1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2025-02-01 13:11:39 +01:00

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Eric Christopher
a62270de2c Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher
71d1cca7ef Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
454315178c [PatternMatch] allow undef elements when matching a vector zero
This is the last step in getting constant pattern matchers to allow
undef elements in constant vectors.

I'm adding a dedicated m_ZeroInt() function and building m_Zero() from
that. In most cases, calling code can be updated to use m_ZeroInt()
directly when there's no need to match pointers, but I'm leaving that
efficiency optimization as a follow-up step because it's not always
clear when that's ok.

There are just enough icmp folds in InstSimplify that can be used for 
integer or pointer types, that we probably still want a generic m_Zero()
for those cases. Otherwise, we could eliminate it (and possibly add a
m_NullPtr() as an alias for isa<ConstantPointerNull>()).

We're conservatively returning a full zero vector (zeroinitializer) in
InstSimplify/InstCombine on some of these folds (see diffs in InstSimplify),
but I'm not sure if that's actually necessary in all cases. We may be 
able to propagate an undef lane instead. One test where this happens is 
marked with 'TODO'.
 

llvm-svn: 330550
2018-04-22 17:07:44 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
dcdc24c017 [InstSimplify, InstCombine] add vector tests with undef elts; NFC
llvm-svn: 330543
2018-04-22 14:19:37 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
46b82b7a6d [InstCombine] allow (icmp sgt smin(PosA, B), 0) fold for vectors
llvm-svn: 281624
2016-09-15 16:23:20 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
9470721c2d [InstCombine] add vector tests for icmp sgt smin
llvm-svn: 281623
2016-09-15 16:13:41 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
e5f70c8c7f [InstCombine] auto-generate checks
llvm-svn: 281621
2016-09-15 15:48:53 +00:00
Philip Reames
a1cf015229 [InstCombine] (icmp sgt smin(PosA, B) 0) -> (icmp sgt B 0)
When checking whether an smin is positive, we can move the comparison to one of the inputs if the other is known positive. If the known positive one is the min, then the other can't be negative. If the other is the min, then we compute the min.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17873

llvm-svn: 263059
2016-03-09 21:05:07 +00:00