mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2024-11-23 11:13:28 +01:00
5c00a1f121
Summary: Currently, sqdmulh_lane and friends from the ACLE (implemented in arm_neon.h), are represented in LLVM IR as a (by vector) sqdmulh and a vector of (repeated) indices, like so: %shuffle = shufflevector <4 x i16> %v, <4 x i16> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 3, i32 3, i32 3, i32 3> %vqdmulh2.i = tail call <4 x i16> @llvm.aarch64.neon.sqdmulh.v4i16(<4 x i16> %a, <4 x i16> %shuffle) When %v's values are known, the shufflevector is optimized away and we are no longer able to select the lane variant of sqdmulh in the backend. This defeats a (hand-coded) optimization that packs several constants into a single vector and uses the lane intrinsics to reduce register pressure and trade-off materialising several constants for a single vector load from the constant pool, like so: int16x8_t v = {2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}; a = vqdmulh_laneq_s16(a, v, 0); b = vqdmulh_laneq_s16(b, v, 1); c = vqdmulh_laneq_s16(c, v, 2); d = vqdmulh_laneq_s16(d, v, 3); [...] In one microbenchmark from libjpeg-turbo this accounts for a 2.5% to 4% performance difference. We could teach the compiler to recover the lane variants, but this would likely require its own pass. (Alternatively, "volatile" could be used on the constants vector, but this is a bit ugly.) This patch instead implements the following LLVM IR intrinsics for AArch64 to maintain the original structure through IR optmization and into instruction selection: - sqdmulh_lane - sqdmulh_laneq - sqrdmulh_lane - sqrdmulh_laneq. These 'lane' variants need an additional register class. The second argument must be in the lower half of the 64-bit NEON register file, but only when operating on i16 elements. Note that the existing patterns for shufflevector and sqdmulh into sqdmulh_lane (etc.) remain, so code that does not rely on NEON intrinsics to generate these instructions is not affected. This patch also changes clang to emit these IR intrinsics for the corresponding NEON intrinsics (AArch64 only). Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, dmgreen, t.p.northover, rovka, rengolin, efriedma Reviewed By: efriedma Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, jdoerfert, cfe-commits, llvm-commits Tags: #clang, #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71469 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
llvm | ||
llvm-c |