1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-11-26 04:32:44 +01:00
llvm-mirror/test/Reduce/remove-multiple-use-of-global-vars-in-same-instruction.ll
Roman Lebedev eae3e5a494 [Reduce] Argument reduction: do deal with function declarations
We can happily turn function definitions into declarations,
thus obscuring their argument from being elided by this pass.

I don't believe there is a good reason to just ignore declarations.
likely even proper llvm intrinsics ones,
at worst the input becomes uninteresting.

The other question here is that all these transforms are all-or-nothing.
In some cases, should we be treating each use separately?

The main blocker here seemed to be that llvm::CloneFunctionInto()
does `&OldFunc->front()`, which inserts a nullptr into a densemap,
which is not happy about it and asserts.
2020-07-26 01:31:56 +03:00

24 lines
1.0 KiB
LLVM

; Test that llvm-reduce can remove uninteresting function arguments from function definitions as well as their calls.
;
; RUN: llvm-reduce --test FileCheck --test-arg --check-prefixes=CHECK-ALL,CHECK-INTERESTINGNESS --test-arg %s --test-arg --input-file %s -o %t
; RUN: cat %t | FileCheck --check-prefixes=CHECK-ALL,CHECK-FINAL %s
; CHECK-ALL: @uninteresting1 = global
; CHECK-ALL: @uninteresting2 = global
; CHECK-ALL: @uninteresting3 = global
@uninteresting1 = global i32 0, align 4
@uninteresting2 = global i32 0, align 4
@uninteresting3 = global i32 0, align 4
declare void @use(i32*, i32*, i32*)
; CHECK-LABEL: @interesting()
define void @interesting() {
entry:
; CHECK-ALL: call void @use(i32* @uninteresting1, i32* @uninteresting2, i32* @uninteresting3)
call void @use(i32* @uninteresting1, i32* @uninteresting2, i32* @uninteresting3)
call void @use(i32* @uninteresting1, i32* @uninteresting2, i32* @uninteresting3)
call void @use(i32* @uninteresting1, i32* @uninteresting2, i32* @uninteresting3)
ret void
}