to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-September/126472.html
TextAPI is a library and accompanying tool that allows conversion between binary shared object stubs and textual counterparts. The motivations and uses cases for this are explained thoroughly in the llvm-dev proposal [1]. This initial commit proposes a potential structure for the TAPI library, also including support for reading/writing text-based ELF stubs (.tbe) in addition to preliminary support for reading binary ELF files. The goal for this patch is to ensure the project architecture appropriately welcomes integration of Mach-O stubbing from Apple's TAPI [2].
Added:
- TextAPI library
- .tbe read support
- .tbe write (to raw_ostream) support
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-September/126472.html
[2] https://github.com/ributzka/tapi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53051
llvm-svn: 348170
Add basic infrastructure for reading and writting TBD files (version 1 - 3).
The TextAPI library is not used by anything yet (besides the unit tests). Tool
support will be added in a separate commit.
The TBD format is currently documented in the implementation file (TextStub.cpp).
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53945
Update: This contains changes to fix issues discovered by the bots:
- add parentheses to silence warnings.
- rename variables
- use PlatformType from BinaryFormat
llvm-svn: 347823
Add basic infrastructure for reading and writting TBD files (version 1 - 3).
The TextAPI library is not used by anything yet (besides the unit tests). Tool
support will be added in a separate commit.
The TBD format is currently documented in the implementation file (TextStub.cpp).
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53945
llvm-svn: 347808
Add a library that parses optimization remarks (currently YAML, so based
on the YAMLParser).
The goal is to be able to provide tools a remark parser that is not
completely dependent on YAML, in case we decide to change the format
later.
It exposes a C API which takes a handler that is called with the remark
structure.
It adds a libLLVMOptRemark.a static library, and it's used in-tree by
the llvm-opt-report tool (from which the parser has been mostly moved
out).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52776
Fixed the tests by removing the usage of C++11 strings, which seems not
to be supported by gcc 4.8.4 if they're used as a macro argument.
llvm-svn: 344171
Add a library that parses optimization remarks (currently YAML, so based
on the YAMLParser).
The goal is to be able to provide tools a remark parser that is not
completely dependent on YAML, in case we decide to change the format
later.
It exposes a C API which takes a handler that is called with the remark
structure.
It adds a libLLVMOptRemark.a static library, and it's used in-tree by
the llvm-opt-report tool (from which the parser has been mostly moved
out).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52776
llvm-svn: 344162
Summary:
This change spans both LLVM and compiler-rt, where we do the following:
- Add XRay to the LLVMBuild system, to allow for distributing the XRay
trace loading library along with the LLVM distributions.
- Use `llvm-config` better in the compiler-rt XRay implementation, to
depend on the potentially already-distributed LLVM XRay library.
While this is tested with the standalone compiler-rt build, it does
require that the LLVMXRay library (and LLVMSupport as well) are
available during the build. In case the static libraries are available,
the unit tests will build and work fine. We're still having issues with
attempting to use a shared library version of the LLVMXRay library since
the shared library might not be accessible from the standard shared
library lookup paths.
The larger change here is the inclusion of the LLVMXRay library in the
distribution, which allows for building tools around the XRay traces and
profiles that the XRay runtime already generates.
Reviewers: echristo, beanz
Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, mboerger, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52349
llvm-svn: 342859
Same as r311392 with some fixes for library dependencies. Thanks to
Chapuni for helping work those out!
Original commit message:
This introduces the FuzzMutate library, which provides structured
fuzzing for LLVM IR, as described in my EuroLLVM 2017 talk. Most of
the basic mutators to inject and delete IR are provided, with support
for most basic operations.
llvm-svn: 311402
Summary:
Previously were in support. Since many many things depend on support,
were all forced to also depend on libxml2, which we only want in a few cases.
This puts all the libxml2 deps in a separate lib to be used only in a few
places.
Reviewers: ruiu, thakis, rnk
Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35819
llvm-svn: 309070
Many times unit tests for different libraries would like to use
the same helper functions for checking common types of errors.
This patch adds a common library with helpers for testing things
in Support, and introduces helpers in here for integrating the
llvm::Error and llvm::Expected<T> classes with gtest and gmock.
Normally, we would just be able to write:
EXPECT_THAT(someFunction(), succeeded());
but due to some quirks in llvm::Error's move semantics, gmock
doesn't make this easy, so two macros EXPECT_THAT_ERROR() and
EXPECT_THAT_EXPECTED() are introduced to gloss over the difficulties.
Consider this an exception, and possibly only temporary as we
look for ways to improve this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33059
llvm-svn: 305395
This creates a new library called BinaryFormat that has all of
the headers from llvm/Support containing structure and layout
definitions for various types of binary formats like dwarf, coff,
elf, etc as well as the code for identifying a file from its
magic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33843
llvm-svn: 304864
This reorganisation prevents us from cluttering up the top-level lib directory
with more driver libraries such as llvm-dlltool (see D29892).
llvm-svn: 302995
This adds a copy of the demangler in libcxxabi.
The code also has no dependencies on anything else in LLVM. To enforce
that I added it as another library. That way a BUILD_SHARED_LIBS will
fail if anyone adds an use of StringRef for example.
The no llvm dependency combined with the fact that this has to build
on linux, OS X and Windows required a few changes to the code. In
particular:
No constexpr.
No alignas
On OS X at least this library has only one global symbol:
__ZN4llvm16itanium_demangleEPKcPcPmPi
My current plan is:
Commit something like this
Change lld to use it
Change lldb to use it as the fallback
Add a few #ifdefs so that exactly the same file can be used in
libcxxabi to export abi::__cxa_demangle.
Once the fast demangler in lldb can handle any names this
implementation can be replaced with it and we will have the one true
demangler.
llvm-svn: 280732
llvm-lib is intended to be a lib.exe compatible utility that also
understands bitcode. The implementation lives in a library so that
lld can use it to implement /lib.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10297
llvm-svn: 239434
This will provide the analogous replacements for the PassManagerBuilder
and other code long term. This code is extracted from the opt tool
currently, and I plan to extend it as I build up support for using the
new pass manager in Clang and other places.
Mailing this out for review in part to let folks comment on the terrible names
here. A brief word about why I chose the names I did.
The library is called "Passes" to try and make it clear that it is a high-level
utility and where *all* of the passes come together and are registered in
a common library. I didn't want it to be *limited* to a registry though, the
registry is just one component.
The class is a "PassBuilder" but this name I'm less happy with. It doesn't
build passes in any traditional sense and isn't a Builder-style API at all. The
class is a PassRegisterer or PassAdder, but neither of those really make a lot
of sense. This class is responsible for constructing passes for registry in an
analysis manager or for population of a pass pipeline. If anyone has a better
name, I would love to hear it. The other candidate I looked at was
PassRegistrar, but that doesn't really fit either. There is no register of all
the passes in use, and so I think continuing the "registry" analog outside of
the registry of pass *names* and *types* is a mistake. The objects themselves
are just objects with the new pass manager.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8054
llvm-svn: 231556
This introduces the ProfileData library and updates llvm-profdata to
use this library for reading profiles. InstrProfReader is an abstract
base class that will be subclassed for both the raw instrprof data
from compiler-rt and the efficient instrprof format that will be used
for PGO.
llvm-svn: 204482
Chandler voiced some concern with checking this in without some
discussion first. Reverting for now.
This reverts r203703, r203704, r203708, and 203709.
llvm-svn: 203723
This provides a library to work with the instrumentation based
profiling format that is used by clang's -fprofile-instr-* options and
by the llvm-profdata tool. This is a binary format, rather than the
textual one that's currently in use.
The tests are in the subsequent commits that use this.
llvm-svn: 203703
This library will be used by clang-query. I can imagine LLDB becoming another
client of this library, so I think LLVM is a sensible place for it to live.
It wraps libedit, and adds tab completion support.
The code is loosely based on the line editor bits in LLDB, with a few
improvements:
- Polymorphism for retrieving the list of tab completions, based on
the concept pattern from the new pass manager.
- Tab completion doesn't corrupt terminal output if the input covers
multiple lines. Unfortunately this can only be done in a truly horrible
way, as far as I can tell. But since the alternative is to implement our
own line editor (which I don't think LLVM should be in the business of
doing, at least for now) I think it may be acceptable.
- Includes a fallback for the case where the user doesn't have libedit
installed.
Note that this uses C stdio, mainly because libedit also uses C stdio.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2200
llvm-svn: 200595
its own library. These functions are bridging between the bitcode reader
and the ll parser which are in different libraries. Previously we didn't
have any good library to do this, and instead played fast and loose with
a "header only" set of interfaces in the Support library. This really
doesn't work well as evidenced by the recent attempt to add timing logic
to the these routines.
As part of this, make them normal functions rather than weird inline
functions, and sink the implementation into the library. Also clean up
the header to be nice and minimal.
This requires updating lots of build system dependencies to specify that
the IRReader library is needed, and several source files to not
implicitly rely upon the header file to transitively include all manner
of other headers.
If you are using IRReader.h, this commit will break you (the header
moved) and you'll need to also update your library usage to include
'irreader'. I will commit the corresponding change to Clang momentarily.
llvm-svn: 177971
Aside from moving the actual files, this patch only updates the build
system and the source file comments under lib/... that are relevant.
I'll be updating other docs and other files in smaller subsequnet
commits.
While I've tried to test this, but it is entirely possible that there
will still be some build system fallout.
Also, note that I've not changed the library name itself: libLLVMCore.a
is still the library name. I'd be interested in others' opinions about
whether we should rename this as well (I think we should, just not sure
what it might break)
llvm-svn: 171359
subdirectories to traverse into.
- Originally I wanted to avoid this and just autoscan, but this has one key
flaw in that new subdirectories can not automatically trigger a rerun of the
llvm-build tool. This is particularly a pain when switching back and forth
between trees where one has added a subdirectory, as the dependencies will
tend to be wrong. This will also eliminates FIXME implicitly.
llvm-svn: 146436
