This was checking for a variety of situations that should
never happen. This saves a tiny bit of compile time.
We should not be selecting instructions with invalid operands in the
first place. Most of the time for registers copys are inserted
to the correct operand register class.
For VOP3, since all operand types are supported and literal
constants never are, we just need to verify the constant bus
requirements (all immediates should be legal inline ones).
The only possibly tricky case to maybe worry about is if when
legalizing operands in moveToVALU with s_add_i32 and similar
instructions. If the original s_add_i32 had a literal constant
and we need to replace it with v_add_i32_e64 we would have an
unsupported literal operand. However, I don't think we should worry
about that because SIFoldOperands should handle folding literal
constant operands into the SALU instructions based on the uses.
At SIFoldOperands time, the legality and profitability of
operand types is a bit different.
llvm-svn: 250951
to prevent setting a huge stride, because DATA_FORMAT has a different
meaning if ADD_TID_ENABLE is set.
This is a candidate for stable llvm 3.7.
Tested-and-Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 248858
It's easier to understand creating a full instruction
than the current situation where sometimes a new
instruction is created and sometimes it is awkwardly
mutated in place.
llvm-svn: 248627
There is no context where s_mov_b64 is emitted
and could potentially be moved to the VALU.
It is currently only emitted for materializing
immediates, which can't be dependent on vector sources.
The immediate splitting is already done when selecting
constants. I'm not sure what contexts if any the register
splitting would have been used before.
Also clean up using s_mov_b64 in place of v_mov_b64_pseudo,
although this isn't required and just skips the extra step
of eliminating the copy from the SReg_64.
llvm-svn: 246080
When splitting 64-bit operations, create the correct
VALU instructions immediately.
This was splitting things like s_or_b64 into the two
s_or_b32s and then pushing the new instructions
onto the worklist. There's no reason we need
to do this intermediate step.
llvm-svn: 246077
This commit fixes a bug in the class 'SIInstrInfo' where the implicit register
machine operands were added to a machine instruction in an incorrect order -
the implicit uses were added before the implicit defs.
I found this bug while working on moving the implicit register operand
verification code from the MIR parser to the machine verifier.
This commit also makes the method 'addImplicitDefUseOperands' in the machine
instruction class public so that it can be reused in the 'SIInstrInfo' class.
Reviewers: Matt Arsenault
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11689
llvm-svn: 243799
Summary:
This function is never called. isReallyTriviallyReMaterializable() is
the function that should be implemented instead.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11620
llvm-svn: 243651
The two-address instruction pass will convert these back to v_mad_f32
if necessary.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11060
llvm-svn: 242038
If pseudoToMCOpcode failed, we would return the original opcode, so operands
would be swapped, but the instruction would remain the same.
It resulted in LSHLREV a, b ---> LSHLREV b, a.
This fixes Glamor text rendering and
piglit/arb_sample_shading-builtin-gl-sample-mask on VI.
This is a candidate for stable branches.
v2: the test was simplified by Tom Stellard
llvm-svn: 240824
Summary:
TargetInstrInfo::getLdStBaseRegImmOfs to
TargetInstrInfo::getMemOpBaseRegImmOfs and implement for x86. The
implementation only handles a few easy cases now and will be made more
sophisticated in the future.
This is NFCI: the only user of `getLdStBaseRegImmOfs` (now
`getmemOpBaseRegImmOfs`) is `LoadClusterMotion` and `LoadClusterMotion`
is disabled for x86.
Reviewers: reames, ab, MatzeB, atrick
Reviewed By: MatzeB, atrick
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10199
llvm-svn: 239741
