1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2025-02-01 05:01:59 +01:00
llvm-mirror/test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/peel-loop-negative.ll
Max Kazantsev 2198626e48 [LoopPeeling] Fix condition for phi-eliminating peeling
When peeling loops basing on phis becoming invariants, we make a wrong loop size check.
UP.Threshold should be compared against the total numbers of instructions after the transformation,
which is equal to 2 * LoopSize in case of peeling one iteration.
We should also check that the maximum allowed number of peeled iterations is not zero.

Reviewers: sanjoy, anna, reames, mkuper

Reviewed By: mkuper

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31753

llvm-svn: 300441
2017-04-17 05:38:28 +00:00

29 lines
745 B
LLVM

; RUN: opt < %s -S -loop-unroll -unroll-threshold=800 -unroll-peel-max-count=0 | FileCheck %s
; We should not peel this loop even though we can, because the max count is set
; to zero.
define i32 @invariant_backedge_neg_1(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @invariant_backedge_neg_1
; CHECK-NOT loop.peel{{.*}}:
; CHECK: loop:
; CHECK: %i = phi
; CHECK: %sum = phi
; CHECK: %plus = phi
entry:
br label %loop
loop:
%i = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %loop ]
%sum = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %incsum, %loop ]
%plus = phi i32 [ %a, %entry ], [ %b, %loop ]
%incsum = add i32 %sum, %plus
%inc = add i32 %i, 1
%cmp = icmp slt i32 %i, 1000
br i1 %cmp, label %loop, label %exit
exit:
ret i32 %sum
}