mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2024-11-23 19:23:23 +01:00
4dedca4724
Move implicit include dependencies down to header/source files.
1948 lines
73 KiB
C++
1948 lines
73 KiB
C++
//===- InductiveRangeCheckElimination.cpp - -------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// The InductiveRangeCheckElimination pass splits a loop's iteration space into
|
|
// three disjoint ranges. It does that in a way such that the loop running in
|
|
// the middle loop provably does not need range checks. As an example, it will
|
|
// convert
|
|
//
|
|
// len = < known positive >
|
|
// for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
|
// if (0 <= i && i < len) {
|
|
// do_something();
|
|
// } else {
|
|
// throw_out_of_bounds();
|
|
// }
|
|
// }
|
|
//
|
|
// to
|
|
//
|
|
// len = < known positive >
|
|
// limit = smin(n, len)
|
|
// // no first segment
|
|
// for (i = 0; i < limit; i++) {
|
|
// if (0 <= i && i < len) { // this check is fully redundant
|
|
// do_something();
|
|
// } else {
|
|
// throw_out_of_bounds();
|
|
// }
|
|
// }
|
|
// for (i = limit; i < n; i++) {
|
|
// if (0 <= i && i < len) {
|
|
// do_something();
|
|
// } else {
|
|
// throw_out_of_bounds();
|
|
// }
|
|
// }
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar/InductiveRangeCheckElimination.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/APInt.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/None.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/Optional.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/PriorityWorklist.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/StringRef.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/Twine.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfo.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopAnalysisManager.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopPass.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/PostDominators.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpressions.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/BasicBlock.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/CFG.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Constants.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/DerivedTypes.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Function.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/InstrTypes.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Instructions.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Metadata.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Module.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/PatternMatch.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Type.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Use.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/User.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Value.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/InitializePasses.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Pass.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/BranchProbability.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/Casting.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/Compiler.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/Cloning.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/LoopSimplify.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/LoopUtils.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/ScalarEvolutionExpander.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/ValueMapper.h"
|
|
#include <algorithm>
|
|
#include <cassert>
|
|
#include <iterator>
|
|
#include <limits>
|
|
#include <utility>
|
|
#include <vector>
|
|
|
|
using namespace llvm;
|
|
using namespace llvm::PatternMatch;
|
|
|
|
static cl::opt<unsigned> LoopSizeCutoff("irce-loop-size-cutoff", cl::Hidden,
|
|
cl::init(64));
|
|
|
|
static cl::opt<bool> PrintChangedLoops("irce-print-changed-loops", cl::Hidden,
|
|
cl::init(false));
|
|
|
|
static cl::opt<bool> PrintRangeChecks("irce-print-range-checks", cl::Hidden,
|
|
cl::init(false));
|
|
|
|
static cl::opt<int> MaxExitProbReciprocal("irce-max-exit-prob-reciprocal",
|
|
cl::Hidden, cl::init(10));
|
|
|
|
static cl::opt<bool> SkipProfitabilityChecks("irce-skip-profitability-checks",
|
|
cl::Hidden, cl::init(false));
|
|
|
|
static cl::opt<bool> AllowUnsignedLatchCondition("irce-allow-unsigned-latch",
|
|
cl::Hidden, cl::init(true));
|
|
|
|
static cl::opt<bool> AllowNarrowLatchCondition(
|
|
"irce-allow-narrow-latch", cl::Hidden, cl::init(true),
|
|
cl::desc("If set to true, IRCE may eliminate wide range checks in loops "
|
|
"with narrow latch condition."));
|
|
|
|
static const char *ClonedLoopTag = "irce.loop.clone";
|
|
|
|
#define DEBUG_TYPE "irce"
|
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
|
|
/// An inductive range check is conditional branch in a loop with
|
|
///
|
|
/// 1. a very cold successor (i.e. the branch jumps to that successor very
|
|
/// rarely)
|
|
///
|
|
/// and
|
|
///
|
|
/// 2. a condition that is provably true for some contiguous range of values
|
|
/// taken by the containing loop's induction variable.
|
|
///
|
|
class InductiveRangeCheck {
|
|
|
|
const SCEV *Begin = nullptr;
|
|
const SCEV *Step = nullptr;
|
|
const SCEV *End = nullptr;
|
|
Use *CheckUse = nullptr;
|
|
bool IsSigned = true;
|
|
|
|
static bool parseRangeCheckICmp(Loop *L, ICmpInst *ICI, ScalarEvolution &SE,
|
|
Value *&Index, Value *&Length,
|
|
bool &IsSigned);
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
extractRangeChecksFromCond(Loop *L, ScalarEvolution &SE, Use &ConditionUse,
|
|
SmallVectorImpl<InductiveRangeCheck> &Checks,
|
|
SmallPtrSetImpl<Value *> &Visited);
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
const SCEV *getBegin() const { return Begin; }
|
|
const SCEV *getStep() const { return Step; }
|
|
const SCEV *getEnd() const { return End; }
|
|
bool isSigned() const { return IsSigned; }
|
|
|
|
void print(raw_ostream &OS) const {
|
|
OS << "InductiveRangeCheck:\n";
|
|
OS << " Begin: ";
|
|
Begin->print(OS);
|
|
OS << " Step: ";
|
|
Step->print(OS);
|
|
OS << " End: ";
|
|
End->print(OS);
|
|
OS << "\n CheckUse: ";
|
|
getCheckUse()->getUser()->print(OS);
|
|
OS << " Operand: " << getCheckUse()->getOperandNo() << "\n";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DUMP_METHOD
|
|
void dump() {
|
|
print(dbgs());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Use *getCheckUse() const { return CheckUse; }
|
|
|
|
/// Represents an signed integer range [Range.getBegin(), Range.getEnd()). If
|
|
/// R.getEnd() le R.getBegin(), then R denotes the empty range.
|
|
|
|
class Range {
|
|
const SCEV *Begin;
|
|
const SCEV *End;
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
Range(const SCEV *Begin, const SCEV *End) : Begin(Begin), End(End) {
|
|
assert(Begin->getType() == End->getType() && "ill-typed range!");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Type *getType() const { return Begin->getType(); }
|
|
const SCEV *getBegin() const { return Begin; }
|
|
const SCEV *getEnd() const { return End; }
|
|
bool isEmpty(ScalarEvolution &SE, bool IsSigned) const {
|
|
if (Begin == End)
|
|
return true;
|
|
if (IsSigned)
|
|
return SE.isKnownPredicate(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE, Begin, End);
|
|
else
|
|
return SE.isKnownPredicate(ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE, Begin, End);
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
/// This is the value the condition of the branch needs to evaluate to for the
|
|
/// branch to take the hot successor (see (1) above).
|
|
bool getPassingDirection() { return true; }
|
|
|
|
/// Computes a range for the induction variable (IndVar) in which the range
|
|
/// check is redundant and can be constant-folded away. The induction
|
|
/// variable is not required to be the canonical {0,+,1} induction variable.
|
|
Optional<Range> computeSafeIterationSpace(ScalarEvolution &SE,
|
|
const SCEVAddRecExpr *IndVar,
|
|
bool IsLatchSigned) const;
|
|
|
|
/// Parse out a set of inductive range checks from \p BI and append them to \p
|
|
/// Checks.
|
|
///
|
|
/// NB! There may be conditions feeding into \p BI that aren't inductive range
|
|
/// checks, and hence don't end up in \p Checks.
|
|
static void
|
|
extractRangeChecksFromBranch(BranchInst *BI, Loop *L, ScalarEvolution &SE,
|
|
BranchProbabilityInfo *BPI,
|
|
SmallVectorImpl<InductiveRangeCheck> &Checks);
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
class InductiveRangeCheckElimination {
|
|
ScalarEvolution &SE;
|
|
BranchProbabilityInfo *BPI;
|
|
DominatorTree &DT;
|
|
LoopInfo &LI;
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
InductiveRangeCheckElimination(ScalarEvolution &SE,
|
|
BranchProbabilityInfo *BPI, DominatorTree &DT,
|
|
LoopInfo &LI)
|
|
: SE(SE), BPI(BPI), DT(DT), LI(LI) {}
|
|
|
|
bool run(Loop *L, function_ref<void(Loop *, bool)> LPMAddNewLoop);
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
class IRCELegacyPass : public FunctionPass {
|
|
public:
|
|
static char ID;
|
|
|
|
IRCELegacyPass() : FunctionPass(ID) {
|
|
initializeIRCELegacyPassPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override {
|
|
AU.addRequired<BranchProbabilityInfoWrapperPass>();
|
|
AU.addRequired<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();
|
|
AU.addPreserved<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();
|
|
AU.addRequired<LoopInfoWrapperPass>();
|
|
AU.addPreserved<LoopInfoWrapperPass>();
|
|
AU.addRequired<ScalarEvolutionWrapperPass>();
|
|
AU.addPreserved<ScalarEvolutionWrapperPass>();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool runOnFunction(Function &F) override;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
} // end anonymous namespace
|
|
|
|
char IRCELegacyPass::ID = 0;
|
|
|
|
INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(IRCELegacyPass, "irce",
|
|
"Inductive range check elimination", false, false)
|
|
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(BranchProbabilityInfoWrapperPass)
|
|
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(DominatorTreeWrapperPass)
|
|
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(LoopInfoWrapperPass)
|
|
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(ScalarEvolutionWrapperPass)
|
|
INITIALIZE_PASS_END(IRCELegacyPass, "irce", "Inductive range check elimination",
|
|
false, false)
|
|
|
|
/// Parse a single ICmp instruction, `ICI`, into a range check. If `ICI` cannot
|
|
/// be interpreted as a range check, return false and set `Index` and `Length`
|
|
/// to `nullptr`. Otherwise set `Index` to the value being range checked, and
|
|
/// set `Length` to the upper limit `Index` is being range checked.
|
|
bool
|
|
InductiveRangeCheck::parseRangeCheckICmp(Loop *L, ICmpInst *ICI,
|
|
ScalarEvolution &SE, Value *&Index,
|
|
Value *&Length, bool &IsSigned) {
|
|
auto IsLoopInvariant = [&SE, L](Value *V) {
|
|
return SE.isLoopInvariant(SE.getSCEV(V), L);
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
ICmpInst::Predicate Pred = ICI->getPredicate();
|
|
Value *LHS = ICI->getOperand(0);
|
|
Value *RHS = ICI->getOperand(1);
|
|
|
|
switch (Pred) {
|
|
default:
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE:
|
|
std::swap(LHS, RHS);
|
|
LLVM_FALLTHROUGH;
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE:
|
|
IsSigned = true;
|
|
if (match(RHS, m_ConstantInt<0>())) {
|
|
Index = LHS;
|
|
return true; // Lower.
|
|
}
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT:
|
|
std::swap(LHS, RHS);
|
|
LLVM_FALLTHROUGH;
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT:
|
|
IsSigned = true;
|
|
if (match(RHS, m_ConstantInt<-1>())) {
|
|
Index = LHS;
|
|
return true; // Lower.
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (IsLoopInvariant(LHS)) {
|
|
Index = RHS;
|
|
Length = LHS;
|
|
return true; // Upper.
|
|
}
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT:
|
|
std::swap(LHS, RHS);
|
|
LLVM_FALLTHROUGH;
|
|
case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT:
|
|
IsSigned = false;
|
|
if (IsLoopInvariant(LHS)) {
|
|
Index = RHS;
|
|
Length = LHS;
|
|
return true; // Both lower and upper.
|
|
}
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
llvm_unreachable("default clause returns!");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void InductiveRangeCheck::extractRangeChecksFromCond(
|
|
Loop *L, ScalarEvolution &SE, Use &ConditionUse,
|
|
SmallVectorImpl<InductiveRangeCheck> &Checks,
|
|
SmallPtrSetImpl<Value *> &Visited) {
|
|
Value *Condition = ConditionUse.get();
|
|
if (!Visited.insert(Condition).second)
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
// TODO: Do the same for OR, XOR, NOT etc?
|
|
if (match(Condition, m_And(m_Value(), m_Value()))) {
|
|
extractRangeChecksFromCond(L, SE, cast<User>(Condition)->getOperandUse(0),
|
|
Checks, Visited);
|
|
extractRangeChecksFromCond(L, SE, cast<User>(Condition)->getOperandUse(1),
|
|
Checks, Visited);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ICmpInst *ICI = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(Condition);
|
|
if (!ICI)
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
Value *Length = nullptr, *Index;
|
|
bool IsSigned;
|
|
if (!parseRangeCheckICmp(L, ICI, SE, Index, Length, IsSigned))
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
const auto *IndexAddRec = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(SE.getSCEV(Index));
|
|
bool IsAffineIndex =
|
|
IndexAddRec && (IndexAddRec->getLoop() == L) && IndexAddRec->isAffine();
|
|
|
|
if (!IsAffineIndex)
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
const SCEV *End = nullptr;
|
|
// We strengthen "0 <= I" to "0 <= I < INT_SMAX" and "I < L" to "0 <= I < L".
|
|
// We can potentially do much better here.
|
|
if (Length)
|
|
End = SE.getSCEV(Length);
|
|
else {
|
|
// So far we can only reach this point for Signed range check. This may
|
|
// change in future. In this case we will need to pick Unsigned max for the
|
|
// unsigned range check.
|
|
unsigned BitWidth = cast<IntegerType>(IndexAddRec->getType())->getBitWidth();
|
|
const SCEV *SIntMax = SE.getConstant(APInt::getSignedMaxValue(BitWidth));
|
|
End = SIntMax;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
InductiveRangeCheck IRC;
|
|
IRC.End = End;
|
|
IRC.Begin = IndexAddRec->getStart();
|
|
IRC.Step = IndexAddRec->getStepRecurrence(SE);
|
|
IRC.CheckUse = &ConditionUse;
|
|
IRC.IsSigned = IsSigned;
|
|
Checks.push_back(IRC);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void InductiveRangeCheck::extractRangeChecksFromBranch(
|
|
BranchInst *BI, Loop *L, ScalarEvolution &SE, BranchProbabilityInfo *BPI,
|
|
SmallVectorImpl<InductiveRangeCheck> &Checks) {
|
|
if (BI->isUnconditional() || BI->getParent() == L->getLoopLatch())
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
BranchProbability LikelyTaken(15, 16);
|
|
|
|
if (!SkipProfitabilityChecks && BPI &&
|
|
BPI->getEdgeProbability(BI->getParent(), (unsigned)0) < LikelyTaken)
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
SmallPtrSet<Value *, 8> Visited;
|
|
InductiveRangeCheck::extractRangeChecksFromCond(L, SE, BI->getOperandUse(0),
|
|
Checks, Visited);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Add metadata to the loop L to disable loop optimizations. Callers need to
|
|
// confirm that optimizing loop L is not beneficial.
|
|
static void DisableAllLoopOptsOnLoop(Loop &L) {
|
|
// We do not care about any existing loopID related metadata for L, since we
|
|
// are setting all loop metadata to false.
|
|
LLVMContext &Context = L.getHeader()->getContext();
|
|
// Reserve first location for self reference to the LoopID metadata node.
|
|
MDNode *Dummy = MDNode::get(Context, {});
|
|
MDNode *DisableUnroll = MDNode::get(
|
|
Context, {MDString::get(Context, "llvm.loop.unroll.disable")});
|
|
Metadata *FalseVal =
|
|
ConstantAsMetadata::get(ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt1Ty(Context), 0));
|
|
MDNode *DisableVectorize = MDNode::get(
|
|
Context,
|
|
{MDString::get(Context, "llvm.loop.vectorize.enable"), FalseVal});
|
|
MDNode *DisableLICMVersioning = MDNode::get(
|
|
Context, {MDString::get(Context, "llvm.loop.licm_versioning.disable")});
|
|
MDNode *DisableDistribution= MDNode::get(
|
|
Context,
|
|
{MDString::get(Context, "llvm.loop.distribute.enable"), FalseVal});
|
|
MDNode *NewLoopID =
|
|
MDNode::get(Context, {Dummy, DisableUnroll, DisableVectorize,
|
|
DisableLICMVersioning, DisableDistribution});
|
|
// Set operand 0 to refer to the loop id itself.
|
|
NewLoopID->replaceOperandWith(0, NewLoopID);
|
|
L.setLoopID(NewLoopID);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
|
|
// Keeps track of the structure of a loop. This is similar to llvm::Loop,
|
|
// except that it is more lightweight and can track the state of a loop through
|
|
// changing and potentially invalid IR. This structure also formalizes the
|
|
// kinds of loops we can deal with -- ones that have a single latch that is also
|
|
// an exiting block *and* have a canonical induction variable.
|
|
struct LoopStructure {
|
|
const char *Tag = "";
|
|
|
|
BasicBlock *Header = nullptr;
|
|
BasicBlock *Latch = nullptr;
|
|
|
|
// `Latch's terminator instruction is `LatchBr', and it's `LatchBrExitIdx'th
|
|
// successor is `LatchExit', the exit block of the loop.
|
|
BranchInst *LatchBr = nullptr;
|
|
BasicBlock *LatchExit = nullptr;
|
|
unsigned LatchBrExitIdx = std::numeric_limits<unsigned>::max();
|
|
|
|
// The loop represented by this instance of LoopStructure is semantically
|
|
// equivalent to:
|
|
//
|
|
// intN_ty inc = IndVarIncreasing ? 1 : -1;
|
|
// pred_ty predicate = IndVarIncreasing ? ICMP_SLT : ICMP_SGT;
|
|
//
|
|
// for (intN_ty iv = IndVarStart; predicate(iv, LoopExitAt); iv = IndVarBase)
|
|
// ... body ...
|
|
|
|
Value *IndVarBase = nullptr;
|
|
Value *IndVarStart = nullptr;
|
|
Value *IndVarStep = nullptr;
|
|
Value *LoopExitAt = nullptr;
|
|
bool IndVarIncreasing = false;
|
|
bool IsSignedPredicate = true;
|
|
|
|
LoopStructure() = default;
|
|
|
|
template <typename M> LoopStructure map(M Map) const {
|
|
LoopStructure Result;
|
|
Result.Tag = Tag;
|
|
Result.Header = cast<BasicBlock>(Map(Header));
|
|
Result.Latch = cast<BasicBlock>(Map(Latch));
|
|
Result.LatchBr = cast<BranchInst>(Map(LatchBr));
|
|
Result.LatchExit = cast<BasicBlock>(Map(LatchExit));
|
|
Result.LatchBrExitIdx = LatchBrExitIdx;
|
|
Result.IndVarBase = Map(IndVarBase);
|
|
Result.IndVarStart = Map(IndVarStart);
|
|
Result.IndVarStep = Map(IndVarStep);
|
|
Result.LoopExitAt = Map(LoopExitAt);
|
|
Result.IndVarIncreasing = IndVarIncreasing;
|
|
Result.IsSignedPredicate = IsSignedPredicate;
|
|
return Result;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static Optional<LoopStructure> parseLoopStructure(ScalarEvolution &,
|
|
BranchProbabilityInfo *BPI,
|
|
Loop &, const char *&);
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
/// This class is used to constrain loops to run within a given iteration space.
|
|
/// The algorithm this class implements is given a Loop and a range [Begin,
|
|
/// End). The algorithm then tries to break out a "main loop" out of the loop
|
|
/// it is given in a way that the "main loop" runs with the induction variable
|
|
/// in a subset of [Begin, End). The algorithm emits appropriate pre and post
|
|
/// loops to run any remaining iterations. The pre loop runs any iterations in
|
|
/// which the induction variable is < Begin, and the post loop runs any
|
|
/// iterations in which the induction variable is >= End.
|
|
class LoopConstrainer {
|
|
// The representation of a clone of the original loop we started out with.
|
|
struct ClonedLoop {
|
|
// The cloned blocks
|
|
std::vector<BasicBlock *> Blocks;
|
|
|
|
// `Map` maps values in the clonee into values in the cloned version
|
|
ValueToValueMapTy Map;
|
|
|
|
// An instance of `LoopStructure` for the cloned loop
|
|
LoopStructure Structure;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// Result of rewriting the range of a loop. See changeIterationSpaceEnd for
|
|
// more details on what these fields mean.
|
|
struct RewrittenRangeInfo {
|
|
BasicBlock *PseudoExit = nullptr;
|
|
BasicBlock *ExitSelector = nullptr;
|
|
std::vector<PHINode *> PHIValuesAtPseudoExit;
|
|
PHINode *IndVarEnd = nullptr;
|
|
|
|
RewrittenRangeInfo() = default;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// Calculated subranges we restrict the iteration space of the main loop to.
|
|
// See the implementation of `calculateSubRanges' for more details on how
|
|
// these fields are computed. `LowLimit` is None if there is no restriction
|
|
// on low end of the restricted iteration space of the main loop. `HighLimit`
|
|
// is None if there is no restriction on high end of the restricted iteration
|
|
// space of the main loop.
|
|
|
|
struct SubRanges {
|
|
Optional<const SCEV *> LowLimit;
|
|
Optional<const SCEV *> HighLimit;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// Compute a safe set of limits for the main loop to run in -- effectively the
|
|
// intersection of `Range' and the iteration space of the original loop.
|
|
// Return None if unable to compute the set of subranges.
|
|
Optional<SubRanges> calculateSubRanges(bool IsSignedPredicate) const;
|
|
|
|
// Clone `OriginalLoop' and return the result in CLResult. The IR after
|
|
// running `cloneLoop' is well formed except for the PHI nodes in CLResult --
|
|
// the PHI nodes say that there is an incoming edge from `OriginalPreheader`
|
|
// but there is no such edge.
|
|
void cloneLoop(ClonedLoop &CLResult, const char *Tag) const;
|
|
|
|
// Create the appropriate loop structure needed to describe a cloned copy of
|
|
// `Original`. The clone is described by `VM`.
|
|
Loop *createClonedLoopStructure(Loop *Original, Loop *Parent,
|
|
ValueToValueMapTy &VM, bool IsSubloop);
|
|
|
|
// Rewrite the iteration space of the loop denoted by (LS, Preheader). The
|
|
// iteration space of the rewritten loop ends at ExitLoopAt. The start of the
|
|
// iteration space is not changed. `ExitLoopAt' is assumed to be slt
|
|
// `OriginalHeaderCount'.
|
|
//
|
|
// If there are iterations left to execute, control is made to jump to
|
|
// `ContinuationBlock', otherwise they take the normal loop exit. The
|
|
// returned `RewrittenRangeInfo' object is populated as follows:
|
|
//
|
|
// .PseudoExit is a basic block that unconditionally branches to
|
|
// `ContinuationBlock'.
|
|
//
|
|
// .ExitSelector is a basic block that decides, on exit from the loop,
|
|
// whether to branch to the "true" exit or to `PseudoExit'.
|
|
//
|
|
// .PHIValuesAtPseudoExit are PHINodes in `PseudoExit' that compute the value
|
|
// for each PHINode in the loop header on taking the pseudo exit.
|
|
//
|
|
// After changeIterationSpaceEnd, `Preheader' is no longer a legitimate
|
|
// preheader because it is made to branch to the loop header only
|
|
// conditionally.
|
|
RewrittenRangeInfo
|
|
changeIterationSpaceEnd(const LoopStructure &LS, BasicBlock *Preheader,
|
|
Value *ExitLoopAt,
|
|
BasicBlock *ContinuationBlock) const;
|
|
|
|
// The loop denoted by `LS' has `OldPreheader' as its preheader. This
|
|
// function creates a new preheader for `LS' and returns it.
|
|
BasicBlock *createPreheader(const LoopStructure &LS, BasicBlock *OldPreheader,
|
|
const char *Tag) const;
|
|
|
|
// `ContinuationBlockAndPreheader' was the continuation block for some call to
|
|
// `changeIterationSpaceEnd' and is the preheader to the loop denoted by `LS'.
|
|
// This function rewrites the PHI nodes in `LS.Header' to start with the
|
|
// correct value.
|
|
void rewriteIncomingValuesForPHIs(
|
|
LoopStructure &LS, BasicBlock *ContinuationBlockAndPreheader,
|
|
const LoopConstrainer::RewrittenRangeInfo &RRI) const;
|
|
|
|
// Even though we do not preserve any passes at this time, we at least need to
|
|
// keep the parent loop structure consistent. The `LPPassManager' seems to
|
|
// verify this after running a loop pass. This function adds the list of
|
|
// blocks denoted by BBs to this loops parent loop if required.
|
|
void addToParentLoopIfNeeded(ArrayRef<BasicBlock *> BBs);
|
|
|
|
// Some global state.
|
|
Function &F;
|
|
LLVMContext &Ctx;
|
|
ScalarEvolution &SE;
|
|
DominatorTree &DT;
|
|
LoopInfo &LI;
|
|
function_ref<void(Loop *, bool)> LPMAddNewLoop;
|
|
|
|
// Information about the original loop we started out with.
|
|
Loop &OriginalLoop;
|
|
|
|
const SCEV *LatchTakenCount = nullptr;
|
|
BasicBlock *OriginalPreheader = nullptr;
|
|
|
|
// The preheader of the main loop. This may or may not be different from
|
|
// `OriginalPreheader'.
|
|
BasicBlock *MainLoopPreheader = nullptr;
|
|
|
|
// The range we need to run the main loop in.
|
|
InductiveRangeCheck::Range Range;
|
|
|
|
// The structure of the main loop (see comment at the beginning of this class
|
|
// for a definition)
|
|
LoopStructure MainLoopStructure;
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
LoopConstrainer(Loop &L, LoopInfo &LI,
|
|
function_ref<void(Loop *, bool)> LPMAddNewLoop,
|
|
const LoopStructure &LS, ScalarEvolution &SE,
|
|
DominatorTree &DT, InductiveRangeCheck::Range R)
|
|
: F(*L.getHeader()->getParent()), Ctx(L.getHeader()->getContext()),
|
|
SE(SE), DT(DT), LI(LI), LPMAddNewLoop(LPMAddNewLoop), OriginalLoop(L),
|
|
Range(R), MainLoopStructure(LS) {}
|
|
|
|
// Entry point for the algorithm. Returns true on success.
|
|
bool run();
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
} // end anonymous namespace
|
|
|
|
/// Given a loop with an deccreasing induction variable, is it possible to
|
|
/// safely calculate the bounds of a new loop using the given Predicate.
|
|
static bool isSafeDecreasingBound(const SCEV *Start,
|
|
const SCEV *BoundSCEV, const SCEV *Step,
|
|
ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,
|
|
unsigned LatchBrExitIdx,
|
|
Loop *L, ScalarEvolution &SE) {
|
|
if (Pred != ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT && Pred != ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT &&
|
|
Pred != ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT && Pred != ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT)
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
if (!SE.isAvailableAtLoopEntry(BoundSCEV, L))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
assert(SE.isKnownNegative(Step) && "expecting negative step");
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: isSafeDecreasingBound with:\n");
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: Start: " << *Start << "\n");
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: Step: " << *Step << "\n");
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: BoundSCEV: " << *BoundSCEV << "\n");
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: Pred: " << ICmpInst::getPredicateName(Pred)
|
|
<< "\n");
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: LatchExitBrIdx: " << LatchBrExitIdx << "\n");
|
|
|
|
bool IsSigned = ICmpInst::isSigned(Pred);
|
|
// The predicate that we need to check that the induction variable lies
|
|
// within bounds.
|
|
ICmpInst::Predicate BoundPred =
|
|
IsSigned ? CmpInst::ICMP_SGT : CmpInst::ICMP_UGT;
|
|
|
|
if (LatchBrExitIdx == 1)
|
|
return SE.isLoopEntryGuardedByCond(L, BoundPred, Start, BoundSCEV);
|
|
|
|
assert(LatchBrExitIdx == 0 &&
|
|
"LatchBrExitIdx should be either 0 or 1");
|
|
|
|
const SCEV *StepPlusOne = SE.getAddExpr(Step, SE.getOne(Step->getType()));
|
|
unsigned BitWidth = cast<IntegerType>(BoundSCEV->getType())->getBitWidth();
|
|
APInt Min = IsSigned ? APInt::getSignedMinValue(BitWidth) :
|
|
APInt::getMinValue(BitWidth);
|
|
const SCEV *Limit = SE.getMinusSCEV(SE.getConstant(Min), StepPlusOne);
|
|
|
|
const SCEV *MinusOne =
|
|
SE.getMinusSCEV(BoundSCEV, SE.getOne(BoundSCEV->getType()));
|
|
|
|
return SE.isLoopEntryGuardedByCond(L, BoundPred, Start, MinusOne) &&
|
|
SE.isLoopEntryGuardedByCond(L, BoundPred, BoundSCEV, Limit);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Given a loop with an increasing induction variable, is it possible to
|
|
/// safely calculate the bounds of a new loop using the given Predicate.
|
|
static bool isSafeIncreasingBound(const SCEV *Start,
|
|
const SCEV *BoundSCEV, const SCEV *Step,
|
|
ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,
|
|
unsigned LatchBrExitIdx,
|
|
Loop *L, ScalarEvolution &SE) {
|
|
if (Pred != ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT && Pred != ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT &&
|
|
Pred != ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT && Pred != ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT)
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
if (!SE.isAvailableAtLoopEntry(BoundSCEV, L))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: isSafeIncreasingBound with:\n");
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: Start: " << *Start << "\n");
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: Step: " << *Step << "\n");
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: BoundSCEV: " << *BoundSCEV << "\n");
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: Pred: " << ICmpInst::getPredicateName(Pred)
|
|
<< "\n");
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: LatchExitBrIdx: " << LatchBrExitIdx << "\n");
|
|
|
|
bool IsSigned = ICmpInst::isSigned(Pred);
|
|
// The predicate that we need to check that the induction variable lies
|
|
// within bounds.
|
|
ICmpInst::Predicate BoundPred =
|
|
IsSigned ? CmpInst::ICMP_SLT : CmpInst::ICMP_ULT;
|
|
|
|
if (LatchBrExitIdx == 1)
|
|
return SE.isLoopEntryGuardedByCond(L, BoundPred, Start, BoundSCEV);
|
|
|
|
assert(LatchBrExitIdx == 0 && "LatchBrExitIdx should be 0 or 1");
|
|
|
|
const SCEV *StepMinusOne =
|
|
SE.getMinusSCEV(Step, SE.getOne(Step->getType()));
|
|
unsigned BitWidth = cast<IntegerType>(BoundSCEV->getType())->getBitWidth();
|
|
APInt Max = IsSigned ? APInt::getSignedMaxValue(BitWidth) :
|
|
APInt::getMaxValue(BitWidth);
|
|
const SCEV *Limit = SE.getMinusSCEV(SE.getConstant(Max), StepMinusOne);
|
|
|
|
return (SE.isLoopEntryGuardedByCond(L, BoundPred, Start,
|
|
SE.getAddExpr(BoundSCEV, Step)) &&
|
|
SE.isLoopEntryGuardedByCond(L, BoundPred, BoundSCEV, Limit));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Optional<LoopStructure>
|
|
LoopStructure::parseLoopStructure(ScalarEvolution &SE,
|
|
BranchProbabilityInfo *BPI, Loop &L,
|
|
const char *&FailureReason) {
|
|
if (!L.isLoopSimplifyForm()) {
|
|
FailureReason = "loop not in LoopSimplify form";
|
|
return None;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
BasicBlock *Latch = L.getLoopLatch();
|
|
assert(Latch && "Simplified loops only have one latch!");
|
|
|
|
if (Latch->getTerminator()->getMetadata(ClonedLoopTag)) {
|
|
FailureReason = "loop has already been cloned";
|
|
return None;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!L.isLoopExiting(Latch)) {
|
|
FailureReason = "no loop latch";
|
|
return None;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
BasicBlock *Header = L.getHeader();
|
|
BasicBlock *Preheader = L.getLoopPreheader();
|
|
if (!Preheader) {
|
|
FailureReason = "no preheader";
|
|
return None;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
BranchInst *LatchBr = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(Latch->getTerminator());
|
|
if (!LatchBr || LatchBr->isUnconditional()) {
|
|
FailureReason = "latch terminator not conditional branch";
|
|
return None;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
unsigned LatchBrExitIdx = LatchBr->getSuccessor(0) == Header ? 1 : 0;
|
|
|
|
BranchProbability ExitProbability =
|
|
BPI ? BPI->getEdgeProbability(LatchBr->getParent(), LatchBrExitIdx)
|
|
: BranchProbability::getZero();
|
|
|
|
if (!SkipProfitabilityChecks &&
|
|
ExitProbability > BranchProbability(1, MaxExitProbReciprocal)) {
|
|
FailureReason = "short running loop, not profitable";
|
|
return None;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ICmpInst *ICI = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(LatchBr->getCondition());
|
|
if (!ICI || !isa<IntegerType>(ICI->getOperand(0)->getType())) {
|
|
FailureReason = "latch terminator branch not conditional on integral icmp";
|
|
return None;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const SCEV *LatchCount = SE.getExitCount(&L, Latch);
|
|
if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(LatchCount)) {
|
|
FailureReason = "could not compute latch count";
|
|
return None;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ICmpInst::Predicate Pred = ICI->getPredicate();
|
|
Value *LeftValue = ICI->getOperand(0);
|
|
const SCEV *LeftSCEV = SE.getSCEV(LeftValue);
|
|
IntegerType *IndVarTy = cast<IntegerType>(LeftValue->getType());
|
|
|
|
Value *RightValue = ICI->getOperand(1);
|
|
const SCEV *RightSCEV = SE.getSCEV(RightValue);
|
|
|
|
// We canonicalize `ICI` such that `LeftSCEV` is an add recurrence.
|
|
if (!isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(LeftSCEV)) {
|
|
if (isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(RightSCEV)) {
|
|
std::swap(LeftSCEV, RightSCEV);
|
|
std::swap(LeftValue, RightValue);
|
|
Pred = ICmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(Pred);
|
|
} else {
|
|
FailureReason = "no add recurrences in the icmp";
|
|
return None;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
auto HasNoSignedWrap = [&](const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR) {
|
|
if (AR->getNoWrapFlags(SCEV::FlagNSW))
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
IntegerType *Ty = cast<IntegerType>(AR->getType());
|
|
IntegerType *WideTy =
|
|
IntegerType::get(Ty->getContext(), Ty->getBitWidth() * 2);
|
|
|
|
const SCEVAddRecExpr *ExtendAfterOp =
|
|
dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(SE.getSignExtendExpr(AR, WideTy));
|
|
if (ExtendAfterOp) {
|
|
const SCEV *ExtendedStart = SE.getSignExtendExpr(AR->getStart(), WideTy);
|
|
const SCEV *ExtendedStep =
|
|
SE.getSignExtendExpr(AR->getStepRecurrence(SE), WideTy);
|
|
|
|
bool NoSignedWrap = ExtendAfterOp->getStart() == ExtendedStart &&
|
|
ExtendAfterOp->getStepRecurrence(SE) == ExtendedStep;
|
|
|
|
if (NoSignedWrap)
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We may have proved this when computing the sign extension above.
|
|
return AR->getNoWrapFlags(SCEV::FlagNSW) != SCEV::FlagAnyWrap;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// `ICI` is interpreted as taking the backedge if the *next* value of the
|
|
// induction variable satisfies some constraint.
|
|
|
|
const SCEVAddRecExpr *IndVarBase = cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(LeftSCEV);
|
|
if (!IndVarBase->isAffine()) {
|
|
FailureReason = "LHS in icmp not induction variable";
|
|
return None;
|
|
}
|
|
const SCEV* StepRec = IndVarBase->getStepRecurrence(SE);
|
|
if (!isa<SCEVConstant>(StepRec)) {
|
|
FailureReason = "LHS in icmp not induction variable";
|
|
return None;
|
|
}
|
|
ConstantInt *StepCI = cast<SCEVConstant>(StepRec)->getValue();
|
|
|
|
if (ICI->isEquality() && !HasNoSignedWrap(IndVarBase)) {
|
|
FailureReason = "LHS in icmp needs nsw for equality predicates";
|
|
return None;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert(!StepCI->isZero() && "Zero step?");
|
|
bool IsIncreasing = !StepCI->isNegative();
|
|
bool IsSignedPredicate;
|
|
const SCEV *StartNext = IndVarBase->getStart();
|
|
const SCEV *Addend = SE.getNegativeSCEV(IndVarBase->getStepRecurrence(SE));
|
|
const SCEV *IndVarStart = SE.getAddExpr(StartNext, Addend);
|
|
const SCEV *Step = SE.getSCEV(StepCI);
|
|
|
|
const SCEV *FixedRightSCEV = nullptr;
|
|
|
|
// If RightValue resides within loop (but still being loop invariant),
|
|
// regenerate it as preheader.
|
|
if (auto *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(RightValue))
|
|
if (L.contains(I->getParent()))
|
|
FixedRightSCEV = RightSCEV;
|
|
|
|
if (IsIncreasing) {
|
|
bool DecreasedRightValueByOne = false;
|
|
if (StepCI->isOne()) {
|
|
// Try to turn eq/ne predicates to those we can work with.
|
|
if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE && LatchBrExitIdx == 1)
|
|
// while (++i != len) { while (++i < len) {
|
|
// ... ---> ...
|
|
// } }
|
|
// If both parts are known non-negative, it is profitable to use
|
|
// unsigned comparison in increasing loop. This allows us to make the
|
|
// comparison check against "RightSCEV + 1" more optimistic.
|
|
if (isKnownNonNegativeInLoop(IndVarStart, &L, SE) &&
|
|
isKnownNonNegativeInLoop(RightSCEV, &L, SE))
|
|
Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT;
|
|
else
|
|
Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT;
|
|
else if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ && LatchBrExitIdx == 0) {
|
|
// while (true) { while (true) {
|
|
// if (++i == len) ---> if (++i > len - 1)
|
|
// break; break;
|
|
// ... ...
|
|
// } }
|
|
if (IndVarBase->getNoWrapFlags(SCEV::FlagNUW) &&
|
|
cannotBeMinInLoop(RightSCEV, &L, SE, /*Signed*/false)) {
|
|
Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT;
|
|
RightSCEV = SE.getMinusSCEV(RightSCEV,
|
|
SE.getOne(RightSCEV->getType()));
|
|
DecreasedRightValueByOne = true;
|
|
} else if (cannotBeMinInLoop(RightSCEV, &L, SE, /*Signed*/true)) {
|
|
Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT;
|
|
RightSCEV = SE.getMinusSCEV(RightSCEV,
|
|
SE.getOne(RightSCEV->getType()));
|
|
DecreasedRightValueByOne = true;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool LTPred = (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT || Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT);
|
|
bool GTPred = (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT || Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT);
|
|
bool FoundExpectedPred =
|
|
(LTPred && LatchBrExitIdx == 1) || (GTPred && LatchBrExitIdx == 0);
|
|
|
|
if (!FoundExpectedPred) {
|
|
FailureReason = "expected icmp slt semantically, found something else";
|
|
return None;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
IsSignedPredicate = ICmpInst::isSigned(Pred);
|
|
if (!IsSignedPredicate && !AllowUnsignedLatchCondition) {
|
|
FailureReason = "unsigned latch conditions are explicitly prohibited";
|
|
return None;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!isSafeIncreasingBound(IndVarStart, RightSCEV, Step, Pred,
|
|
LatchBrExitIdx, &L, SE)) {
|
|
FailureReason = "Unsafe loop bounds";
|
|
return None;
|
|
}
|
|
if (LatchBrExitIdx == 0) {
|
|
// We need to increase the right value unless we have already decreased
|
|
// it virtually when we replaced EQ with SGT.
|
|
if (!DecreasedRightValueByOne)
|
|
FixedRightSCEV =
|
|
SE.getAddExpr(RightSCEV, SE.getOne(RightSCEV->getType()));
|
|
} else {
|
|
assert(!DecreasedRightValueByOne &&
|
|
"Right value can be decreased only for LatchBrExitIdx == 0!");
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
bool IncreasedRightValueByOne = false;
|
|
if (StepCI->isMinusOne()) {
|
|
// Try to turn eq/ne predicates to those we can work with.
|
|
if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE && LatchBrExitIdx == 1)
|
|
// while (--i != len) { while (--i > len) {
|
|
// ... ---> ...
|
|
// } }
|
|
// We intentionally don't turn the predicate into UGT even if we know
|
|
// that both operands are non-negative, because it will only pessimize
|
|
// our check against "RightSCEV - 1".
|
|
Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT;
|
|
else if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ && LatchBrExitIdx == 0) {
|
|
// while (true) { while (true) {
|
|
// if (--i == len) ---> if (--i < len + 1)
|
|
// break; break;
|
|
// ... ...
|
|
// } }
|
|
if (IndVarBase->getNoWrapFlags(SCEV::FlagNUW) &&
|
|
cannotBeMaxInLoop(RightSCEV, &L, SE, /* Signed */ false)) {
|
|
Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT;
|
|
RightSCEV = SE.getAddExpr(RightSCEV, SE.getOne(RightSCEV->getType()));
|
|
IncreasedRightValueByOne = true;
|
|
} else if (cannotBeMaxInLoop(RightSCEV, &L, SE, /* Signed */ true)) {
|
|
Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT;
|
|
RightSCEV = SE.getAddExpr(RightSCEV, SE.getOne(RightSCEV->getType()));
|
|
IncreasedRightValueByOne = true;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool LTPred = (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT || Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT);
|
|
bool GTPred = (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT || Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT);
|
|
|
|
bool FoundExpectedPred =
|
|
(GTPred && LatchBrExitIdx == 1) || (LTPred && LatchBrExitIdx == 0);
|
|
|
|
if (!FoundExpectedPred) {
|
|
FailureReason = "expected icmp sgt semantically, found something else";
|
|
return None;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
IsSignedPredicate =
|
|
Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT || Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT;
|
|
|
|
if (!IsSignedPredicate && !AllowUnsignedLatchCondition) {
|
|
FailureReason = "unsigned latch conditions are explicitly prohibited";
|
|
return None;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!isSafeDecreasingBound(IndVarStart, RightSCEV, Step, Pred,
|
|
LatchBrExitIdx, &L, SE)) {
|
|
FailureReason = "Unsafe bounds";
|
|
return None;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (LatchBrExitIdx == 0) {
|
|
// We need to decrease the right value unless we have already increased
|
|
// it virtually when we replaced EQ with SLT.
|
|
if (!IncreasedRightValueByOne)
|
|
FixedRightSCEV =
|
|
SE.getMinusSCEV(RightSCEV, SE.getOne(RightSCEV->getType()));
|
|
} else {
|
|
assert(!IncreasedRightValueByOne &&
|
|
"Right value can be increased only for LatchBrExitIdx == 0!");
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
BasicBlock *LatchExit = LatchBr->getSuccessor(LatchBrExitIdx);
|
|
|
|
assert(SE.getLoopDisposition(LatchCount, &L) ==
|
|
ScalarEvolution::LoopInvariant &&
|
|
"loop variant exit count doesn't make sense!");
|
|
|
|
assert(!L.contains(LatchExit) && "expected an exit block!");
|
|
const DataLayout &DL = Preheader->getModule()->getDataLayout();
|
|
SCEVExpander Expander(SE, DL, "irce");
|
|
Instruction *Ins = Preheader->getTerminator();
|
|
|
|
if (FixedRightSCEV)
|
|
RightValue =
|
|
Expander.expandCodeFor(FixedRightSCEV, FixedRightSCEV->getType(), Ins);
|
|
|
|
Value *IndVarStartV = Expander.expandCodeFor(IndVarStart, IndVarTy, Ins);
|
|
IndVarStartV->setName("indvar.start");
|
|
|
|
LoopStructure Result;
|
|
|
|
Result.Tag = "main";
|
|
Result.Header = Header;
|
|
Result.Latch = Latch;
|
|
Result.LatchBr = LatchBr;
|
|
Result.LatchExit = LatchExit;
|
|
Result.LatchBrExitIdx = LatchBrExitIdx;
|
|
Result.IndVarStart = IndVarStartV;
|
|
Result.IndVarStep = StepCI;
|
|
Result.IndVarBase = LeftValue;
|
|
Result.IndVarIncreasing = IsIncreasing;
|
|
Result.LoopExitAt = RightValue;
|
|
Result.IsSignedPredicate = IsSignedPredicate;
|
|
|
|
FailureReason = nullptr;
|
|
|
|
return Result;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// If the type of \p S matches with \p Ty, return \p S. Otherwise, return
|
|
/// signed or unsigned extension of \p S to type \p Ty.
|
|
static const SCEV *NoopOrExtend(const SCEV *S, Type *Ty, ScalarEvolution &SE,
|
|
bool Signed) {
|
|
return Signed ? SE.getNoopOrSignExtend(S, Ty) : SE.getNoopOrZeroExtend(S, Ty);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Optional<LoopConstrainer::SubRanges>
|
|
LoopConstrainer::calculateSubRanges(bool IsSignedPredicate) const {
|
|
IntegerType *Ty = cast<IntegerType>(LatchTakenCount->getType());
|
|
|
|
auto *RTy = cast<IntegerType>(Range.getType());
|
|
|
|
// We only support wide range checks and narrow latches.
|
|
if (!AllowNarrowLatchCondition && RTy != Ty)
|
|
return None;
|
|
if (RTy->getBitWidth() < Ty->getBitWidth())
|
|
return None;
|
|
|
|
LoopConstrainer::SubRanges Result;
|
|
|
|
// I think we can be more aggressive here and make this nuw / nsw if the
|
|
// addition that feeds into the icmp for the latch's terminating branch is nuw
|
|
// / nsw. In any case, a wrapping 2's complement addition is safe.
|
|
const SCEV *Start = NoopOrExtend(SE.getSCEV(MainLoopStructure.IndVarStart),
|
|
RTy, SE, IsSignedPredicate);
|
|
const SCEV *End = NoopOrExtend(SE.getSCEV(MainLoopStructure.LoopExitAt), RTy,
|
|
SE, IsSignedPredicate);
|
|
|
|
bool Increasing = MainLoopStructure.IndVarIncreasing;
|
|
|
|
// We compute `Smallest` and `Greatest` such that [Smallest, Greatest), or
|
|
// [Smallest, GreatestSeen] is the range of values the induction variable
|
|
// takes.
|
|
|
|
const SCEV *Smallest = nullptr, *Greatest = nullptr, *GreatestSeen = nullptr;
|
|
|
|
const SCEV *One = SE.getOne(RTy);
|
|
if (Increasing) {
|
|
Smallest = Start;
|
|
Greatest = End;
|
|
// No overflow, because the range [Smallest, GreatestSeen] is not empty.
|
|
GreatestSeen = SE.getMinusSCEV(End, One);
|
|
} else {
|
|
// These two computations may sign-overflow. Here is why that is okay:
|
|
//
|
|
// We know that the induction variable does not sign-overflow on any
|
|
// iteration except the last one, and it starts at `Start` and ends at
|
|
// `End`, decrementing by one every time.
|
|
//
|
|
// * if `Smallest` sign-overflows we know `End` is `INT_SMAX`. Since the
|
|
// induction variable is decreasing we know that that the smallest value
|
|
// the loop body is actually executed with is `INT_SMIN` == `Smallest`.
|
|
//
|
|
// * if `Greatest` sign-overflows, we know it can only be `INT_SMIN`. In
|
|
// that case, `Clamp` will always return `Smallest` and
|
|
// [`Result.LowLimit`, `Result.HighLimit`) = [`Smallest`, `Smallest`)
|
|
// will be an empty range. Returning an empty range is always safe.
|
|
|
|
Smallest = SE.getAddExpr(End, One);
|
|
Greatest = SE.getAddExpr(Start, One);
|
|
GreatestSeen = Start;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
auto Clamp = [this, Smallest, Greatest, IsSignedPredicate](const SCEV *S) {
|
|
return IsSignedPredicate
|
|
? SE.getSMaxExpr(Smallest, SE.getSMinExpr(Greatest, S))
|
|
: SE.getUMaxExpr(Smallest, SE.getUMinExpr(Greatest, S));
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// In some cases we can prove that we don't need a pre or post loop.
|
|
ICmpInst::Predicate PredLE =
|
|
IsSignedPredicate ? ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE : ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE;
|
|
ICmpInst::Predicate PredLT =
|
|
IsSignedPredicate ? ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT : ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT;
|
|
|
|
bool ProvablyNoPreloop =
|
|
SE.isKnownPredicate(PredLE, Range.getBegin(), Smallest);
|
|
if (!ProvablyNoPreloop)
|
|
Result.LowLimit = Clamp(Range.getBegin());
|
|
|
|
bool ProvablyNoPostLoop =
|
|
SE.isKnownPredicate(PredLT, GreatestSeen, Range.getEnd());
|
|
if (!ProvablyNoPostLoop)
|
|
Result.HighLimit = Clamp(Range.getEnd());
|
|
|
|
return Result;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void LoopConstrainer::cloneLoop(LoopConstrainer::ClonedLoop &Result,
|
|
const char *Tag) const {
|
|
for (BasicBlock *BB : OriginalLoop.getBlocks()) {
|
|
BasicBlock *Clone = CloneBasicBlock(BB, Result.Map, Twine(".") + Tag, &F);
|
|
Result.Blocks.push_back(Clone);
|
|
Result.Map[BB] = Clone;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
auto GetClonedValue = [&Result](Value *V) {
|
|
assert(V && "null values not in domain!");
|
|
auto It = Result.Map.find(V);
|
|
if (It == Result.Map.end())
|
|
return V;
|
|
return static_cast<Value *>(It->second);
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
auto *ClonedLatch =
|
|
cast<BasicBlock>(GetClonedValue(OriginalLoop.getLoopLatch()));
|
|
ClonedLatch->getTerminator()->setMetadata(ClonedLoopTag,
|
|
MDNode::get(Ctx, {}));
|
|
|
|
Result.Structure = MainLoopStructure.map(GetClonedValue);
|
|
Result.Structure.Tag = Tag;
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Result.Blocks.size(); i != e; ++i) {
|
|
BasicBlock *ClonedBB = Result.Blocks[i];
|
|
BasicBlock *OriginalBB = OriginalLoop.getBlocks()[i];
|
|
|
|
assert(Result.Map[OriginalBB] == ClonedBB && "invariant!");
|
|
|
|
for (Instruction &I : *ClonedBB)
|
|
RemapInstruction(&I, Result.Map,
|
|
RF_NoModuleLevelChanges | RF_IgnoreMissingLocals);
|
|
|
|
// Exit blocks will now have one more predecessor and their PHI nodes need
|
|
// to be edited to reflect that. No phi nodes need to be introduced because
|
|
// the loop is in LCSSA.
|
|
|
|
for (auto *SBB : successors(OriginalBB)) {
|
|
if (OriginalLoop.contains(SBB))
|
|
continue; // not an exit block
|
|
|
|
for (PHINode &PN : SBB->phis()) {
|
|
Value *OldIncoming = PN.getIncomingValueForBlock(OriginalBB);
|
|
PN.addIncoming(GetClonedValue(OldIncoming), ClonedBB);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
LoopConstrainer::RewrittenRangeInfo LoopConstrainer::changeIterationSpaceEnd(
|
|
const LoopStructure &LS, BasicBlock *Preheader, Value *ExitSubloopAt,
|
|
BasicBlock *ContinuationBlock) const {
|
|
// We start with a loop with a single latch:
|
|
//
|
|
// +--------------------+
|
|
// | |
|
|
// | preheader |
|
|
// | |
|
|
// +--------+-----------+
|
|
// | ----------------\
|
|
// | / |
|
|
// +--------v----v------+ |
|
|
// | | |
|
|
// | header | |
|
|
// | | |
|
|
// +--------------------+ |
|
|
// |
|
|
// ..... |
|
|
// |
|
|
// +--------------------+ |
|
|
// | | |
|
|
// | latch >----------/
|
|
// | |
|
|
// +-------v------------+
|
|
// |
|
|
// |
|
|
// | +--------------------+
|
|
// | | |
|
|
// +---> original exit |
|
|
// | |
|
|
// +--------------------+
|
|
//
|
|
// We change the control flow to look like
|
|
//
|
|
//
|
|
// +--------------------+
|
|
// | |
|
|
// | preheader >-------------------------+
|
|
// | | |
|
|
// +--------v-----------+ |
|
|
// | /-------------+ |
|
|
// | / | |
|
|
// +--------v--v--------+ | |
|
|
// | | | |
|
|
// | header | | +--------+ |
|
|
// | | | | | |
|
|
// +--------------------+ | | +-----v-----v-----------+
|
|
// | | | |
|
|
// | | | .pseudo.exit |
|
|
// | | | |
|
|
// | | +-----------v-----------+
|
|
// | | |
|
|
// ..... | | |
|
|
// | | +--------v-------------+
|
|
// +--------------------+ | | | |
|
|
// | | | | | ContinuationBlock |
|
|
// | latch >------+ | | |
|
|
// | | | +----------------------+
|
|
// +---------v----------+ |
|
|
// | |
|
|
// | |
|
|
// | +---------------^-----+
|
|
// | | |
|
|
// +-----> .exit.selector |
|
|
// | |
|
|
// +----------v----------+
|
|
// |
|
|
// +--------------------+ |
|
|
// | | |
|
|
// | original exit <----+
|
|
// | |
|
|
// +--------------------+
|
|
|
|
RewrittenRangeInfo RRI;
|
|
|
|
BasicBlock *BBInsertLocation = LS.Latch->getNextNode();
|
|
RRI.ExitSelector = BasicBlock::Create(Ctx, Twine(LS.Tag) + ".exit.selector",
|
|
&F, BBInsertLocation);
|
|
RRI.PseudoExit = BasicBlock::Create(Ctx, Twine(LS.Tag) + ".pseudo.exit", &F,
|
|
BBInsertLocation);
|
|
|
|
BranchInst *PreheaderJump = cast<BranchInst>(Preheader->getTerminator());
|
|
bool Increasing = LS.IndVarIncreasing;
|
|
bool IsSignedPredicate = LS.IsSignedPredicate;
|
|
|
|
IRBuilder<> B(PreheaderJump);
|
|
auto *RangeTy = Range.getBegin()->getType();
|
|
auto NoopOrExt = [&](Value *V) {
|
|
if (V->getType() == RangeTy)
|
|
return V;
|
|
return IsSignedPredicate ? B.CreateSExt(V, RangeTy, "wide." + V->getName())
|
|
: B.CreateZExt(V, RangeTy, "wide." + V->getName());
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// EnterLoopCond - is it okay to start executing this `LS'?
|
|
Value *EnterLoopCond = nullptr;
|
|
auto Pred =
|
|
Increasing
|
|
? (IsSignedPredicate ? ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT : ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT)
|
|
: (IsSignedPredicate ? ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT : ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT);
|
|
Value *IndVarStart = NoopOrExt(LS.IndVarStart);
|
|
EnterLoopCond = B.CreateICmp(Pred, IndVarStart, ExitSubloopAt);
|
|
|
|
B.CreateCondBr(EnterLoopCond, LS.Header, RRI.PseudoExit);
|
|
PreheaderJump->eraseFromParent();
|
|
|
|
LS.LatchBr->setSuccessor(LS.LatchBrExitIdx, RRI.ExitSelector);
|
|
B.SetInsertPoint(LS.LatchBr);
|
|
Value *IndVarBase = NoopOrExt(LS.IndVarBase);
|
|
Value *TakeBackedgeLoopCond = B.CreateICmp(Pred, IndVarBase, ExitSubloopAt);
|
|
|
|
Value *CondForBranch = LS.LatchBrExitIdx == 1
|
|
? TakeBackedgeLoopCond
|
|
: B.CreateNot(TakeBackedgeLoopCond);
|
|
|
|
LS.LatchBr->setCondition(CondForBranch);
|
|
|
|
B.SetInsertPoint(RRI.ExitSelector);
|
|
|
|
// IterationsLeft - are there any more iterations left, given the original
|
|
// upper bound on the induction variable? If not, we branch to the "real"
|
|
// exit.
|
|
Value *LoopExitAt = NoopOrExt(LS.LoopExitAt);
|
|
Value *IterationsLeft = B.CreateICmp(Pred, IndVarBase, LoopExitAt);
|
|
B.CreateCondBr(IterationsLeft, RRI.PseudoExit, LS.LatchExit);
|
|
|
|
BranchInst *BranchToContinuation =
|
|
BranchInst::Create(ContinuationBlock, RRI.PseudoExit);
|
|
|
|
// We emit PHI nodes into `RRI.PseudoExit' that compute the "latest" value of
|
|
// each of the PHI nodes in the loop header. This feeds into the initial
|
|
// value of the same PHI nodes if/when we continue execution.
|
|
for (PHINode &PN : LS.Header->phis()) {
|
|
PHINode *NewPHI = PHINode::Create(PN.getType(), 2, PN.getName() + ".copy",
|
|
BranchToContinuation);
|
|
|
|
NewPHI->addIncoming(PN.getIncomingValueForBlock(Preheader), Preheader);
|
|
NewPHI->addIncoming(PN.getIncomingValueForBlock(LS.Latch),
|
|
RRI.ExitSelector);
|
|
RRI.PHIValuesAtPseudoExit.push_back(NewPHI);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
RRI.IndVarEnd = PHINode::Create(IndVarBase->getType(), 2, "indvar.end",
|
|
BranchToContinuation);
|
|
RRI.IndVarEnd->addIncoming(IndVarStart, Preheader);
|
|
RRI.IndVarEnd->addIncoming(IndVarBase, RRI.ExitSelector);
|
|
|
|
// The latch exit now has a branch from `RRI.ExitSelector' instead of
|
|
// `LS.Latch'. The PHI nodes need to be updated to reflect that.
|
|
LS.LatchExit->replacePhiUsesWith(LS.Latch, RRI.ExitSelector);
|
|
|
|
return RRI;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void LoopConstrainer::rewriteIncomingValuesForPHIs(
|
|
LoopStructure &LS, BasicBlock *ContinuationBlock,
|
|
const LoopConstrainer::RewrittenRangeInfo &RRI) const {
|
|
unsigned PHIIndex = 0;
|
|
for (PHINode &PN : LS.Header->phis())
|
|
PN.setIncomingValueForBlock(ContinuationBlock,
|
|
RRI.PHIValuesAtPseudoExit[PHIIndex++]);
|
|
|
|
LS.IndVarStart = RRI.IndVarEnd;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
BasicBlock *LoopConstrainer::createPreheader(const LoopStructure &LS,
|
|
BasicBlock *OldPreheader,
|
|
const char *Tag) const {
|
|
BasicBlock *Preheader = BasicBlock::Create(Ctx, Tag, &F, LS.Header);
|
|
BranchInst::Create(LS.Header, Preheader);
|
|
|
|
LS.Header->replacePhiUsesWith(OldPreheader, Preheader);
|
|
|
|
return Preheader;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void LoopConstrainer::addToParentLoopIfNeeded(ArrayRef<BasicBlock *> BBs) {
|
|
Loop *ParentLoop = OriginalLoop.getParentLoop();
|
|
if (!ParentLoop)
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
for (BasicBlock *BB : BBs)
|
|
ParentLoop->addBasicBlockToLoop(BB, LI);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Loop *LoopConstrainer::createClonedLoopStructure(Loop *Original, Loop *Parent,
|
|
ValueToValueMapTy &VM,
|
|
bool IsSubloop) {
|
|
Loop &New = *LI.AllocateLoop();
|
|
if (Parent)
|
|
Parent->addChildLoop(&New);
|
|
else
|
|
LI.addTopLevelLoop(&New);
|
|
LPMAddNewLoop(&New, IsSubloop);
|
|
|
|
// Add all of the blocks in Original to the new loop.
|
|
for (auto *BB : Original->blocks())
|
|
if (LI.getLoopFor(BB) == Original)
|
|
New.addBasicBlockToLoop(cast<BasicBlock>(VM[BB]), LI);
|
|
|
|
// Add all of the subloops to the new loop.
|
|
for (Loop *SubLoop : *Original)
|
|
createClonedLoopStructure(SubLoop, &New, VM, /* IsSubloop */ true);
|
|
|
|
return &New;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool LoopConstrainer::run() {
|
|
BasicBlock *Preheader = nullptr;
|
|
LatchTakenCount = SE.getExitCount(&OriginalLoop, MainLoopStructure.Latch);
|
|
Preheader = OriginalLoop.getLoopPreheader();
|
|
assert(!isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(LatchTakenCount) && Preheader != nullptr &&
|
|
"preconditions!");
|
|
|
|
OriginalPreheader = Preheader;
|
|
MainLoopPreheader = Preheader;
|
|
|
|
bool IsSignedPredicate = MainLoopStructure.IsSignedPredicate;
|
|
Optional<SubRanges> MaybeSR = calculateSubRanges(IsSignedPredicate);
|
|
if (!MaybeSR.hasValue()) {
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: could not compute subranges\n");
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
SubRanges SR = MaybeSR.getValue();
|
|
bool Increasing = MainLoopStructure.IndVarIncreasing;
|
|
IntegerType *IVTy =
|
|
cast<IntegerType>(Range.getBegin()->getType());
|
|
|
|
SCEVExpander Expander(SE, F.getParent()->getDataLayout(), "irce");
|
|
Instruction *InsertPt = OriginalPreheader->getTerminator();
|
|
|
|
// It would have been better to make `PreLoop' and `PostLoop'
|
|
// `Optional<ClonedLoop>'s, but `ValueToValueMapTy' does not have a copy
|
|
// constructor.
|
|
ClonedLoop PreLoop, PostLoop;
|
|
bool NeedsPreLoop =
|
|
Increasing ? SR.LowLimit.hasValue() : SR.HighLimit.hasValue();
|
|
bool NeedsPostLoop =
|
|
Increasing ? SR.HighLimit.hasValue() : SR.LowLimit.hasValue();
|
|
|
|
Value *ExitPreLoopAt = nullptr;
|
|
Value *ExitMainLoopAt = nullptr;
|
|
const SCEVConstant *MinusOneS =
|
|
cast<SCEVConstant>(SE.getConstant(IVTy, -1, true /* isSigned */));
|
|
|
|
if (NeedsPreLoop) {
|
|
const SCEV *ExitPreLoopAtSCEV = nullptr;
|
|
|
|
if (Increasing)
|
|
ExitPreLoopAtSCEV = *SR.LowLimit;
|
|
else if (cannotBeMinInLoop(*SR.HighLimit, &OriginalLoop, SE,
|
|
IsSignedPredicate))
|
|
ExitPreLoopAtSCEV = SE.getAddExpr(*SR.HighLimit, MinusOneS);
|
|
else {
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: could not prove no-overflow when computing "
|
|
<< "preloop exit limit. HighLimit = "
|
|
<< *(*SR.HighLimit) << "\n");
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!isSafeToExpandAt(ExitPreLoopAtSCEV, InsertPt, SE)) {
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: could not prove that it is safe to expand the"
|
|
<< " preloop exit limit " << *ExitPreLoopAtSCEV
|
|
<< " at block " << InsertPt->getParent()->getName()
|
|
<< "\n");
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ExitPreLoopAt = Expander.expandCodeFor(ExitPreLoopAtSCEV, IVTy, InsertPt);
|
|
ExitPreLoopAt->setName("exit.preloop.at");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (NeedsPostLoop) {
|
|
const SCEV *ExitMainLoopAtSCEV = nullptr;
|
|
|
|
if (Increasing)
|
|
ExitMainLoopAtSCEV = *SR.HighLimit;
|
|
else if (cannotBeMinInLoop(*SR.LowLimit, &OriginalLoop, SE,
|
|
IsSignedPredicate))
|
|
ExitMainLoopAtSCEV = SE.getAddExpr(*SR.LowLimit, MinusOneS);
|
|
else {
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: could not prove no-overflow when computing "
|
|
<< "mainloop exit limit. LowLimit = "
|
|
<< *(*SR.LowLimit) << "\n");
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!isSafeToExpandAt(ExitMainLoopAtSCEV, InsertPt, SE)) {
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: could not prove that it is safe to expand the"
|
|
<< " main loop exit limit " << *ExitMainLoopAtSCEV
|
|
<< " at block " << InsertPt->getParent()->getName()
|
|
<< "\n");
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ExitMainLoopAt = Expander.expandCodeFor(ExitMainLoopAtSCEV, IVTy, InsertPt);
|
|
ExitMainLoopAt->setName("exit.mainloop.at");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We clone these ahead of time so that we don't have to deal with changing
|
|
// and temporarily invalid IR as we transform the loops.
|
|
if (NeedsPreLoop)
|
|
cloneLoop(PreLoop, "preloop");
|
|
if (NeedsPostLoop)
|
|
cloneLoop(PostLoop, "postloop");
|
|
|
|
RewrittenRangeInfo PreLoopRRI;
|
|
|
|
if (NeedsPreLoop) {
|
|
Preheader->getTerminator()->replaceUsesOfWith(MainLoopStructure.Header,
|
|
PreLoop.Structure.Header);
|
|
|
|
MainLoopPreheader =
|
|
createPreheader(MainLoopStructure, Preheader, "mainloop");
|
|
PreLoopRRI = changeIterationSpaceEnd(PreLoop.Structure, Preheader,
|
|
ExitPreLoopAt, MainLoopPreheader);
|
|
rewriteIncomingValuesForPHIs(MainLoopStructure, MainLoopPreheader,
|
|
PreLoopRRI);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
BasicBlock *PostLoopPreheader = nullptr;
|
|
RewrittenRangeInfo PostLoopRRI;
|
|
|
|
if (NeedsPostLoop) {
|
|
PostLoopPreheader =
|
|
createPreheader(PostLoop.Structure, Preheader, "postloop");
|
|
PostLoopRRI = changeIterationSpaceEnd(MainLoopStructure, MainLoopPreheader,
|
|
ExitMainLoopAt, PostLoopPreheader);
|
|
rewriteIncomingValuesForPHIs(PostLoop.Structure, PostLoopPreheader,
|
|
PostLoopRRI);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
BasicBlock *NewMainLoopPreheader =
|
|
MainLoopPreheader != Preheader ? MainLoopPreheader : nullptr;
|
|
BasicBlock *NewBlocks[] = {PostLoopPreheader, PreLoopRRI.PseudoExit,
|
|
PreLoopRRI.ExitSelector, PostLoopRRI.PseudoExit,
|
|
PostLoopRRI.ExitSelector, NewMainLoopPreheader};
|
|
|
|
// Some of the above may be nullptr, filter them out before passing to
|
|
// addToParentLoopIfNeeded.
|
|
auto NewBlocksEnd =
|
|
std::remove(std::begin(NewBlocks), std::end(NewBlocks), nullptr);
|
|
|
|
addToParentLoopIfNeeded(makeArrayRef(std::begin(NewBlocks), NewBlocksEnd));
|
|
|
|
DT.recalculate(F);
|
|
|
|
// We need to first add all the pre and post loop blocks into the loop
|
|
// structures (as part of createClonedLoopStructure), and then update the
|
|
// LCSSA form and LoopSimplifyForm. This is necessary for correctly updating
|
|
// LI when LoopSimplifyForm is generated.
|
|
Loop *PreL = nullptr, *PostL = nullptr;
|
|
if (!PreLoop.Blocks.empty()) {
|
|
PreL = createClonedLoopStructure(&OriginalLoop,
|
|
OriginalLoop.getParentLoop(), PreLoop.Map,
|
|
/* IsSubLoop */ false);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!PostLoop.Blocks.empty()) {
|
|
PostL =
|
|
createClonedLoopStructure(&OriginalLoop, OriginalLoop.getParentLoop(),
|
|
PostLoop.Map, /* IsSubLoop */ false);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// This function canonicalizes the loop into Loop-Simplify and LCSSA forms.
|
|
auto CanonicalizeLoop = [&] (Loop *L, bool IsOriginalLoop) {
|
|
formLCSSARecursively(*L, DT, &LI, &SE);
|
|
simplifyLoop(L, &DT, &LI, &SE, nullptr, nullptr, true);
|
|
// Pre/post loops are slow paths, we do not need to perform any loop
|
|
// optimizations on them.
|
|
if (!IsOriginalLoop)
|
|
DisableAllLoopOptsOnLoop(*L);
|
|
};
|
|
if (PreL)
|
|
CanonicalizeLoop(PreL, false);
|
|
if (PostL)
|
|
CanonicalizeLoop(PostL, false);
|
|
CanonicalizeLoop(&OriginalLoop, true);
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Computes and returns a range of values for the induction variable (IndVar)
|
|
/// in which the range check can be safely elided. If it cannot compute such a
|
|
/// range, returns None.
|
|
Optional<InductiveRangeCheck::Range>
|
|
InductiveRangeCheck::computeSafeIterationSpace(
|
|
ScalarEvolution &SE, const SCEVAddRecExpr *IndVar,
|
|
bool IsLatchSigned) const {
|
|
// We can deal when types of latch check and range checks don't match in case
|
|
// if latch check is more narrow.
|
|
auto *IVType = cast<IntegerType>(IndVar->getType());
|
|
auto *RCType = cast<IntegerType>(getBegin()->getType());
|
|
if (IVType->getBitWidth() > RCType->getBitWidth())
|
|
return None;
|
|
// IndVar is of the form "A + B * I" (where "I" is the canonical induction
|
|
// variable, that may or may not exist as a real llvm::Value in the loop) and
|
|
// this inductive range check is a range check on the "C + D * I" ("C" is
|
|
// getBegin() and "D" is getStep()). We rewrite the value being range
|
|
// checked to "M + N * IndVar" where "N" = "D * B^(-1)" and "M" = "C - NA".
|
|
//
|
|
// The actual inequalities we solve are of the form
|
|
//
|
|
// 0 <= M + 1 * IndVar < L given L >= 0 (i.e. N == 1)
|
|
//
|
|
// Here L stands for upper limit of the safe iteration space.
|
|
// The inequality is satisfied by (0 - M) <= IndVar < (L - M). To avoid
|
|
// overflows when calculating (0 - M) and (L - M) we, depending on type of
|
|
// IV's iteration space, limit the calculations by borders of the iteration
|
|
// space. For example, if IndVar is unsigned, (0 - M) overflows for any M > 0.
|
|
// If we figured out that "anything greater than (-M) is safe", we strengthen
|
|
// this to "everything greater than 0 is safe", assuming that values between
|
|
// -M and 0 just do not exist in unsigned iteration space, and we don't want
|
|
// to deal with overflown values.
|
|
|
|
if (!IndVar->isAffine())
|
|
return None;
|
|
|
|
const SCEV *A = NoopOrExtend(IndVar->getStart(), RCType, SE, IsLatchSigned);
|
|
const SCEVConstant *B = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(
|
|
NoopOrExtend(IndVar->getStepRecurrence(SE), RCType, SE, IsLatchSigned));
|
|
if (!B)
|
|
return None;
|
|
assert(!B->isZero() && "Recurrence with zero step?");
|
|
|
|
const SCEV *C = getBegin();
|
|
const SCEVConstant *D = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(getStep());
|
|
if (D != B)
|
|
return None;
|
|
|
|
assert(!D->getValue()->isZero() && "Recurrence with zero step?");
|
|
unsigned BitWidth = RCType->getBitWidth();
|
|
const SCEV *SIntMax = SE.getConstant(APInt::getSignedMaxValue(BitWidth));
|
|
|
|
// Subtract Y from X so that it does not go through border of the IV
|
|
// iteration space. Mathematically, it is equivalent to:
|
|
//
|
|
// ClampedSubtract(X, Y) = min(max(X - Y, INT_MIN), INT_MAX). [1]
|
|
//
|
|
// In [1], 'X - Y' is a mathematical subtraction (result is not bounded to
|
|
// any width of bit grid). But after we take min/max, the result is
|
|
// guaranteed to be within [INT_MIN, INT_MAX].
|
|
//
|
|
// In [1], INT_MAX and INT_MIN are respectively signed and unsigned max/min
|
|
// values, depending on type of latch condition that defines IV iteration
|
|
// space.
|
|
auto ClampedSubtract = [&](const SCEV *X, const SCEV *Y) {
|
|
// FIXME: The current implementation assumes that X is in [0, SINT_MAX].
|
|
// This is required to ensure that SINT_MAX - X does not overflow signed and
|
|
// that X - Y does not overflow unsigned if Y is negative. Can we lift this
|
|
// restriction and make it work for negative X either?
|
|
if (IsLatchSigned) {
|
|
// X is a number from signed range, Y is interpreted as signed.
|
|
// Even if Y is SINT_MAX, (X - Y) does not reach SINT_MIN. So the only
|
|
// thing we should care about is that we didn't cross SINT_MAX.
|
|
// So, if Y is positive, we subtract Y safely.
|
|
// Rule 1: Y > 0 ---> Y.
|
|
// If 0 <= -Y <= (SINT_MAX - X), we subtract Y safely.
|
|
// Rule 2: Y >=s (X - SINT_MAX) ---> Y.
|
|
// If 0 <= (SINT_MAX - X) < -Y, we can only subtract (X - SINT_MAX).
|
|
// Rule 3: Y <s (X - SINT_MAX) ---> (X - SINT_MAX).
|
|
// It gives us smax(Y, X - SINT_MAX) to subtract in all cases.
|
|
const SCEV *XMinusSIntMax = SE.getMinusSCEV(X, SIntMax);
|
|
return SE.getMinusSCEV(X, SE.getSMaxExpr(Y, XMinusSIntMax),
|
|
SCEV::FlagNSW);
|
|
} else
|
|
// X is a number from unsigned range, Y is interpreted as signed.
|
|
// Even if Y is SINT_MIN, (X - Y) does not reach UINT_MAX. So the only
|
|
// thing we should care about is that we didn't cross zero.
|
|
// So, if Y is negative, we subtract Y safely.
|
|
// Rule 1: Y <s 0 ---> Y.
|
|
// If 0 <= Y <= X, we subtract Y safely.
|
|
// Rule 2: Y <=s X ---> Y.
|
|
// If 0 <= X < Y, we should stop at 0 and can only subtract X.
|
|
// Rule 3: Y >s X ---> X.
|
|
// It gives us smin(X, Y) to subtract in all cases.
|
|
return SE.getMinusSCEV(X, SE.getSMinExpr(X, Y), SCEV::FlagNUW);
|
|
};
|
|
const SCEV *M = SE.getMinusSCEV(C, A);
|
|
const SCEV *Zero = SE.getZero(M->getType());
|
|
|
|
// This function returns SCEV equal to 1 if X is non-negative 0 otherwise.
|
|
auto SCEVCheckNonNegative = [&](const SCEV *X) {
|
|
const Loop *L = IndVar->getLoop();
|
|
const SCEV *One = SE.getOne(X->getType());
|
|
// Can we trivially prove that X is a non-negative or negative value?
|
|
if (isKnownNonNegativeInLoop(X, L, SE))
|
|
return One;
|
|
else if (isKnownNegativeInLoop(X, L, SE))
|
|
return Zero;
|
|
// If not, we will have to figure it out during the execution.
|
|
// Function smax(smin(X, 0), -1) + 1 equals to 1 if X >= 0 and 0 if X < 0.
|
|
const SCEV *NegOne = SE.getNegativeSCEV(One);
|
|
return SE.getAddExpr(SE.getSMaxExpr(SE.getSMinExpr(X, Zero), NegOne), One);
|
|
};
|
|
// FIXME: Current implementation of ClampedSubtract implicitly assumes that
|
|
// X is non-negative (in sense of a signed value). We need to re-implement
|
|
// this function in a way that it will correctly handle negative X as well.
|
|
// We use it twice: for X = 0 everything is fine, but for X = getEnd() we can
|
|
// end up with a negative X and produce wrong results. So currently we ensure
|
|
// that if getEnd() is negative then both ends of the safe range are zero.
|
|
// Note that this may pessimize elimination of unsigned range checks against
|
|
// negative values.
|
|
const SCEV *REnd = getEnd();
|
|
const SCEV *EndIsNonNegative = SCEVCheckNonNegative(REnd);
|
|
|
|
const SCEV *Begin = SE.getMulExpr(ClampedSubtract(Zero, M), EndIsNonNegative);
|
|
const SCEV *End = SE.getMulExpr(ClampedSubtract(REnd, M), EndIsNonNegative);
|
|
return InductiveRangeCheck::Range(Begin, End);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static Optional<InductiveRangeCheck::Range>
|
|
IntersectSignedRange(ScalarEvolution &SE,
|
|
const Optional<InductiveRangeCheck::Range> &R1,
|
|
const InductiveRangeCheck::Range &R2) {
|
|
if (R2.isEmpty(SE, /* IsSigned */ true))
|
|
return None;
|
|
if (!R1.hasValue())
|
|
return R2;
|
|
auto &R1Value = R1.getValue();
|
|
// We never return empty ranges from this function, and R1 is supposed to be
|
|
// a result of intersection. Thus, R1 is never empty.
|
|
assert(!R1Value.isEmpty(SE, /* IsSigned */ true) &&
|
|
"We should never have empty R1!");
|
|
|
|
// TODO: we could widen the smaller range and have this work; but for now we
|
|
// bail out to keep things simple.
|
|
if (R1Value.getType() != R2.getType())
|
|
return None;
|
|
|
|
const SCEV *NewBegin = SE.getSMaxExpr(R1Value.getBegin(), R2.getBegin());
|
|
const SCEV *NewEnd = SE.getSMinExpr(R1Value.getEnd(), R2.getEnd());
|
|
|
|
// If the resulting range is empty, just return None.
|
|
auto Ret = InductiveRangeCheck::Range(NewBegin, NewEnd);
|
|
if (Ret.isEmpty(SE, /* IsSigned */ true))
|
|
return None;
|
|
return Ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static Optional<InductiveRangeCheck::Range>
|
|
IntersectUnsignedRange(ScalarEvolution &SE,
|
|
const Optional<InductiveRangeCheck::Range> &R1,
|
|
const InductiveRangeCheck::Range &R2) {
|
|
if (R2.isEmpty(SE, /* IsSigned */ false))
|
|
return None;
|
|
if (!R1.hasValue())
|
|
return R2;
|
|
auto &R1Value = R1.getValue();
|
|
// We never return empty ranges from this function, and R1 is supposed to be
|
|
// a result of intersection. Thus, R1 is never empty.
|
|
assert(!R1Value.isEmpty(SE, /* IsSigned */ false) &&
|
|
"We should never have empty R1!");
|
|
|
|
// TODO: we could widen the smaller range and have this work; but for now we
|
|
// bail out to keep things simple.
|
|
if (R1Value.getType() != R2.getType())
|
|
return None;
|
|
|
|
const SCEV *NewBegin = SE.getUMaxExpr(R1Value.getBegin(), R2.getBegin());
|
|
const SCEV *NewEnd = SE.getUMinExpr(R1Value.getEnd(), R2.getEnd());
|
|
|
|
// If the resulting range is empty, just return None.
|
|
auto Ret = InductiveRangeCheck::Range(NewBegin, NewEnd);
|
|
if (Ret.isEmpty(SE, /* IsSigned */ false))
|
|
return None;
|
|
return Ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
PreservedAnalyses IRCEPass::run(Function &F, FunctionAnalysisManager &AM) {
|
|
auto &SE = AM.getResult<ScalarEvolutionAnalysis>(F);
|
|
auto &DT = AM.getResult<DominatorTreeAnalysis>(F);
|
|
auto &BPI = AM.getResult<BranchProbabilityAnalysis>(F);
|
|
LoopInfo &LI = AM.getResult<LoopAnalysis>(F);
|
|
|
|
InductiveRangeCheckElimination IRCE(SE, &BPI, DT, LI);
|
|
|
|
bool Changed = false;
|
|
|
|
for (const auto &L : LI) {
|
|
Changed |= simplifyLoop(L, &DT, &LI, &SE, nullptr, nullptr,
|
|
/*PreserveLCSSA=*/false);
|
|
Changed |= formLCSSARecursively(*L, DT, &LI, &SE);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
SmallPriorityWorklist<Loop *, 4> Worklist;
|
|
appendLoopsToWorklist(LI, Worklist);
|
|
auto LPMAddNewLoop = [&Worklist](Loop *NL, bool IsSubloop) {
|
|
if (!IsSubloop)
|
|
appendLoopsToWorklist(*NL, Worklist);
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
while (!Worklist.empty()) {
|
|
Loop *L = Worklist.pop_back_val();
|
|
Changed |= IRCE.run(L, LPMAddNewLoop);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!Changed)
|
|
return PreservedAnalyses::all();
|
|
return getLoopPassPreservedAnalyses();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool IRCELegacyPass::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
|
|
if (skipFunction(F))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
ScalarEvolution &SE = getAnalysis<ScalarEvolutionWrapperPass>().getSE();
|
|
BranchProbabilityInfo &BPI =
|
|
getAnalysis<BranchProbabilityInfoWrapperPass>().getBPI();
|
|
auto &DT = getAnalysis<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>().getDomTree();
|
|
auto &LI = getAnalysis<LoopInfoWrapperPass>().getLoopInfo();
|
|
InductiveRangeCheckElimination IRCE(SE, &BPI, DT, LI);
|
|
|
|
bool Changed = false;
|
|
|
|
for (const auto &L : LI) {
|
|
Changed |= simplifyLoop(L, &DT, &LI, &SE, nullptr, nullptr,
|
|
/*PreserveLCSSA=*/false);
|
|
Changed |= formLCSSARecursively(*L, DT, &LI, &SE);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
SmallPriorityWorklist<Loop *, 4> Worklist;
|
|
appendLoopsToWorklist(LI, Worklist);
|
|
auto LPMAddNewLoop = [&](Loop *NL, bool IsSubloop) {
|
|
if (!IsSubloop)
|
|
appendLoopsToWorklist(*NL, Worklist);
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
while (!Worklist.empty()) {
|
|
Loop *L = Worklist.pop_back_val();
|
|
Changed |= IRCE.run(L, LPMAddNewLoop);
|
|
}
|
|
return Changed;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool InductiveRangeCheckElimination::run(
|
|
Loop *L, function_ref<void(Loop *, bool)> LPMAddNewLoop) {
|
|
if (L->getBlocks().size() >= LoopSizeCutoff) {
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: giving up constraining loop, too large\n");
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
BasicBlock *Preheader = L->getLoopPreheader();
|
|
if (!Preheader) {
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: loop has no preheader, leaving\n");
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
LLVMContext &Context = Preheader->getContext();
|
|
SmallVector<InductiveRangeCheck, 16> RangeChecks;
|
|
|
|
for (auto BBI : L->getBlocks())
|
|
if (BranchInst *TBI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(BBI->getTerminator()))
|
|
InductiveRangeCheck::extractRangeChecksFromBranch(TBI, L, SE, BPI,
|
|
RangeChecks);
|
|
|
|
if (RangeChecks.empty())
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
auto PrintRecognizedRangeChecks = [&](raw_ostream &OS) {
|
|
OS << "irce: looking at loop "; L->print(OS);
|
|
OS << "irce: loop has " << RangeChecks.size()
|
|
<< " inductive range checks: \n";
|
|
for (InductiveRangeCheck &IRC : RangeChecks)
|
|
IRC.print(OS);
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(PrintRecognizedRangeChecks(dbgs()));
|
|
|
|
if (PrintRangeChecks)
|
|
PrintRecognizedRangeChecks(errs());
|
|
|
|
const char *FailureReason = nullptr;
|
|
Optional<LoopStructure> MaybeLoopStructure =
|
|
LoopStructure::parseLoopStructure(SE, BPI, *L, FailureReason);
|
|
if (!MaybeLoopStructure.hasValue()) {
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "irce: could not parse loop structure: "
|
|
<< FailureReason << "\n";);
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
LoopStructure LS = MaybeLoopStructure.getValue();
|
|
const SCEVAddRecExpr *IndVar =
|
|
cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(SE.getMinusSCEV(SE.getSCEV(LS.IndVarBase), SE.getSCEV(LS.IndVarStep)));
|
|
|
|
Optional<InductiveRangeCheck::Range> SafeIterRange;
|
|
Instruction *ExprInsertPt = Preheader->getTerminator();
|
|
|
|
SmallVector<InductiveRangeCheck, 4> RangeChecksToEliminate;
|
|
// Basing on the type of latch predicate, we interpret the IV iteration range
|
|
// as signed or unsigned range. We use different min/max functions (signed or
|
|
// unsigned) when intersecting this range with safe iteration ranges implied
|
|
// by range checks.
|
|
auto IntersectRange =
|
|
LS.IsSignedPredicate ? IntersectSignedRange : IntersectUnsignedRange;
|
|
|
|
IRBuilder<> B(ExprInsertPt);
|
|
for (InductiveRangeCheck &IRC : RangeChecks) {
|
|
auto Result = IRC.computeSafeIterationSpace(SE, IndVar,
|
|
LS.IsSignedPredicate);
|
|
if (Result.hasValue()) {
|
|
auto MaybeSafeIterRange =
|
|
IntersectRange(SE, SafeIterRange, Result.getValue());
|
|
if (MaybeSafeIterRange.hasValue()) {
|
|
assert(
|
|
!MaybeSafeIterRange.getValue().isEmpty(SE, LS.IsSignedPredicate) &&
|
|
"We should never return empty ranges!");
|
|
RangeChecksToEliminate.push_back(IRC);
|
|
SafeIterRange = MaybeSafeIterRange.getValue();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!SafeIterRange.hasValue())
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
LoopConstrainer LC(*L, LI, LPMAddNewLoop, LS, SE, DT,
|
|
SafeIterRange.getValue());
|
|
bool Changed = LC.run();
|
|
|
|
if (Changed) {
|
|
auto PrintConstrainedLoopInfo = [L]() {
|
|
dbgs() << "irce: in function ";
|
|
dbgs() << L->getHeader()->getParent()->getName() << ": ";
|
|
dbgs() << "constrained ";
|
|
L->print(dbgs());
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(PrintConstrainedLoopInfo());
|
|
|
|
if (PrintChangedLoops)
|
|
PrintConstrainedLoopInfo();
|
|
|
|
// Optimize away the now-redundant range checks.
|
|
|
|
for (InductiveRangeCheck &IRC : RangeChecksToEliminate) {
|
|
ConstantInt *FoldedRangeCheck = IRC.getPassingDirection()
|
|
? ConstantInt::getTrue(Context)
|
|
: ConstantInt::getFalse(Context);
|
|
IRC.getCheckUse()->set(FoldedRangeCheck);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return Changed;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Pass *llvm::createInductiveRangeCheckEliminationPass() {
|
|
return new IRCELegacyPass();
|
|
}
|