This reverts commit r247898 (which reverted r247894).
Patch fixed to address two issues exposed by buildbots:
- unused variable warning in NDEBUG mode
- std::initializer_list lifetime issue causing test failures
Original Summary:
Support for including the function bitcode indices in the Value Symbol
Table. This requires writing the VST after the function blocks, which in
turn requires a new VST forward declaration record encoding the offset of
the full VST (which is backpatched to contain the offset after the VST
is written).
This patch also enables the lazy function reader to use the new function
indices out of the VST. This support will be used by ThinLTO as well, which
will be in a follow on patch. Backwards compatibility with older bitcode
files is maintained.
A new test is also included.
The bitcode format (used for the lazy reader as well as the upcoming
ThinLTO patches) came out of discussions with Duncan and others and is
described here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B036uwnWM6RWdnBLakxmeDdOeXc/view
Reviewers: dexonsmith, davidxl, joker.eph
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12536
llvm-svn: 247927
Temporarily revert to fix some buildbot issues. One is a minor issue
with a variable unused in NDEBUG mode. More concerning are some test
failures on win7 that I need to dig into.
This reverts commit 4e66a74543459832cfd571db42b4543580ae1d1d.
llvm-svn: 247898
Summary:
Support for including the function bitcode indices in the Value Symbol
Table. This requires writing the VST after the function blocks, which in
turn requires a new VST forward declaration record encoding the offset of
the full VST (which is backpatched to contain the offset after the VST
is written).
This patch also enables the lazy function reader to use the new function
indices out of the VST. This support will be used by ThinLTO as well, which
will be in a follow on patch. Backwards compatibility with older bitcode
files is maintained.
A new test is also included.
The bitcode format (used for the lazy reader as well as the upcoming
ThinLTO patches) came out of discussions with Duncan and others and is
described here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B036uwnWM6RWdnBLakxmeDdOeXc/view
Reviewers: dexonsmith, davidxl, joker.eph
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12536
llvm-svn: 247894
