1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-11-22 18:54:02 +01:00
llvm-mirror/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/2008-02-12-SMAXTripCount.ll
Arthur Eubanks 09cfe7939a [SCEV] Fix ScalarEvolution tests under NPM
Many tests use opt's -analyze feature, which does not translate well to
NPM and has better alternatives. The alternative here is to explicitly
add a pass that calls ScalarEvolution::print().

The legacy pass manager RUNs aren't changing, but they are now pinned to
the legacy pass manager.  For each legacy pass manager RUN, I added a
corresponding NPM RUN using the 'print<scalar-evolution>' pass. For
compatibility with update_analyze_test_checks.py and existing test
CHECKs, 'print<scalar-evolution>' now prints what -analyze prints per
function.

This was generated by the following Python script and failures were
manually fixed up:

import sys
for i in sys.argv:
    with open(i, 'r') as f:
        s = f.read()
    with open(i, 'w') as f:
        for l in s.splitlines():
            if "RUN:" in l and ' -analyze ' in l and '\\' not in l:
                f.write(l.replace(' -analyze ', ' -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 '))
                f.write('\n')
                f.write(l.replace(' -analyze ', ' -disable-output ').replace(' -scalar-evolution ', ' "-passes=print<scalar-evolution>" ').replace(" | ", " 2>&1 | "))
                f.write('\n')
            else:
                f.write(l)

There are a couple failures still in ScalarEvolution under NPM, but
those are due to other unrelated naming conflicts.

Reviewed By: asbirlea

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83798
2020-07-16 11:24:07 -07:00

19 lines
484 B
LLVM

; RUN: opt < %s -scalar-evolution -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt < %s "-passes=print<scalar-evolution>" -disable-output 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
; PR2002
; CHECK: Loop %loop: backedge-taken count is (100 + (-100 smax %n))
define void @foo(i8 %n) {
entry:
br label %loop
loop:
%i = phi i8 [ -100, %entry ], [ %i.inc, %next ]
%cond = icmp slt i8 %i, %n
br i1 %cond, label %next, label %return
next:
%i.inc = add i8 %i, 1
br label %loop
return:
ret void
}