Rushed when I realized I hadn't committed the FreeDeleter for a clang
change I'd committed, and didn't check that I had things lying around in
my client.
Apologies for the noise.
llvm-svn: 216792
Summary:
If a variadic function body contains a musttail call, then we copy all
of the remaining register parameters into virtual registers in the
function prologue. We track the virtual registers through the function
body, and add them as additional registers to pass to the call. Because
this is all done in virtual registers, the register allocator usually
gives us good code. If the function does a call, however, it will have
to spill and reload all argument registers (ew).
Forwarding regparms on x86_32 is not implemented because most compilers
don't support varargs in 32-bit with regparms.
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5060
llvm-svn: 216780
We've rejected these kinds of functions since r28405 in 2006 because
it's impossible to lower the return of a callee cleanup varargs
function. However there are lots of legal ways to leave such a function
without returning, such as aborting. Today we can leave a function with
a musttail call to another function with the correct prototype, and
everything works out.
I'm removing the verifier check declaring that a normal return from such
a function is UB.
Reviewed By: nlewycky
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5059
llvm-svn: 216779
This patch checks for DAG patterns that are an add or a sub followed by a
compare on 16 and 8 bit inputs. Since AArch64 does not support those types
natively they are legalized into 32 bit values, which means that mask operations
are inserted into the DAG to emulate overflow behaviour. In many cases those
masks do not change the result of the processing and just introduce a dependent
operation, often in the middle of a hot loop.
This patch detects the relevent DAG patterns and then tests to see if the
transforms are equivalent with and without the mask, removing the mask if
possible. The exact mechanism of this patch was discusses in
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2014-July/074444.html
There is a reasonably good chance there are missed oppurtunities due to similiar
(but not identical) DAG patterns that could be funneled into this test, adding
them should be simple if we see test cases.
Tests included.
rdar://13754426
llvm-svn: 216776
The new solution is to not use this lowering if there are any dynamic
allocas in the current function. We know up front if there are dynamic
allocas, but we don't know if we'll need to create stack temporaries
with large alignment during lowering. Conservatively assume that we will
need such temporaries.
Reviewed By: hans
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5128
llvm-svn: 216775
Even loads/stores that have a stronger ordering than monotonic can be safe.
The rule is no release-acquire pair on the path from the QueryInst, assuming that
the QueryInst is not atomic itself.
llvm-svn: 216771
Summary:
Mostly renaming the (not very explicit) variables Tmp0, .. Tmp4, and grouping
related statements together, along with a few lines of comments for the
surprising parts.
No functional change intended.
Test Plan: make check-all
Reviewers: jfb
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5088
llvm-svn: 216768
When we select a trunc instruction we don't emit any code if the type is already
i32 or smaller. This is because the instruction that uses the truncated value
will deal with it.
This behavior can incorrectly transfer a kill flag, which was meant for the
result of the truncate, onto the source register.
%2 = trunc i32 %1 to i16
... = ... %2 -> ... = ... vreg1 <kill>
... = ... %1 ... = ... vreg1
This commit fixes this by emitting a COPY instruction, so that the result and
source register are distinct virtual registers.
This fixes rdar://problem/18178188.
llvm-svn: 216750
Summary:
Instead of specifying the alignment as metadata which may be destroyed by
transformation passes, make the alignment the second argument to ldu/ldg
intrinsic calls.
Test Plan:
ldu-ldg.ll
ldu-i8.ll
ldu-reg-plus-offset.ll
Reviewers: eliben, meheff, jholewinski
Reviewed By: meheff, jholewinski
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5093
llvm-svn: 216731
While working on a Thumb-2 code size optimization I just realized that we don't have any regression tests for it.
So here's a first test case, I plan to increase the coverage over time.
llvm-svn: 216728
In an llvm-stress generated test, we were trying to create a v0iN type and
asserting when that failed. This case could probably be handled by the
function, but not without added complexity and the situation it arises in is
sufficiently odd that there's probably no benefit anyway.
Should fix PR20775.
llvm-svn: 216725
and forget about the previously used accumulator.
Coming up with a simple testcase is not easy, as this highly depends on
what the register allocator is doing: this issue showed up while working
with the PBQP allocator, which produced a different allocation scheme.
A testcase would need to come up with chain starting in D[0-7], then
moving to D[8-15], followed by a call to a function whose regmask
clobbers the starting accumulator in D[0-7], then another use of the chain.
Fixed some formatting, added some invariant checks while there.
llvm-svn: 216721
The code in SelectionDAG::getMemset for some reason assumes the value passed to
memset is an i32. This breaks the generated code for targets that only have
registers smaller than 32 bits because the value might get split into multiple
registers by the calling convention. See the test for the MSP430 target included
in the patch for an example.
This patch ensures that nothing is assumed about the type of the value. Instead,
the type is taken from the selected overload of the llvm.memset intrinsic.
llvm-svn: 216716
This fix checks first if the instruction to be folded (e.g. sign-/zero-extend,
or shift) is in the same machine basic block as the instruction we are folding
into.
Not doing so can result in incorrect code, because the value might not be
live-out of the basic block, where the value is defined.
This fixes rdar://problem/18169495.
llvm-svn: 216700
Don't promote byval pointer arguments when when their size in bits is
not equal to their alloc size in bits. This can happen for x86_fp80,
where the size in bits is 80 but the alloca size in bits in 128.
Promoting these types can break passing unions of x86_fp80s and other
types.
Patch by Thomas Jablin!
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5057
llvm-svn: 216693
The AArch64 target lowering for [zs]ext of vectors is set up to handle
input simple types and expects the generic SDag path to do something reasonable
with anything that's not a simple type. The code, however, was only
checking that the result type was a simple type and assuming that
implied that the source type would also be a simple type. That's not a
valid assumption, as operations like "zext <1 x i1> %0 to <1 x i32>"
demonstrate. The fix is to simply explicitly validate the source type
as well as the result type.
PR20791
llvm-svn: 216689
On MachO, putting a symbol that doesn't start with a 'L' or 'l' in one of the
__TEXT,__literal* sections prevents the linker from merging the context of the
section.
Since private GVs are the ones the get mangled to start with 'L' or 'l', we now
only put those on the __TEXT,__literal* sections.
llvm-svn: 216682
