1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-10-18 18:42:46 +02:00
llvm-mirror/unittests/Support/KnownBitsTest.h
Simon Pilgrim 8366289c89 [DemandedBits] Improve accuracy of Add propagator
The current demand propagator for addition will mark all input bits at and right of the alive output bit as alive. But carry won't propagate beyond a bit for which both operands are zero (or one/zero in the case of subtraction) so a more accurate answer is possible given known bits.

I derived a propagator by working through truth tables and using a bit-reversed addition to make demand ripple to the right, but I'm not sure how to make a convincing argument for its correctness in the comments yet. Nevertheless, here's a minimal implementation and test to get feedback.

This would help in a situation where, for example, four bytes (<128) packed into an int are added with four others SIMD-style but only one of the four results is actually read.

Known A:     0_______0_______0_______0_______
Known B:     0_______0_______0_______0_______
AOut:        00000000001000000000000000000000
AB, current: 00000000001111111111111111111111
AB, patch:   00000000001111111000000000000000

Committed on behalf of: @rrika (Erika)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72423
2020-08-17 12:54:09 +01:00

53 lines
1.4 KiB
C++

//===- llvm/unittest/Support/KnownBitsTest.h - KnownBits tests ------------===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This file implements helpers for KnownBits and DemandedBits unit tests.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#ifndef LLVM_UNITTESTS_SUPPORT_KNOWNBITSTEST_H
#define LLVM_UNITTESTS_SUPPORT_KNOWNBITSTEST_H
#include "llvm/Support/KnownBits.h"
namespace {
using namespace llvm;
template <typename FnTy> void ForeachKnownBits(unsigned Bits, FnTy Fn) {
unsigned Max = 1 << Bits;
KnownBits Known(Bits);
for (unsigned Zero = 0; Zero < Max; ++Zero) {
for (unsigned One = 0; One < Max; ++One) {
Known.Zero = Zero;
Known.One = One;
if (Known.hasConflict())
continue;
Fn(Known);
}
}
}
template <typename FnTy>
void ForeachNumInKnownBits(const KnownBits &Known, FnTy Fn) {
unsigned Bits = Known.getBitWidth();
unsigned Max = 1 << Bits;
for (unsigned N = 0; N < Max; ++N) {
APInt Num(Bits, N);
if ((Num & Known.Zero) != 0 || (~Num & Known.One) != 0)
continue;
Fn(Num);
}
}
} // end anonymous namespace
#endif