Transition InstrProf and Coverage over to the stricter Error/Expected
interface.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19901
llvm-svn: 269462
Summary: This way we can get rid of one of the fields in the .def file.
Reviewers: llvm-commits
Subscribers: zturner
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20251
llvm-svn: 269461
This patch adds basic support for MachO::load_command. Load command types and sizes are encoded in the YAML and expanded back into MachO.
The YAML doesn't yet support load command structs, that is coming next. In the meantime as a temporary measure when writing MachO files the load commands are padded with zeros so that the generated binary is valid.
llvm-svn: 269442
This reverts commit r269428, as it breaks the LLDB build. We need to
understand how to change LLDB in the same way as LLC before landing this
again.
llvm-svn: 269432
Without a diagnostic handler installed, llc's behaviour is to exit on the first
error that it encounters. This is very different from the behaviour of clang
and other front ends, which try to gather as many errors as possible before
exiting.
This commit adds a diagnostic handler to llc, allowing it to find and report
more than one error. The old behaviour is preserved under a flag (-exit-on-error).
Some of the tests fail with the new diagnostic handler, so they have to use the
new flag in order to run under the previous behaviour. Some of these are known
bugs, others need further investigation. Ideally, we should fix the tests and
remove the flag at some point in the future.
Patch by Diana Picus.
llvm-svn: 269428
a sequence of values.
It increments through the values in the half-open range: [Begin, End),
producing those values when indirecting the iterator. It should support
integers, iterators, and any other type providing these basic arithmetic
operations.
This came up in the C++ standards committee meeting, and it seemed like
a useful construct that LLVM might want as well, and I wanted to
understand how easily we could solve it. I suspect this can be used to
write simpler counting loops even in LLVM along the lines of:
for (int i : seq(0, v.size())) {
...
};
As part of this, I had to fix the lack of a proxy object returned from
the operator[] in our iterator facade.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17870
llvm-svn: 269390
Summary:
...loop after the last iteration.
This is really hard to do correctly. The core problem is that we need to
model liveness through the induction PHIs from iteration to iteration in
order to get the correct results, and we need to correctly de-duplicate
the common subgraphs of instructions feeding some subset of the
induction PHIs. All of this can be driven either from a side effect at
some iteration or from the loop values used after the loop finishes.
This patch implements this by storing the forward-propagating analysis
of each instruction in a cache to recall whether it was free and whether
it has become live and thus counted toward the total unroll cost. Then,
at each sink for a value in the loop, we recursively walk back through
every value that feeds the sink, including looping back through the
iterations as needed, until we have marked the entire input graph as
live. Because we cache this, we never visit instructions more than twice
-- once when we analyze them and put them into the cache, and once when
we count their cost towards the unrolled loop. Also, because the cache
is only two bits and because we are dealing with relatively small
iteration counts, we can store all of this very densely in memory to
avoid this from becoming an excessively slow analysis.
The code here is still pretty gross. I would appreciate suggestions
about better ways to factor or split this up, I've stared too long at
the algorithmic side to really have a good sense of what the design
should probably look at.
Also, it might seem like we should do all of this bottom-up, but I think
that is a red herring. Specifically, the simplification power is *much*
greater working top-down. We can forward propagate very effectively,
even across strange and interesting recurrances around the backedge.
Because we use data to propagate, this doesn't cause a state space
explosion. Doing this level of constant folding, etc, would be very
expensive to do bottom-up because it wouldn't be until the last moment
that you could collapse everything. The current solution is essentially
a top-down simplification with a bottom-up cost accounting which seems
to get the best of both worlds. It makes the simplification incremental
and powerful while leaving everything dead until we *know* it is needed.
Finally, a core property of this approach is its *monotonicity*. At all
times, the current UnrolledCost is a conservatively low estimate. This
ensures that we will never early-exit from the analysis due to exceeding
a threshold when if we had continued, the cost would have gone back
below the threshold. These kinds of bugs can cause incredibly hard to
track down random changes to behavior.
We could use a techinque similar (but much simpler) within the inliner
as well to avoid considering speculated code in the inline cost.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: sanjoy, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11758
llvm-svn: 269388
Having the MachO enums in a def file instead of inline will allow us to write utilities and encoding/decoding methods for load commands without having to write a lot of mechanically repeated code.
llvm-svn: 269380
Ported DA to the new PM by splitting the former DependenceAnalysis Pass
into a DependenceInfo result type and DependenceAnalysisWrapperPass type
and adding a new PM-style DependenceAnalysis analysis pass returning the
DependenceInfo.
Patch by Philip Pfaffe, most of the review by Justin.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18834
llvm-svn: 269370
I've added the reserved field as an "optional" in YAML, but I've added asserts in the yaml2macho code to enforce that the field is present in mach_header_64, but not in mach_header.
llvm-svn: 269320
This merges the functionality of the macros in `CVLeafTypes.def` and the
macros in `TypeRecords.def` into a single set of macros.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20190
Reviewed By: rnk, amccarth
llvm-svn: 269316
This introduces a variadic template and some helper macros to
safely and correctly deserialize many types of common record
fields while maintaining error checking.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20183
Reviewed By: rnk, amccarth
llvm-svn: 269315
Since we want to be able to use yaml to describe degenerate object files as well as valid ones, we need to be explicit of some fields in your yaml definitions.
llvm-svn: 269313
It's very common to want to replace a node and then remove it since
it's dead, especially as we port backends from the SDNode *Select API
to the void Select one. This helper makes this sequence a bit less
verbose.
llvm-svn: 269236
DbgInfoIntrinsic::StripCast() is dead since r79977
The only function that creates Comdat objects seems to be in Module, and always creates them using the default constructor.
llvm-svn: 269204
Extract a part of isDereferenceableAndAlignedPointer functionality to Value:
Reviewed By: hfinkel, sanjoy
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17611
llvm-svn: 269190
This means SelectCode unconditionally returns nullptr now. I'll follow
up with a change to make that return void as well, but it seems best
to keep that one very mechanical.
This is part of the work to have Select return void instead of an
SDNode *, which is in turn part of llvm.org/pr26808.
llvm-svn: 269136
Remove the ModuleLevelChanges argument, and the ability to create new
subprograms for cloned functions. The latter was added without review in
r203662, but it has no in-tree clients (all non-test callers pass false
for ModuleLevelChanges [1], so it isn't reachable outside of tests). It
also isn't clear that adding a duplicate subprogram to the compile unit is
always the right thing to do when cloning a function within a module. If
this functionality comes back it should be accompanied with a more concrete
use case.
Furthermore, all in-tree clients add the returned function to the module.
Since that's pretty much the only sensible thing you can do with the function,
just do that in CloneFunction.
[1] http://llvm-cs.pcc.me.uk/lib/Transforms/Utils/CloneFunction.cpp/rCloneFunction
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18628
llvm-svn: 269110
The plan is to eventually make this logic simpler, however I expect it to
be a little tricky for the foreseeable future (at least until we're rid of
pointee types), so move it here so that it can be reused to build a summary
index for devirtualization.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20005
llvm-svn: 269081
Currently, SelectionDAG assumes 8/16-bit cmpxchg returns either a sign
extended result, or a zero extended result. SystemZ takes a third
option by returning junk in the high bits (rotated contents of the other
bytes in the memory word). In that case, don't use Assert*ext, and
zero-extend the result ourselves if a comparison is needed.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19800
llvm-svn: 269075
Summary:
Add support for emission of plaintext lists of the imported files for
each distributed backend compilation. Used for distributed build file
staging.
Invoked with new gold-plugin thinlto-emit-imports-files option, which is
only valid with thinlto-index-only (i.e. for distributed builds), or
from llvm-lto with new -thinlto-action=emitimports value.
Depends on D19556.
Reviewers: joker.eph
Subscribers: llvm-commits, joker.eph
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19636
llvm-svn: 269067
This restores commit r268627:
Summary:
When launching ThinLTO backends in a distributed build (currently
supported in gold via the thinlto-index-only plugin option), emit
an individual index file for each backend process as described here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-April/098272.html
...
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19556
Address msan failures by avoiding std::prev on map.end(), the
theory is that this is causing issues due to some known UB problems
in __tree.
llvm-svn: 269059
