1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-11-23 11:13:28 +01:00
llvm-mirror/test/CodeGen/X86/pr38539.ll
Simon Pilgrim 062a2c49e3 [X86] Avoid icmp undef in reduced tests
Because we don't currently simplify icmp with undef in DAG, bugpoint loves to introduce them during reduction.

This is a small step towards re-adding non-undef values into some of the simpler tests so that they should still test correctly and emit similar/same codegen.

Prep work for PR40800 ([SelectionDAG] Add UNDEF handling to SelectionDAG::FoldSetCC).

llvm-svn: 356076
2019-03-13 18:36:59 +00:00

114 lines
3.5 KiB
LLVM

; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown -verify-machineinstrs | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=X64
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=i686-unknown -verify-machineinstrs | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=X86
; This test is targeted at 64-bit mode. It used to crash due to the creation of an EXTRACT_SUBREG after the peephole pass had ran.
define void @f() {
; X64-LABEL: f:
; X64: # %bb.0: # %BB
; X64-NEXT: movb (%rax), %al
; X64-NEXT: cmpb $0, (%rax)
; X64-NEXT: setne (%rax)
; X64-NEXT: leaq -{{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %rax
; X64-NEXT: movq %rax, (%rax)
; X64-NEXT: movb $0, (%rax)
; X64-NEXT: retq
;
; X86-LABEL: f:
; X86: # %bb.0: # %BB
; X86-NEXT: pushl %ebp
; X86-NEXT: .cfi_def_cfa_offset 8
; X86-NEXT: .cfi_offset %ebp, -8
; X86-NEXT: movl %esp, %ebp
; X86-NEXT: .cfi_def_cfa_register %ebp
; X86-NEXT: andl $-8, %esp
; X86-NEXT: subl $16, %esp
; X86-NEXT: movb (%eax), %al
; X86-NEXT: cmpb $0, (%eax)
; X86-NEXT: setne (%eax)
; X86-NEXT: leal -{{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %eax
; X86-NEXT: movl %eax, (%eax)
; X86-NEXT: movb $0, (%eax)
; X86-NEXT: movl %ebp, %esp
; X86-NEXT: popl %ebp
; X86-NEXT: .cfi_def_cfa %esp, 4
; X86-NEXT: retl
BB:
%A30 = alloca i66
%L17 = load i66, i66* %A30
%B20 = and i66 %L17, -1
%G2 = getelementptr i66, i66* %A30, i1 true
%L10 = load volatile i8, i8* undef
%L11 = load volatile i8, i8* undef
%B6 = udiv i8 %L10, %L11
%C15 = icmp eq i8 %L11, 0
%B8 = srem i66 0, %B20
%C2 = icmp ule i66 %B8, %B20
%B5 = or i8 0, %B6
%C19 = icmp uge i1 false, %C2
%C1 = icmp sle i8 undef, %B5
%B37 = srem i1 %C1, %C2
%C7 = icmp uge i1 false, %C15
store i1 %C7, i1* undef
%G6 = getelementptr i66, i66* %G2, i1 %B37
store i66* %G6, i66** undef
%B30 = srem i1 %C19, %C7
store i1 %B30, i1* undef
ret void
}
; Similar to above, but bitwidth adjusted to target 32-bit mode. This also shows that we didn't constrain the register class when extracting a subreg.
define void @g() {
; X64-LABEL: g:
; X64: # %bb.0: # %BB
; X64-NEXT: movb (%rax), %al
; X64-NEXT: cmpb $0, (%rax)
; X64-NEXT: setne (%rax)
; X64-NEXT: leaq -{{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %rax
; X64-NEXT: movq %rax, (%rax)
; X64-NEXT: movb $0, (%rax)
; X64-NEXT: retq
;
; X86-LABEL: g:
; X86: # %bb.0: # %BB
; X86-NEXT: pushl %ebp
; X86-NEXT: .cfi_def_cfa_offset 8
; X86-NEXT: .cfi_offset %ebp, -8
; X86-NEXT: movl %esp, %ebp
; X86-NEXT: .cfi_def_cfa_register %ebp
; X86-NEXT: andl $-8, %esp
; X86-NEXT: subl $8, %esp
; X86-NEXT: movb (%eax), %al
; X86-NEXT: cmpb $0, (%eax)
; X86-NEXT: setne (%eax)
; X86-NEXT: leal -{{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %eax
; X86-NEXT: movl %eax, (%eax)
; X86-NEXT: movb $0, (%eax)
; X86-NEXT: movl %ebp, %esp
; X86-NEXT: popl %ebp
; X86-NEXT: .cfi_def_cfa %esp, 4
; X86-NEXT: retl
BB:
%A30 = alloca i34
%L17 = load i34, i34* %A30
%B20 = and i34 %L17, -1
%G2 = getelementptr i34, i34* %A30, i1 true
%L10 = load volatile i8, i8* undef
%L11 = load volatile i8, i8* undef
%B6 = udiv i8 %L10, %L11
%C15 = icmp eq i8 %L11, 0
%B8 = srem i34 0, %B20
%C2 = icmp ule i34 %B8, %B20
%B5 = or i8 0, %B6
%C19 = icmp uge i1 false, %C2
%C1 = icmp sle i8 undef, %B5
%B37 = srem i1 %C1, %C2
%C7 = icmp uge i1 false, %C15
store i1 %C7, i1* undef
%G6 = getelementptr i34, i34* %G2, i1 %B37
store i34* %G6, i34** undef
%B30 = srem i1 %C19, %C7
store i1 %B30, i1* undef
ret void
}