mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2024-11-24 03:33:20 +01:00
1542bebc55
Summary: Add a flag to the FunctionToLoopAdaptor that allows enabling MemorySSA only for the loop pass managers that are known to preserve it. If an LPM is known to have only loop transforms that *all* preserve MemorySSA, then use MemorySSA if `EnableMSSALoopDependency` is set. If an LPM has loop passes that do not preserve MemorySSA, then the flag passed is `false`, regardless of the value of `EnableMSSALoopDependency`. When using a custom loop pass pipeline via `passes=...`, use keyword `loop` vs `loop-mssa` to use MemorySSA in that LPM. If a loop that does not preserve MemorySSA is added while using the `loop-mssa` keyword, that's an error. Add the new `loop-mssa` keyword to a few tests where a difference occurs when enabling MemorySSA. Reviewers: chandlerc Subscribers: mehdi_amini, Prazek, george.burgess.iv, sanjoy.google, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66376 llvm-svn: 369548
152 lines
6.6 KiB
C++
152 lines
6.6 KiB
C++
//===- LoopAnalysisManager.cpp - Loop analysis management -----------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopAnalysisManager.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/GlobalsModRef.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/MemorySSA.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionAliasAnalysis.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h"
|
|
|
|
using namespace llvm;
|
|
|
|
namespace llvm {
|
|
// Explicit template instantiations and specialization definitions for core
|
|
// template typedefs.
|
|
template class AllAnalysesOn<Loop>;
|
|
template class AnalysisManager<Loop, LoopStandardAnalysisResults &>;
|
|
template class InnerAnalysisManagerProxy<LoopAnalysisManager, Function>;
|
|
template class OuterAnalysisManagerProxy<FunctionAnalysisManager, Loop,
|
|
LoopStandardAnalysisResults &>;
|
|
|
|
bool LoopAnalysisManagerFunctionProxy::Result::invalidate(
|
|
Function &F, const PreservedAnalyses &PA,
|
|
FunctionAnalysisManager::Invalidator &Inv) {
|
|
// First compute the sequence of IR units covered by this proxy. We will want
|
|
// to visit this in postorder, but because this is a tree structure we can do
|
|
// this by building a preorder sequence and walking it backwards. We also
|
|
// want siblings in forward program order to match the LoopPassManager so we
|
|
// get the preorder with siblings reversed.
|
|
SmallVector<Loop *, 4> PreOrderLoops = LI->getLoopsInReverseSiblingPreorder();
|
|
|
|
// If this proxy or the loop info is going to be invalidated, we also need
|
|
// to clear all the keys coming from that analysis. We also completely blow
|
|
// away the loop analyses if any of the standard analyses provided by the
|
|
// loop pass manager go away so that loop analyses can freely use these
|
|
// without worrying about declaring dependencies on them etc.
|
|
// FIXME: It isn't clear if this is the right tradeoff. We could instead make
|
|
// loop analyses declare any dependencies on these and use the more general
|
|
// invalidation logic below to act on that.
|
|
auto PAC = PA.getChecker<LoopAnalysisManagerFunctionProxy>();
|
|
bool invalidateMemorySSAAnalysis = false;
|
|
if (MSSAUsed)
|
|
invalidateMemorySSAAnalysis = Inv.invalidate<MemorySSAAnalysis>(F, PA);
|
|
if (!(PAC.preserved() || PAC.preservedSet<AllAnalysesOn<Function>>()) ||
|
|
Inv.invalidate<AAManager>(F, PA) ||
|
|
Inv.invalidate<AssumptionAnalysis>(F, PA) ||
|
|
Inv.invalidate<DominatorTreeAnalysis>(F, PA) ||
|
|
Inv.invalidate<LoopAnalysis>(F, PA) ||
|
|
Inv.invalidate<ScalarEvolutionAnalysis>(F, PA) ||
|
|
invalidateMemorySSAAnalysis) {
|
|
// Note that the LoopInfo may be stale at this point, however the loop
|
|
// objects themselves remain the only viable keys that could be in the
|
|
// analysis manager's cache. So we just walk the keys and forcibly clear
|
|
// those results. Note that the order doesn't matter here as this will just
|
|
// directly destroy the results without calling methods on them.
|
|
for (Loop *L : PreOrderLoops) {
|
|
// NB! `L` may not be in a good enough state to run Loop::getName.
|
|
InnerAM->clear(*L, "<possibly invalidated loop>");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We also need to null out the inner AM so that when the object gets
|
|
// destroyed as invalid we don't try to clear the inner AM again. At that
|
|
// point we won't be able to reliably walk the loops for this function and
|
|
// only clear results associated with those loops the way we do here.
|
|
// FIXME: Making InnerAM null at this point isn't very nice. Most analyses
|
|
// try to remain valid during invalidation. Maybe we should add an
|
|
// `IsClean` flag?
|
|
InnerAM = nullptr;
|
|
|
|
// Now return true to indicate this *is* invalid and a fresh proxy result
|
|
// needs to be built. This is especially important given the null InnerAM.
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Directly check if the relevant set is preserved so we can short circuit
|
|
// invalidating loops.
|
|
bool AreLoopAnalysesPreserved =
|
|
PA.allAnalysesInSetPreserved<AllAnalysesOn<Loop>>();
|
|
|
|
// Since we have a valid LoopInfo we can actually leave the cached results in
|
|
// the analysis manager associated with the Loop keys, but we need to
|
|
// propagate any necessary invalidation logic into them. We'd like to
|
|
// invalidate things in roughly the same order as they were put into the
|
|
// cache and so we walk the preorder list in reverse to form a valid
|
|
// postorder.
|
|
for (Loop *L : reverse(PreOrderLoops)) {
|
|
Optional<PreservedAnalyses> InnerPA;
|
|
|
|
// Check to see whether the preserved set needs to be adjusted based on
|
|
// function-level analysis invalidation triggering deferred invalidation
|
|
// for this loop.
|
|
if (auto *OuterProxy =
|
|
InnerAM->getCachedResult<FunctionAnalysisManagerLoopProxy>(*L))
|
|
for (const auto &OuterInvalidationPair :
|
|
OuterProxy->getOuterInvalidations()) {
|
|
AnalysisKey *OuterAnalysisID = OuterInvalidationPair.first;
|
|
const auto &InnerAnalysisIDs = OuterInvalidationPair.second;
|
|
if (Inv.invalidate(OuterAnalysisID, F, PA)) {
|
|
if (!InnerPA)
|
|
InnerPA = PA;
|
|
for (AnalysisKey *InnerAnalysisID : InnerAnalysisIDs)
|
|
InnerPA->abandon(InnerAnalysisID);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check if we needed a custom PA set. If so we'll need to run the inner
|
|
// invalidation.
|
|
if (InnerPA) {
|
|
InnerAM->invalidate(*L, *InnerPA);
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Otherwise we only need to do invalidation if the original PA set didn't
|
|
// preserve all Loop analyses.
|
|
if (!AreLoopAnalysesPreserved)
|
|
InnerAM->invalidate(*L, PA);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Return false to indicate that this result is still a valid proxy.
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
template <>
|
|
LoopAnalysisManagerFunctionProxy::Result
|
|
LoopAnalysisManagerFunctionProxy::run(Function &F,
|
|
FunctionAnalysisManager &AM) {
|
|
return Result(*InnerAM, AM.getResult<LoopAnalysis>(F));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
PreservedAnalyses llvm::getLoopPassPreservedAnalyses() {
|
|
PreservedAnalyses PA;
|
|
PA.preserve<DominatorTreeAnalysis>();
|
|
PA.preserve<LoopAnalysis>();
|
|
PA.preserve<LoopAnalysisManagerFunctionProxy>();
|
|
PA.preserve<ScalarEvolutionAnalysis>();
|
|
// FIXME: What we really want to do here is preserve an AA category, but that
|
|
// concept doesn't exist yet.
|
|
PA.preserve<AAManager>();
|
|
PA.preserve<BasicAA>();
|
|
PA.preserve<GlobalsAA>();
|
|
PA.preserve<SCEVAA>();
|
|
return PA;
|
|
}
|