1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-10-25 22:12:57 +02:00
llvm-mirror/lib/Transforms/Utils/LCSSA.cpp
David Majnemer bf189bdcd7 [IR] Reformulate LLVM's EH funclet IR
While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on
top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies:
- catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design
  but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM
  experts.
- catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers.  They cannot
  be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes.
  This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation.
- catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward.
  It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other
  funclets.
- The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of
  control flow edges.  Because of this, we are forced to carefully
  analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal
  nesting among funclets.  While we have logic to clone funclets when
  they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a
  representation which forbade them upfront.

Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following:
- Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control
  flow, just a bunch of simple operands;  catchpad would be splittable.
- Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model
  the constraints of funclet oriented EH.
- Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume
  the token produced by the funclet which contains them.
- Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad.  Their presence can be inferred
  implicitly using coloring information.

N.B.  The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the
veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for.  An expert should take a
look to make sure the results are reasonable.

Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139

llvm-svn: 255422
2015-12-12 05:38:55 +00:00

328 lines
12 KiB
C++

//===-- LCSSA.cpp - Convert loops into loop-closed SSA form ---------------===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This pass transforms loops by placing phi nodes at the end of the loops for
// all values that are live across the loop boundary. For example, it turns
// the left into the right code:
//
// for (...) for (...)
// if (c) if (c)
// X1 = ... X1 = ...
// else else
// X2 = ... X2 = ...
// X3 = phi(X1, X2) X3 = phi(X1, X2)
// ... = X3 + 4 X4 = phi(X3)
// ... = X4 + 4
//
// This is still valid LLVM; the extra phi nodes are purely redundant, and will
// be trivially eliminated by InstCombine. The major benefit of this
// transformation is that it makes many other loop optimizations, such as
// LoopUnswitching, simpler.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/AliasAnalysis.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/GlobalsModRef.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopPass.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionAliasAnalysis.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Constants.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Function.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Instructions.h"
#include "llvm/IR/PredIteratorCache.h"
#include "llvm/Pass.h"
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/LoopUtils.h"
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/SSAUpdater.h"
using namespace llvm;
#define DEBUG_TYPE "lcssa"
STATISTIC(NumLCSSA, "Number of live out of a loop variables");
/// Return true if the specified block is in the list.
static bool isExitBlock(BasicBlock *BB,
const SmallVectorImpl<BasicBlock *> &ExitBlocks) {
for (unsigned i = 0, e = ExitBlocks.size(); i != e; ++i)
if (ExitBlocks[i] == BB)
return true;
return false;
}
/// Given an instruction in the loop, check to see if it has any uses that are
/// outside the current loop. If so, insert LCSSA PHI nodes and rewrite the
/// uses.
static bool processInstruction(Loop &L, Instruction &Inst, DominatorTree &DT,
const SmallVectorImpl<BasicBlock *> &ExitBlocks,
PredIteratorCache &PredCache, LoopInfo *LI) {
SmallVector<Use *, 16> UsesToRewrite;
BasicBlock *InstBB = Inst.getParent();
for (Use &U : Inst.uses()) {
Instruction *User = cast<Instruction>(U.getUser());
BasicBlock *UserBB = User->getParent();
if (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(User))
UserBB = PN->getIncomingBlock(U);
if (InstBB != UserBB && !L.contains(UserBB))
UsesToRewrite.push_back(&U);
}
// If there are no uses outside the loop, exit with no change.
if (UsesToRewrite.empty())
return false;
++NumLCSSA; // We are applying the transformation
// Invoke instructions are special in that their result value is not available
// along their unwind edge. The code below tests to see whether DomBB
// dominates the value, so adjust DomBB to the normal destination block,
// which is effectively where the value is first usable.
BasicBlock *DomBB = Inst.getParent();
if (InvokeInst *Inv = dyn_cast<InvokeInst>(&Inst))
DomBB = Inv->getNormalDest();
DomTreeNode *DomNode = DT.getNode(DomBB);
SmallVector<PHINode *, 16> AddedPHIs;
SmallVector<PHINode *, 8> PostProcessPHIs;
SSAUpdater SSAUpdate;
SSAUpdate.Initialize(Inst.getType(), Inst.getName());
// Insert the LCSSA phi's into all of the exit blocks dominated by the
// value, and add them to the Phi's map.
for (BasicBlock *ExitBB : ExitBlocks) {
if (!DT.dominates(DomNode, DT.getNode(ExitBB)))
continue;
// If we already inserted something for this BB, don't reprocess it.
if (SSAUpdate.HasValueForBlock(ExitBB))
continue;
PHINode *PN = PHINode::Create(Inst.getType(), PredCache.size(ExitBB),
Inst.getName() + ".lcssa", &ExitBB->front());
// Add inputs from inside the loop for this PHI.
for (BasicBlock *Pred : PredCache.get(ExitBB)) {
PN->addIncoming(&Inst, Pred);
// If the exit block has a predecessor not within the loop, arrange for
// the incoming value use corresponding to that predecessor to be
// rewritten in terms of a different LCSSA PHI.
if (!L.contains(Pred))
UsesToRewrite.push_back(
&PN->getOperandUse(PN->getOperandNumForIncomingValue(
PN->getNumIncomingValues() - 1)));
}
AddedPHIs.push_back(PN);
// Remember that this phi makes the value alive in this block.
SSAUpdate.AddAvailableValue(ExitBB, PN);
// LoopSimplify might fail to simplify some loops (e.g. when indirect
// branches are involved). In such situations, it might happen that an exit
// for Loop L1 is the header of a disjoint Loop L2. Thus, when we create
// PHIs in such an exit block, we are also inserting PHIs into L2's header.
// This could break LCSSA form for L2 because these inserted PHIs can also
// have uses outside of L2. Remember all PHIs in such situation as to
// revisit than later on. FIXME: Remove this if indirectbr support into
// LoopSimplify gets improved.
if (auto *OtherLoop = LI->getLoopFor(ExitBB))
if (!L.contains(OtherLoop))
PostProcessPHIs.push_back(PN);
}
// Rewrite all uses outside the loop in terms of the new PHIs we just
// inserted.
for (Use *UseToRewrite : UsesToRewrite) {
// If this use is in an exit block, rewrite to use the newly inserted PHI.
// This is required for correctness because SSAUpdate doesn't handle uses in
// the same block. It assumes the PHI we inserted is at the end of the
// block.
Instruction *User = cast<Instruction>(UseToRewrite->getUser());
BasicBlock *UserBB = User->getParent();
if (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(User))
UserBB = PN->getIncomingBlock(*UseToRewrite);
if (isa<PHINode>(UserBB->begin()) && isExitBlock(UserBB, ExitBlocks)) {
// Tell the VHs that the uses changed. This updates SCEV's caches.
if (UseToRewrite->get()->hasValueHandle())
ValueHandleBase::ValueIsRAUWd(*UseToRewrite, &UserBB->front());
UseToRewrite->set(&UserBB->front());
continue;
}
// Otherwise, do full PHI insertion.
SSAUpdate.RewriteUse(*UseToRewrite);
}
// Post process PHI instructions that were inserted into another disjoint loop
// and update their exits properly.
for (auto *I : PostProcessPHIs) {
if (I->use_empty())
continue;
BasicBlock *PHIBB = I->getParent();
Loop *OtherLoop = LI->getLoopFor(PHIBB);
SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 8> EBs;
OtherLoop->getExitBlocks(EBs);
if (EBs.empty())
continue;
// Recurse and re-process each PHI instruction. FIXME: we should really
// convert this entire thing to a worklist approach where we process a
// vector of instructions...
processInstruction(*OtherLoop, *I, DT, EBs, PredCache, LI);
}
// Remove PHI nodes that did not have any uses rewritten.
for (PHINode *PN : AddedPHIs)
if (PN->use_empty())
PN->eraseFromParent();
return true;
}
/// Return true if the specified block dominates at least
/// one of the blocks in the specified list.
static bool
blockDominatesAnExit(BasicBlock *BB,
DominatorTree &DT,
const SmallVectorImpl<BasicBlock *> &ExitBlocks) {
DomTreeNode *DomNode = DT.getNode(BB);
for (BasicBlock *ExitBB : ExitBlocks)
if (DT.dominates(DomNode, DT.getNode(ExitBB)))
return true;
return false;
}
bool llvm::formLCSSA(Loop &L, DominatorTree &DT, LoopInfo *LI,
ScalarEvolution *SE) {
bool Changed = false;
// Get the set of exiting blocks.
SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 8> ExitBlocks;
L.getExitBlocks(ExitBlocks);
if (ExitBlocks.empty())
return false;
PredIteratorCache PredCache;
// Look at all the instructions in the loop, checking to see if they have uses
// outside the loop. If so, rewrite those uses.
for (BasicBlock *BB : L.blocks()) {
// For large loops, avoid use-scanning by using dominance information: In
// particular, if a block does not dominate any of the loop exits, then none
// of the values defined in the block could be used outside the loop.
if (!blockDominatesAnExit(BB, DT, ExitBlocks))
continue;
for (Instruction &I : *BB) {
// Reject two common cases fast: instructions with no uses (like stores)
// and instructions with one use that is in the same block as this.
if (I.use_empty() ||
(I.hasOneUse() && I.user_back()->getParent() == BB &&
!isa<PHINode>(I.user_back())))
continue;
Changed |= processInstruction(L, I, DT, ExitBlocks, PredCache, LI);
}
}
// If we modified the code, remove any caches about the loop from SCEV to
// avoid dangling entries.
// FIXME: This is a big hammer, can we clear the cache more selectively?
if (SE && Changed)
SE->forgetLoop(&L);
assert(L.isLCSSAForm(DT));
return Changed;
}
/// Process a loop nest depth first.
bool llvm::formLCSSARecursively(Loop &L, DominatorTree &DT, LoopInfo *LI,
ScalarEvolution *SE) {
bool Changed = false;
// Recurse depth-first through inner loops.
for (Loop *SubLoop : L.getSubLoops())
Changed |= formLCSSARecursively(*SubLoop, DT, LI, SE);
Changed |= formLCSSA(L, DT, LI, SE);
return Changed;
}
namespace {
struct LCSSA : public FunctionPass {
static char ID; // Pass identification, replacement for typeid
LCSSA() : FunctionPass(ID) {
initializeLCSSAPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
}
// Cached analysis information for the current function.
DominatorTree *DT;
LoopInfo *LI;
ScalarEvolution *SE;
bool runOnFunction(Function &F) override;
/// This transformation requires natural loop information & requires that
/// loop preheaders be inserted into the CFG. It maintains both of these,
/// as well as the CFG. It also requires dominator information.
void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override {
AU.setPreservesCFG();
AU.addRequired<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();
AU.addRequired<LoopInfoWrapperPass>();
AU.addPreservedID(LoopSimplifyID);
AU.addPreserved<AAResultsWrapperPass>();
AU.addPreserved<GlobalsAAWrapperPass>();
AU.addPreserved<ScalarEvolutionWrapperPass>();
AU.addPreserved<SCEVAAWrapperPass>();
}
};
}
char LCSSA::ID = 0;
INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(LCSSA, "lcssa", "Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass", false, false)
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(DominatorTreeWrapperPass)
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(LoopInfoWrapperPass)
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(GlobalsAAWrapperPass)
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(SCEVAAWrapperPass)
INITIALIZE_PASS_END(LCSSA, "lcssa", "Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass", false, false)
Pass *llvm::createLCSSAPass() { return new LCSSA(); }
char &llvm::LCSSAID = LCSSA::ID;
/// Process all loops in the function, inner-most out.
bool LCSSA::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
bool Changed = false;
LI = &getAnalysis<LoopInfoWrapperPass>().getLoopInfo();
DT = &getAnalysis<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>().getDomTree();
auto *SEWP = getAnalysisIfAvailable<ScalarEvolutionWrapperPass>();
SE = SEWP ? &SEWP->getSE() : nullptr;
// Simplify each loop nest in the function.
for (LoopInfo::iterator I = LI->begin(), E = LI->end(); I != E; ++I)
Changed |= formLCSSARecursively(**I, *DT, LI, SE);
return Changed;
}