1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-11-24 03:33:20 +01:00
llvm-mirror/test/Regression
Chris Lattner b1f34a989b When converting phi nodes into select instructions, we shouldn't promote PHI
nodes unless we KNOW that we are able to promote all of them.  In this case
promoting the phi to a select is silly because we will always have to do the
call conditionally.  As such, select promotion is actually a pessimization.

llvm-svn: 16972
2004-10-14 05:12:50 +00:00
..
Analysis Believe it or not, this was broken in LLVM 1.3 2004-08-16 05:39:19 +00:00
Assembler The verifier takes 50s on this testcase, that is not good n stuff 2004-09-29 20:07:25 +00:00
BugPoint
Bytecode Fixed the test to actually run correctly. 2004-08-19 19:23:28 +00:00
C++Frontend New testcase for PR450 2004-10-05 00:18:21 +00:00
CFrontend Testcase for LLVM PR445 2004-09-28 03:36:39 +00:00
CodeGen New testcase. The setcc is only used by a select, but not as a condition: 2004-10-08 16:33:40 +00:00
Debugger
ExecutionEngine Add more casts. You can never have enough casts. 2004-05-07 21:10:28 +00:00
Linker Another testcase for constness linkage 2004-10-05 02:16:01 +00:00
LLC
Other New testcase that the vector support does not work with yet. 2004-08-20 08:34:27 +00:00
TableGen New testcase for list slicing 2004-07-27 01:00:56 +00:00
Transforms When converting phi nodes into select instructions, we shouldn't promote PHI 2004-10-14 05:12:50 +00:00
Verifier Testcase for PR340: Verifier misses malformed switch instruction 2004-05-21 16:47:02 +00:00