The dream of a unified check-line auto-generator for all phases of compilation is dead.
The llc script has already diverged to be better at its goal, so having 2 scripts that
do almost the same thing just causes confusion. Now, this script will only work with
opt to produce check lines for IR transforms.
llvm-svn: 305208
Summary:
Python's argparse module includes a `%(default)s` format specifier that
can be used to print the default value of an option in its help text.
Use this for opt-viewer utilities' `--jobs` arguments.
Reviewers: anemet
Reviewed By: anemet
Subscribers: llvm-commits, fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34081
llvm-svn: 305155
Summary: We aren't actually building the test suite, so this isn't needed.
Reviewers: rengolin, hansw
Reviewed By: rengolin
Subscribers: rengolin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29840
llvm-svn: 305017
If there's enough data in fron of it the skipped region would just
become arbitrarily large, and we scan for the CHECK-NOT everywhere.
llvm-svn: 304900
In testing, we've found yet another miscompile caused by the new tables.
And this one is even less clear how to fix (we could teach it to fold
a 16-bit load instead of the 32-bit load it wants, or block folding
entirely).
Also, the approach to excluding instructions seems increasingly to not
scale well.
I have left a more detailed analysis on the review log for the original
patch (https://reviews.llvm.org/D32684) along with suggested path
forward. I will land an additional test case that I wrote which covers
the code that was miscompiling (folding into the output of `pextrw`) in
a subsequent commit to keep this a pure revert.
For each commit reverted here, I've restricted the revert to the
non-test code touching the x86 fold table emission until the last commit
where I did revert the test updates. This means the *new* test cases
added for `insertps` and `xchg` remain untouched (and continue to pass).
Reverted commits:
r304540: [X86] Don't fold into memory operands into insertps in the ...
r304347: [TableGen] Adapt more places to getValueAsString now ...
r304163: [X86] Don't fold away the memory operand of an xchg.
r304123: Don't capture a temporary std::string in a StringRef.
r304122: Resubmit "[X86] Adding new LLVM TableGen backend that ..."
Original commit was in r304088, and after a string of fixes was reverted
previously in r304121 to fix build bots, and then re-landed in r304122.
llvm-svn: 304762
Apparently ::NodeKind is sometimes part of the name in GDB.
Without this patch I get the following error message from GDB:
`Unhandled NodeKind llvm::Twine::NodeKind::EmptyKind`.
Patch by Alexander Richardson!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32795
llvm-svn: 304675
on macOS
This function will be used to tie Clang's Integeration tests to a particular
SDK version. See https://reviews.llvm.org/D32178 for more context.
llvm-svn: 304541
insertps behaves differently, the register form selects from an input
register based on the immediate operand while the memory form just loads
the given address. We have custom code to change the immediate in cases
where that's legal, so completely remove insertps from the generated
tables.
llvm-svn: 304540
It tried to detect 9 letters (the length of anonymous) followed by a period. But anonymous classes start with "anonymous_" rather than "anonymous." these days.
llvm-svn: 304387
Internally both these methods just return the result of getValue on either a StringInit or a CodeInit object. In both cases this returns a StringRef pointing to a string allocated in the BumpPtrAllocator so its not going anywhere. So we can just pass that StringRef along.
This is a fairly naive patch that targets just the build failures caused by this change. There's additional work that can be done to avoid creating std::string at call sites that still think getValueAsString returns a std::string. I'll try to clean those up in future patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33710
llvm-svn: 304325
xchg with a mem operand has different locking semantics. If we unfold it
into a xchg r,r we will loose the implicit lock. Likewise we never want
to fold a register xchg into a memory one as it would be a lot slower.
This triggers during LLVM selfhost.
llvm-svn: 304163
This was reverted due to buildbot breakages and I was not familiar
with this code to investigate it. But while trying to get a
useful backtrace for the author, it turns out the fix was very
obvious. Resubmitting this patch as is, and will submit the
fix in a followup so that the fix is not hidden in the larger
CL.
llvm-svn: 304122
This reverts commit 28cb1003507f287726f43c771024a1dc102c45fe as well
as all subsequent followups. llvm-tblgen currently segfaults with
this change, and it seems it has been broken on the bots all
day with no fixes in preparation. See, for example:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86-windows-msvc2015/
llvm-svn: 304121
X86 backend holds huge tables in order to map between the register and memory forms of each instruction.
This TableGen Backend automatically generated all these tables with the appropriate flags for each entry.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32684
llvm-svn: 304088
Summary:
For various clang analyzer tests, which were unsupported, I got lit
exceptions, similar to the following:
Exception during script execution:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "utils/lit/lit/run.py", line 190, in execute_test
result = test.config.test_format.execute(test, lit_config)
File "tools/clang/test/Analysis/analyzer_test.py", line 11, in execute
if result.code == lit.Test.FAIL:
AttributeError: 'tuple' object has no attribute 'code'
This is because executeShTest() in utils/lit/lit/TestRunner.py is
supposed to return a lit.Test.Result object, but in case of unsupported
tests, it returns a plain tuple.
Fix this by returning a properly initialized lit.Test.Result object
instead.
Reviewers: rnk, rafael, modocache
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33579
llvm-svn: 303943
The error message that git-llvm script prints out when svn is missing
is very cryptic. I spent a fair amount of time to find what was wrong
with my environment. It looks like many newcomers also exprienced a
hard time to submit their first patches due to this error.
This patch adds a more user-friendly error message.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33458
llvm-svn: 303696
Summary:
It's rare but a small number of patterns use IntInit's at the root of the match.
On X86, one such rule is enabled by the OptForSize predicate and causes the
compiler to use the smaller:
%0 = MOV32r1
instead of the usual:
%0 = MOV32ri 1
This patch adds support for matching IntInit's at the root and uses this as a
test case for the optsize attribute that was implemented in r301750
Reviewers: qcolombet, ab, t.p.northover, rovka, kristof.beyls, aditya_nandakumar
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32791
llvm-svn: 303678
It's causing some buildbots to timeout whenever tablegen needs re-compilation,
particularly those with -fsanitize=memory but not only them. A compile time
regression was expected since it triples the amount of SelectionDAG rules we
are able to import but it's currently too high.
llvm-svn: 303542
This seems to have been present since the beginning of time,
which is quite surprising. The symptom was this: Suppose you
have a test with a run line that looks like this:
RUN: foo | FileCheck %s
foo prints some output and then due to a bug in the program it
asserts. On Windows this results in the program returning a
negative exit code. But if enough output had been printed
already by the tool so that the FileCheck match would succeed
then FileCheck would return 0, and because of bad logic in
lit this 0 return value would overwrite the failed return
value from previous items in the pipeline. This only happened
with negative exit codes.
The most sensible behavior is to just take whatever the first
exit code is. There is no logical ordering defined on exit
codes, so comparing with < and > does not make a lot of sense.
Instead, as soon as we find the first non-successful return
value, that should be the result of the entire expression.
This fixes the issue, as now tests which fail on non-Windows
platforms also fail for me on Windows as well.
llvm-svn: 303440
Summary:
As of this patch, 1018 out of 3938 rules are currently imported.
Depends on D32275
Reviewers: qcolombet, kristof.beyls, rovka, t.p.northover, ab, aditya_nandakumar
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: dberris, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32278
The previous commit failed on test-suite/Bitcode/simd_ops/AArch64_halide_runtime.bc
because isImmOperandEqual() assumed MO was a register operand and that's not
always true.
llvm-svn: 303341
Summary:
As of this patch, 1018 out of 3938 rules are currently imported.
Depends on D32275
Reviewers: qcolombet, kristof.beyls, rovka, t.p.northover, ab, aditya_nandakumar
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: dberris, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32278
llvm-svn: 303259
Summary:
Without this, it's possible to encounter multiple defs for a register.
This is triggered by the current version of D32868 when applied to trunk.
Reviewers: qcolombet, ab, t.p.northover, rovka, kristof.beyls
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: llvm-commits, igorb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32869
llvm-svn: 303253
When looping through a destination pattern's operands to decide how many
default operands we need to introduce, we used to count the "expanded"
number of operands. So if one default operand would be rendered as 2
values, we'd count it as 2 operands, when in fact it needs to count as
only 1 operand regardless of how many values it expands to.
This turns out to be a problem only in some very specific cases, e.g.
when we have one operand with multiple default values followed by more
operands with default values (see the new test). In such a situation
we'd stop looping before looking at all the operands, and then error out
assuming that we don't have enough default operands to make up the
shortfall.
At the moment this only affects ARM.
The patch removes the loop counting default operands entirely and
assumes that we'll have to introduce values for any default operand that
we find (i.e. we're assuming it cannot be given as a child at all). It
also extracts the code for adding renderers for default operands into a
helper method.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33031
llvm-svn: 303240
