Fix a crash in `InstCombiner::Descale()` when a multiply-by-zero gets
created as an argument to a GEP partway through an iteration, causing
-instcombine to optimize the GEP before the multiply.
rdar://problem/17615671
llvm-svn: 212742
isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute can optionally take a DataLayout pointer. In the
past, this was mainly used to make better decisions regarding divisions known
not to trap, and so was not all that important for users concerned with "cheap"
instructions. However, now it also helps look through bitcasts for
dereferencable loads, and will also be important if/when we add a
dereferencable pointer attribute.
This is some initial work to feed a DataLayout pointer through to callers of
isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute, generally where one was already available.
llvm-svn: 212720
In PR20059 ( http://llvm.org/pr20059 ), instcombine eliminates shuffles that are necessary before performing an operation that can trap (srem).
This patch calls isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute() and bails out of the optimization in SimplifyVectorOp() if needed.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4424
llvm-svn: 212629
* Find factorization opportunities using identity values.
* Find factorization opportunities by treating shl(X, C) as mul (X, shl(C))
* Keep NSW flag while simplifying instruction using factorization.
This fixes PR19263.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3799
llvm-svn: 211261
original fix would actually trigger the *exact* same crasher as the
original bug for a different reason. Awesomesauce.
Working on test cases now, but wanted to get bots healthier.
llvm-svn: 209860
across PHI nodes. The code was computing the Idxs from the 'GEP'
variable's indices when what it wanted was Op1's indices. This caused an
ASan heap-overflow for me that pin pointed the issue when Op1 had more
indices than GEP did. =] I'll let Louis add a specific test case for
this if he wants.
llvm-svn: 209857
Currently LLVM will generally merge GEPs. This allows backends to use more
complex addressing modes. In some cases this is not happening because there
is PHI inbetween the two GEPs:
GEP1--\
|-->PHI1-->GEP3
GEP2--/
This patch checks to see if GEP1 and GEP2 are similiar enough that they can be
cloned (GEP12) in GEP3's BB, allowing GEP->GEP merging (GEP123):
GEP1--\ --\ --\
|-->PHI1-->GEP3 ==> |-->PHI2->GEP12->GEP3 == > |-->PHI2->GEP123
GEP2--/ --/ --/
This also breaks certain use chains that are preventing GEP->GEP merges that the
the existing instcombine would merge otherwise.
Tests included.
llvm-svn: 209843
Currently LLVM will generally merge GEPs. This allows backends to use more
complex addressing modes. In some cases this is not happening because there
is PHI inbetween the two GEPs:
GEP1--\
|-->PHI1-->GEP3
GEP2--/
This patch checks to see if GEP1 and GEP2 are similiar enough that they can be
cloned (GEP12) in GEP3's BB, allowing GEP->GEP merging (GEP123):
GEP1--\ --\ --\
|-->PHI1-->GEP3 ==> |-->PHI2->GEP12->GEP3 == > |-->PHI2->GEP123
GEP2--/ --/ --/
This also breaks certain use chains that are preventing GEP->GEP merges that the
the existing instcombine would merge otherwise.
Tests included.
llvm-svn: 209755
This patch fixes 3 issues introduced by r209049 that only showed up in on
the sanitizer buildbots. One was a typo in a compare. The other is a check to
confirm that the single differing value in the two incoming GEPs is the same
type. The final issue was the the IRBuilder under some circumstances would
build PHIs in the middle of the block.
llvm-svn: 209065
Currently LLVM will generally merge GEPs. This allows backends to use more
complex addressing modes. In some cases this is not happening because there
is PHI inbetween the two GEPs:
GEP1--\
|-->PHI1-->GEP3
GEP2--/
This patch checks to see if GEP1 and GEP2 are similiar enough that they can be
cloned (GEP12) in GEP3's BB, allowing GEP->GEP merging (GEP123):
GEP1--\ --\ --\
|-->PHI1-->GEP3 ==> |-->PHI2->GEP12->GEP3 == > |-->PHI2->GEP123
GEP2--/ --/ --/
This also breaks certain use chains that are preventing GEP->GEP merges that the
the existing instcombine would merge otherwise.
Tests included.
rdar://15547484
llvm-svn: 209049
In transformation:
BinOp(shuffle(v1,undef), shuffle(v2,undef)) -> shuffle(BinOp(v1, v2),undef)
type of the undef argument must be same as type of BinOp.
llvm-svn: 208531
Do not apply transformation:
BinOp(shuffle(v1), shuffle(v2)) -> shuffle(BinOp(v1, v2))
if operands v1 and v2 are of different size.
This change fixes PR19717, which was caused by r208488.
llvm-svn: 208518
This patch enables transformations:
BinOp(shuffle(v1), shuffle(v2)) -> shuffle(BinOp(v1, v2))
BinOp(shuffle(v1), const1) -> shuffle(BinOp, const2)
They allow to eliminate extra shuffles in some cases.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3525
llvm-svn: 208488
definition below all of the header #include lines, lib/Transforms/...
edition.
This one is tricky for two reasons. We again have a couple of passes
that define something else before the includes as well. I've sunk their
name macros with the DEBUG_TYPE.
Also, InstCombine contains headers that need DEBUG_TYPE, so now those
headers #define and #undef DEBUG_TYPE around their code, leaving them
well formed modular headers. Fixing these headers was a large motivation
for all of these changes, as "leaky" macros of this form are hard on the
modules implementation.
llvm-svn: 206844
This requires a number of steps.
1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation
detail
2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User*
iterator.
3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the
Use to the User.
4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs.
5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users().
6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether
they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when
needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally
opaque.
Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the
Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and
switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the
renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make
any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would
touch all of the same lies of code.
The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice
regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s
rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits
a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird
extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have.
I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms
a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into
another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right
move.
However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up
a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =]
llvm-svn: 203364
Move the test for this class into the IR unittests as well.
This uncovers that ValueMap too is in the IR library. Ironically, the
unittest for ValueMap is useless in the Support library (honestly, so
was the ValueHandle test) and so it already lives in the IR unittests.
Mmmm, tasty layering.
llvm-svn: 202821
name might indicate, it is an iterator over the types in an instruction
in the IR.... You see where this is going.
Another step of modularizing the support library.
llvm-svn: 202815
I am really sorry for the noise, but the current state where some parts of the
code use TD (from the old name: TargetData) and other parts use DL makes it
hard to write a patch that changes where those variables come from and how
they are passed along.
llvm-svn: 201827
Ideally only those transform passes that run at -O0 remain enabled,
in reality we get as close as we reasonably can.
Passes are responsible for disabling themselves, it's not the job of
the pass manager to do it for them.
llvm-svn: 200892
This logic hadn't been updated to handle FastMathFlags, and it took me a while to detect it because it doesn't show up in a simple search for CreateFAdd.
llvm-svn: 199629
The GEP pattern is what SCEV expander emits for "ugly geps". The latter is what
you get for pointer subtraction in C code. The rest of instcombine already
knows how to deal with that so just canonicalize on that.
llvm-svn: 191090
Use the pointer size if datalayout is available.
Use i64 if it's not, which is consistent with what other
places do when the pointer size is unknown.
The test doesn't really test this in a useful way
since it will be transformed to that later anyway,
but this now tests it for non-zero arrays and when
datalayout isn't available. The cases in
visitGetElementPtrInst should save an extra re-visit to
the newly created GEP since it won't need to cleanup after
itself.
llvm-svn: 188339
the things, and renames it to CBindingWrapping.h. I also moved
CBindingWrapping.h into Support/.
This new file just contains the macros for defining different wrap/unwrap
methods.
The calls to those macros, as well as any custom wrap/unwrap definitions
(like for array of Values for example), are put into corresponding C++
headers.
Doing this required some #include surgery, since some .cpp files relied
on the fact that including Wrap.h implicitly caused the inclusion of a
bunch of other things.
This also now means that the C++ headers will include their corresponding
C API headers; for example Value.h must include llvm-c/Core.h. I think
this is harmless, since the C API headers contain just external function
declarations and some C types, so I don't believe there should be any
nasty dependency issues here.
llvm-svn: 180881
