1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-10-26 06:22:56 +02:00
llvm-mirror/lib/Target/X86/X86ScheduleSLM.td
Alexey Volkov aa4646ea54 [X86] Silvermont new scheduler model
This model is not final and work is still in progress.
However there are substantial improvements on integer tests mainly because of better RAL with new scheduler.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3451

llvm-svn: 206957
2014-04-23 08:57:09 +00:00

229 lines
7.3 KiB
TableGen

//=- X86ScheduleSLM.td - X86 Silvermont Scheduling -----------*- tablegen -*-=//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This file defines the machine model for Intal Silvermont to support
// instruction scheduling and other instruction cost heuristics.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
def SLMModel : SchedMachineModel {
// All x86 instructions are modeled as a single micro-op, and SLM can decode 2
// instructions per cycle.
let IssueWidth = 2;
let MicroOpBufferSize = 32; // Based on the reorder buffer.
let LoadLatency = 3;
let MispredictPenalty = 10;
// FIXME: SSE4 is unimplemented. This flag is set to allow
// the scheduler to assign a default model to unrecognized opcodes.
let CompleteModel = 0;
}
let SchedModel = SLMModel in {
// Silveromnt has 5 reservation stations for micro-ops
def IEC_RSV0 : ProcResource<1>;
def IEC_RSV1 : ProcResource<1>;
def FPC_RSV0 : ProcResource<1> { let BufferSize = 1; }
def FPC_RSV1 : ProcResource<1> { let BufferSize = 1; }
def MEC_RSV : ProcResource<1>;
// Many micro-ops are capable of issuing on multiple ports.
def IEC_RSV01 : ProcResGroup<[IEC_RSV0, IEC_RSV1]>;
def FPC_RSV01 : ProcResGroup<[FPC_RSV0, FPC_RSV1]>;
def SMDivider : ProcResource<1>;
def SMFPMultiplier : ProcResource<1>;
def SMFPDivider : ProcResource<1>;
// Loads are 3 cycles, so ReadAfterLd registers needn't be available until 3
// cycles after the memory operand.
def : ReadAdvance<ReadAfterLd, 3>;
// Many SchedWrites are defined in pairs with and without a folded load.
// Instructions with folded loads are usually micro-fused, so they only appear
// as two micro-ops when queued in the reservation station.
// This multiclass defines the resource usage for variants with and without
// folded loads.
multiclass SMWriteResPair<X86FoldableSchedWrite SchedRW,
ProcResourceKind ExePort,
int Lat> {
// Register variant is using a single cycle on ExePort.
def : WriteRes<SchedRW, [ExePort]> { let Latency = Lat; }
// Memory variant also uses a cycle on MEC_RSV and adds 3 cycles to the
// latency.
def : WriteRes<SchedRW.Folded, [MEC_RSV, ExePort]> {
let Latency = !add(Lat, 3);
}
}
// A folded store needs a cycle on MEC_RSV for the store data, but it does not
// need an extra port cycle to recompute the address.
def : WriteRes<WriteRMW, [MEC_RSV]>;
def : WriteRes<WriteStore, [IEC_RSV01, MEC_RSV]>;
def : WriteRes<WriteLoad, [MEC_RSV]> { let Latency = 3; }
def : WriteRes<WriteMove, [IEC_RSV01]>;
def : WriteRes<WriteZero, []>;
defm : SMWriteResPair<WriteALU, IEC_RSV01, 1>;
defm : SMWriteResPair<WriteIMul, IEC_RSV1, 3>;
defm : SMWriteResPair<WriteShift, IEC_RSV0, 1>;
defm : SMWriteResPair<WriteJump, IEC_RSV1, 1>;
// This is for simple LEAs with one or two input operands.
// The complex ones can only execute on port 1, and they require two cycles on
// the port to read all inputs. We don't model that.
def : WriteRes<WriteLEA, [IEC_RSV1]>;
// This is quite rough, latency depends on the dividend.
def : WriteRes<WriteIDiv, [IEC_RSV01, SMDivider]> {
let Latency = 25;
let ResourceCycles = [1, 25];
}
def : WriteRes<WriteIDivLd, [MEC_RSV, IEC_RSV01, SMDivider]> {
let Latency = 29;
let ResourceCycles = [1, 1, 25];
}
// Scalar and vector floating point.
defm : SMWriteResPair<WriteFAdd, FPC_RSV1, 3>;
defm : SMWriteResPair<WriteFRcp, FPC_RSV0, 5>;
defm : SMWriteResPair<WriteFSqrt, FPC_RSV0, 15>;
defm : SMWriteResPair<WriteCvtF2I, FPC_RSV01, 4>;
defm : SMWriteResPair<WriteCvtI2F, FPC_RSV01, 4>;
defm : SMWriteResPair<WriteCvtF2F, FPC_RSV01, 4>;
defm : SMWriteResPair<WriteFShuffle, FPC_RSV0, 1>;
defm : SMWriteResPair<WriteFBlend, FPC_RSV0, 1>;
// This is quite rough, latency depends on precision
def : WriteRes<WriteFMul, [FPC_RSV0, SMFPMultiplier]> {
let Latency = 5;
let ResourceCycles = [1, 2];
}
def : WriteRes<WriteFMulLd, [MEC_RSV, FPC_RSV0, SMFPMultiplier]> {
let Latency = 8;
let ResourceCycles = [1, 1, 2];
}
def : WriteRes<WriteFDiv, [FPC_RSV0, SMFPDivider]> {
let Latency = 34;
let ResourceCycles = [1, 34];
}
def : WriteRes<WriteFDivLd, [MEC_RSV, FPC_RSV0, SMFPDivider]> {
let Latency = 37;
let ResourceCycles = [1, 1, 34];
}
// Vector integer operations.
defm : SMWriteResPair<WriteVecShift, FPC_RSV0, 1>;
defm : SMWriteResPair<WriteVecLogic, FPC_RSV01, 1>;
defm : SMWriteResPair<WriteVecALU, FPC_RSV01, 1>;
defm : SMWriteResPair<WriteVecIMul, FPC_RSV0, 4>;
defm : SMWriteResPair<WriteShuffle, FPC_RSV0, 1>;
defm : SMWriteResPair<WriteBlend, FPC_RSV0, 1>;
defm : SMWriteResPair<WriteMPSAD, FPC_RSV0, 7>;
// String instructions.
// Packed Compare Implicit Length Strings, Return Mask
def : WriteRes<WritePCmpIStrM, [FPC_RSV0]> {
let Latency = 13;
let ResourceCycles = [13];
}
def : WriteRes<WritePCmpIStrMLd, [FPC_RSV0, MEC_RSV]> {
let Latency = 13;
let ResourceCycles = [13, 1];
}
// Packed Compare Explicit Length Strings, Return Mask
def : WriteRes<WritePCmpEStrM, [FPC_RSV0]> {
let Latency = 17;
let ResourceCycles = [17];
}
def : WriteRes<WritePCmpEStrMLd, [FPC_RSV0, MEC_RSV]> {
let Latency = 17;
let ResourceCycles = [17, 1];
}
// Packed Compare Implicit Length Strings, Return Index
def : WriteRes<WritePCmpIStrI, [FPC_RSV0]> {
let Latency = 17;
let ResourceCycles = [17];
}
def : WriteRes<WritePCmpIStrILd, [FPC_RSV0, MEC_RSV]> {
let Latency = 17;
let ResourceCycles = [17, 1];
}
// Packed Compare Explicit Length Strings, Return Index
def : WriteRes<WritePCmpEStrI, [FPC_RSV0]> {
let Latency = 21;
let ResourceCycles = [21];
}
def : WriteRes<WritePCmpEStrILd, [FPC_RSV0, MEC_RSV]> {
let Latency = 21;
let ResourceCycles = [21, 1];
}
// AES Instructions.
def : WriteRes<WriteAESDecEnc, [FPC_RSV0]> {
let Latency = 8;
let ResourceCycles = [5];
}
def : WriteRes<WriteAESDecEncLd, [FPC_RSV0, MEC_RSV]> {
let Latency = 8;
let ResourceCycles = [5, 1];
}
def : WriteRes<WriteAESIMC, [FPC_RSV0]> {
let Latency = 8;
let ResourceCycles = [5];
}
def : WriteRes<WriteAESIMCLd, [FPC_RSV0, MEC_RSV]> {
let Latency = 8;
let ResourceCycles = [5, 1];
}
def : WriteRes<WriteAESKeyGen, [FPC_RSV0]> {
let Latency = 8;
let ResourceCycles = [5];
}
def : WriteRes<WriteAESKeyGenLd, [FPC_RSV0, MEC_RSV]> {
let Latency = 8;
let ResourceCycles = [5, 1];
}
// Carry-less multiplication instructions.
def : WriteRes<WriteCLMul, [FPC_RSV0]> {
let Latency = 10;
let ResourceCycles = [10];
}
def : WriteRes<WriteCLMulLd, [FPC_RSV0, MEC_RSV]> {
let Latency = 10;
let ResourceCycles = [10, 1];
}
def : WriteRes<WriteSystem, [FPC_RSV0]> { let Latency = 100; }
def : WriteRes<WriteMicrocoded, [FPC_RSV0]> { let Latency = 100; }
def : WriteRes<WriteFence, [MEC_RSV]>;
def : WriteRes<WriteNop, []>;
// AVX is not supported on that architecture, but we should define the basic
// scheduling resources anyway.
def : WriteRes<WriteIMulH, [FPC_RSV0]>;
defm : SMWriteResPair<WriteVarBlend, FPC_RSV0, 1>;
defm : SMWriteResPair<WriteFVarBlend, FPC_RSV0, 1>;
defm : SMWriteResPair<WriteFShuffle256, FPC_RSV0, 1>;
defm : SMWriteResPair<WriteShuffle256, FPC_RSV0, 1>;
defm : SMWriteResPair<WriteVarVecShift, FPC_RSV0, 1>;
} // SchedModel