Instructions like 'fxsave' and control flow instructions like 'jne'
match any operand size. The loop I added to the Intel syntax matcher
assumed that using a different size would give a different instruction.
Now it handles the case where we get the same instruction for different
memory operand sizes.
This also allows us to remove the hack we had for unsized absolute
memory operands, because we can successfully match things like 'jnz'
without reporting ambiguity. Removing this hack uncovered test case
involving 'fadd' that was ambiguous. The memory operand could have been
single or double precision.
llvm-svn: 216604
we stopped efficiently lowering sextload using the SSE41 instructions
for that operation.
This is a consequence of a bad predicate I used thinking of the memory
access needs. The code actually handles the cases where the predicate
doesn't apply, and handles them much better. =] Simple fix and a test
case added. Fixes PR20767.
llvm-svn: 216538
This combine is essentially combining target-specific nodes back into target
independent nodes that it "knows" will be combined yet again by a target
independent DAG combine into a different set of target-independent nodes that
are legal (not custom though!) and thus "ok". This seems... deeply flawed. The
crux of the problem is that we don't combine un-legalized shuffles that are
introduced by legalizing other operations, and thus we don't see a very
profitable combine opportunity. So the backend just forces the input to that
combine to re-appear.
However, for this to work, the conditions detected to re-form the unlegalized
nodes must be *exactly* right. Previously, failing this would have caused poor
code (if you're lucky) or a crasher when we failed to select instructions.
After r215611 we would fall back into the legalizer. In some cases, this just
"fixed" the crasher by produces bad code. But in the test case added it caused
the legalizer and the dag combiner to iterate forever.
The fix is to make the alignment checking in the x86 side of things match the
alignment checking in the generic DAG combine exactly. This isn't really a
satisfying or principled fix, but it at least make the code work as intended.
It also highlights that it would be nice to detect the availability of under
aligned loads for a given type rather than bailing on this optimization. I've
left a FIXME to document this.
Original commit message for r215611 which covers the rest of the chang:
[SDAG] Fix a case where we would iteratively legalize a node during
combining by replacing it with something else but not re-process the
node afterward to remove it.
In a truly remarkable stroke of bad luck, this would (in the test case
attached) end up getting some other node combined into it without ever
getting re-processed. By adding it back on to the worklist, in addition
to deleting the dead nodes more quickly we also ensure that if it
*stops* being dead for any reason it makes it back through the
legalizer. Without this, the test case will end up failing during
instruction selection due to an and node with a type we don't have an
instruction pattern for.
It took many million runs of the shuffle fuzz tester to find this.
llvm-svn: 216537
The existing matcher has lots of AT&T assembly dialect assumptions baked
into it. In particular, the hack for resolving the size of a memory
operand by appending the four most common suffixes doesn't work at all.
The Intel assembly dialect mnemonic table has ambiguous entries, so we
need to try matching multiple times with different operand sizes, since
that's the only way to choose different instruction variants.
This makes us more compatible with gas's implementation of Intel
assembly syntax. MSVC assumes you want byte-sized operations for the
instructions that we reject as ambiguous.
Reviewed By: grosbach
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4747
llvm-svn: 216481
This actually was caught by existing tests but those tests were disabled
with an XFAIL because of PR20736. While working on fixing that,
I noticed the test failure, and tracked it down to this.
We even have a really nice Clang warning that would have caught this but
it isn't enabled in LLVM! =[ I may look at enabling it.
llvm-svn: 216391
This patch adds support to recognize division by uniform power of 2 and modifies the cost table to vectorize division by uniform power of 2 whenever possible.
Updates Cost model for Loop and SLP Vectorizer.The cost table is currently only updated for X86 backend.
Thanks to Hal, Andrea, Sanjay for the review. (http://reviews.llvm.org/D4971)
llvm-svn: 216371
these DAG combines.
The DAG auto-CSE thing is truly terrible. Due to it, when RAUW-ing
a node with its operand, you can cause its uses to CSE to itself, which
then causes their uses to become your uses which causes them to be
picked up by the RAUW. For nodes that are determined to be "no-ops",
this is "fine". But if the RAUW is one of several steps to enact
a transformation, this causes the DAG to really silently eat an discard
nodes that you would never expect. It took days for me to actually
pinpoint a test case triggering this and a really frustrating amount of
time to even comprehend the bug because I never even thought about the
ability of RAUW to iteratively consume nodes due to CSE-ing them into
itself.
To fix this, we have to build up a brand-new chain of operations any
time we are combining across (potentially) intervening nodes. But once
the logic is added to do this, another issue surfaces: CombineTo eagerly
deletes the one node combined, *but no others*. This is... really
frustrating. If deleting it makes its operands become dead, those
operand nodes often won't go onto the worklist in the
order you would want -- they're already on it and not near the top. That
means things higher on the worklist will get combined prior to these
dead nodes being GCed out of the worklist, and if the chain is long, the
immediate users won't be enough to re-detect where the root of the chain
is that became single-use again after deleting the dead nodes. The
better way to do this is to never immediately delete nodes, and instead
to just enqueue them so we can recursively delete them. The
combined-from node is typically not on the worklist anyways by virtue of
having been popped off.... But that in turn breaks other tests that
*require* CombineTo to delete unused nodes. :: sigh ::
Fortunately, there is a better way. This whole routine should have been
returning the replacement rather than using CombineTo which is quite
hacky. Switch to that, and all the pieces fall together.
I suspect the same kind of miscompile is possible in the half-shuffle
folding code, and potentially the recursive folding code. I'll be
switching those over to a pattern more like this one for safety's sake
even though I don't immediately have any test cases for them. Note that
the only way I got a test case for this instance was with *heavily* DAG
combined 256-bit shuffle sequences generated by my fuzzer. ;]
llvm-svn: 216319
There's no need to do this if the user doesn't call va_start. In the
future, we're going to have thunks that forward these register
parameters with musttail calls, and they won't need these spills for
handling va_start.
Most of the test suite changes are adding va_start calls to existing
tests to keep things working.
llvm-svn: 216294
This (mostly) reverts commit r216119.
Somewhere during the review Reid committed r214980 which fixed this
another way, and I neglected to check that the testcase still failed
before committing.
I've left test/CodeGen/X86/aligned-variadic.ll around in case it adds
extra coverage.
llvm-svn: 216246
We discussed the issue of generality vs. readability of the AVX512 classes
recently. I proposed this approach to try to hide and centralize the mappings
we commonly perform based on the vector type. A new class X86VectorVTInfo
captures these.
The idea is to pass an instance of this class to classes/multiclasses instead
of the corresponding ValueType. Then the class/multiclass can use its field
for things that derive from the type rather than passing all those as separate
arguments.
I modified avx512_valign to demonstrate this new approach. As you can see
instead of 7 related template parameters we now have one. The downside is
that we have to refer to fields for the derived values. I named the argument
'_' in order to make this as invisible as possible. Please let me know if you
absolutely hate this. (Also once we allow local initializations in
multiclasses we can recover the original version by assigning the fields to
local variables.)
Another possible use-case for this class is to directly map things, e.g.:
RegisterClass KRC = X86VectorVTInfo<32, i16>.KRC
llvm-svn: 216209
Summary:
This bug was introduced in r213006 which makes an assumption that MCSection is COFF for Windows MSVC. This assumption is broken for MCJIT users where ELF is used instead [1]. The fix is to change the MCSection cast to a dyn_cast.
[1] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-December/068407.html.
Reviewers: majnemer
Reviewed By: majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4872
llvm-svn: 216173
Fix for PR20648 - http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20648
This patch checks the operands of a vselect to see if all values are constants.
If yes, bail out of any further attempts to create a blend or shuffle because
SelectionDAGLegalize knows how to turn this kind of vselect into a single load.
This already happens for machines without SSE4.1, so the added checks just send
more targets down that path.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4934
llvm-svn: 216121
The goal of the patch is to implement section 3.2.3 of the AMD64 ABI
correctly. The controlling sentence is, "The size of each argument gets
rounded up to eightbytes. Therefore the stack will always be eightbyte
aligned." The equivalent sentence in the i386 ABI page 37 says, "At all
times, the stack pointer should point to a word-aligned area." For both
architectures, the stack pointer is not being rounded up to the nearest
eightbyte or word between the last normal argument and the first
variadic argument.
Patch by Thomas Jablin!
llvm-svn: 216119
Summary: This fixes http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19530.
The problem is that X86ISelLowering erroneously thought the third call
was eligible for tail call elimination.
It would have been if it's return value was actually the one returned
by the calling function, but here that is not the case and
additional values are being returned.
Test Plan: Test case from the original bug report is included.
Reviewers: rafael
Reviewed By: rafael
Subscribers: rafael, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4968
llvm-svn: 216117
Summary:
Fixes http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20016 reproducible on new
lea-5.ll case.
Also use RSP/RBP for x32 lea to save 1 byte used for 0x67 prefix in
ESP/EBP case.
Test Plan: lea tests modified to include x32/nacl and new test added
Reviewers: nadav, dschuff, t.p.northover
Subscribers: llvm-commits, zinovy.nis
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4929
llvm-svn: 216065
Note: This was originally reverted to track down a buildbot error. Reapply
without any modifications.
Original commit message:
In the large code model for X86 floating-point constants are placed in the
constant pool and materialized by loading from it. Since the constant pool
could be far away, a PC relative load might not work. Therefore we first
materialize the address of the constant pool with a movabsq and then load
from there the floating-point value.
Fixes <rdar://problem/17674628>.
llvm-svn: 216012
Note: This was originally reverted to track down a buildbot error. Reapply
without any modifications.
Original commit message:
This mostly affects the i64 value type, which always resulted in an 15byte
mobavsq instruction to materialize any constant. The custom code checks the
value of the immediate and tries to use a different and smaller mov
instruction when possible.
This fixes <rdar://problem/17420988>.
llvm-svn: 216010
