mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2024-11-25 12:12:47 +01:00
889150360c
When one mistakenly specifies 'def' instead of using 'defm', the error message is quite misleading: 'Couldn't find class..' Instead, it should recommend using defm if the multiclass of same name exists. Reviewed By: hfinkel Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59294 llvm-svn: 356985
11 lines
275 B
TableGen
11 lines
275 B
TableGen
// RUN: not llvm-tblgen %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
|
|
// XFAIL: vg_leak
|
|
|
|
// This test checks that using def instead of defm gives a meaningful error
|
|
multiclass M2 {
|
|
def X;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: error: Couldn't find class 'M2'. Use 'defm' if you meant to use multiclass 'M2'
|
|
def rec1 : M2;
|