1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-11-23 19:23:23 +01:00
llvm-mirror/test/Transforms/SCCP
2011-09-20 23:28:51 +00:00
..
2002-05-02-MissSecondInst.ll
2002-05-20-MissedIncomingValue.ll
2002-05-21-InvalidSimplify.ll
2002-08-30-GetElementPtrTest.ll
2003-06-24-OverdefinedPHIValue.ll
2003-08-26-InvokeHandling.ll Update the tests to the new EH scheme. 2011-08-31 20:55:40 +00:00
2004-11-16-DeadInvoke.ll Update the tests to the new EH scheme. 2011-08-31 20:55:40 +00:00
2004-12-10-UndefBranchBug.ll
2006-10-23-IPSCCP-Crash.ll
2006-12-04-PackedType.ll
2006-12-19-UndefBug.ll
2007-05-16-InvokeCrash.ll Update the tests to the new EH scheme. 2011-08-31 20:55:40 +00:00
2008-01-27-UndefCorrelate.ll
2008-04-22-multiple-ret-sccp.ll remove asmparser support for the old getresult instruction, which has been subsumed by extractvalue. 2011-06-17 06:57:15 +00:00
2008-05-23-UndefCallFold.ll
2009-01-14-IPSCCP-Invoke.ll Update the tests to the new EH scheme. 2011-08-31 20:55:40 +00:00
2009-05-27-VectorOperandZero.ll
apint-array.ll
apint-basictest2.ll
apint-basictest3.ll
apint-basictest4.ll
apint-basictest.ll
apint-bigarray.ll
apint-bigint2.ll
apint-bigint.ll
apint-ipsccp1.ll
apint-ipsccp2.ll
apint-ipsccp3.ll
apint-ipsccp4.ll
apint-load.ll
apint-phi.ll
apint-select.ll
atomic-load-store.ll Add missing newline. 2011-09-01 21:20:11 +00:00
calltest.ll
crash.ll
dg.exp
ipsccp-addr-taken.ll
ipsccp-basic.ll Make sure IPSCCP never marks a tracked call as overdefined in SCCPSolver::ResolvedUndefsIn. If we do, we can end up in a situation where a function is resolved to return a constant, but the caller is marked overdefined, which confuses the code later. 2011-09-20 23:28:51 +00:00
loadtest.ll
logical-nuke.ll
phitest.ll
retvalue-undef.ll
sccptest.ll
select.ll
switch.ll Minor bug in SCCP found by inspection. (I don't think it's possible to hit this with a normal pass pipeline, but fixing for completeness.) 2011-08-16 21:12:35 +00:00
undef-resolve.ll Silly mistake from r137777; restore significant isStructTy() checks. While here, be a bit more defensive 2011-08-17 18:10:43 +00:00