1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-11-26 04:32:44 +01:00
llvm-mirror/test/tools/llvm-mca/ARM/m7-negative-readadvance.s
David Penry ee87f9f4e2 [ARM] Use ProcResGroup in Cortex-M7 scheduling model
Used to model structural hazards on FP issue, where some
instructions take up 2 issue slots and others one as well
as similar structural hazards on load issue, where some
instructions take up two load lanes and others one.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98977
2021-04-19 21:23:05 +01:00

76 lines
3.0 KiB
ArmAsm

# NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_mca_test_checks.py
# RUN: llvm-mca -mtriple=arm -mcpu=cortex-m7 --timeline --iterations=1 < %s | FileCheck %s
add r1, r1, #1
# ReadAdvance: 0
add r1, r1, #2
# ReadAdvance: -1
vldr d0, [r1]
# CHECK: Iterations: 1
# CHECK-NEXT: Instructions: 3
# CHECK-NEXT: Total Cycles: 6
# CHECK-NEXT: Total uOps: 3
# CHECK: Dispatch Width: 2
# CHECK-NEXT: uOps Per Cycle: 0.50
# CHECK-NEXT: IPC: 0.50
# CHECK-NEXT: Block RThroughput: 1.5
# CHECK: Instruction Info:
# CHECK-NEXT: [1]: #uOps
# CHECK-NEXT: [2]: Latency
# CHECK-NEXT: [3]: RThroughput
# CHECK-NEXT: [4]: MayLoad
# CHECK-NEXT: [5]: MayStore
# CHECK-NEXT: [6]: HasSideEffects (U)
# CHECK: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] Instructions:
# CHECK-NEXT: 1 1 0.50 add.w r1, r1, #1
# CHECK-NEXT: 1 1 0.50 add.w r1, r1, #2
# CHECK-NEXT: 1 3 1.00 * vldr d0, [r1]
# CHECK: Resources:
# CHECK-NEXT: [0.0] - M7UnitALU
# CHECK-NEXT: [0.1] - M7UnitALU
# CHECK-NEXT: [1] - M7UnitBranch
# CHECK-NEXT: [2] - M7UnitLoadH
# CHECK-NEXT: [3] - M7UnitLoadL
# CHECK-NEXT: [4] - M7UnitMAC
# CHECK-NEXT: [5] - M7UnitSIMD
# CHECK-NEXT: [6] - M7UnitShift1
# CHECK-NEXT: [7] - M7UnitShift2
# CHECK-NEXT: [8] - M7UnitStore
# CHECK-NEXT: [9] - M7UnitVFP
# CHECK-NEXT: [10] - M7UnitVPortH
# CHECK-NEXT: [11] - M7UnitVPortL
# CHECK: Resource pressure per iteration:
# CHECK-NEXT: [0.0] [0.1] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
# CHECK-NEXT: 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 - - - - - - 1.00 1.00
# CHECK: Resource pressure by instruction:
# CHECK-NEXT: [0.0] [0.1] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] Instructions:
# CHECK-NEXT: - 1.00 - - - - - - - - - - - add.w r1, r1, #1
# CHECK-NEXT: 1.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - add.w r1, r1, #2
# CHECK-NEXT: - - - 1.00 1.00 - - - - - - 1.00 1.00 vldr d0, [r1]
# CHECK: Timeline view:
# CHECK-NEXT: Index 012345
# CHECK: [0,0] DE . add.w r1, r1, #1
# CHECK-NEXT: [0,1] .DE . add.w r1, r1, #2
# CHECK-NEXT: [0,2] . DeE vldr d0, [r1]
# CHECK: Average Wait times (based on the timeline view):
# CHECK-NEXT: [0]: Executions
# CHECK-NEXT: [1]: Average time spent waiting in a scheduler's queue
# CHECK-NEXT: [2]: Average time spent waiting in a scheduler's queue while ready
# CHECK-NEXT: [3]: Average time elapsed from WB until retire stage
# CHECK: [0] [1] [2] [3]
# CHECK-NEXT: 0. 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 add.w r1, r1, #1
# CHECK-NEXT: 1. 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 add.w r1, r1, #2
# CHECK-NEXT: 2. 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 vldr d0, [r1]
# CHECK-NEXT: 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 <total>