As far as I can tell UTF-8 has been supported since the beginning of Python's
codec support, and it's the de facto standard for text these days, at least
for primarily-English text. This allows us to put Unicode into lit RUN lines.
rdar://problem/18311663
llvm-svn: 217688
parsing (and latent bug in the instruction definitions).
This is effectively a revert of r136287 which tried to address
a specific and narrow case of immediate operands failing to be accepted
by x86 instructions with a pretty heavy hammer: it introduced a new kind
of operand that behaved differently. All of that is removed with this
commit, but the test cases are both preserved and enhanced.
The core problem that r136287 and this commit are trying to handle is
that gas accepts both of the following instructions:
insertps $192, %xmm0, %xmm1
insertps $-64, %xmm0, %xmm1
These will encode to the same byte sequence, with the immediate
occupying an 8-bit entry. The first form was fixed by r136287 but that
broke the prior handling of the second form! =[ Ironically, we would
still emit the second form in some cases and then be unable to
re-assemble the output.
The reason why the first instruction failed to be handled is because
prior to r136287 the operands ere marked 'i32i8imm' which forces them to
be sign-extenable. Clearly, that won't work for 192 in a single byte.
However, making thim zero-extended or "unsigned" doesn't really address
the core issue either because it breaks negative immediates. The correct
fix is to make these operands 'i8imm' reflecting that they can be either
signed or unsigned but must be 8-bit immediates. This patch backs out
r136287 and then changes those places as well as some others to use
'i8imm' rather than one of the extended variants.
Naturally, this broke something else. The custom DAG nodes had to be
updated to have a much more accurate type constraint of an i8 node, and
a bunch of Pat immediates needed to be specified as i8 values.
The fallout didn't end there though. We also then ceased to be able to
match the instruction-specific intrinsics to the instructions so
modified. Digging, this is because they too used i32 rather than i8 in
their signature. So I've also switched those intrinsics to i8 arguments
in line with the instructions.
In order to make the intrinsic adjustments of course, I also had to add
auto upgrading for the intrinsics.
I suspect that the intrinsic argument types may have led everything down
this rabbit hole. Pretty happy with the result.
llvm-svn: 217310
This is the final round of renaming. This changes tblgen to emit lower-case
function names for FastEmitInst_* and FastEmit_*, and updates all its uses
in the source code.
Reviewed by Eric
llvm-svn: 217075
This removes static initializers from the backends which generate this data, and also makes this struct match the other Tablegen generated structs in behaviour
Reviewed by Andy Trick and Chandler C
llvm-svn: 216919
This patch adds a new property: isInsertSubreg and the related target hooks:
TargetIntrInfo::getInsertSubregInputs and
TargetInstrInfo::getInsertSubregLikeInputs to specify that a target specific
instruction is a (kind of) INSERT_SUBREG.
The approach is similar to r215394.
<rdar://problem/12702965>
llvm-svn: 216139
This patch adds a new property: isExtractSubreg and the related target hooks:
TargetIntrInfo::getExtractSubregInputs and
TargetInstrInfo::getExtractSubregLikeInputs to specify that a target specific
instruction is a (kind of) EXTRACT_SUBREG.
The approach is similar to r215394.
<rdar://problem/12702965>
llvm-svn: 216130
Implement `uselistorder` and `uselistorder_bb` assembly directives,
which allow the use-list order to be recovered when round-tripping to
assembly.
This is the bulk of PR20515.
llvm-svn: 216025
ARM in particular is getting dangerously close to exceeding 32 bits worth of
possible subtarget features. When this happens, various parts of MC start to
fail inexplicably as masks get truncated to "unsigned".
Mostly just refactoring at present, and there's probably no way to test.
llvm-svn: 215887
Summary:
This patch changes the way xfail and unsupported tests are displayed.
This output is only displayed when the --show-unsupported/--show-xfail flags are passed to lit.
Currently xfail/unsupported tests are printed during the run of the test-suite. I think its better to display this information during the summary instead.
This patch removes the printing of these tests from when they are run to the summary.
Reviewers: ddunbar, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4842
llvm-svn: 215809
Add header guards to files that were missing guards. Remove #endif comments
as they don't seem common in LLVM (we can easily add them back if we decide
they're useful)
Changes made by clang-tidy with minor tweaks.
llvm-svn: 215558
Especially with blends and large tree heights there was a problem with
the fuzzer where it would end up with enough undef shuffle elements in
enough parts of the tree that in a birthday-attack kind of way we ended
up regularly having large numbers of undef elements in the result. I was
seeing reasonably frequent cases of *all* results being undef which
prevents us from doing any correctness checking at all. While having
undef lanes is important, this was too much.
So I've tried to apply some math to the probabilities of having an undef
lane and balance them against the tree height. Please be gentle, I'm
really terrible at math. I probably made a bunch of amateur mistakes
here. Fixes, etc. are quite welcome. =D At least in running it some, it
seems to be producing more interesting (for correctness testing)
results.
llvm-svn: 215540
a tree of inputs to blend iteratively together.
This required a pretty substantial rewrite of the innards. The number of
shuffle instructions is now bounded in terms of tree-height. There is
a flag to disable blends so that its still possible to test single input
shuffles. I've also improved various aspects of how the test program is
generated, primarily to simplify the test harness and allow some
optimizations to clean up how we actually check the results and build up
the inputs.
Again, apologies for my likely horrible use of Python... But hey, it
works! (Ish?)
llvm-svn: 215530
This patch adds a new property: isRegSequence and the related target hooks:
TargetIntrInfo::getRegSequenceInputs and
TargetInstrInfo::getRegSequenceLikeInputs to specify that a target specific
instruction is a (kind of) REG_SEQUENCE.
<rdar://problem/12702965>
llvm-svn: 215394
be deleted. This will be reapplied as soon as possible and before
the 3.6 branch date at any rate.
Approved by Jim Grosbach, Lang Hames, Rafael Espindola.
This reverts commits r215111, 215115, 215116, 215117, 215136.
llvm-svn: 215154
Currently FileCheck errors out on empty input. This is usually the
right thing to do, but makes testing things like "this command does
not emit some error message" hard to test. This usually leads to
people using "command 2>&1 | count 0" instead, and then the bots that
use guard malloc fail a few hours later.
By adding a flag to FileCheck that allows empty inputs, we can make
tests that consist entirely of "CHECK-NOT" lines feasible.
llvm-svn: 215127
I am sure we will be finding bits and pieces of dead code for years to
come, but this is a good start.
Thanks to Lang Hames for making MCJIT a good replacement!
llvm-svn: 215111
within a single bit-width of vectors. This is particularly useful for
when you know you have bugs in a certain area and want to find simpler
test cases than those produced by an open-ended fuzzing that ends up
legalizing the vector in addition to shuffling it.
llvm-svn: 215056
This is a python script which for a given seed generates a random
sequence of random shuffles of a random vector width. It embeds this
into a function and emits a main function which calls the test routine
and checks that the results (where defined) match the obvious results.
I'll be using this to drive out miscompiles from the new vector shuffle
logic now that it is clean of any crashes I can find with llvm-stress.
Note, my python skills are very poor. Sorry if this is terrible code,
and feel free to tell me how I should write this or just patch it as
necessary.
The tests generated try to be very portable and use boring C routines.
It technically will mis-declare the C routines and pass 32-bit integers
to parametrs that expect 64-bit integers. If someone wants to fix this
and has less terrible ideas of how to do it, I'm all ears. Fortunately,
this "just works" for x86. =]
llvm-svn: 215054
