MachineLegalizer used to be the name of both the class and the member,
causing GCC errors. r276522 fixed that by renaming the member to just
'Legalizer'. The 'class' workaround isn't necessary anymore; drop it.
llvm-svn: 289848
This patch checks that the SlowMisaligned128Store subtarget feature is set
when penalizing such stores in getMemoryOpCost.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27677
llvm-svn: 289845
This is a tiny patch with a big pile of test changes.
This partially fixes PR27885:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27885
My motivating case looks like this:
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,1,0,2]
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2,2,3]
- vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,2,3],xmm1[4,5,6,7]
+ vshufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2],xmm1[0,2]
And this happens several times in the diffs. For chips with domain-crossing penalties,
the instruction count and size reduction should usually overcome any potential
domain-crossing penalty due to using an FP op in a sequence of int ops. For chips such
as recent Intel big cores and Atom, there is no domain-crossing penalty for shufps, so
using shufps is a pure win.
So the test case diffs all appear to be improvements except one test in
vector-shuffle-combining.ll where we miss an opportunity to use a shift to generate
zero elements and one test in combine-sra.ll where multiple uses prevent the expected
shuffle combining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27692
llvm-svn: 289837
Move the check for the code model into isGlobalInSmallSectionImpl and return false (not in small section) for variables placed in sections prefixed with .ldata (workaround for a tool limitation).
llvm-svn: 289832
Add the missing domain equivalences for movss, movsd, movd and movq zero extending loading instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27684
llvm-svn: 289825
Specifically avoid implicit conversions from/to integral types to
avoid potential errors when changing the underlying type. For example,
a typical initialization of a "full" mask was "LaneMask = ~0u", which
would result in a value of 0x00000000FFFFFFFF if the type was extended
to uint64_t.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27454
llvm-svn: 289820
In some situations, the BUILD_VECTOR node that builds a v18i8 vector by
a splat of an i8 constant will end up with signed 8-bit values and other
situations, it'll end up with unsigned ones. Handle both situations.
Fixes PR31340.
llvm-svn: 289804
This is essentially a recommit of r285893, but with a correctness fix. The
problem of the original commit was that this:
bic r5, r7, #31
cbz r5, .LBB2_10
got rewritten into:
lsrs r5, r7, #5
beq .LBB2_10
The result in destination register r5 is not the same and this is incorrect
when r5 is not dead. So this fix includes checking the uses of the AND
destination register. And also, compared to the original commit, some regression
tests didn't need changing anymore because of this extra check.
For completeness, this was the original commit message:
For the common pattern (CMPZ (AND x, #bitmask), #0), we can do some more
efficient instruction selection if the bitmask is one consecutive sequence of
set bits (32 - clz(bm) - ctz(bm) == popcount(bm)).
1) If the bitmask touches the LSB, then we can remove all the upper bits and
set the flags by doing one LSLS.
2) If the bitmask touches the MSB, then we can remove all the lower bits and
set the flags with one LSRS.
3) If the bitmask has popcount == 1 (only one set bit), we can shift that bit
into the sign bit with one LSLS and change the condition query from NE/EQ to
MI/PL (we could also implement this by shifting into the carry bit and
branching on BCC/BCS).
4) Otherwise, we can emit a sequence of LSLS+LSRS to remove the upper and lower
zero bits of the mask.
1-3 require only one 16-bit instruction and can elide the CMP. 4 requires two
16-bit instructions but can elide the CMP and doesn't require materializing a
complex immediate, so is also a win.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27761
llvm-svn: 289794
This implements execute-only support for ARM code generation, which
prevents the compiler from generating data accesses to code sections.
The following changes are involved:
* Add the CodeGen option "-arm-execute-only" to the ARM code generator.
* Add the clang flag "-mexecute-only" as well as the GCC-compatible
alias "-mpure-code" to enable this option.
* When enabled, literal pools are replaced with MOVW/MOVT instructions,
with VMOV used in addition for floating-point literals. As the MOVT
instruction is required, execute-only support is only available in
Thumb mode for targets supporting ARMv8-M baseline or Thumb2.
* Jump tables are placed in data sections when in execute-only mode.
* The execute-only text section is assigned section ID 0, and is
marked as unreadable with the SHF_ARM_PURECODE flag with symbol 'y'.
This also overrides selection of ELF sections for globals.
llvm-svn: 289784
Most of the PowerPC64 code generation for the ELF ABI is already PIC.
There are four main exceptions:
(1) Constant pointer arrays etc. should in writeable sections.
(2) The TOC restoration NOP after a call is needed for all global
symbols. While GNU ld has a workaround for questionable GCC self-calls,
we trigger the checks for calls from COMDAT sections as they cross input
sections and are therefore not considered self-calls. The current
decision is questionable and suboptimal, but outside the scope of the
change.
(3) TLS access can not use the initial-exec model.
(4) Jump tables should use relative addresses. Note that the current
encoding doesn't work for the large code model, but it is more compact
than the default for any non-trivial jump table. Improving this is again
beyond the scope of this change.
At least (1) and (3) are assumptions made in target-independent code and
introducing additional hooks is a bit messy. Testing with clang shows
that a -fPIC binary is 600KB smaller than the corresponding -fno-pic
build. Separate testing from improved jump table encodings would explain
only about 100KB or so. The rest is expected to be a result of more
aggressive immediate forming for -fno-pic, where the -fPIC binary just
uses TOC entries.
This change brings the LLVM output in line with the GCC output, other
PPC64 compilers like XLC on AIX are known to produce PIC by default
as well. The relocation model can still be provided explicitly, i.e.
when using MCJIT.
One test case for case (1) is included, other test cases with relocation
mode sensitive behavior are wired to static for now. They will be
reviewed and adjusted separately.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26566
llvm-svn: 289743
I've chosen to remove NVPTXInstrInfo::CanTailMerge but not
NVPTXInstrInfo::isLoadInstr and isStoreInstr (which are also dead)
because while the latter two are reasonably useful utilities, the former
cannot be used safely: It relies on successful address space inference
to identify writes to shared memory, but addrspace inference is a
best-effort thing.
llvm-svn: 289740
Summary:
Previously they were defined as a 2D char array in a header file. This
is kind of overkill -- we can let the linker lay out these strings
however it pleases. While we're at it, we might as well just inline
these constants where they're used, as each of them is used only once.
Also move NVPTXUtilities.{h,cpp} into namespace llvm.
Reviewers: tra
Subscribers: jholewinski, mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27636
llvm-svn: 289728
Given that INSERT_VECTOR_ELT operates on D registers anyway, combining
64-bit vectors into a 128-bit vector is basically free. Therefore, try
to split BUILD_VECTOR nodes before giving up and lowering them to a series
of INSERT_VECTOR_ELT instructions. Sometimes this allows dramatically
better lowerings; see testcases for examples. Inspired by similar code
in the x86 backend for AVX.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27624
llvm-svn: 289706
Currently, there are substantial problems forming vld1_dup even if the
VDUP survives legalization. The lack of an actual node
leads to terrible results: not only can we not form post-increment vld1_dup
instructions, but we form scalar pre-increment and post-increment
loads which force the loaded value into a GPR. This patch fixes that
by combining the vdup+load into an ARMISD node before DAGCombine
messes it up.
Also includes a crash fix for vld2_dup (see testcase @vld2dupi8_postinc_variable).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27694
llvm-svn: 289703
Since SGPRs should spill to VGPRs, they should be allocated first.
I don't think this is sufficient for SGPRs to always spill to
VGPRs though.
llvm-svn: 289671
Retrying after fixing after removing load-store factoring through
token factors in favor of improved token factor operand pruning
Simplify Consecutive Merge Store Candidate Search
Now that address aliasing is much less conservative, push through
simplified store merging search which only checks for parallel stores
through the chain subgraph. This is cleaner as the separation of
non-interfering loads/stores from the store-merging logic.
Whem merging stores, search up the chain through a single load, and
finds all possible stores by looking down from through a load and a
TokenFactor to all stores visited. This improves the quality of the
output SelectionDAG and generally the output CodeGen (with some
exceptions).
Additional Minor Changes:
1. Finishes removing unused AliasLoad code
2. Unifies the the chain aggregation in the merged stores across
code paths
3. Re-add the Store node to the worklist after calling
SimplifyDemandedBits.
4. Increase GatherAllAliasesMaxDepth from 6 to 18. That number is
arbitrary, but seemed sufficient to not cause regressions in
tests.
This finishes the change Matt Arsenault started in r246307 and
jyknight's original patch.
Many tests required some changes as memory operations are now
reorderable. Some tests relying on the order were changed to use
volatile memory operations
Noteworthy tests:
CodeGen/AArch64/argument-blocks.ll -
It's not entirely clear what the test_varargs_stackalign test is
supposed to be asserting, but the new code looks right.
CodeGen/AArch64/arm64-memset-inline.lli -
CodeGen/AArch64/arm64-stur.ll -
CodeGen/ARM/memset-inline.ll -
The backend now generates *worse* code due to store merging
succeeding, as we do do a 16-byte constant-zero store efficiently.
CodeGen/AArch64/merge-store.ll -
Improved, but there still seems to be an extraneous vector insert
from an element to itself?
CodeGen/PowerPC/ppc64-align-long-double.ll -
Worse code emitted in this case, due to the improved store->load
forwarding.
CodeGen/X86/dag-merge-fast-accesses.ll -
CodeGen/X86/MergeConsecutiveStores.ll -
CodeGen/X86/stores-merging.ll -
CodeGen/Mips/load-store-left-right.ll -
Restored correct merging of non-aligned stores
CodeGen/AMDGPU/promote-alloca-stored-pointer-value.ll -
Improved. Correctly merges buffer_store_dword calls
CodeGen/AMDGPU/si-triv-disjoint-mem-access.ll -
Improved. Sidesteps loading a stored value and
merges two stores
CodeGen/X86/pr18023.ll -
This test has been removed, as it was asserting incorrect
behavior. Non-volatile stores *CAN* be moved past volatile loads,
and now are.
CodeGen/X86/vector-idiv.ll -
CodeGen/X86/vector-lzcnt-128.ll -
It's basically impossible to tell what these tests are actually
testing. But, looks like the code got better due to the memory
operations being recognized as non-aliasing.
CodeGen/X86/win32-eh.ll -
Both loads of the securitycookie are now merged.
Reviewers: arsenm, hfinkel, tstellarAMD, jyknight, nhaehnle
Subscribers: wdng, nhaehnle, nemanjai, arsenm, weimingz, niravd, RKSimon, aemerson, qcolombet, dsanders, resistor, tstellarAMD, t.p.northover, spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D14834
llvm-svn: 289659
adding new optimization opportunity by adding new X86ISelLowering pattern. The test case was shown in https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30945.
Test explanation:
Select gets three arguments mask, op and op2. In this case, the Mask is a result of ICMP. The ICMP instruction compares (with equal operand) the zero initializer vector and the result of the first ICMP.
In general, The result of "cmp eq, op1, zero initializers" is "not(op1)" where op1 is a mask. By rearranging of the two arguments inside the Select instruction, we can get the same result. Without the necessary of the middle phase ("cmp eq, op1, zero initializers").
Missed optimization opportunity:
vpcmpled %zmm0, %zmm1, %k0
knotw %k0, %k1
can be combine to
vpcmpgtd %zmm0, %zmm2, %k1
Reviewers:
1. delena
2. igorb
Commited after check all
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27160
llvm-svn: 289653
At least the plugin used by the LibreOffice build
(<https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Clang_plugins>) indirectly
uses those members (through inline functions in LLVM/Clang include files in turn
using them), but they are not exported by utils/extract_symbols.py on Windows,
and accessing data across DLL/EXE boundaries on Windows is generally
problematic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26671
llvm-svn: 289647
This change aims to unify and correct our logic for when we need to allow for
the possibility of the linker adding a TOC restoration instruction after a
call. This comes up in two contexts:
1. When determining tail-call eligibility. If we make a tail call (i.e.
directly branch to a function) then there is no place for the linker to add
a TOC restoration.
2. When determining when we need to add a nop instruction after a call.
Likewise, if there is a possibility that the linker might need to add a
TOC restoration after a call, then we need to put a nop after the call
(the bl instruction).
First problem: We were using similar, but different, logic to decide (1) and
(2). This is just wrong. Both the resideInSameModule function (used when
determining tail-call eligibility) and the isLocalCall function (used when
deciding if the post-call nop is needed) were supposed to be determining the
same underlying fact (i.e. might a TOC restoration be needed after the call).
The same logic should be used in both places.
Second problem: The logic in both places was wrong. We only know that two
functions will share the same TOC when both functions come from the same
section of the same object. Otherwise the linker might cause the functions to
use different TOC base addresses (unless the multi-TOC linker option is
disabled, in which case only shared-library boundaries are relevant). There are
a number of factors that can cause functions to be placed in different sections
or come from different objects (-ffunction-sections, explicitly-specified
section names, COMDAT, weak linkage, etc.). All of these need to be checked.
The existing logic only checked properties of the callee, but the properties of
the caller must also be checked (for example, calling from a function in a
COMDAT section means calling between sections).
There was a conceptual error in the resideInSameModule function in that it
allowed tail calls to functions with weak linkage and protected/hidden
visibility. While protected/hidden visibility does prevent the function
implementation from being replaced at runtime (via interposition), it does not
prevent the linker from using an alternate implementation at link time (i.e.
using some strong definition to replace the provided weak one during linking).
If this happens, then we're still potentially looking at a required TOC
restoration upon return.
Otherwise, in general, the post-call nop is needed wherever ELF interposition
needs to be supported. We don't currently support ELF interposition at the IR
level (see http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-November/107625.html
for more information), and I don't think we should try to make it appear to
work in the backend in spite of that fact. This will yield subtle bugs if
interposition is attempted. As a result, regardless of whether we're in PIC
mode, we don't assume that we need to add the nop to support the possibility of
ELF interposition. However, the necessary check is in place (i.e. calling
GV->isInterposable and TM.shouldAssumeDSOLocal) so when we have functions for
which interposition is allowed at the IR level, we'll add the nop as necessary.
In the mean time, we'll generate more tail calls and fewer nops when compiling
position-independent code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27231
llvm-svn: 289638
Summary:
This patch aims to generalize matching of the strided store accesses to more general masks.
The more general rule is to have consecutive accesses based on the stride:
[x, y, ... z, x+1, y+1, ...z+1, x+2, y+2, ...z+2, ...]
All elements in the masks need not form a contiguous space, there may be gaps.
As before, undefs are allowed and filled in with adjacent element loads.
Reviewers: HaoLiu, mssimpso
Subscribers: mkuper, delena, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23646
llvm-svn: 289573
This is not always behaving as expected as it turns out block live-in
lists are only correct most of the time. Still waiting for reviews on
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27559 to have them correct all of the time.
See also http://llvm.org/PR31361, rdar://25117107
This reverts commit r288567.
This reverts commit r288561.
llvm-svn: 289570
We were using the correct pseudo-instruction, but because the operand's flags
weren't set correctly we still ended up emitting incorrect relocations during
MC lowering.
llvm-svn: 289566
In certain cases it is possible that transient instructions such as
%reg = IMPLICIT_DEF as a single instruction in a basic block to reach
the MipsHazardSchedule pass. This patch teaches MipsHazardSchedule to
properly look through such cases.
Reviewers: vkalintiris, zoran.jovanovic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27209
llvm-svn: 289529
Summary:
This pass will be used to relax instructions which use out of bounds
memory accesses to equivalent operations that can work with the
addresses.
The pass currently implements relaxation for the STDWPtrQRr instruction.
Without this pass, an assertion error would be hit in the pseudo expansion pass.
In the future, we will need to add more instructions to this pass. We can do
that on a case-by-case basic.
Reviewers: arsenm, kparzysz
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27650
llvm-svn: 289517
The general idea here is to get enough of the existing restrictions out of the way that the already existing folding logic in foldMemoryOperand can kick in for STATEPOINTs and fold references to immutable stack slots. The key changes are:
Support for folding multiple operands at once which reference the same load
Support for folding multiple loads into a single instruction
Walk all the operands of the instruction for varidic instructions (this is a bug fix!)
Once this lands, I'll post another patch which refactors the TII interface here. There's nothing actually x86 specific about the x86 code used here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24103
llvm-svn: 289510
