1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2025-02-01 05:01:59 +01:00

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sanjay Patel
5b68045419 [InstCombine] make icmp vector canonicalization safe for constant with undef elements
This is a fix for:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43730
...and as shown there, we have existing test cases that show potential miscompiles.

We could just bail out for vector constants that contain any undef elements, or we can do as shown here:
allow the transform, but replace the undefs with a safe value.

For most of the tests shown, this results in a full splat constant (no undefs) which is probably a win
for further IR analysis because we conservatively don't match undefs in most cases. Codegen can probably
recover these kinds of undef lanes via demanded elements analysis if that's profitable.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69519
2019-10-29 10:58:14 -04:00
Roman Lebedev
08f625dc49 [NFC][InstCombine] Revisit canonicalize-constant-low-bit-mask-and-icmp-s* tests in preparatio for PR42198.
The `icmp sgt`/`icmp sle` variants are, too, miscompiles:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/JFNP
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/jHvL
A precondition 'x != 0' was forgotten by me.

While ensuring test coverage for `-1`, also add test coverage
for `0` mask. Mask `0` is allowed for all the folds,
mask `-1` is allowed for all the folds with unsigned `icmp` pred.
Constant mask `0` is missed though.

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42198

llvm-svn: 362910
2019-06-09 16:30:14 +00:00
Eric Christopher
a62270de2c Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher
71d1cca7ef Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Roman Lebedev
78ea998629 [InstCombine] Fold x & (-1 >> y) u>= x to x u<= (-1 >> y)
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38123
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/azI

This pattern is not commutative. But InstSimplify will
already have taken care of the 'commutative' variant.

llvm-svn: 337096
2018-07-14 12:20:06 +00:00
Roman Lebedev
7cd159f5d4 [NFC][InstCombine] Tests for x & (-1 >> y) u>= x to x u<= (-1 >> y)
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38123
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/azI

This pattern is not commutative. But InstSimplify will
already have taken care of the 'commutative' variant.

llvm-svn: 337095
2018-07-14 12:20:01 +00:00