the output to the correct register. Fixes a hidden problem uncovered
by the last patch where we'd try to DAG combine our MVT::Other node
oddly.
llvm-svn: 121358
result. This allows us to compile:
void *test12(long count) {
return new int[count];
}
into:
test12:
movl $4, %ecx
movq %rdi, %rax
mulq %rcx
movq $-1, %rdi
cmovnoq %rax, %rdi
jmp __Znam ## TAILCALL
instead of:
test12:
movl $4, %ecx
movq %rdi, %rax
mulq %rcx
seto %cl
testb %cl, %cl
movq $-1, %rdi
cmoveq %rax, %rdi
jmp __Znam
Of course it would be even better if the regalloc inverted the cmov to 'cmovoq',
which would eliminate the need for the 'movq %rdi, %rax'.
llvm-svn: 120936
backend that they were all implemented except umul. This one fell back
to the default implementation that did a hi/lo multiply and compared the
top. Fix this to check the overflow flag that the 'mul' instruction
sets, so we can avoid an explicit test. Now we compile:
void *func(long count) {
return new int[count];
}
into:
__Z4funcl: ## @_Z4funcl
movl $4, %ecx ## encoding: [0xb9,0x04,0x00,0x00,0x00]
movq %rdi, %rax ## encoding: [0x48,0x89,0xf8]
mulq %rcx ## encoding: [0x48,0xf7,0xe1]
seto %cl ## encoding: [0x0f,0x90,0xc1]
testb %cl, %cl ## encoding: [0x84,0xc9]
movq $-1, %rdi ## encoding: [0x48,0xc7,0xc7,0xff,0xff,0xff,0xff]
cmoveq %rax, %rdi ## encoding: [0x48,0x0f,0x44,0xf8]
jmp __Znam ## TAILCALL
instead of:
__Z4funcl: ## @_Z4funcl
movl $4, %ecx ## encoding: [0xb9,0x04,0x00,0x00,0x00]
movq %rdi, %rax ## encoding: [0x48,0x89,0xf8]
mulq %rcx ## encoding: [0x48,0xf7,0xe1]
testq %rdx, %rdx ## encoding: [0x48,0x85,0xd2]
movq $-1, %rdi ## encoding: [0x48,0xc7,0xc7,0xff,0xff,0xff,0xff]
cmoveq %rax, %rdi ## encoding: [0x48,0x0f,0x44,0xf8]
jmp __Znam ## TAILCALL
Other than the silly seto+test, this is using the o bit directly, so it's going in the right
direction.
llvm-svn: 120935
foo = a - b
.long foo
instead of just
.long a - b
First, on darwin9 64 bits the assembler produces the wrong result. Second,
if "a" is the end of the section all darwin assemblers (9, 10 and mc) will not
consider a - b to be a constant but will if the dummy foo is created.
Split how we handle these cases. The first one is something MC should take care
of. The second one has to be handled by the caller.
llvm-svn: 120889
The user (i.e. whoever generated a call to the intrinsic in the first place) is
essentially asking for a particular instruction to be placed in the assembler.
If that instruction won't execute on the target machine, that's their problem
not ours. Two buildbots with processors that don't support SSE3 were barfing
on the apm.ll test in CodeGen/X86 because of this assertion.
llvm-svn: 120574
legalization time. Since at legalization time there is no mapping from
SDNode back to the corresponding LLVM instruction and the return
SDNode is target specific, this requires a target hook to check for
eligibility. Only x86 and ARM support this form of sibcall optimization
right now.
rdar://8707777
llvm-svn: 120501
instructions. I choose to handle this with an asmparser hack,
though it could be handled by changing all the instruction definitions
to allow be "setneb" instead of "setne". The asm parser hack is
better in this case, because we want the disassembler to produce
setne, not setneb.
llvm-svn: 120260
- I'm leaving MachO.h, because I believe it has external consumers, but I would really like to eliminate it (we have stylistic disagreements with one another).
llvm-svn: 120187
