Add support for the expansion of funnelshift/rotates to getIntrinsicInstrCost.
This also required us to move the X86 fshl/fshr costs to the same place as the rotates to avoid expansion and get correct scalarization vs vectorization costs.
llvm-svn: 346854
When we repeat the 2 shifting operands then this is a bit rotation - annoyingly this has to be done in the other getIntrinsicInstrCost than most intrinsics as we need to check the operands are the same.
llvm-svn: 346688
Improve getCastInstrCost() by respecting the different types of Src and Dst
for vector integer <-> fp conversions.
This means that extracting from integer becomes more expensive (by the
extraction penalty), and the extraction from fp becomes cheaper (no longer
has a false extraction penalty).
Review: Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54423
llvm-svn: 346663
Instead of defaulting to a cost = 1, expand to element extract/insert like we do for other shuffles.
This exposes an issue in LoopVectorize which could call SK_ExtractSubvector with a scalar subvector type.
llvm-svn: 346656
The patch has been reverted because it ended up prohibiting propagation
of a constant to exit value. For such values, we should skip all checks
related to hard uses because propagating a constant is always profitable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53691
llvm-svn: 346397
This reverts commit 2f425e9c7946b9d74e64ebbfa33c1caa36914402.
It seems that the check that we still should do the transform if we
know the result is constant is missing in this code. So the logic that
has been deleted by this change is still sometimes accidentally useful.
I revert the change to see what can be done about it. The motivating
case is the following:
@Y = global [400 x i16] zeroinitializer, align 1
define i16 @foo() {
entry:
br label %for.body
for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.body
%i = phi i16 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.body ]
%arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [400 x i16], [400 x i16]* @Y, i16 0, i16 %i
store i16 0, i16* %arrayidx, align 1
%inc = add nuw nsw i16 %i, 1
%cmp = icmp ult i16 %inc, 400
br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.end
for.end: ; preds = %for.body
%inc.lcssa = phi i16 [ %inc, %for.body ]
ret i16 %inc.lcssa
}
We should be able to figure out that the result is constant, but the patch
breaks it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51584
llvm-svn: 346198
Let i8/i16 uint/sint to fp conversions cost 1 if operand is a load.
Since the load already does the extension, there is no extra cost (previously
returned 2).
Review: Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54028
llvm-svn: 346009
Summary:
The hot and cold count thresholds are derived from the summary, but for
debugging purposes it is convenient to provide the actual thresholds.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54040
llvm-svn: 346005
Scalar i1 to fp conversions are done with a branch sequence, so it should
have a higher cost.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53924
llvm-svn: 345818
This factors out a new method getBoolVecToIntConversionCost() containing the
code for vector sext/zext of i1, in order to reuse it for i1 to double vector
conversions.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53923
llvm-svn: 345817
When rewriting loop exit values, IndVars considers this transform not profitable if
the loop instruction has a loop user which it believes cannot be optimized away.
In current implementation only calls that immediately use the instruction are considered
as such.
This patch extends the definition of "hard" users to any side-effecting instructions
(which usually cannot be optimized away from the loop) and also allows handling
of not just immediate users, but use chains.
Differentlai Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51584
Reviewed By: etherzhhb
llvm-svn: 345814
When we calculate a product of 2 AddRecs, we end up making quite massive
computations to deduce the operands of resulting AddRec. This process can
be optimized by computing all args of intermediate sum and then calling
`getAddExpr` once rather than calling `getAddExpr` with intermediate
result every time a new argument is computed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53189
Reviewed By: rtereshin
llvm-svn: 345813
Correct costings of SK_ExtractSubvector requires the SubTy argument to indicate the type/size of the extracted subvector.
Unlike the rest of the shuffle kinds this means that the main Ty argument represents the source vector type not the destination!
I've done my best to fix a number of vectorizer uses:
SLP - the reduction epilogue costs should be using a SK_PermuteSingleSrc shuffle as these all occur at the hardware vector width - we're not extracting (illegal) subvector types. This is causing the cost model diffs as SK_ExtractSubvector costs are poorly handled and tend to just return 1 at the moment.
LV - I'm not clear on what the SK_ExtractSubvector should represents for recurrences - I've used a <1 x ?> subvector extraction as that seems to match the VF delta.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53573
llvm-svn: 345617
Sub, SDiv and UDiv are not commutative, so only the RHS operand can fold a
load. This patch adds a check for this.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53791
llvm-svn: 345596
The SystemZ backend can do arithmetic of memory by loading and then extending
one of the operands. Similarly, a load + truncate can be folded into an
operand.
This patch improves the SystemZ TTI cost function to recognize this.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D52692
llvm-svn: 345327
Enable the DAG optimization that converts vector div/rem with constants into
multiply+shifts sequences by expanding them early. This is needed since
ISD::SMUL_LOHI is 'Custom' lowered on SystemZ, and will therefore not be
available to BuildSDIV after legalization.
Better cost values for these instructions based on how they will be
implemented (a constant divisor is cheaper).
Review: Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53196
llvm-svn: 345321
Non-uniform division/remainder handling was added back at D49248/D50765 - so share the 'mul+sub' costs that already exist for uniform cases.
llvm-svn: 345164
Summary:
Teach vectorizer about vectorizing variant value stores to uniform
address. Similar to rL343028, we do not allow vectorization if we have
multiple stores to the same uniform address.
Cost model already has the change for considering the extract
instruction cost for a variant value store. See added test cases for how
vectorization is done.
The patch also contains changes to the ORE messages.
Reviewers: Ayal, mkuper, anemet, hsaito
Subscribers: rkruppe, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52656
llvm-svn: 344613
SCEV's transform that turns `{A1,+,A2,+,...,+,An}<L> * {B1,+,B2,+,...,+,Bn}<L>` into
a single AddRec of size `2n+1` with complex combinatorial coefficients can easily
trigger exponential growth of the SCEV (in case if nothing gets folded and simplified).
We tried to restrain this transform using the option `scalar-evolution-max-add-rec-size`,
but its default value seems to be insufficiently small: the test attached to this patch
with default value of this option `16` has a SCEV of >3M symbols (when printed out).
This patch reduces the simplification limit. It is not a cure to combinatorial
explosions, but at least it reduces this corner case to something more or less
reasonable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53282
Reviewed By: sanjoy
llvm-svn: 344584
Until mischeduler is clever enough to avoid spilling in a vectorized loop
with many (scalar) DLRs it is better to avoid high vectorization factors (8
and above).
llvm-svn: 344129
A new function getNumVectorRegs() is better to use for the number of needed
vector registers instead of getNumberOfParts(). This is to make sure that the
number of vector registers (and typically operations) required for a vector
type is accurate.
getNumberOfParts() which was previously used works by splitting the vector
type until it is legal gives incorrect results for types with a non
power of two number of elements (rare).
A new static function getScalarSizeInBits() that also checks for a pointer
type and returns 64U for it since otherwise it gets a value of 0). Used in a
few places where Ty may be pointer.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
llvm-svn: 344115
This is the third patch in a series intended to make
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44748 more easily reviewable. Please see that
patch for more context. The second being r344013.
The intent is to make the output of printing a LocationSize more
precise. The main motivation for this is that we plan to add a bit to
distinguish whether a given LocationSize is an upper-bound or is
precise; making that information available in pretty-printing is nice.
llvm-svn: 344108
Summary:
We are overly conservative in loop vectorizer with respect to stores to loop
invariant addresses.
More details in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38546
This is the first part of the fix where we start with vectorizing loop invariant
values to loop invariant addresses.
This also includes changes to ORE for stores to invariant address.
Reviewers: anemet, Ayal, mkuper, mssimpso
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50665
llvm-svn: 343028
After recent improvements which makes better use of LOC instead of IPM, the
TTI cost functions also needs to be updated to reflect this.
This involves sext, zext and xor of i1.
The tests were updated so that for z13 the new costs are expected, while the
old costs are still checked for on zEC12.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D51339
llvm-svn: 342207
This patch does the following things:
1. update SymbolicallyEvaluateGEP so that it bails out if it cannot preserve inrange arribute;
2. update llvm/test/Analysis/ConstantFolding/gep.ll to remove UB in it;
3. remove inaccurate comment above ConstantFoldInstOperandsImpl in llvm/lib/Analysis/ConstantFolding.cpp;
4. add a new regression test that makes sure that no optimizations change an inrange GEP in an unexpected way.
Patch by Zhaomo Yang!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51698
llvm-svn: 341888
The only point to this change is the test diffs. When I remove this code entirely (in favor of the recently added generic handling), I don't want there to be any confusion due to spurious test diffs.
As an aside, the fact out tests are AST construction order dependent is not great. I thought about fixing that, but the reasonable schemes I might want (e.g. sort by name) need the test diffs anyways.
Philip
llvm-svn: 341841
There were two combines not covered by the check before now, neither of which
actually differed from normal in the benefit analysis.
The most recent seems to be because it was just added at the top of the
function (naturally). The older is from way back in 2008 (r46687) when we just
didn't put those checks in so routinely, and has been diligently maintained
since.
llvm-svn: 341831
