Summary:
Sanitizer blacklist entries currently apply to all sanitizers--there
is no way to specify that an entry should only apply to a specific
sanitizer. This is important for Control Flow Integrity since there are
several different CFI modes that can be enabled at once. For maximum
security, CFI blacklist entries should be scoped to only the specific
CFI mode(s) that entry applies to.
Adding section headers to SpecialCaseLists allows users to specify more
information about list entries, like sanitizer names or other metadata,
like so:
[section1]
fun:*fun1*
[section2|section3]
fun:*fun23*
The section headers are regular expressions. For backwards compatbility,
blacklist entries entered before a section header are put into the '[*]'
section so that blacklists without sections retain the same behavior.
SpecialCaseList has been modified to also accept a section name when
matching against the blacklist. It has also been modified so the
follow-up change to clang can define a derived class that allows
matching sections by SectionMask instead of by string.
Reviewers: pcc, kcc, eugenis, vsk
Reviewed By: eugenis, vsk
Subscribers: vitalybuka, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37924
llvm-svn: 314170
Summary:
This is nessesary in Python3. Everywhere else we assume that
encoding is UTF8. If we don't specify it here, the defaults
from the environment will be used, which may result in ASCII
decoder being used. And if the file is non-ASCII, then it
will crash:
```
File "/usr/local/bin/coverage-report-server.py", line 168, in do_GET
for line_no, line in enumerate(f, start=1)])
File "/usr/local/bin/coverage-report-server.py", line 165, in <listcomp>
["<span class='{cls}'>{line} </span>".format(
File "/usr/lib/python3.5/encodings/ascii.py", line 26, in decode
return codecs.ascii_decode(input, self.errors)[0]
UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 106: ordinal not in range(128)
```
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33548
Now, how would i add a testcase here?
Reviewers: m.ostapenko, kcc
Reviewed By: kcc
Subscribers: kcc, llvm-commits
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37661
llvm-svn: 313063
This patch fixes two issues:
* Fixed relative links to source files
* Enumeration of lines in source files starts from 1 instead of 0 to
align with .symcov files generated by sancov -symbolize
Patch by Dmitiriy Nikiforov.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31038
llvm-svn: 298250
This is forcing to use Error::success(), which is in a wide majority
of cases a lot more readable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26481
llvm-svn: 286561
The core of the change is supposed to be NFC, however it also fixes
what I believe was an undefined behavior when calling:
va_start(ValueArgs, Desc);
with Desc being a StringRef.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25342
llvm-svn: 283671
Summary:
Answering any meaningful questions about .sancov files requires
accessing symbol information from the corresponding binary.
This change introduces a separate intermediate data structure and
format: symbolized coverage. It contains all symbol information that
is required to answer common queries:
- merging
- coverd/uncovered files and functions
- line status.
Also removing the html report functionality from sancov: generated
HTML files are too huge, and a different approach is required.
Maintaining this half-working approach in the C++ is painful.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24947
llvm-svn: 282639
Coverage reports for gigabyte-sized binaries are huge. There's no
practical reason to generate them statically.
Implementing an experiment http coverage report server. The server
loads .symcov file and serves interactive coverage pages.
llvm-svn: 282637
The export table is not considered part of the object file symbol table,
so we have to look through it separately.
Reviewers: kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23321
llvm-svn: 278284
See http://reviews.llvm.org/D22079
Changes the Archive::child_begin and Archive::children to require a reference
to an Error. If iterator increment fails (because the archive header is
damaged) the iterator will be set to 'end()', and the error stored in the
given Error&. The Error value should be checked by the user immediately after
the loop. E.g.:
Error Err;
for (auto &C : A->children(Err)) {
// Do something with archive child C.
}
// Check the error immediately after the loop.
if (Err)
return Err;
Failure to check the Error will result in an abort() when the Error goes out of
scope (as guaranteed by the Error class).
llvm-svn: 275316
a good error message to be produced.
This is nearly the last libObject interface that used ErrorOr and the last one
that appears in llvm/include/llvm/Object/MachO.h . For Mach-O objects this is
just a clean up because it’s version of getSymbolAddress() can’t return an
error.
I will leave it to the experts on COFF and ELF to actually add meaning full
error messages in their tests if they wish. And also leave it to these experts
to change the last two ErrorOr interfaces in llvm/include/llvm/Object/ObjectFile.h
for createCOFFObjectFile() and createELFObjectFile() if they wish.
Since there are no test cases for COFF and ELF error cases with respect to
getSymbolAddress() in the test suite this is no functional change (NFC).
llvm-svn: 273701
looking for it along $PATH. This allows installs of LLVM tools outside of
$PATH to find the symbolizer and produce pretty backtraces if they crash.
llvm-svn: 272232
Summary:
Previously we would try to load PDBs for every PE executable we tried to
symbolize. If that failed, we would fall back to DWARF. If there wasn't
any DWARF, we'd print mostly useless symbol information using the export
table.
With this change, we only try to load PDBs for executables that claim to
have them. If that fails, we can now print an error rather than falling
back silently. This should make it a lot easier to diagnose and fix
common symbolization issues, such as not having DIA or not having a PDB.
Reviewers: zturner, eugenis
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20982
llvm-svn: 271725
when the object is in an archive to use something like libx.a(foo.o) as part of
the error message.
Also changed llvm-objdump and llvm-size to be like llvm-nm and ignore non-object
files in archives and not produce any error message.
To do this Archive::Child::getAsBinary() was changed from ErrorOr<...> to
Expected<...> then that was threaded up to its users.
Converting this interface to Expected<> from ErrorOr<> does involve
touching a number of places. To contain the changes for now the use of
errorToErrorCode() is still used in one place yet to be fully converted.
Again there some were bugs in the existing code that did not deal with the
old ErrorOr<> return values. So now with Expected<> since they must be
checked and the error handled, I added a TODO and a comments for those.
llvm-svn: 269784
Produce another specific error message for a malformed Mach-O file when a symbol’s
string index is past the end of the string table. The existing test case in test/Object/macho-invalid.test
for macho-invalid-symbol-name-past-eof now reports the error with the message indicating
that a symbol at a specific index has a bad sting index and that bad string index value.
Again converting interfaces to Expected<> from ErrorOr<> does involve
touching a number of places. Where the existing code reported the error with a
string message or an error code it was converted to do the same. There is some
code for this that could be factored into a routine but I would like to leave that for
the code owners post-commit to do as they want for handling an llvm::Error. An
example of how this could be done is shown in the diff in
lib/ExecutionEngine/RuntimeDyld/RuntimeDyldImpl.h which had a Check() routine
already for std::error_code so I added one like it for llvm::Error .
Also there some were bugs in the existing code that did not deal with the
old ErrorOr<> return values. So now with Expected<> since they must be
checked and the error handled, I added a TODO and a comment:
“// TODO: Actually report errors helpfully” and a call something like
consumeError(NameOrErr.takeError()) so the buggy code will not crash
since needed to deal with the Error.
Note there fixes needed to lld that goes along with this that I will commit right after this.
So expect lld not to built after this commit and before the next one.
llvm-svn: 266919
Produce the first specific error message for a malformed Mach-O file describing
the problem instead of the generic message for object_error::parse_failed of
"Invalid data was encountered while parsing the file”. Many more good error
messages will follow after this first one.
This is built on Lang Hames’ great work of adding the ’Error' class for
structured error handling and threading Error through MachOObjectFile
construction. And making createMachOObjectFile return Expected<...> .
So to to get the error to the llvm-obdump tool, I changed the stack of
these methods to also return Expected<...> :
object::ObjectFile::createObjectFile()
object::SymbolicFile::createSymbolicFile()
object::createBinary()
Then finally in ParseInputMachO() in MachODump.cpp the error can
be reported and the specific error message can be printed in llvm-objdump
and can be seen in the existing test case for the existing malformed binary
but with the updated error message.
Converting these interfaces to Expected<> from ErrorOr<> does involve
touching a number of places. To contain the changes for now use of
errorToErrorCode() and errorOrToExpected() are used where the callers
are yet to be converted.
Also there some were bugs in the existing code that did not deal with the
old ErrorOr<> return values. So now with Expected<> since they must be
checked and the error handled, I added a TODO and a comment:
“// TODO: Actually report errors helpfully” and a call something like
consumeError(ObjOrErr.takeError()) so the buggy code will not crash
since needed to deal with the Error.
Note there is one fix also needed to lld/COFF/InputFiles.cpp that goes along
with this that I will commit right after this. So expect lld not to built
after this commit and before the next one.
llvm-svn: 265606
Some Include What You Use suggestions were used too.
Use anonymous namespaces in source files.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18778
llvm-svn: 265454
Summary:
Using leading zeroes allows you to search for "000%" to find non-covered
items.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18420
llvm-svn: 264336
Summary:
Caller can provides the list of .so files where some files are
unreadable (e.g linux-vdso.so.1). It's more convenient to handler this in
sancov with warning then making all callers to check files.
Reviewers: aizatsky
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18103
llvm-svn: 263307
Summary:
This change adds 3 tables to html report:
- list of covered files with number of functions covered.
- list of not covered files
- list of not covered functions.
I tried to put most coverage-calculating functionality into
SourceCoverageData.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17421
llvm-svn: 261287
Multi-dso programs result in multiple coverage files dumped of the form
'<module_name>.<pid>.sancov'. When analyzing these coverage files it is
important to use correct corresponding object file.
This change removes the "-obj" sancov flag and lets user specify object
file names alongside coverage files. Sancov tool would match them using
<module_name> part of coverage file and short file name of the object
file.
Corresponding changes:
- compiler-rt: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17171
- docs: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17175
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17169
llvm-svn: 260628
Summary:
This patch is provided in preparation for removing autoconf on 1/26. The proposal to remove autoconf on 1/26 was discussed on the llvm-dev thread here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-January/093875.html
"I felt a great disturbance in the [build system], as if millions of [makefiles] suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something [amazing] has happened."
- Obi Wan Kenobi
Reviewers: chandlerc, grosbach, bob.wilson, tstellarAMD, echristo, whitequark
Subscribers: chfast, simoncook, emaste, jholewinski, tberghammer, jfb, danalbert, srhines, arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, dsanders, joker.eph, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16471
llvm-svn: 258861
