1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-11-23 19:23:23 +01:00
Commit Graph

598 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Adrian Prantl
b613a7a943 Add LLVM IR debug info support for Fortran COMMON blocks
COMMON blocks are a feature of Fortran that has no direct analog in C languages, but they are similar to data sections in assembly language programming. A COMMON block is a named area of memory that holds a collection of variables. Fortran subprograms may map the COMMON block memory area to their own, possibly distinct, non-empty list of variables. A Fortran COMMON block might look like the following example.

    COMMON /ALPHA/ I, J

    For this construct, the compiler generates a new scope-like DI construct (!DICommonBlock) into which variables (see I, J above) can be placed. As the common block implies a range of storage with global lifetime, the !DICommonBlock refers to a !DIGlobalVariable. The Fortran variable that comprise the COMMON block are also linked via metadata to offsets within the global variable that stands for the entire common block.

    @alpha_ = common global %alphabytes_ zeroinitializer, align 64, !dbg !27, !dbg !30, !dbg !33
    !14 = distinct !DISubprogram(…)
    !20 = distinct !DICommonBlock(scope: !14, declaration: !25, name: "alpha")
    !25 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(scope: !20, name: "common alpha", type: !24)
    !27 = !DIGlobalVariableExpression(var: !25, expr: !DIExpression())
    !29 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(scope: !20, name: "i", file: !3, type: !28)
    !30 = !DIGlobalVariableExpression(var: !29, expr: !DIExpression())
    !31 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(scope: !20, name: "j", file: !3, type: !28)
    !32 = !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus_uconst, 4)
    !33 = !DIGlobalVariableExpression(var: !31, expr: !32)

    The DWARF generated for this is as follows.

    DW_TAG_common_block:
    DW_AT_name: alpha
    DW_AT_location: @alpha_+0
    DW_TAG_variable:
    DW_AT_name: common alpha
    DW_AT_type: array of 8 bytes
    DW_AT_location: @alpha_+0
    DW_TAG_variable:
    DW_AT_name: i
    DW_AT_type: integer*4
    DW_AT_location: @Alpha+0
    DW_TAG_variable:
    DW_AT_name: j
    DW_AT_type: integer*4
    DW_AT_location: @Alpha+4

Patch by Eric Schweitz!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54327

llvm-svn: 357934
2019-04-08 19:13:55 +00:00
Fangrui Song
cd412ccdee Change some StringRef::data() reinterpret_cast to bytes_begin() or arrayRefFromStringRef()
llvm-svn: 357852
2019-04-07 03:58:42 +00:00
Matt Arsenault
01d726ce5c IR: Add immarg attribute
This indicates an intrinsic parameter is required to be a constant,
and should not be replaced with a non-constant value.

Add the attribute to all AMDGPU and generic intrinsics that comments
indicate it should apply to. I scanned other target intrinsics, but I
don't see any obvious comments indicating which arguments are intended
to be only immediates.

This breaks one questionable testcase for the autoupgrade. I'm unclear
on whether the autoupgrade is supposed to really handle declarations
which were never valid. The verifier fails because the attributes now
refer to a parameter past the end of the argument list.

llvm-svn: 355981
2019-03-12 21:02:54 +00:00
Craig Topper
ea7e6b3857 Implementation of asm-goto support in LLVM
This patch accompanies the RFC posted here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/127239.html

This patch adds a new CallBr IR instruction to support asm-goto
inline assembly like gcc as used by the linux kernel. This
instruction is both a call instruction and a terminator
instruction with multiple successors. Only inline assembly
usage is supported today.

This also adds a new INLINEASM_BR opcode to SelectionDAG and
MachineIR to represent an INLINEASM block that is also
considered a terminator instruction.

There will likely be more bug fixes and optimizations to follow
this, but we felt it had reached a point where we would like to
switch to an incremental development model.

Patch by Craig Topper, Alexander Ivchenko, Mikhail Dvoretckii

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53765

llvm-svn: 353563
2019-02-08 20:48:56 +00:00
Julian Lettner
86d339523f Revert "[Sanitizers] UBSan unreachable incompatible with ASan in the presence of noreturn calls"
This reverts commit cea84ab93aeb079a358ab1c8aeba6d9140ef8b47.

llvm-svn: 352069
2019-01-24 18:04:21 +00:00
Julian Lettner
c814a6a425 [Sanitizers] UBSan unreachable incompatible with ASan in the presence of noreturn calls
Summary:
UBSan wants to detect when unreachable code is actually reached, so it
adds instrumentation before every `unreachable` instruction. However,
the optimizer will remove code after calls to functions marked with
`noreturn`. To avoid this UBSan removes `noreturn` from both the call
instruction as well as from the function itself. Unfortunately, ASan
relies on this annotation to unpoison the stack by inserting calls to
`_asan_handle_no_return` before `noreturn` functions. This is important
for functions that do not return but access the the stack memory, e.g.,
unwinder functions *like* `longjmp` (`longjmp` itself is actually
"double-proofed" via its interceptor). The result is that when ASan and
UBSan are combined, the `noreturn` attributes are missing and ASan
cannot unpoison the stack, so it has false positives when stack
unwinding is used.

Changes:
  # UBSan now adds the `expect_noreturn` attribute whenever it removes
    the `noreturn` attribute from a function
  # ASan additionally checks for the presence of this attribute

Generated code:
```
call void @__asan_handle_no_return    // Additionally inserted to avoid false positives
call void @longjmp
call void @__asan_handle_no_return
call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable
unreachable
```

The second call to `__asan_handle_no_return` is redundant. This will be
cleaned up in a follow-up patch.

rdar://problem/40723397

Reviewers: delcypher, eugenis

Tags: #sanitizers

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56624

llvm-svn: 352003
2019-01-24 01:06:19 +00:00
Matt Arsenault
fd94cae16d Reapply "IR: Add fp operations to atomicrmw"
This reapplies commits r351778 and r351782 with
RISCV test fixes.

llvm-svn: 351850
2019-01-22 18:18:02 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
3764443332 Revert r351778: IR: Add fp operations to atomicrmw
This broke the RISCV build, and even with that fixed, one of the RISCV
tests behaves surprisingly differently with asserts than without,
leaving there no clear test pattern to use. Generally it seems bad for
hte IR to differ substantially due to asserts (as in, an alloca is used
with asserts that isn't needed without!) and nothing I did simply would
fix it so I'm reverting back to green.

This also required reverting the RISCV build fix in r351782.

llvm-svn: 351796
2019-01-22 10:29:58 +00:00
Matt Arsenault
44582e29c8 IR: Add fp operations to atomicrmw
Add just fadd/fsub for now.

llvm-svn: 351778
2019-01-22 03:32:36 +00:00
Serge Guelton
b20ef5f960 Replace llvm::isPodLike<...> by llvm::is_trivially_copyable<...>
As noted in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36651, the specialization for
isPodLike<std::pair<...>> did not match the expectation of
std::is_trivially_copyable which makes the memcpy optimization invalid.

This patch renames the llvm::isPodLike trait into llvm::is_trivially_copyable.
Unfortunately std::is_trivially_copyable is not portable across compiler / STL
versions. So a portable version is provided too.

Note that the following specialization were invalid:

    std::pair<T0, T1>
    llvm::Optional<T>

Tests have been added to assert that former specialization are respected by the
standard usage of llvm::is_trivially_copyable, and that when a decent version
of std::is_trivially_copyable is available, llvm::is_trivially_copyable is
compared to std::is_trivially_copyable.

As of this patch, llvm::Optional is no longer considered trivially copyable,
even if T is. This is to be fixed in a later patch, as it has impact on a
long-running bug (see r347004)

Note that GCC warns about this UB, but this got silented by https://reviews.llvm.org/D50296.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54472

llvm-svn: 351701
2019-01-20 21:19:56 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
ae65e281f3 Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636
2019-01-19 08:50:56 +00:00
Teresa Johnson
e8cb930dbb Revert "[ThinLTO] Add summary entries for index-based WPD"
Mistaken commit of something still under review!

This reverts commit r351453.

llvm-svn: 351455
2019-01-17 16:05:04 +00:00
Teresa Johnson
5b4ceacd72 [ThinLTO] Add summary entries for index-based WPD
Summary:
If LTOUnit splitting is disabled, the module summary analysis computes
the summary information necessary to perform single implementation
devirtualization during the thin link with the index and no IR. The
information collected from the regular LTO IR in the current hybrid WPD
algorithm is summarized, including:
1) For vtable definitions, record the function pointers and their offset
within the vtable initializer (subsumes the information collected from
IR by tryFindVirtualCallTargets).
2) A record for each type metadata summarizing the vtable definitions
decorated with that metadata (subsumes the TypeIdentiferMap collected
from IR).

Also added are the necessary bitcode records, and the corresponding
assembly support.

The index-based WPD will be sent as a follow-on.

Depends on D53890.

Reviewers: pcc

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, Prazek, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, arphaman, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54815

llvm-svn: 351453
2019-01-17 15:49:03 +00:00
Teresa Johnson
52c19ef944 [LTO] Record whether LTOUnit splitting is enabled in index
Summary:
Records in the module summary index whether the bitcode was compiled
with the option necessary to enable splitting the LTO unit
(e.g. -fsanitize=cfi, -fwhole-program-vtables, or -fsplit-lto-unit).

The information is passed down to the ModuleSummaryIndex builder via a
new module flag "EnableSplitLTOUnit", which is propagated onto a flag
on the summary index.

This is then used during the LTO link to check whether all linked
summaries were built with the same value of this flag. If not, an error
is issued when we detect a situation requiring whole program visibility
of the class hierarchy. This is the case when both of the following
conditions are met:
1) We are performing LowerTypeTests or Whole Program Devirtualization.
2) There are type tests or type checked loads in the code.

Note I have also changed the ThinLTOBitcodeWriter to also gate the
module splitting on the value of this flag.

Reviewers: pcc

Subscribers: ormris, mehdi_amini, Prazek, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, arphaman, dang, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53890

llvm-svn: 350948
2019-01-11 18:31:57 +00:00
Cameron McInally
3a2064d3a0 [IR] Add a dedicated FNeg IR Instruction
The IEEE-754 Standard makes it clear that fneg(x) and
fsub(-0.0, x) are two different operations. The former is a bitwise
operation, while the latter is an arithmetic operation. This patch
creates a dedicated FNeg IR Instruction to model that behavior.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53877

llvm-svn: 346774
2018-11-13 18:15:47 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
0e44a1b235 [x86/SLH] Add a real Clang flag and LLVM IR attribute for Speculative
Load Hardening.

Wires up the existing pass to work with a proper IR attribute rather
than just a hidden/internal flag. The internal flag continues to work
for now, but I'll likely remove it soon.

Most of the churn here is adding the IR attribute. I talked about this
Kristof Beyls and he seemed at least initially OK with this direction.
The idea of using a full attribute here is that we *do* expect at least
some forms of this for other architectures. There isn't anything
*inherently* x86-specific about this technique, just that we only have
an implementation for x86 at the moment.

While we could potentially expose this as a Clang-level attribute as
well, that seems like a good question to defer for the moment as it
isn't 100% clear whether that or some other programmer interface (or
both?) would be best. We'll defer the programmer interface side of this
for now, but at least get to the point where the feature can be enabled
without relying on implementation details.

This also allows us to do something that was really hard before: we can
enable *just* the indirect call retpolines when using SLH. For x86, we
don't have any other way to mitigate indirect calls. Other architectures
may take a different approach of course, and none of this is surfaced to
user-level flags.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51157

llvm-svn: 341363
2018-09-04 12:38:00 +00:00
Teresa Johnson
6b92d64b27 Fix for llvm-dis/llvm-bcanalyzer overflows
Summary:
These tools failed for a very large bitcode file produced by LTO due to
64-bit values being assigned to 32-bit types. For the BitstreamReader.h
fix, the value initially fit into the 32-bit unsigned, but there was an
overflow when multiplying by 32 furter below to compute the bit offset.

No test case in the patch as this requires a huge bitcode file.

Reviewers: pcc, george.karpenkov

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, a.sidorin, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47731

llvm-svn: 333942
2018-06-04 19:20:02 +00:00
Vedant Kumar
56aff921dc [Debugify] Don't apply DI before the bitcode writer pass
Applying synthetic debug info before the bitcode writer pass has no
testing-related purpose. This commit prevents that from happening.

It also adds tests which check that IR produced with/without
-debugify-each enabled is identical after stripping. This makes it
possible to check that individual passes (or full pipelines) are
invariant to debug info.

llvm-svn: 333861
2018-06-04 00:11:49 +00:00
Shiva Chen
a2029fa58e [DebugInfo] Add DILabel metadata and intrinsic llvm.dbg.label.
In order to set breakpoints on labels and list source code around
labels, we need collect debug information for labels, i.e., label
name, the function label belong, line number in the file, and the
address label located. In order to keep these information in LLVM
IR and to allow backend to generate debug information correctly.
We create a new kind of metadata for labels, DILabel. The format
of DILabel is

!DILabel(scope: !1, name: "foo", file: !2, line: 3)

We hope to keep debug information as much as possible even the
code is optimized. So, we create a new kind of intrinsic for label
metadata to avoid the metadata is eliminated with basic block.
The intrinsic will keep existing if we keep it from optimized out.
The format of the intrinsic is

llvm.dbg.label(metadata !1)

It has only one argument, that is the DILabel metadata. The
intrinsic will follow the label immediately. Backend could get the
label metadata through the intrinsic's parameter.

We also create DIBuilder API for labels to be used by Frontend.
Frontend could use createLabel() to allocate DILabel objects, and use
insertLabel() to insert llvm.dbg.label intrinsic in LLVM IR.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45024

Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.

llvm-svn: 331841
2018-05-09 02:40:45 +00:00
Adrian Prantl
076a6683eb Remove \brief commands from doxygen comments.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.

Patch produced by

  for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290

llvm-svn: 331272
2018-05-01 15:54:18 +00:00
Vlad Tsyrklevich
505d68d60f Add the ShadowCallStack attribute
Summary:
Introduce the ShadowCallStack function attribute. It's added to
functions compiled with -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack in order to mark
functions to be instrumented by a ShadowCallStack pass to be submitted
in a separate change.

Reviewers: pcc, kcc, kubamracek

Reviewed By: pcc, kcc

Subscribers: cryptoad, mehdi_amini, javed.absar, llvm-commits, kcc

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44800

llvm-svn: 329108
2018-04-03 20:10:40 +00:00
Matt Morehouse
3102888fd3 [SimplifyCFG] Create attribute for fuzzing-specific optimizations.
Summary:
When building with libFuzzer, converting control flow to selects or
obscuring the original operands of CMPs reduces the effectiveness of
libFuzzer's heuristics.

This patch provides an attribute to disable or modify certain optimizations
for optimal fuzzing signal.

Provides a less aggressive alternative to https://reviews.llvm.org/D44057.

Reviewers: vitalybuka, davide, arsenm, hfinkel

Reviewed By: vitalybuka

Subscribers: junbuml, mehdi_amini, wdng, javed.absar, hiraditya, llvm-commits, kcc

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44232

llvm-svn: 328214
2018-03-22 17:07:51 +00:00
Oren Ben Simhon
3960b83ba4 [X86] Added support for nocf_check attribute for indirect Branch Tracking
X86 Supports Indirect Branch Tracking (IBT) as part of Control-Flow Enforcement Technology (CET).
IBT instruments ENDBR instructions used to specify valid targets of indirect call / jmp.
The `nocf_check` attribute has two roles in the context of X86 IBT technology:
	1. Appertains to a function - do not add ENDBR instruction at the beginning of the function.
	2. Appertains to a function pointer - do not track the target function of this pointer by adding nocf_check prefix to the indirect-call instruction.

This patch implements `nocf_check` context for Indirect Branch Tracking.
It also auto generates `nocf_check` prefixes before indirect branchs to jump tables that are guarded by range checks.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41879

llvm-svn: 327767
2018-03-17 13:29:46 +00:00
Steven Wu
a49fcd3ebf bitcode support change for fast flags compatibility
Summary: The discussion and as per need, each vendor needs a way to keep the old fast flags and the new fast flags in the auto upgrade path of the IR upgrader.  This revision addresses that issue.

Patched by Michael Berg

Reviewers: qcolombet, hans, steven_wu

Reviewed By: qcolombet, steven_wu

Subscribers: dexonsmith, vsk, mehdi_amini, andrewrk, MatzeB, wristow, spatel

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43253

llvm-svn: 325525
2018-02-19 19:22:28 +00:00
Vitaly Buka
f35a8dc055 [ThinLTO/CFI] Include TYPE_ID summaries into GLOBALVAL_SUMMARY_BLOCK
Summary:
TypeID summaries are used by CFI and need to be serialized by ThinLTO
indexing for later use by LTO Backend.

Reviewers: tejohnson, pcc

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42611

llvm-svn: 325182
2018-02-14 22:41:15 +00:00
Rafael Espindola
7713c013a2 Pass a reference to a module to the bitcode writer.
This simplifies most callers as they are already using references or
std::unique_ptr.

llvm-svn: 325155
2018-02-14 19:11:32 +00:00
Momchil Velikov
7bd8b6b601 Re-commit r324489: [DebugInfo] Improvements to representation of enumeration types (PR36168)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42734

llvm-svn: 324899
2018-02-12 16:10:09 +00:00
Momchil Velikov
4a73a6b3d3 Revert "[DebugInfo] Improvements to representation of enumeration types (PR36168)"
Revert commit r324489, it broke LLDB tests.

llvm-svn: 324511
2018-02-07 20:28:47 +00:00
Momchil Velikov
88a786863a [DebugInfo] Improvements to representation of enumeration types (PR36168)
This patch is the LLVM part of fixing the issues, described in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36168

* The representation of enumerator values in the debug info metadata now
  contains a boolean flag isUnsigned, which determines how the bits of
  the value are interpreted.
* The DW_TAG_enumeration type DIE now always (for DWARF version >= 3)
  includes a DW_AT_type attribute, which refers to the underlying
  integer type, as suggested in DWARFv4 (5.7 Enumeration Type Entries).
* The debug info metadata for enumeration type contains (in flags)
  indication whether this is a C++11 "fixed enum".
* For C++11 enumeration with a fixed underlying type, the DIE also
  includes the DW_AT_enum_class attribute (for DWARF version >= 4).
* Encoding of enumerator constants uses DW_FORM_sdata for signed values
  and DW_FORM_udata for unsigned values, as suggested by DWARFv4 (7.5.4
  Attribute Encodings).

The changes should be backwards compatible:

* the isUnsigned attribute is optional and defaults to false.
* if the underlying type for the enumeration is not available, the
  enumerator values are considered signed.
* the FixedEnum flag defaults to clear.
* the bitcode format for DIEnumerator stores the unsigned flag bit #1 of
  the first record element, so the format does not change and the zero
  previously stored there is consistent with the false default for
  IsUnsigned.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42734

llvm-svn: 324489
2018-02-07 16:46:33 +00:00
Teresa Johnson
37dc2d9629 [ThinLTO] Serialize WithGlobalValueDeadStripping index flag for distributed backends
Summary:
A recent fix to drop dead symbols (r323633) did not work for ThinLTO
distributed backends because we lose the WithGlobalValueDeadStripping
set on the index during the thin link. This patch adds a new flags
record to the bitcode format for the index, and serializes this flag
for the combined index (it would always be 0 for the per-module index
generated by the compile step, so no need to serialize the new flags
record there until/unless we add another flag that applies to the
per-module indexes).

Generally this flag should always be set for the distributed backends,
which are necessarily performed after the thin link. However, if we were
to simply set this flag on the index applied to the distributed backends
(invoked via clang), we would lose the ability to disable dead stripping
via -compute-dead=false for debugging purposes.

Reviewers: grimar, pcc

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42799

llvm-svn: 324444
2018-02-07 04:05:59 +00:00
Easwaran Raman
3831ff54c8 Re-land "[ThinLTO] Add call edges' relative block frequency to per-module summary."
It was reverted after buildbot regressions.

Original commit message:

This allows relative block frequency of call edges to be passed
to the thinlink stage where it will be used to compute synthetic
entry counts of functions.

llvm-svn: 323460
2018-01-25 19:27:17 +00:00
Easwaran Raman
144f3acb63 Revert "[ThinLTO] Add call edges' relative block frequency to per-module summary."
Causes buildbot regressions.

llvm-svn: 323358
2018-01-24 18:15:29 +00:00
Easwaran Raman
e7546e2838 [ThinLTO] Add call edges' relative block frequency to per-module summary.
Summary:
This allows relative block frequency of call edges to be passed to the
thinlink stage where it will be used to compute synthetic entry counts
of functions.

Reviewers: tejohnson, pcc

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits, inglorion

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42212

llvm-svn: 323349
2018-01-24 17:51:23 +00:00
Evgeniy Stepanov
67168a732b Hardware-assisted AddressSanitizer (llvm part).
Summary:
This is LLVM instrumentation for the new HWASan tool. It is basically
a stripped down copy of ASan at this point, w/o stack or global
support. Instrumenation adds a global constructor + runtime callbacks
for every load and store.

HWASan comes with its own IR attribute.

A brief design document can be found in
clang/docs/HardwareAssistedAddressSanitizerDesign.rst (submitted earlier).

Reviewers: kcc, pcc, alekseyshl

Subscribers: srhines, mehdi_amini, mgorny, javed.absar, eraman, llvm-commits, hiraditya

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40932

llvm-svn: 320217
2017-12-09 00:21:41 +00:00
Eugene Zelenko
d3b4cc91a1 [Bitcode] Fix some Clang-tidy modernize-use-using and Include What You Use warnings; other minor fixes (NFC).
llvm-svn: 312760
2017-09-07 23:28:24 +00:00
Andrew Kaylor
76e7a73bbb Add strictfp attribute to prevent unwanted optimizations of libm calls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34163

llvm-svn: 310885
2017-08-14 21:15:13 +00:00
Haojie Wang
13f5c24893 ThinLTO Minimized Bitcode File Size Reduction
Summary: Currently the ThinLTO minimized bitcode file only strip the debug info, but there is still a lot of information in the minimized bit code file that will be not used for thin linker. In this patch, most of the extra information is striped to reduce the minimized bitcode file. Now only ModuleVersion, ModuleInfo, ModuleGlobalValueSummary, ModuleHash, Symtab and Strtab are left. Now the minimized bitcode file size is reduced to 15%-30% of the debug info stripped bitcode file size.

Reviewers: danielcdh, tejohnson, pcc

Reviewed By: pcc

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, aprantl, inglorion, eraman, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35334

llvm-svn: 308760
2017-07-21 17:25:20 +00:00
Konstantin Zhuravlyov
d382d6f3fc Enhance synchscope representation
OpenCL 2.0 introduces the notion of memory scopes in atomic operations to
  global and local memory. These scopes restrict how synchronization is
  achieved, which can result in improved performance.

  This change extends existing notion of synchronization scopes in LLVM to
  support arbitrary scopes expressed as target-specific strings, in addition to
  the already defined scopes (single thread, system).

  The LLVM IR and MIR syntax for expressing synchronization scopes has changed
  to use *syncscope("<scope>")*, where <scope> can be "singlethread" (this
  replaces *singlethread* keyword), or a target-specific name. As before, if
  the scope is not specified, it defaults to CrossThread/System scope.

  Implementation details:
    - Mapping from synchronization scope name/string to synchronization scope id
      is stored in LLVM context;
    - CrossThread/System and SingleThread scopes are pre-defined to efficiently
      check for known scopes without comparing strings;
    - Synchronization scope names are stored in SYNC_SCOPE_NAMES_BLOCK in
      the bitcode.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21723

llvm-svn: 307722
2017-07-11 22:23:00 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne
8c0398b976 Object: Teach irsymtab::read() to try to use the irsymtab that we wrote to disk.
Fixes PR27551.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33974

llvm-svn: 306488
2017-06-27 23:50:24 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne
aaf2889bcd Bitcode: Write the irsymtab to disk.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33973

llvm-svn: 306487
2017-06-27 23:50:11 +00:00
Evgeniy Stepanov
286f104576 [cfi] CFI-ICall for ThinLTO.
Implement ControlFlowIntegrity for indirect function calls in ThinLTO.
Design follows the RFC in llvm-dev, see
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/llvm-dev/MgUlaphu4Qc/kywu0AqjAQAJ

llvm-svn: 305533
2017-06-16 00:18:29 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne
910e0ef4ff Apply summary-based dead stripping to regular LTO modules with summaries.
If a regular LTO module has a summary index, then instead of linking
it into the combined regular LTO module right away, add it to the
combined summary index and associate it with a special module that
represents the combined regular LTO module.

Any such modules are linked during LTO::run(), at which time we use
the results of summary-based dead stripping to control whether to
link prevailing symbols.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33922

llvm-svn: 305482
2017-06-15 17:26:13 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne
fb2ea7897f Write summaries for merged modules when splitting modules for ThinLTO.
This is to prepare to allow for dead stripping of globals in the
merged modules.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33921

llvm-svn: 305027
2017-06-08 23:01:49 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne
7431adb3c3 Bitcode: Introduce a BitcodeFileContents data type. NFCI.
This data type includes the contents of a bitcode file.
Right now a bitcode file can only contain modules, but
a later change will add a symbol table.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33969

llvm-svn: 305019
2017-06-08 22:00:24 +00:00
Teresa Johnson
57b818ae6b Remove ignore-empty-index-file option
Summary:
As discussed in the D32195 review thread and on IRC, remove this option
and replace with parameter, which will be set to true when invoked
from clang in the context of a ThinLTO distributed backend.

Reviewers: pcc

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33133

llvm-svn: 302939
2017-05-12 19:32:11 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne
3a58d4ac26 Bitcode: Make the summary reader responsible for merging. NFCI.
This is to prepare for an upcoming change which uses pointers instead of
GUIDs to represent references.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32469

llvm-svn: 301843
2017-05-01 22:04:36 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne
d5c295b069 Object: Remove ModuleSummaryIndexObjectFile class.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32195

llvm-svn: 301832
2017-05-01 20:42:32 +00:00
Matt Arsenault
c9972a05d5 Add speculatable function attribute
This attribute tells the optimizer that the function may be speculated.

Patch by Tom Stellard

llvm-svn: 301680
2017-04-28 20:25:27 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne
2d3eb26eeb Bitcode: Add a string table to the bitcode format.
Add a top-level STRTAB block containing a string table blob, and start storing
strings for module codes FUNCTION, GLOBALVAR, ALIAS, IFUNC and COMDAT in
the string table.

This change allows us to share names between globals and comdats as well
as between modules, and improves the efficiency of loading bitcode files by
no longer using a bit encoding for symbol names. Once we start writing the
irsymtab to the bitcode file we will also be able to share strings between
it and the module.

On my machine, link time for Chromium for Linux with ThinLTO decreases by
about 7% for no-op incremental builds or about 1% for full builds. Total
bitcode file size decreases by about 3%.

As discussed on llvm-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-April/111732.html

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31838

llvm-svn: 300464
2017-04-17 17:51:36 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne
0c4012c570 Bitcode: Remove reader support for MODULE_CODE_PURGEVALS.
Support for writing this module code was removed in r73220, which was well
before the LLVM 3.0 release, so we do not need to be able to understand it
for backwards compatibility.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31563

llvm-svn: 299370
2017-04-03 17:58:48 +00:00