1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-11-24 19:52:54 +01:00
llvm-mirror/lib/Analysis/LiveValues.cpp
Owen Anderson 46990c17f7 Get rid of static constructors for pass registration. Instead, every pass exposes an initializeMyPassFunction(), which
must be called in the pass's constructor.  This function uses static dependency declarations to recursively initialize
the pass's dependencies.

Clients that only create passes through the createFooPass() APIs will require no changes.  Clients that want to use the
CommandLine options for passes will need to manually call the appropriate initialization functions in PassInitialization.h
before parsing commandline arguments.

I have tested this with all standard configurations of clang and llvm-gcc on Darwin.  It is possible that there are problems
with the static dependencies that will only be visible with non-standard options.  If you encounter any crash in pass
registration/creation, please send the testcase to me directly.

llvm-svn: 116820
2010-10-19 17:21:58 +00:00

200 lines
6.8 KiB
C++

//===- LiveValues.cpp - Liveness information for LLVM IR Values. ----------===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This file defines the implementation for the LLVM IR Value liveness
// analysis pass.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "llvm/Analysis/LiveValues.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h"
using namespace llvm;
namespace llvm {
FunctionPass *createLiveValuesPass() { return new LiveValues(); }
}
char LiveValues::ID = 0;
INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(LiveValues, "live-values",
"Value Liveness Analysis", false, true)
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(DominatorTree)
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(LoopInfo)
INITIALIZE_PASS_END(LiveValues, "live-values",
"Value Liveness Analysis", false, true)
LiveValues::LiveValues() : FunctionPass(ID) {
initializeLiveValuesPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
}
void LiveValues::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
AU.addRequired<DominatorTree>();
AU.addRequired<LoopInfo>();
AU.setPreservesAll();
}
bool LiveValues::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
DT = &getAnalysis<DominatorTree>();
LI = &getAnalysis<LoopInfo>();
// This pass' values are computed lazily, so there's nothing to do here.
return false;
}
void LiveValues::releaseMemory() {
Memos.clear();
}
/// isUsedInBlock - Test if the given value is used in the given block.
///
bool LiveValues::isUsedInBlock(const Value *V, const BasicBlock *BB) {
Memo &M = getMemo(V);
return M.Used.count(BB);
}
/// isLiveThroughBlock - Test if the given value is known to be
/// live-through the given block, meaning that the block is properly
/// dominated by the value's definition, and there exists a block
/// reachable from it that contains a use. This uses a conservative
/// approximation that errs on the side of returning false.
///
bool LiveValues::isLiveThroughBlock(const Value *V,
const BasicBlock *BB) {
Memo &M = getMemo(V);
return M.LiveThrough.count(BB);
}
/// isKilledInBlock - Test if the given value is known to be killed in
/// the given block, meaning that the block contains a use of the value,
/// and no blocks reachable from the block contain a use. This uses a
/// conservative approximation that errs on the side of returning false.
///
bool LiveValues::isKilledInBlock(const Value *V, const BasicBlock *BB) {
Memo &M = getMemo(V);
return M.Killed.count(BB);
}
/// getMemo - Retrieve an existing Memo for the given value if one
/// is available, otherwise compute a new one.
///
LiveValues::Memo &LiveValues::getMemo(const Value *V) {
DenseMap<const Value *, Memo>::iterator I = Memos.find(V);
if (I != Memos.end())
return I->second;
return compute(V);
}
/// getImmediateDominator - A handy utility for the specific DominatorTree
/// query that we need here.
///
static const BasicBlock *getImmediateDominator(const BasicBlock *BB,
const DominatorTree *DT) {
DomTreeNode *Node = DT->getNode(const_cast<BasicBlock *>(BB))->getIDom();
return Node ? Node->getBlock() : 0;
}
/// compute - Compute a new Memo for the given value.
///
LiveValues::Memo &LiveValues::compute(const Value *V) {
Memo &M = Memos[V];
// Determine the block containing the definition.
const BasicBlock *DefBB;
// Instructions define values with meaningful live ranges.
if (const Instruction *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(V))
DefBB = I->getParent();
// Arguments can be analyzed as values defined in the entry block.
else if (const Argument *A = dyn_cast<Argument>(V))
DefBB = &A->getParent()->getEntryBlock();
// Constants and other things aren't meaningful here, so just
// return having computed an empty Memo so that we don't come
// here again. The assumption here is that client code won't
// be asking about such values very often.
else
return M;
// Determine if the value is defined inside a loop. This is used
// to track whether the value is ever used outside the loop, so
// it'll be set to null if the value is either not defined in a
// loop or used outside the loop in which it is defined.
const Loop *L = LI->getLoopFor(DefBB);
// Track whether the value is used anywhere outside of the block
// in which it is defined.
bool LiveOutOfDefBB = false;
// Examine each use of the value.
for (Value::const_use_iterator I = V->use_begin(), E = V->use_end();
I != E; ++I) {
const User *U = *I;
const BasicBlock *UseBB = cast<Instruction>(U)->getParent();
// Note the block in which this use occurs.
M.Used.insert(UseBB);
// If the use block doesn't have successors, the value can be
// considered killed.
if (succ_begin(UseBB) == succ_end(UseBB))
M.Killed.insert(UseBB);
// Observe whether the value is used outside of the loop in which
// it is defined. Switch to an enclosing loop if necessary.
for (; L; L = L->getParentLoop())
if (L->contains(UseBB))
break;
// Search for live-through blocks.
const BasicBlock *BB;
if (const PHINode *PHI = dyn_cast<PHINode>(U)) {
// For PHI nodes, start the search at the incoming block paired with the
// incoming value, which must be dominated by the definition.
unsigned Num = PHI->getIncomingValueNumForOperand(I.getOperandNo());
BB = PHI->getIncomingBlock(Num);
// A PHI-node use means the value is live-out of it's defining block
// even if that block also contains the only use.
LiveOutOfDefBB = true;
} else {
// Otherwise just start the search at the use.
BB = UseBB;
// Note if the use is outside the defining block.
LiveOutOfDefBB |= UseBB != DefBB;
}
// Climb the immediate dominator tree from the use to the definition
// and mark all intermediate blocks as live-through.
for (; BB != DefBB; BB = getImmediateDominator(BB, DT)) {
if (BB != UseBB && !M.LiveThrough.insert(BB))
break;
}
}
// If the value is defined inside a loop and is not live outside
// the loop, then each exit block of the loop in which the value
// is used is a kill block.
if (L) {
SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 4> ExitingBlocks;
L->getExitingBlocks(ExitingBlocks);
for (unsigned i = 0, e = ExitingBlocks.size(); i != e; ++i) {
const BasicBlock *ExitingBlock = ExitingBlocks[i];
if (M.Used.count(ExitingBlock))
M.Killed.insert(ExitingBlock);
}
}
// If the value was never used outside the block in which it was
// defined, it's killed in that block.
if (!LiveOutOfDefBB)
M.Killed.insert(DefBB);
return M;
}