mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2024-10-19 19:12:56 +02:00
782c5d6f79
There is precedence for factorization transforms in instcombine for FP ops with fast-math. We also have similar logic in foldSPFofSPF(). It would take more work to add this to reassociate because that's specialized for binops, and min/max are not binops (or even single instructions). Also, I don't have evidence that larger min/max trees than this exist in real code, but if we find that's true, we might want to reorganize where/how we do this optimization. In the motivating example from https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35717 , we have: int test(int xc, int xm, int xy) { int xk; if (xc < xm) xk = xc < xy ? xc : xy; else xk = xm < xy ? xm : xy; return xk; } This patch solves that problem because we recognize more min/max patterns after rL321672 https://rise4fun.com/Alive/Qjne https://rise4fun.com/Alive/3yg Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41603 llvm-svn: 321998 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| Coroutines | ||
| Hello | ||
| InstCombine | ||
| Instrumentation | ||
| IPO | ||
| ObjCARC | ||
| Scalar | ||
| Utils | ||
| Vectorize | ||
| CMakeLists.txt | ||
| LLVMBuild.txt | ||