits > 64) as they require the allocation of memory for the temporary variable.
This is another of the compile time issues identified in PR32037 (see also D30265).
This patch adds the APInt::extractBits() helper method which avoids the temporary memory allocation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30336
llvm-svn: 296147
The current pattern for extract bits in range is typically:
Mask.lshr(BitOffset).trunc(SubSizeInBits);
Which can be particularly slow for large APInts (MaskSizeInBits > 64) as they require the allocation of memory for the temporary variable.
This is another of the compile time issues identified in PR32037 (see also D30265).
This patch adds the APInt::extractBits() helper method which avoids the temporary memory allocation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30336
llvm-svn: 296141
The current pattern for setting bits in range is typically:
Mask |= APInt::getBitsSet(MaskSizeInBits, LoPos, HiPos);
Which can be particularly slow for large APInts (MaskSizeInBits > 64) as they require the allocation memory for the temporary variable.
This is one of the key compile time issues identified in PR32037.
This patch adds the APInt::setBits() helper method which avoids the temporary memory allocation completely, this first implementation uses setBit() internally instead but already significantly reduces the regression in PR32037 (~10% drop). Additional optimization may be possible.
I investigated whether there is need for APInt::clearBits() and APInt::flipBits() equivalents but haven't seen these patterns to be particularly common, but reusing the code would be trivial.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30265
llvm-svn: 296102
This commit provides `zip_{first,shortest}` with the standard member types and
methods expected of iterators (e.g., `difference_type`), in order for zip to be
used with other adaptors, such as `make_filter_range`.
Support for reverse iteration has also been added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30246
llvm-svn: 296036
Add explicit conversions between forward and reverse ilist iterators.
These follow the conversion conventions of std::reverse_iterator, which
are off-by-one: the newly-constructed "reverse" iterator dereferences to
the previous node of the one sent in. This has the benefit of
converting reverse ranges in place:
- If [I, E) is a valid range,
- then [reverse(E), reverse(I)) gives the same range in reverse order.
ilist_iterator::getReverse() is unchanged: it returns a reverse iterator
to the *same* node.
llvm-svn: 294349
Summary: As per title. I ran into that limitation of the API doing some other work, so I though that'd be a nice addition.
Reviewers: jroelofs, compnerd, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29503
llvm-svn: 294063
Summary:
This seemed to be an oversight seeing as DenseMap has these conversions.
This patch does the following:
- Adds a default constructor to the iterators.
- Allows DenseSet::ConstIterators to be copy constructed from DenseSet::Iterators
- Allows mutual comparison between Iterators and ConstIterators.
All of these are available in the DenseMap implementation, so the implementation here is trivial.
Reviewers: dblaikie, dberris
Reviewed By: dberris
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28999
llvm-svn: 292879
Summary:
There's a comment in XorSlowCase that says "0^0==1" which isn't true. 0 xored with 0 is still 0. So I don't think we need to clear any unused bits here.
Now there is no difference between XorSlowCase and AndSlowCase/OrSlowCase other than the operation being performed
Reviewers: majnemer, MatzeB, chandlerc, bkramer
Reviewed By: MatzeB
Subscribers: chfast, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28986
llvm-svn: 292873
Summary:
This patch changes the layout of DoubleAPFloat, and adjust all
operations to do either:
1) (IEEEdouble, IEEEdouble) -> (uint64_t, uint64_t) -> PPCDoubleDoubleImpl,
then run the old algorithm.
2) Do the right thing directly.
1) includes multiply, divide, remainder, mod, fusedMultiplyAdd, roundToIntegral,
convertFromString, next, convertToInteger, convertFromAPInt,
convertFromSignExtendedInteger, convertFromZeroExtendedInteger,
convertToHexString, toString, getExactInverse.
2) includes makeZero, makeLargest, makeSmallest, makeSmallestNormalized,
compare, bitwiseIsEqual, bitcastToAPInt, isDenormal, isSmallest,
isLargest, isInteger, ilogb, scalbn, frexp, hash_value, Profile.
I could split this into two patches, e.g. use
1) for all operatoins first, then incrementally change some of them to
2). I didn't do that, because 1) involves code that converts data between
PPCDoubleDoubleImpl and (IEEEdouble, IEEEdouble) back and forth, and may
pessimize the compiler. Instead, I find easy functions and use
approach 2) for them directly.
Next step is to implement move multiply and divide from 1) to 2). I don't
have plans for other functions in 1).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27872
llvm-svn: 292839
