This is a mechanical change of comments in switches like fallthrough,
fall-through, or fall-thru to use the LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro instead.
llvm-svn: 278902
Patch by Sunita Marathe
Third try, now following fixes to MSan to handle mempcy in such a way that this commit won't break the MSan buildbots. (Thanks, Evegenii!)
llvm-svn: 277189
pass manager passes' `run` methods.
This removes a bunch of SFINAE goop from the pass manager and just
requires pass authors to accept `AnalysisManager<IRUnitT> &` as a dead
argument. This is a small price to pay for the simplicity of the system
as a whole, despite the noise that changing it causes at this stage.
This will also helpfull allow us to make the signature of the run
methods much more flexible for different kinds af passes to support
things like intelligently updating the pass's progression over IR units.
While this touches many, many, files, the changes are really boring.
Mostly made with the help of my trusty perl one liners.
Thanks to Sean and Hal for bouncing ideas for this with me in IRC.
llvm-svn: 272978
We would fail to validate the type of the tan function which would cause
downstream users of isValidProtoForLibFunc to assert.
This fixes PR28143.
llvm-svn: 272802
Summary:
The SimplifyLibCalls part of InstCombine generates calls to those otherwise.
I wonder if at some point we shouldn't just call disableAllFunctions() and
then enable functions on a whitelist basis...
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96495
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kzhuravl
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21282
llvm-svn: 272664
There was a typo in r267758. It caused invalid accesses when
given something like "void @free(...)", as NumParams == 0, and
we then try to look at the 0th parameter.
Turns out, most of these were untested; add both attribute
and missing-prototype checks for all libc libfuncs.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20543
llvm-svn: 270750
A number of libcalls don't exist in any particular lib but are, instead,
defined in math.h as inline functions (even in C mode!). Don't rely on
their existence when lowering @llvm.{cos,sin,floor,..}.f32, promote them
instead.
N.B. We had logic to handle FREM but were missing out on a number of
others. This change generalizes the FREM handling.
llvm-svn: 268875
I tried to be as close as possible to the strongest check that
existed before; cleaning these up properly is left for future work.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19469
llvm-svn: 267758
This patch simply mirrors the attributes we give to @llvm.nvvm.reflect
to the __nvvm_reflect libdevice call. This shaves about 30% of the code
in libdevice away because of CSE opportunities. It's also helps us
figure out that libdevice implementations of transcendental functions
don't have side-effects.
llvm-svn: 265060
work in the face of the limitations of DLLs and templated static
variables.
This requires passes that use the AnalysisBase mixin provide a static
variable themselves. So as to keep their APIs clean, I've made these
private and befriended the CRTP base class (which is the common
practice).
I've added documentation to AnalysisBase for why this is necessary and
at what point we can go back to the much simpler system.
This is clearly a better pattern than the extern template as it caught
*numerous* places where the template magic hadn't been applied and
things were "just working" but would eventually have broken
mysteriously.
llvm-svn: 263216
analyses in the new pass manager.
These just handle really basic stuff: turning a type name into a string
statically that is nice to print in logs, and getting a static unique ID
for each analysis.
Sadly, the format of passes in anonymous namespaces makes using their
names in tests really annoying so I've customized the names of the no-op
passes to keep tests sane to read.
This is the first of a few simplifying refactorings for the new pass
manager that should reduce boilerplate and confusion.
llvm-svn: 262004
Summary:
NVVM doesn't have a standard library, as currently implemented, so this
just isn't going to work. I'd like to revisit this, since it's hiding
opportunities for optimization, but correctness comes first.
Thank you to hfinkel for pointing me in the right direction here.
Reviewers: tra
Subscribers: echristo, jhen, llvm-commits, hfinkel
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16604
llvm-svn: 258884
Summary:
The LibCallSimplifier will turn llvm.exp2.* intrinsics into ldexp* libcalls
which do not make sense with the AMDGPU backend.
In the long run, we'll want an llvm.ldexp.* intrinsic to properly make use of
this optimization, but this works around the problem for now.
See also: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14327 (suggested llvm.ldexp.* implementation)
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92709
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14990
llvm-svn: 255658
This is a prerequisite for further optimisations of these functions,
which will be commited as a separate patch.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14219
llvm-svn: 252535
Generate tables in the .xdata section representing what actions to take
when an exception is thrown. This currently fills in state for
cleanups, catch handlers are still unfinished.
llvm-svn: 233636
Also, add several entries to vectorizable functions table, and
corresponding tests. The table isn't complete, it'll be populated later.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8131
llvm-svn: 232531
Summary:
This makes it more obvious that the enum definition and the
"StandardName" array is in sync. Mechanically refactored w/ a
python script.
Test Plan: still compiles
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7845
llvm-svn: 231172
manager to support the actual uses of it. =]
When I ported instcombine to the new pass manager I discover that it
didn't work because TLI wasn't available in the right places. This is
a somewhat surprising and/or subtle aspect of the new pass manager
design that came up before but I think is useful to be reminded of:
While the new pass manager *allows* a function pass to query a module
analysis, it requires that the module analysis is already run and cached
prior to the function pass manager starting up, possibly with
a 'require<foo>' style utility in the pass pipeline. This is an
intentional hurdle because using a module analysis from a function pass
*requires* that the module analysis is run prior to entering the
function pass manager. Otherwise the other functions in the module could
be in who-knows-what state, etc.
A somewhat surprising consequence of this design decision (at least to
me) is that you have to design a function pass that leverages
a module analysis to do so as an optional feature. Even if that means
your function pass does no work in the absence of the module analysis,
you have to handle that possibility and remain conservatively correct.
This is a natural consequence of things being able to invalidate the
module analysis and us being unable to re-run it. And it's a generally
good thing because it lets us reorder passes arbitrarily without
breaking correctness, etc.
This ends up causing problems in one case. What if we have a module
analysis that is *definitionally* impossible to invalidate. In the
places this might come up, the analysis is usually also definitionally
trivial to run even while other transformation passes run on the module,
regardless of the state of anything. And so, it follows that it is
natural to have a hard requirement on such analyses from a function
pass.
It turns out, that TargetLibraryInfo is just such an analysis, and
InstCombine has a hard requirement on it.
The approach I've taken here is to produce an analysis that models this
flexibility by making it both a module and a function analysis. This
exposes the fact that it is in fact safe to compute at any point. We can
even make it a valid CGSCC analysis at some point if that is useful.
However, we don't want to have a copy of the actual target library info
state for each function! This state is specific to the triple. The
somewhat direct and blunt approach here is to turn TLI into a pimpl,
with the state and mutators in the implementation class and the query
routines primarily in the wrapper. Then the analysis can lazily
construct and cache the implementations, keyed on the triple, and
on-demand produce wrappers of them for each function.
One minor annoyance is that we will end up with a wrapper for each
function in the module. While this is a bit wasteful (one pointer per
function) it seems tolerable. And it has the advantage of ensuring that
we pay the absolute minimum synchronization cost to access this
information should we end up with a nice parallel function pass manager
in the future. We could look into trying to mark when analysis results
are especially cheap to recompute and more eagerly GC-ing the cached
results, or we could look at supporting a variant of analyses whose
results are specifically *not* cached and expected to just be used and
discarded by the consumer. Either way, these seem like incremental
enhancements that should happen when we start profiling the memory and
CPU usage of the new pass manager and not before.
The other minor annoyance is that if we end up using the TLI in both
a module pass and a function pass, those will be produced by two
separate analyses, and thus will point to separate copies of the
implementation state. While a minor issue, I dislike this and would like
to find a way to cleanly allow a single analysis instance to be used
across multiple IR unit managers. But I don't have a good solution to
this today, and I don't want to hold up all of the work waiting to come
up with one. This too seems like a reasonable thing to incrementally
improve later.
llvm-svn: 226981
TargetLibraryAnalysis pass.
There are actually no direct tests of this already in the tree. I've
added the most basic test that the pass manager bits themselves work,
and the TLI object produced will be tested by an upcoming patches as
they port passes which rely on TLI.
This is starting to point out the awkwardness of the invalidate API --
it seems poorly fitting on the *result* object. I suspect I will change
it to live on the analysis instead, but that's not for this change, and
I'd rather have a few more passes ported in order to have more
experience with how this plays out.
I believe there is only one more analysis required in order to start
porting instcombine. =]
llvm-svn: 226160
The pass is really just a means of accessing a cached instance of the
TargetLibraryInfo object, and this way we can re-use that object for the
new pass manager as its result.
Lots of delta, but nothing interesting happening here. This is the
common pattern that is developing to allow analyses to live in both the
old and new pass manager -- a wrapper pass in the old pass manager
emulates the separation intrinsic to the new pass manager between the
result and pass for analyses.
llvm-svn: 226157
While the term "Target" is in the name, it doesn't really have to do
with the LLVM Target library -- this isn't an abstraction which LLVM
targets generally need to implement or extend. It has much more to do
with modeling the various runtime libraries on different OSes and with
different runtime environments. The "target" in this sense is the more
general sense of a target of cross compilation.
This is in preparation for porting this analysis to the new pass
manager.
No functionality changed, and updates inbound for Clang and Polly.
llvm-svn: 226078
