1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-11-22 18:54:02 +01:00
llvm-mirror/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionAliasAnalysis.cpp
Eli Friedman b83eae9454 Recommit [ScalarEvolution] Make getMinusSCEV() fail for unrelated pointers.
As part of making ScalarEvolution's handling of pointers consistent, we
want to forbid multiplying a pointer by -1 (or any other value). This
means we can't blindly subtract pointers.

There are a few ways we could deal with this:
1. We could completely forbid subtracting pointers in getMinusSCEV()
2. We could forbid subracting pointers with different pointer bases
(this patch).
3. We could try to ptrtoint pointer operands.

The option in this patch is more friendly to non-integral pointers: code
that works with normal pointers will also work with non-integral
pointers. And it seems like there are very few places that actually
benefit from the third option.

As a minimal patch, the ScalarEvolution implementation of getMinusSCEV
still ends up subtracting pointers if they have the same base.  This
should eliminate the shared pointer base, but eventually we'll need to
rewrite it to avoid negating the pointer base. I plan to do this as a
separate step to allow measuring the compile-time impact.

This doesn't cause obvious functional changes in most cases; the one
case that is significantly affected is ICmpZero handling in LSR (which
is the source of almost all the test changes).  The resulting changes
seem okay to me, but suggestions welcome.  As an alternative, I tried
explicitly ptrtoint'ing the operands, but the result doesn't seem
obviously better.

I deleted the test lsr-undef-in-binop.ll becuase I couldn't figure out
how to repair it to test what it was actually trying to test.

Recommitting with fix to MemoryDepChecker::isDependent.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104806
2021-07-06 12:16:05 -07:00

161 lines
6.6 KiB
C++

//===- ScalarEvolutionAliasAnalysis.cpp - SCEV-based Alias Analysis -------===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This file defines the ScalarEvolutionAliasAnalysis pass, which implements a
// simple alias analysis implemented in terms of ScalarEvolution queries.
//
// This differs from traditional loop dependence analysis in that it tests
// for dependencies within a single iteration of a loop, rather than
// dependencies between different iterations.
//
// ScalarEvolution has a more complete understanding of pointer arithmetic
// than BasicAliasAnalysis' collection of ad-hoc analyses.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionAliasAnalysis.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h"
#include "llvm/InitializePasses.h"
using namespace llvm;
AliasResult SCEVAAResult::alias(const MemoryLocation &LocA,
const MemoryLocation &LocB, AAQueryInfo &AAQI) {
// If either of the memory references is empty, it doesn't matter what the
// pointer values are. This allows the code below to ignore this special
// case.
if (LocA.Size.isZero() || LocB.Size.isZero())
return AliasResult::NoAlias;
// This is SCEVAAResult. Get the SCEVs!
const SCEV *AS = SE.getSCEV(const_cast<Value *>(LocA.Ptr));
const SCEV *BS = SE.getSCEV(const_cast<Value *>(LocB.Ptr));
// If they evaluate to the same expression, it's a MustAlias.
if (AS == BS)
return AliasResult::MustAlias;
// If something is known about the difference between the two addresses,
// see if it's enough to prove a NoAlias.
if (SE.getEffectiveSCEVType(AS->getType()) ==
SE.getEffectiveSCEVType(BS->getType())) {
unsigned BitWidth = SE.getTypeSizeInBits(AS->getType());
APInt ASizeInt(BitWidth, LocA.Size.hasValue()
? LocA.Size.getValue()
: MemoryLocation::UnknownSize);
APInt BSizeInt(BitWidth, LocB.Size.hasValue()
? LocB.Size.getValue()
: MemoryLocation::UnknownSize);
// Compute the difference between the two pointers.
const SCEV *BA = SE.getMinusSCEV(BS, AS);
// Test whether the difference is known to be great enough that memory of
// the given sizes don't overlap. This assumes that ASizeInt and BSizeInt
// are non-zero, which is special-cased above.
if (!isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(BA) &&
ASizeInt.ule(SE.getUnsignedRange(BA).getUnsignedMin()) &&
(-BSizeInt).uge(SE.getUnsignedRange(BA).getUnsignedMax()))
return AliasResult::NoAlias;
// Folding the subtraction while preserving range information can be tricky
// (because of INT_MIN, etc.); if the prior test failed, swap AS and BS
// and try again to see if things fold better that way.
// Compute the difference between the two pointers.
const SCEV *AB = SE.getMinusSCEV(AS, BS);
// Test whether the difference is known to be great enough that memory of
// the given sizes don't overlap. This assumes that ASizeInt and BSizeInt
// are non-zero, which is special-cased above.
if (!isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(AB) &&
BSizeInt.ule(SE.getUnsignedRange(AB).getUnsignedMin()) &&
(-ASizeInt).uge(SE.getUnsignedRange(AB).getUnsignedMax()))
return AliasResult::NoAlias;
}
// If ScalarEvolution can find an underlying object, form a new query.
// The correctness of this depends on ScalarEvolution not recognizing
// inttoptr and ptrtoint operators.
Value *AO = GetBaseValue(AS);
Value *BO = GetBaseValue(BS);
if ((AO && AO != LocA.Ptr) || (BO && BO != LocB.Ptr))
if (alias(MemoryLocation(AO ? AO : LocA.Ptr,
AO ? LocationSize::beforeOrAfterPointer()
: LocA.Size,
AO ? AAMDNodes() : LocA.AATags),
MemoryLocation(BO ? BO : LocB.Ptr,
BO ? LocationSize::beforeOrAfterPointer()
: LocB.Size,
BO ? AAMDNodes() : LocB.AATags),
AAQI) == AliasResult::NoAlias)
return AliasResult::NoAlias;
// Forward the query to the next analysis.
return AAResultBase::alias(LocA, LocB, AAQI);
}
/// Given an expression, try to find a base value.
///
/// Returns null if none was found.
Value *SCEVAAResult::GetBaseValue(const SCEV *S) {
if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(S)) {
// In an addrec, assume that the base will be in the start, rather
// than the step.
return GetBaseValue(AR->getStart());
} else if (const SCEVAddExpr *A = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(S)) {
// If there's a pointer operand, it'll be sorted at the end of the list.
const SCEV *Last = A->getOperand(A->getNumOperands() - 1);
if (Last->getType()->isPointerTy())
return GetBaseValue(Last);
} else if (const SCEVUnknown *U = dyn_cast<SCEVUnknown>(S)) {
// This is a leaf node.
return U->getValue();
}
// No Identified object found.
return nullptr;
}
bool SCEVAAResult::invalidate(Function &Fn, const PreservedAnalyses &PA,
FunctionAnalysisManager::Invalidator &Inv) {
// We don't care if this analysis itself is preserved, it has no state. But
// we need to check that the analyses it depends on have been.
return Inv.invalidate<ScalarEvolutionAnalysis>(Fn, PA);
}
AnalysisKey SCEVAA::Key;
SCEVAAResult SCEVAA::run(Function &F, FunctionAnalysisManager &AM) {
return SCEVAAResult(AM.getResult<ScalarEvolutionAnalysis>(F));
}
char SCEVAAWrapperPass::ID = 0;
INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(SCEVAAWrapperPass, "scev-aa",
"ScalarEvolution-based Alias Analysis", false, true)
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(ScalarEvolutionWrapperPass)
INITIALIZE_PASS_END(SCEVAAWrapperPass, "scev-aa",
"ScalarEvolution-based Alias Analysis", false, true)
FunctionPass *llvm::createSCEVAAWrapperPass() {
return new SCEVAAWrapperPass();
}
SCEVAAWrapperPass::SCEVAAWrapperPass() : FunctionPass(ID) {
initializeSCEVAAWrapperPassPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
}
bool SCEVAAWrapperPass::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
Result.reset(
new SCEVAAResult(getAnalysis<ScalarEvolutionWrapperPass>().getSE()));
return false;
}
void SCEVAAWrapperPass::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
AU.setPreservesAll();
AU.addRequired<ScalarEvolutionWrapperPass>();
}