mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2024-11-25 04:02:41 +01:00
230 lines
8.4 KiB
ReStructuredText
230 lines
8.4 KiB
ReStructuredText
================================
|
|
How to submit an LLVM bug report
|
|
================================
|
|
|
|
Introduction - Got bugs?
|
|
========================
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you're working with LLVM and run into a bug, we definitely want to know
|
|
about it. This document describes what you can do to increase the odds of
|
|
getting it fixed quickly.
|
|
|
|
Basically you have to do two things at a minimum. First, decide whether
|
|
the bug `crashes the compiler`_ (or an LLVM pass), or if the
|
|
compiler is `miscompiling`_ the program (i.e., the
|
|
compiler successfully produces an executable, but it doesn't run right).
|
|
Based on what type of bug it is, follow the instructions in the linked
|
|
section to narrow down the bug so that the person who fixes it will be able
|
|
to find the problem more easily.
|
|
|
|
Once you have a reduced test-case, go to `the LLVM Bug Tracking System
|
|
<https://bugs.llvm.org/enter_bug.cgi>`_ and fill out the form with the
|
|
necessary details (note that you don't need to pick a category, just use
|
|
the "new-bugs" category if you're not sure). The bug description should
|
|
contain the following information:
|
|
|
|
* All information necessary to reproduce the problem.
|
|
* The reduced test-case that triggers the bug.
|
|
* The location where you obtained LLVM (if not from our Subversion
|
|
repository).
|
|
|
|
Thanks for helping us make LLVM better!
|
|
|
|
.. _crashes the compiler:
|
|
|
|
Crashing Bugs
|
|
=============
|
|
|
|
More often than not, bugs in the compiler cause it to crash---often due to
|
|
an assertion failure of some sort. The most important piece of the puzzle
|
|
is to figure out if it is crashing in the GCC front-end or if it is one of
|
|
the LLVM libraries (e.g. the optimizer or code generator) that has
|
|
problems.
|
|
|
|
To figure out which component is crashing (the front-end, optimizer or code
|
|
generator), run the ``clang`` command line as you were when the crash
|
|
occurred, but with the following extra command line options:
|
|
|
|
* ``-O0 -emit-llvm``: If ``clang`` still crashes when passed these
|
|
options (which disable the optimizer and code generator), then the crash
|
|
is in the front-end. Jump ahead to the section on :ref:`front-end bugs
|
|
<front-end>`.
|
|
|
|
* ``-emit-llvm``: If ``clang`` crashes with this option (which disables
|
|
the code generator), you found an optimizer bug. Jump ahead to
|
|
`compile-time optimization bugs`_.
|
|
|
|
* Otherwise, you have a code generator crash. Jump ahead to `code
|
|
generator bugs`_.
|
|
|
|
.. _front-end bug:
|
|
.. _front-end:
|
|
|
|
Front-end bugs
|
|
--------------
|
|
|
|
If the problem is in the front-end, you should re-run the same ``clang``
|
|
command that resulted in the crash, but add the ``-save-temps`` option.
|
|
The compiler will crash again, but it will leave behind a ``foo.i`` file
|
|
(containing preprocessed C source code) and possibly ``foo.s`` for each
|
|
compiled ``foo.c`` file. Send us the ``foo.i`` file, along with the options
|
|
you passed to ``clang``, and a brief description of the error it caused.
|
|
|
|
The `delta <http://delta.tigris.org/>`_ tool helps to reduce the
|
|
preprocessed file down to the smallest amount of code that still replicates
|
|
the problem. You're encouraged to use delta to reduce the code to make the
|
|
developers' lives easier. `This website
|
|
<http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction>`_ has instructions
|
|
on the best way to use delta.
|
|
|
|
.. _compile-time optimization bugs:
|
|
|
|
Compile-time optimization bugs
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
If you find that a bug crashes in the optimizer, compile your test-case to a
|
|
``.bc`` file by passing "``-emit-llvm -O0 -c -o foo.bc``".
|
|
Then run:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: bash
|
|
|
|
opt -O3 -debug-pass=Arguments foo.bc -disable-output
|
|
|
|
This command should do two things: it should print out a list of passes, and
|
|
then it should crash in the same way as clang. If it doesn't crash, please
|
|
follow the instructions for a `front-end bug`_.
|
|
|
|
If this does crash, then you should be able to debug this with the following
|
|
bugpoint command:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: bash
|
|
|
|
bugpoint foo.bc <list of passes printed by opt>
|
|
|
|
Please run this, then file a bug with the instructions and reduced .bc
|
|
files that bugpoint emits. If something goes wrong with bugpoint, please
|
|
submit the "foo.bc" file and the list of passes printed by ``opt``.
|
|
|
|
.. _code generator bugs:
|
|
|
|
Code generator bugs
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
If you find a bug that crashes clang in the code generator, compile your
|
|
source file to a .bc file by passing "``-emit-llvm -c -o foo.bc``" to
|
|
clang (in addition to the options you already pass). Once your have
|
|
foo.bc, one of the following commands should fail:
|
|
|
|
#. ``llc foo.bc``
|
|
#. ``llc foo.bc -relocation-model=pic``
|
|
#. ``llc foo.bc -relocation-model=static``
|
|
|
|
If none of these crash, please follow the instructions for a `front-end
|
|
bug`_. If one of these do crash, you should be able to reduce this with
|
|
one of the following bugpoint command lines (use the one corresponding to
|
|
the command above that failed):
|
|
|
|
#. ``bugpoint -run-llc foo.bc``
|
|
#. ``bugpoint -run-llc foo.bc --tool-args -relocation-model=pic``
|
|
#. ``bugpoint -run-llc foo.bc --tool-args -relocation-model=static``
|
|
|
|
Please run this, then file a bug with the instructions and reduced .bc file
|
|
that bugpoint emits. If something goes wrong with bugpoint, please submit
|
|
the "foo.bc" file and the option that llc crashes with.
|
|
|
|
.. _miscompiling:
|
|
|
|
Miscompilations
|
|
===============
|
|
|
|
If clang successfully produces an executable, but that executable
|
|
doesn't run right, this is either a bug in the code or a bug in the
|
|
compiler. The first thing to check is to make sure it is not using
|
|
undefined behavior (e.g. reading a variable before it is defined). In
|
|
particular, check to see if the program `valgrind
|
|
<http://valgrind.org/>`_'s clean, passes purify, or some other memory
|
|
checker tool. Many of the "LLVM bugs" that we have chased down ended up
|
|
being bugs in the program being compiled, not LLVM.
|
|
|
|
Once you determine that the program itself is not buggy, you should choose
|
|
which code generator you wish to compile the program with (e.g. LLC or the JIT)
|
|
and optionally a series of LLVM passes to run. For example:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: bash
|
|
|
|
bugpoint -run-llc [... optzn passes ...] file-to-test.bc --args -- [program arguments]
|
|
|
|
bugpoint will try to narrow down your list of passes to the one pass that
|
|
causes an error, and simplify the bitcode file as much as it can to assist
|
|
you. It will print a message letting you know how to reproduce the
|
|
resulting error.
|
|
|
|
Incorrect code generation
|
|
=========================
|
|
|
|
Similarly to debugging incorrect compilation by mis-behaving passes, you
|
|
can debug incorrect code generation by either LLC or the JIT, using
|
|
``bugpoint``. The process ``bugpoint`` follows in this case is to try to
|
|
narrow the code down to a function that is miscompiled by one or the other
|
|
method, but since for correctness, the entire program must be run,
|
|
``bugpoint`` will compile the code it deems to not be affected with the C
|
|
Backend, and then link in the shared object it generates.
|
|
|
|
To debug the JIT:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: bash
|
|
|
|
bugpoint -run-jit -output=[correct output file] [bitcode file] \
|
|
--tool-args -- [arguments to pass to lli] \
|
|
--args -- [program arguments]
|
|
|
|
Similarly, to debug the LLC, one would run:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: bash
|
|
|
|
bugpoint -run-llc -output=[correct output file] [bitcode file] \
|
|
--tool-args -- [arguments to pass to llc] \
|
|
--args -- [program arguments]
|
|
|
|
**Special note:** if you are debugging MultiSource or SPEC tests that
|
|
already exist in the ``llvm/test`` hierarchy, there is an easier way to
|
|
debug the JIT, LLC, and CBE, using the pre-written Makefile targets, which
|
|
will pass the program options specified in the Makefiles:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: bash
|
|
|
|
cd llvm/test/../../program
|
|
make bugpoint-jit
|
|
|
|
At the end of a successful ``bugpoint`` run, you will be presented
|
|
with two bitcode files: a *safe* file which can be compiled with the C
|
|
backend and the *test* file which either LLC or the JIT
|
|
mis-codegenerates, and thus causes the error.
|
|
|
|
To reproduce the error that ``bugpoint`` found, it is sufficient to do
|
|
the following:
|
|
|
|
#. Regenerate the shared object from the safe bitcode file:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: bash
|
|
|
|
llc -march=c safe.bc -o safe.c
|
|
gcc -shared safe.c -o safe.so
|
|
|
|
#. If debugging LLC, compile test bitcode native and link with the shared
|
|
object:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: bash
|
|
|
|
llc test.bc -o test.s
|
|
gcc test.s safe.so -o test.llc
|
|
./test.llc [program options]
|
|
|
|
#. If debugging the JIT, load the shared object and supply the test
|
|
bitcode:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: bash
|
|
|
|
lli -load=safe.so test.bc [program options]
|