Summary:
This fixes PR 28933 by making sure GVNHoist does not try to recreate memory
accesses when it has not actually moved them.
Reviewers: sebpop
Subscribers: llvm-commits, george.burgess.iv
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23411
llvm-svn: 278401
Summary:
We teach alias analysis that invariant.start is readonly.
This helps with GVN and memcopy optimizations that currently treat.
invariant.start as a clobber.
We need to treat this as readonly, so that DSE does not incorrectly
remove stores prior to the invariant.start
Reviewers: sanjoy, reames, majnemer, dberlin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23214
llvm-svn: 278138
The patch splits a complex && if condition into easier to read and understand
logic. That wrong early exit condition was letting some instructions with not
all operands available pass through when HoistingGeps was true.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23174
llvm-svn: 277785
With this patch we compute the MemorySSA once and update it in the code generator.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22966
llvm-svn: 277649
When loading or storing in a field of a struct like "a.b.c", GVN is able to
detect the equivalent expressions, and GVN-hoist would fail in the code
generation. This is because the GEPs are not hoisted as scalar operations to
avoid moving the GEPs too far from their ld/st instruction when the ld/st is not
movable. So we end up having to generate code for the GEP of a ld/st when we
move the ld/st. In the case of a GEP referring to another GEP as in "a.b.c" we
need to code generate all the GEPs necessary to make all the operands available
at the new location for the ld/st. With this patch we recursively walk through
the GEP operands checking whether all operands are available, and in the case of
a GEP operand, it recursively makes all its operands available. Code generation
happens from the inner GEPs out until reaching the GEP that appears as an
operand of the ld/st.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22599
llvm-svn: 276841
Instead of DFS numbering basic blocks we now DFS number instructions that avoids
the costly operation of which instruction comes first in a basic block.
Patch mostly written by Daniel Berlin.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22777
llvm-svn: 276714
If we two loads of two different alignments, we must use the minimum of
the two alignments when hoisting. Same deal for stores.
For allocas, use the maximum of the two allocas.
llvm-svn: 276601
Do not clone stored values unless they are GEPs that are special cased to avoid
hoisting them without hoisting their associated ld/st.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22652
llvm-svn: 276358
While debugging GVNHoist, I found it confusing that the entries in a
VNtoInsns were not always value numbers. They _usually_ were except for
StoreInst in which case they were a hash of two different value numbers.
This leads to two observations:
- It is more difficult to debug things when the semantic contents of
VNtoInsns changes over time.
- Using a single value number is not much cheaper, the value of
VNtoInsns is a SmallVector.
- It is not immediately clear what the algorithm would do if there were
hash collisions in the StoreInst case.
Using a DenseMap of std::pair sidesteps all of this.
N.B. The changes in the test were due their sensitivity to the
iteration order of VNtoInsns which has changed.
llvm-svn: 275761
This pass hoists duplicated computations in the program. The primary goal of
gvn-hoist is to reduce the size of functions before inline heuristics to reduce
the total cost of function inlining.
Pass written by Sebastian Pop, Aditya Kumar, Xiaoyu Hu, and Brian Rzycki.
Important algorithmic contributions by Daniel Berlin under the form of reviews.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19338
llvm-svn: 275561
Fix for PR 28418.
opt never finishes compiling a test when -gvn option is passed.
The problem is caused by the fact that GVN fails to fold a constant expression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22185
llvm-svn: 275483
This pass hoists duplicated computations in the program. The primary goal of
gvn-hoist is to reduce the size of functions before inline heuristics to reduce
the total cost of function inlining.
Pass written by Sebastian Pop, Aditya Kumar, Xiaoyu Hu, and Brian Rzycki.
Important algorithmic contributions by Daniel Berlin under the form of reviews.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19338
llvm-svn: 275401
This pass hoists duplicated computations in the program. The primary goal of
gvn-hoist is to reduce the size of functions before inline heuristics to reduce
the total cost of function inlining.
Pass written by Sebastian Pop, Aditya Kumar, Xiaoyu Hu, and Brian Rzycki.
Important algorithmic contributions by Daniel Berlin under the form of reviews.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19338
llvm-svn: 274305
r273711 was reverted by r273743. The inliner needs to know about any
call sites in the inlined function. These were obscured if we replaced
a call to undef with an undef but kept the call around.
This fixes PR28298.
llvm-svn: 273753
Again, fairly simple. Only change is ensuring that we actually copy the property of the load correctly. The aliasing legality constraints were already handled by the FRE patches. There's nothing special about unorder atomics from the perspective of the PRE algorithm itself.
llvm-svn: 268804
You'll note there are essentially no code changes here. Cross block FRE heavily reuses code from the block local FRE. All of the tricky parts were done as part of the previous patch and the refactoring that removed the original code duplication.
llvm-svn: 268775
This patch is the first in a small series teaching GVN to optimize unordered loads aggressively. This change just handles block local FRE because that's the simplest thing which lets me test MDA, and the AvailableValue pieces. Somewhat suprisingly, MDA appears fine and only a couple of small changes are needed in GVN.
Once this is in, I'll tackle non-local FRE and PRE. The former looks like a natural extension of this, the later will require a couple of minor changes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19440
llvm-svn: 268770
Currently each Function points to a DISubprogram and DISubprogram has a
scope field. For member functions the scope is a DICompositeType. DIScopes
point to the DICompileUnit to facilitate type uniquing.
Distinct DISubprograms (with isDefinition: true) are not part of the type
hierarchy and cannot be uniqued. This change removes the subprograms
list from DICompileUnit and instead adds a pointer to the owning compile
unit to distinct DISubprograms. This would make it easy for ThinLTO to
strip unneeded DISubprograms and their transitively referenced debug info.
Motivation
----------
Materializing DISubprograms is currently the most expensive operation when
doing a ThinLTO build of clang.
We want the DISubprogram to be stored in a separate Bitcode block (or the
same block as the function body) so we can avoid having to expensively
deserialize all DISubprograms together with the global metadata. If a
function has been inlined into another subprogram we need to store a
reference the block containing the inlined subprogram.
Attached to https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27284 is a python script
that updates LLVM IR testcases to the new format.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19034
<rdar://problem/25256815>
llvm-svn: 266446
When GVN wants to re-interpret an already available value in a smaller
type, it needs to right-shift the value on big-endian systems to ensure
the correct bytes are accessed. The shift value is the difference of
the sizes of the two types.
This is correct as long as both types occupy multiples of full bytes.
However, when one of them is a sub-byte type like i1, this no longer
holds true: we still need to shift, but only to access the correct
*byte*. Accessing bits within the byte requires no shift in either
endianness; e.g. an i1 resides in the least-significant bit of its
containing byte on both big- and little-endian systems.
Therefore, the appropriate shift value to be used is the difference of
the *storage* sizes of the two types. This is already handled correctly
in one place where such a shift takes place (GetStoreValueForLoad), but
is incorrect in two other places: GetLoadValueForLoad and
CoerceAvailableValueToLoadType.
This patch changes both places to use the storage size as well.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18662
llvm-svn: 265684
A release fence acts as a publication barrier for stores within the current thread to become visible to other threads which might observe the release fence. It does not require the current thread to observe stores performed on other threads. As a result, we can allow store-load and load-load forwarding across a release fence.
We choose to be much more conservative about stores. In theory, nothing prevents us from shifting a store from after a release fence to before it, and then eliminating the preceeding (previously fenced) store. Doing this without actually moving the second store is likely also legal, but we chose to be conservative at this time.
The LangRef indicates only atomic loads and stores are effected by fences. This patch chooses to be far more conservative then that.
This is the GVN companion to http://reviews.llvm.org/D11434 which applied the same logic in EarlyCSE and has been baking in tree for a while now.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11436
llvm-svn: 264472
tests to run GVN in both modes.
This is mostly the boring refactoring just like SROA and other complex
transformation passes. There is some trickiness in that GVN's
ValueNumber class requires hand holding to get to compile cleanly. I'm
open to suggestions about a better pattern there, but I tried several
before settling on this. I was trying to balance my desire to sink as
much implementation detail into the source file as possible without
introducing overly many layers of abstraction.
Much like with SROA, the design of this system is made somewhat more
cumbersome by the need to support both pass managers without duplicating
the significant state and logic of the pass. The same compromise is
struck here.
I've also left a FIXME in a doxygen comment as the GVN pass seems to
have pretty woeful documentation within it. I'd like to submit this with
the FIXME and let those more deeply familiar backfill the information
here now that we have a nice place in an interface to put that kind of
documentaiton.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18019
llvm-svn: 263208
