Sanjay Patel 36c33bfea9 [DAGCombiner][x86] scalarize binop followed by extractelement ... As noted in PR39973 and D55558: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39973 ...this is a partial implementation of a fold that we do as an IR canonicalization in instcombine: // extelt (binop X, Y), Index --> binop (extelt X, Index), (extelt Y, Index) We want to have this in the DAG too because as we can see in some of the test diffs (reductions), the pattern may not be visible in IR. Given that this is already an IR canonicalization, any backend that would prefer a vector op over a scalar op is expected to already have the reverse transform in DAG lowering (not sure if that's a realistic expectation though). The transform is limited with a TLI hook because there's an existing transform in CodeGenPrepare that tries to do the opposite transform. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55722 llvm-svn: 350354		2019-01-03 21:31:16 +00:00
..
llvm	[DAGCombiner][x86] scalarize binop followed by extractelement	2019-01-03 21:31:16 +00:00
llvm-c	[LLVM-C] Expand LLVMRelocMode	2019-01-03 00:33:44 +00:00