1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-11-22 18:54:02 +01:00
llvm-mirror/unittests/Analysis/LoopPassManagerTest.cpp
Chandler Carruth 2ed363a464 [PM] Introduce a reasonable port of the main per-module pass pipeline
from the old pass manager in the new one.

I'm not trying to support (initially) the numerous options that are
currently available to customize the pass pipeline. If we end up really
wanting them, we can add them later, but I suspect many are no longer
interesting. The simplicity of omitting them will help a lot as we sort
out what the pipeline should look like in the new PM.

I've also documented to the best of my ability *why* each pass or group
of passes is used so that reading the pipeline is more helpful. In many
cases I think we have some questionable choices of ordering and I've
left FIXME comments in place so we know what to come back and revisit
going forward. But for now, I've left it as similar to the current
pipeline as I could.

Lastly, I've had to comment out several places where passes are not
ported to the new pass manager or where the loop pass infrastructure is
not yet ready. I did at least fix a few bugs in the loop pass
infrastructure uncovered by running the full pipeline, but I didn't want
to go too far in this patch -- I'll come back and re-enable these as the
infrastructure comes online. But I'd like to keep the comments in place
because I don't want to lose track of which passes need to be enabled
and where they go.

One thing that seemed like a significant API improvement was to require
that we don't build pipelines for O0. It seems to have no real benefit.

I've also switched back to returning pass managers by value as at this
API layer it feels much more natural to me for composition. But if
others disagree, I'm happy to go back to an output parameter.

I'm not 100% happy with the testing strategy currently, but it seems at
least OK. I may come back and try to refactor or otherwise improve this
in subsequent patches but I wanted to at least get a good starting point
in place.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28042

llvm-svn: 290325
2016-12-22 06:59:15 +00:00

210 lines
7.0 KiB
C++

//===- llvm/unittest/Analysis/LoopPassManagerTest.cpp - LPM tests ---------===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "llvm/Analysis/AliasAnalysis.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/AssumptionCache.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopPassManager.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/TargetLibraryInfo.h"
#include "llvm/AsmParser/Parser.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Function.h"
#include "llvm/IR/LLVMContext.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Module.h"
#include "llvm/IR/PassManager.h"
#include "llvm/Support/SourceMgr.h"
#include "gtest/gtest.h"
using namespace llvm;
namespace {
class TestLoopAnalysis : public AnalysisInfoMixin<TestLoopAnalysis> {
friend AnalysisInfoMixin<TestLoopAnalysis>;
static AnalysisKey Key;
int &Runs;
public:
struct Result {
Result(int Count) : BlockCount(Count) {}
int BlockCount;
};
TestLoopAnalysis(int &Runs) : Runs(Runs) {}
/// \brief Run the analysis pass over the loop and return a result.
Result run(Loop &L, LoopAnalysisManager &AM) {
++Runs;
int Count = 0;
for (auto I = L.block_begin(), E = L.block_end(); I != E; ++I)
++Count;
return Result(Count);
}
};
AnalysisKey TestLoopAnalysis::Key;
class TestLoopPass {
std::vector<StringRef> &VisitedLoops;
int &AnalyzedBlockCount;
bool OnlyUseCachedResults;
public:
TestLoopPass(std::vector<StringRef> &VisitedLoops, int &AnalyzedBlockCount,
bool OnlyUseCachedResults = false)
: VisitedLoops(VisitedLoops), AnalyzedBlockCount(AnalyzedBlockCount),
OnlyUseCachedResults(OnlyUseCachedResults) {}
PreservedAnalyses run(Loop &L, LoopAnalysisManager &AM) {
VisitedLoops.push_back(L.getName());
if (OnlyUseCachedResults) {
// Hack to force the use of the cached interface.
if (auto *AR = AM.getCachedResult<TestLoopAnalysis>(L))
AnalyzedBlockCount += AR->BlockCount;
} else {
// Typical path just runs the analysis as needed.
auto &AR = AM.getResult<TestLoopAnalysis>(L);
AnalyzedBlockCount += AR.BlockCount;
}
return PreservedAnalyses::all();
}
static StringRef name() { return "TestLoopPass"; }
};
// A test loop pass that invalidates the analysis for loops with the given name.
class TestLoopInvalidatingPass {
StringRef Name;
public:
TestLoopInvalidatingPass(StringRef LoopName) : Name(LoopName) {}
PreservedAnalyses run(Loop &L, LoopAnalysisManager &AM) {
return L.getName() == Name ? getLoopPassPreservedAnalyses()
: PreservedAnalyses::all();
}
static StringRef name() { return "TestLoopInvalidatingPass"; }
};
std::unique_ptr<Module> parseIR(LLVMContext &C, const char *IR) {
SMDiagnostic Err;
return parseAssemblyString(IR, Err, C);
}
class LoopPassManagerTest : public ::testing::Test {
protected:
LLVMContext Context;
std::unique_ptr<Module> M;
public:
LoopPassManagerTest()
: M(parseIR(Context, "define void @f() {\n"
"entry:\n"
" br label %loop.0\n"
"loop.0:\n"
" br i1 undef, label %loop.0.0, label %end\n"
"loop.0.0:\n"
" br i1 undef, label %loop.0.0, label %loop.0.1\n"
"loop.0.1:\n"
" br i1 undef, label %loop.0.1, label %loop.0\n"
"end:\n"
" ret void\n"
"}\n"
"\n"
"define void @g() {\n"
"entry:\n"
" br label %loop.g.0\n"
"loop.g.0:\n"
" br i1 undef, label %loop.g.0, label %end\n"
"end:\n"
" ret void\n"
"}\n")) {}
};
#define EXPECT_N_ELEMENTS_EQ(N, EXPECTED, ACTUAL) \
do { \
EXPECT_EQ(N##UL, ACTUAL.size()); \
for (int I = 0; I < N; ++I) \
EXPECT_TRUE(EXPECTED[I] == ACTUAL[I]) << "Element " << I << " is " \
<< ACTUAL[I] << ". Expected " \
<< EXPECTED[I] << "."; \
} while (0)
TEST_F(LoopPassManagerTest, Basic) {
LoopAnalysisManager LAM(true);
int LoopAnalysisRuns = 0;
LAM.registerPass([&] { return TestLoopAnalysis(LoopAnalysisRuns); });
FunctionAnalysisManager FAM(true);
// We need DominatorTreeAnalysis for LoopAnalysis.
FAM.registerPass([&] { return DominatorTreeAnalysis(); });
FAM.registerPass([&] { return LoopAnalysis(); });
// We also allow loop passes to assume a set of other analyses and so need
// those.
FAM.registerPass([&] { return AAManager(); });
FAM.registerPass([&] { return TargetLibraryAnalysis(); });
FAM.registerPass([&] { return ScalarEvolutionAnalysis(); });
FAM.registerPass([&] { return AssumptionAnalysis(); });
FAM.registerPass([&] { return LoopAnalysisManagerFunctionProxy(LAM); });
LAM.registerPass([&] { return FunctionAnalysisManagerLoopProxy(FAM); });
ModuleAnalysisManager MAM(true);
MAM.registerPass([&] { return FunctionAnalysisManagerModuleProxy(FAM); });
FAM.registerPass([&] { return ModuleAnalysisManagerFunctionProxy(MAM); });
ModulePassManager MPM(true);
FunctionPassManager FPM(true);
// Visit all of the loops.
std::vector<StringRef> VisitedLoops1;
int AnalyzedBlockCount1 = 0;
{
LoopPassManager LPM;
LPM.addPass(TestLoopPass(VisitedLoops1, AnalyzedBlockCount1));
FPM.addPass(createFunctionToLoopPassAdaptor(std::move(LPM)));
}
// Only use cached analyses.
std::vector<StringRef> VisitedLoops2;
int AnalyzedBlockCount2 = 0;
{
LoopPassManager LPM;
LPM.addPass(TestLoopInvalidatingPass("loop.g.0"));
LPM.addPass(TestLoopPass(VisitedLoops2, AnalyzedBlockCount2,
/*OnlyUseCachedResults=*/true));
FPM.addPass(createFunctionToLoopPassAdaptor(std::move(LPM)));
}
MPM.addPass(createModuleToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM)));
MPM.run(*M, MAM);
StringRef ExpectedLoops[] = {"loop.0.0", "loop.0.1", "loop.0", "loop.g.0"};
// Validate the counters and order of loops visited.
// loop.0 has 3 blocks whereas loop.0.0, loop.0.1, and loop.g.0 each have 1.
EXPECT_N_ELEMENTS_EQ(4, ExpectedLoops, VisitedLoops1);
EXPECT_EQ(6, AnalyzedBlockCount1);
EXPECT_N_ELEMENTS_EQ(4, ExpectedLoops, VisitedLoops2);
// The block from loop.g.0 won't be counted, since it wasn't cached.
EXPECT_EQ(5, AnalyzedBlockCount2);
// The first LPM runs the loop analysis for all four loops, the second uses
// cached results for everything.
EXPECT_EQ(4, LoopAnalysisRuns);
}
}